
A fifth of world's wetlands may vanish by 2050, scientists warn
This is according to a
This puts up to $39 trillion in ecosystem benefits at risk, more than any other ecosystem.
The report found that since 1970, at least 400 million hectares of wetlands have been lost — that is 22% of the global total. And nearly a quarter of those that have survived are in a degraded state, a figure that is increasing.
Degradation is now as pressing a concern as outright loss, the report said, warning that these losses significantly affect water availability, biodiversity, climate stability and human well-being.
The report was launched before the 15th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties (COP15) to the Convention on Wetlands in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, which starts on Wednesday.
Despite covering just 6% of the Earth's surface, wetlands provide ecosystem services that include clean water, food production, flood protection and carbon storage that total more than 7.5% of global GDP. They also support a disproportionately high share of livelihoods across sectors such as agriculture, aquaculture and tourism.
Yet every year, 0.52% of wetlands are lost, undermining efforts to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss. The report noted that these losses are unevenly distributed, with the highest rates occurring in low-income regions where wetlands are more ecologically critical and closely linked to local livelihoods, food systems and water supplies.
National reports submitted under the Convention on Wetlands and global citizen science data confirm that the ecological condition of wetlands is deteriorating in most regions, particularly in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean. But their situation is increasingly worsening in Europe and North America.
The wetland types that have experienced the most significant historical declines include inland marshes, peatlands and lakes. Despite their immense value, wetlands continue to be lost or degraded at an alarming rate, 'threatening our collective future', wrote Musonda Mumba, secretary-general of the convention, in the report's foreword.
'The data presented in this outlook are sobering,' she said. 'Wetland degradation is widespread across all regions. Millions of hectares have been lost. Many freshwater species remain at risk.'
The societal costs — from reduced access to clean water and increased vulnerability to disasters to rising emissions — are escalating.
'The economic value of the wetlands lost in the last 50 years exceeds $5.1 trillion, yet this figure does not fully reflect their intrinsic worth or cultural significance. While restoration is essential, prevention is more cost-effective. Once degraded, wetlands are expensive and difficult to restore,' Mumba noted.
Cumulative pressures, including land-use change, pollution, agricultural expansion, hydrological disruption, invasive species and the effect of climate change — such as rising sea levels and drought — are driving these declines.
'These drivers are frequently interlinked, leading to nonlinear and difficult-to-reverse degradation processes,' the report said.
National reports to COP15 showed that 74% of countries are undertaking wetland restoration to some extent, 66% have national targets in place, and more than 70% have identified priority sites. 'However, progress is uneven, and only a limited number of countries are implementing restoration at sufficient scale,' the report said.
It detailed how vulnerable and disadvantaged groups in society receive fewer of the benefits of wetlands than those with greater assets (such as property rights, financial capital and social status), but are also more dependent upon the goods and services provided by natural wetlands.
'Similarly, when wetlands are converted to other land uses, notably intensive agriculture or built infrastructure, ownership of the benefits tends to be held privately and by those with greater assets, while the cost of losing the wetland ecosystem services tends to fall on the disadvantaged …
'Additionally, disadvantaged groups tend to be more reliant upon regulating services provided by wetlands, such as flood protection and clean water, because they tend to live in more vulnerable areas and have less access to alternative (engineered) options.'
Peatlands store more carbon than any other terrestrial ecosystem yet many are degraded and now emit greenhouse gases rather than storing them. Coastal wetlands, such as mangroves, seagrasses and salt marshes, sequester carbon rapidly, and buffer coastlines from rising sea levels and storms.
Inland wetlands, such as rivers, lakes and marshes, regulate water flows to help prevent flooding and sustain water supplies during droughts. The report said that without urgent investment in these systems, climate goals will remain out of reach.
Four pathways are outlined to reversing wetland loss and 'unlocking nature-positive investment'.
These include integrating wetland value in decision-making; recognising wetlands as key to the global water cycle — for their role in storing, filtering, and regulating water; embedding wetlands in innovative financing mechanisms — including carbon markets, resilience bonds and blended finance; and mobilising public and private resources for wetland restoration.
The report features a wide selection of case studies that demonstrate progress is possible — and prevention is cheaper than restoration, which can cost anywhere from
$1 000 to $70 000 a hectare depending on the ecosystem.
In Zambia's Kafue Flats, an
A national case study from South Africa highlights the new automated wetland condition assessment methodology developed through the
The innovative approach involves 'GIS automation and stakeholder validation to provide a scalable, cost-effective way of tracking wetland ecosystem conditions across the country', the report noted.
Coenraad Krijger, the chief executive of Wetlands International, said in a statement that the report is a sobering read, but 'it does showcase pathways to a brighter future — if we all work together'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mail & Guardian
5 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
A fifth of world's wetlands may vanish by 2050, scientists warn
The destruction of wetlands affects water availability, biodiversity, climate stability and the wellbeing of all life, including people's livelihoods. Photo: File This is according to a This puts up to $39 trillion in ecosystem benefits at risk, more than any other ecosystem. The report found that since 1970, at least 400 million hectares of wetlands have been lost — that is 22% of the global total. And nearly a quarter of those that have survived are in a degraded state, a figure that is increasing. Degradation is now as pressing a concern as outright loss, the report said, warning that these losses significantly affect water availability, biodiversity, climate stability and human well-being. The report was launched before the 15th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties (COP15) to the Convention on Wetlands in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, which starts on Wednesday. Despite covering just 6% of the Earth's surface, wetlands provide ecosystem services that include clean water, food production, flood protection and carbon storage that total more than 7.5% of global GDP. They also support a disproportionately high share of livelihoods across sectors such as agriculture, aquaculture and tourism. Yet every year, 0.52% of wetlands are lost, undermining efforts to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss. The report noted that these losses are unevenly distributed, with the highest rates occurring in low-income regions where wetlands are more ecologically critical and closely linked to local livelihoods, food systems and water supplies. National reports submitted under the Convention on Wetlands and global citizen science data confirm that the ecological condition of wetlands is deteriorating in most regions, particularly in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean. But their situation is increasingly worsening in Europe and North America. The wetland types that have experienced the most significant historical declines include inland marshes, peatlands and lakes. Despite their immense value, wetlands continue to be lost or degraded at an alarming rate, 'threatening our collective future', wrote Musonda Mumba, secretary-general of the convention, in the report's foreword. 'The data presented in this outlook are sobering,' she said. 'Wetland degradation is widespread across all regions. Millions of hectares have been lost. Many freshwater species remain at risk.' The societal costs — from reduced access to clean water and increased vulnerability to disasters to rising emissions — are escalating. 'The economic value of the wetlands lost in the last 50 years exceeds $5.1 trillion, yet this figure does not fully reflect their intrinsic worth or cultural significance. While restoration is essential, prevention is more cost-effective. Once degraded, wetlands are expensive and difficult to restore,' Mumba noted. Cumulative pressures, including land-use change, pollution, agricultural expansion, hydrological disruption, invasive species and the effect of climate change — such as rising sea levels and drought — are driving these declines. 'These drivers are frequently interlinked, leading to nonlinear and difficult-to-reverse degradation processes,' the report said. National reports to COP15 showed that 74% of countries are undertaking wetland restoration to some extent, 66% have national targets in place, and more than 70% have identified priority sites. 'However, progress is uneven, and only a limited number of countries are implementing restoration at sufficient scale,' the report said. It detailed how vulnerable and disadvantaged groups in society receive fewer of the benefits of wetlands than those with greater assets (such as property rights, financial capital and social status), but are also more dependent upon the goods and services provided by natural wetlands. 'Similarly, when wetlands are converted to other land uses, notably intensive agriculture or built infrastructure, ownership of the benefits tends to be held privately and by those with greater assets, while the cost of losing the wetland ecosystem services tends to fall on the disadvantaged … 'Additionally, disadvantaged groups tend to be more reliant upon regulating services provided by wetlands, such as flood protection and clean water, because they tend to live in more vulnerable areas and have less access to alternative (engineered) options.' Peatlands store more carbon than any other terrestrial ecosystem yet many are degraded and now emit greenhouse gases rather than storing them. Coastal wetlands, such as mangroves, seagrasses and salt marshes, sequester carbon rapidly, and buffer coastlines from rising sea levels and storms. Inland wetlands, such as rivers, lakes and marshes, regulate water flows to help prevent flooding and sustain water supplies during droughts. The report said that without urgent investment in these systems, climate goals will remain out of reach. Four pathways are outlined to reversing wetland loss and 'unlocking nature-positive investment'. These include integrating wetland value in decision-making; recognising wetlands as key to the global water cycle — for their role in storing, filtering, and regulating water; embedding wetlands in innovative financing mechanisms — including carbon markets, resilience bonds and blended finance; and mobilising public and private resources for wetland restoration. The report features a wide selection of case studies that demonstrate progress is possible — and prevention is cheaper than restoration, which can cost anywhere from $1 000 to $70 000 a hectare depending on the ecosystem. In Zambia's Kafue Flats, an A national case study from South Africa highlights the new automated wetland condition assessment methodology developed through the The innovative approach involves 'GIS automation and stakeholder validation to provide a scalable, cost-effective way of tracking wetland ecosystem conditions across the country', the report noted. Coenraad Krijger, the chief executive of Wetlands International, said in a statement that the report is a sobering read, but 'it does showcase pathways to a brighter future — if we all work together'.

The Herald
18-07-2025
- The Herald
Smile or fruit, beware of the emoji you send — especially at work
Red heart, banana and peach emojis may look innocent — and they are. But in what context and sequence are you using them? That's what could be problematic with the emojis you love sending. Dr Zakeera Docrat, the University of the Western Cape's forensic and legal linguist, has warned people to think about the messages they send with emojis, especially in the workplace. Speaking at a webinar under the theme: 'Beyond the smile: Emojis, communication and misinterpretation in the modern workplace', Docrat said one should be careful of the emojis they send. She urged companies to develop policies that regulate communication in the workplace. 'It would be dependent on what you want to control within the specific workplace but you can never have one policy that would be applied and adopted across various spaces, that would never work. It needs to be a policy that is specific to your needs and as a forensic and legal linguist, it's always good to consult us and to say, these are the issues that we have. 'We need to formulate a policy that controls the behaviour and communication practices. It has to be something that's updated quite frequently,' Docrat said. What do we deem as appropriate workplace communication? 'A lot of the emojis are open to interpretation, it's based on context, the nature of the relationship between you and the recipient ... If there is a power dynamic between you and another colleague, is it appropriate for you to be sending them an emoji? Is it an appropriate response to send an emoji? Why are you doing it? 'The role of gender is also important and for me it influences the power dynamic, especially if it is a senior male colleague. If a male colleague sends me a red heart emoji, and I don't have that type of relationship where I know them very well and I get sent a heart, I would immediately be offended.' So, do you know what the emojis you love sending mean and are they appropriate to send to your colleagues? 'What are you communicating with your emoji? Take for an example the tongue out emojis. Are you joking or are you being insulting?' Docrat, who testified in the Judicial Conduct Tribunal hearing into sexual harassment against Eastern Cape judge president Selby Mbenenge, said emojis mean different things to different people. Andiswa Mengo has accused Mbenenge of sexually harassing her over eight months in 2021 and 2022. She has testified that not only did he send her unwanted sexually explicit WhatsApp messages, but had attempted to solicit oral sex from her in his chambers and sent her a photo of his penis. Said Docrat: 'When we talk about the analysis or interpretation of emojis, we can't be divorced in a sense from the culture and the language in which the emojis are being used. It is very important for an expert, and I don't want to say [expert should] be from that culture or know that language but [the expert] has to have an association [with the culture or language it is being used]. 'You have to be able to read the context. Understanding the language that is being used in a written text, understanding the culture is extremely important.' Emojis with sexual connotations included a peach and eggplant with water droplets used in sequence; an eggplant, banana, lips, lip biting, also used in sequence.


The Citizen
18-07-2025
- The Citizen
RRVA and EcoSolutions team up for wildlife
In a hands-on effort to protect Randpark Ridge's biodiversity, the Randpark Ridge Village Association (RRVA) has teamed up with EcoSolutions Urban Ecology to install owl and bat boxes across the suburb's greenbelts, a project already showing results. This initiative, led and funded by the RRVA, aims to restore natural pest control methods while strengthening local ecosystems. By identifying key areas and coordinating expert support, the association is making sure the greenbelts are not only beautiful but also ecologically balanced. Read more: Rescued barn owl flies free again 'These boxes are more than just homes for wildlife; they're part of our vision for a greener, healthier Randpark Ridge,' said RRVA administrator Nerisha Govender. The boxes provide safe nesting and roosting spaces for owls and bats, two of nature's most effective pest managers. 'Just one barn owl can eat up to 1 000 rodents a year,' Govender said. Strategically placed owl boxes give these nocturnal hunters a quiet place to settle, helping control rodents without harmful poisons. Bats, too, are powerful allies in pest control. 'Insect-eating bats can consume hundreds of bugs in just one hour,' Govender said, including mosquitoes, moths, and crop-damaging pests. EcoSolutions, based in Randpark Ridge, supplied and installed the boxes, using their expertise to ensure correct placement, safety, and durability. The organisation also provides long-term maintenance, including monitoring activity and refreshing nesting materials. Together with EcoSolutions, the RRVA is proving that small, smart interventions can bring real balance back to urban nature and give residents a front-row seat to it. Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts! At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!