Trump intensifies trade war with threat of 30 per cent tariffs on EU, Mexico
In an escalation of a trade war that has angered US allies and rattled investors, Trump announced the latest tariffs in separate letters to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum that were posted on his Truth Social media site on Saturday.
The EU and Mexico, both among the largest US trading partners, responded by calling the tariffs unfair and disruptive while pledging to continue to negotiate with the US for a broader trade deal before the deadline.
Sheinbaum said she was sure an agreement could be reached.
'I've always said that in these cases, what you have to do is keep a cool head to face any problem,'
Sheinbaum said at an event in the Mexican state of Sonora.
'We're also clear on what we can work with the United States government on, and we're clear on what we can't. And there's something that's never negotiable: the sovereignty of our country.'
Loading
Trump sent similar letters to 23 other trading partners this week, including Canada, Japan and Brazil, setting blanket tariff rates ranging from 20 per cent up to 50 per cent, as well as a 50 per cent tariff on copper.
The US president said the 30 per cent rate was 'separate from all sectoral tariffs', indicating 50 per cent levies on steel and aluminium imports and a 25 per cent tariff on auto imports would remain.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
35 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
'She's a mess': US President Donald slams Rosie O'Donnell during a live press conference as their long-running feud takes another ugly turn
Donald Trump has taken fresh aim at Rosie O'Donnell, calling her "a mess" and suggesting her move overseas was "a good thing" as their decades-long public feud continues to spiral. Speaking at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on Sunday (local time), the 79-year-old US President responded to a reporter's question about O'Donnell's recent comments on The Chris Cuomo Project, where she opened up about her mental health struggles during Trump's presidency. "So Rosie O'Donnell, she went on Chris Cuomo and blamed you for the fact that she's overweight, depressed and drunk, what do you say to that?" the reporter asked. With a smirk, Trump replied: "I don't know about Rosie. I watch Rosie, she's a mess. She's a mess. But she's left our country, which is a good thing, not a bad thing." O'Donnell, who recently relocated to the seaside suburb of Howth in Dublin, Ireland, has long clashed with Trump- but the bitter back-and-forth has ramped up in recent weeks. In her June 25 interview, the 63-year-old comedian said Trump's first election win in 2016 left her in a dark place. "During his first go around, it was very difficult and I got myself into some bad places," she told Cuomo. "I was very, very, depressed. I was over-eating, I was over-drinking, I was so depressed, Chris. It hurt my heart that America believed the lies about him. And then it broke my heart to be in a business that creates and sells those lies for profit. It was very heavy to tell you the truth." Trump escalated things even further on Saturday, posting on Truth Social that he was "giving serious consideration" to revoking O'Donnell's US citizenship. "Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship," he wrote. "She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA." The host of 'The View' fired back on social media, branding Trump "a dangerous old soulless man with dementia who lacks empathy compassion and basic humanity". "The president of the USA has always hated the fact that I see him for who he is- a criminal con man sexual abusing liar out to harm our nation to serve himself- this is why I moved to Ireland," she said. In another post, she mocked Trump for still being "rattled" by her nearly two decades on. "Hey Donald- you're rattled again? 18 years later and I still live rent-free in that collapsing brain of yours," she said. "You want to revoke my citizenship? go ahead and try, King Joffrey with a tangerine spray tan." O'Donnell also accused Trump of having links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, claiming he was "on the list" of clients tied to Epstein's infamous private island. Interestingly, the pair were once on good terms, with O'Donnell even saying she attended Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples. But their public breakdown began with a heated clash on The View in 2006, when O'Donnell took aim at Trump's morals and media influence. "He's the moral compass for 20-year-olds in America. Donald, sit and spin, my friend," she said at the time. Trump retaliated by telling People that O'Donnell lied about him and was "a woman out of control". "I'll most likely sue her for making those false statements- and it'll be fun. Rosie's a loser. A real loser," he said.


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
THE ECONOMIST: Nvidia's lucrative new Artificial Intelligence customers are foreign governments
Late in 2023 Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, began peddling a new idea. Every country, he said, should have its own artificial-intelligence (AI) system, trained on domestic data, aligned with national values and built using local infrastructure. Appealing to policymakers' fondness for manufacturing, the boss of the chip colossus described these systems as 'AI factories', ingesting data and churning out intelligence. He called it 'sovereign AI'. Politicians are warming to the idea. Earlier this year the European Commission unveiled plans for a €20b ($35.6b) fund to build up to five 'AI gigafactories'. In just the past two months the governments of France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have all been involved in deals to build local AI infrastructure. According to Nvidia, at least 20 countries are pursuing the idea of sovereign AI. The reason for Mr Huang's enthusiasm is clear. For Nvidia, which this month became the first company to reach a $US4t market value, governments are a potentially lucrative source of business. Jefferies, an investment bank, estimates that sovereign initiatives could generate some $US200b in cumulative revenue for the chipmaker 'over the coming years'; the company believes that spending could reach $US1t over an equally fuzzy period. Sovereign AI could also act as a welcome hedge for Mr Huang. His biggest customers — Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft — are all developing their own chips, which could in time reduce their reliance on Nvidia. Saudi Arabia expects to purchase 'several hundred thousand' of Nvidia's top-end processors over the next five years. The UAE, with perhaps the most ambitious plans of all, intends to import half a million annually. But will sovereign AI pay off for taxpayers? Despite growing enthusiasm, the concept remains woolly. Sovereign AI may help countries develop national models, protect sensitive information and widen access to the technology. But it will do little to reduce countries' dependence on America and, in many cases, risks wasting vast sums of money. There are subtle variations in how governments are pursuing sovereign AI. France's approach centres on Mistral, a domestic model-maker, which has formed a consortium with Bpifrance, a government bank, MGX, an Emirati state-owned investment firm, and Nvidia to build what has been touted as Europe's largest AI data campus. In the Gulf, governments have taken more direct control. In May Saudi Arabia launched Humain, a firm tasked with building AI infrastructure in the kingdom. In the UAE that role has fallen to G42, an AI firm part-owned by Mubadala, a sovereign-wealth fund. Governments justify these projects on various grounds. A few big spenders want to catch up to America: the European Commission, for instance, hopes to propel Europe to the 'forefront of AI development'. Others, such as India, worry that AI models trained on foreign, and especially English-language, data will not reflect local languages and values, a growing concern as AI systems come to shape everything from education to public services. A degree of control over domestic data is also viewed as essential. In areas such as health care, officials worry about patients' information being plugged into foreign models. A homegrown system, some contend, makes it easier to protect such information while still allowing it to be used to train AI models. A final concern for governments is to widen access to AI systems. Nadia Carlsten, chief executive of the DCAI, which runs Gefion, Denmark's national AI supercomputer, says that smaller companies and research institutes are 'always at the back of the line'. A domestic offering, she argues, helps ensure cheaper and more reliable access for such users. Gefion, launched in 2024, is being used for applications such as drug discovery and weather forecasting. Yet these initiatives will not offer anything close to self-sufficiency. Cutting-edge processors are the most important requirement for advanced AI systems. Nvidia dominates that market, accounting for about 90 per cent of all commercially available AI chips — which is why it has played a central role in nearly all sovereign-AI initiatives. Its only serious rival, AMD, is also American. The servers that house these chips are mostly built by another two American companies, Dell and Supermicro. Even China, which has built something close to a self-sufficient AI stack, has yet to develop a domestic alternative to America's whizziest chips. Sovereign-AI projects may well help governments achieve more modest objectives, such as keeping data secure and ensuring access to the technology for groups such as researchers. But America's cloud giants could probably provide this more efficiently — not least because their scale gives them bargaining power over suppliers such as Nvidia. Indeed, Amazon and Microsoft are already pitching sovereign clouds with enhanced controls over data and dedicated local infrastructure. National AI models could simply be built on top of these. Kevin Xu of Interconnected Capital, a hedge fund, warns that many sovereign-AI projects risk creating something 'more like a palace than a factory'. That would be a poor use of taxpayers' money — but it might suit Nvidia just fine. The Economist


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
US President Donald Trump to make unprecedented second state visit to UK
Donald Trump will make an unprecedented second state visit to Britain in September, with the US president to be hosted by King Charles and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle. Trump, who is a big supporter of the royal family, will be accompanied by his wife, Melania during the three-day visit from September 17 to 19, Buckingham Palace announced on Monday. No US president has been invited for a second state visit. Trump previously enjoyed the pomp and pageantry of the state visit in 2019 during his first term when he was hosted by Queen Elizabeth II. The invitation was hand-delivered by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in February during a meeting at the White House. Trump said it was a 'great, great honour' and appeared particularly pleased by the fact he will be staying at Windsor Castle. 'That's really something,' he said. Precedent for second-term US presidents who have already made a state visit is usually tea or lunch with the monarch at Windsor Castle, as was the case for George W Bush and Barack Obama. State visits are ceremonial meetings between heads of state that are used to honour friendly nations and sometimes smooth relations between rivals. While the king formally issues the invitation for a state visit, he does so on the advice of the elected government. The visit is seen as part of Starmer's effort to keep Trump close and lessen the impact of some of his polices on the UK. The relationship between the two appears amicable and has helped the UK from facing the sort of hefty US tariffs that other nations are seeing. But like Trump's previous visit, it's unlikely he will be welcomed by all. Last time, a day of protests saw the flying of a giant blimp depicting Trump as an angry orange baby from outside parliament. MPs from Starmer's Labour Party have also questioned whether the honour should be extended to Trump at a time that he is supporting Israel's war in Gaza and threatening the sovereignty of allies such as Canada and Greenland. Charles could also face some challenges during the visit because he is head of state of both the UK and Canada, which Trump has suggested should become the 51st US state. During a speech to the Canadian parliament in May the King highlighted Canada's 'unique identity' and 'sovereignty', while echoing the words of the country's national anthem when he said, 'The True North is indeed strong and free'. State visits to Britain are particularly prized by heads of state because they come with a full complement of royal pomp and circumstance, including military reviews, carriage rides and a glittering state banquet hosted by the monarch. The events normally take place in and around Buckingham Palace in central London. But like last week's state visit from French President Emmanual Macron and his wife, Brigitte, the Trumps will stay at Windsor Castle. Buckingham Palace is undergoing extensive remodelling.