NCAA: No Expansion Of Basketball Tournaments Beyond 68 teams This Season
The NCAA Tournament expanded from 64 to 68 teams in 2011. The change introduced the First Four round, a set of pre-tournament games in which the four lowest-seeded at-large teams and four lowest-seeded conference champions compete for spots in the traditional 64-team bracket.
Baker indicated in May that the current formula has flaws and said it would be beneficial to give more opportunities to worthy teams.
'If you have a tournament that's got 64 or 68 teams in it, you're going to have a bunch of teams that are probably among what most people would consider to be the best 68 or 70 teams in the country that aren't going to make the tournament, period,' Baker said then. 'The point behind going from 68 to 72 or 76 is to basically give some of those schools that were probably among the 72, 76, 68, 64 best teams in the country a way into the tournament.'
Coaches have expressed different opinions about an expanded bracket. Tom Izzo, Nate Oats and Dan Hurley have indicated they like the field at 68 but Texas coach Sean Miller told CBS Sports he wouldn't mind expansion.
'Never before has the tournament felt more even, with few exceptions," Miller said. "On any given night in a 40-minute game, it's just amazing what can happen. I think adding depth to that will only make what's already good even better.'
SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey said the league backs expansion 'but you just don't jump into it.'
'So, if there are reasons from a broadcast point, a financial point, logistics point or competitive realities that don't support expansion, again, we're going to be fine,' he said at SEC football media days last month." But I think this is the right direction to at least explore.'
Kansas coach Bill Self said fellow Big 12 coaches seem to favor an NCAA tourney expansion. The Big 12 had seven bids in 2025, half the total of the SEC.
'There was a little bit that was brought forth and the consensus among the coaches, even though it was very little, would be in favor of that,' he said earlier this year. 'I don't know if you could make it where it was totally equitable all the way across the board for everybody.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Ripple (XRP) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) Will grow triple digits in 2025, but Little Pepe could rise 12000%
Many analysts predict triple-digit gains for familiar names like Ripple (XRP) and Shiba Inu (SHIB). But while those tokens promise steady growth based on strong fundamentals and cult-like followings, a new meme-powered Layer 2 protocol is making serious noise, and some believe it could outperform everything else in sight. That token is Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), and it's not just another meme coin; it's an entire meme chain built for speed, scalability, and virality. With over 90% of its current presale stage already sold out, a listing price of $0.003, and a $777,000 giveaway currently live, $LILPEPE is positioning itself for a potential 12,000% price surge if meme season roars back in full force. XRP and SHIB Set for Triple-Digit Growth in 2025 Institutional acceptance of Ripple's XRP as a cross-border settlement layer and financial firm adoption is expanding. XRP appears to have overcome SEC regulatory issues after years. New alliances and utility-based use cases in Asia could push XRP beyond $9 in 2025, a triple-digit gain from $3.18. Shiba Inu (SHIB) is one of the most active meme tokens in community participation and ecosystem building. SHIB may finally break through with Shibarium enhancements, improved DeFi integrations, and new burn dynamics. SHIB is currently trading at about $0.000013, thus a return to its all-time high would be triple-digit. But while both XRP and SHIB are solid bets for strong returns, neither can match the sheer upside potential of a new token entering the market with virality, advanced utility, and community-first economics baked in from Day One. Little Pepe ($LILPEPE): A New Meme Chain Built for Explosive Gains Little Pepe ($LILPEPE) isn't just a meme coin; it's a fully-fledged Layer 2 EVM-compatible chain purpose-built for meme culture. Most meme tokens rely on hype alone, but Little Pepe pairs meme virality with blockchain innovation. The project is launching its own high-speed Layer 2 network, designed to eliminate the typical pain points of meme coin trading, such as high gas fees, sniper bots, and network congestion. One of the biggest differentiators is that $LILPEPE is the native utility token of this upcoming chain, giving it serious upside as the entire ecosystem grows. Projects that build on the Little Pepe chain will use $LILPEPE for transaction fees, staking, rewards, and participation in meme launchpads. This feature could attract a flood of creators and investors looking for a meme-friendly but technically sound environment. Currently, $LILPEPE is in Stage 8 of its presale, with the token priced at just $0.0017 and a next-stage price set at $0.0018. The presale has already raised over $12.2 million, and more than 8.9 billion tokens have been sold, signaling extremely high investor interest. With a total supply of 100 billion tokens, $LILPEPE's tokenomics are structured for long-term growth and fair distribution: 26.5% allocated to presale 30% to reserves for the chain 13.5% for staking and rewards 10% for marketing 10% for liquidity 10% for CEX/DEX reserves 0% tax on buys or sells No taxes, robust reserves, and staking benefits make this a great structure for short-term traders and long-term holders. Win $777,000 to Celebrate Launch. To celebrate the Little Pepe Chain launch, the team is giving away $777,000 in $LILPEPE to 10 winners. Users must donate $100 to the presale on the official site and follow the project's social media, tag friends, and share content to enter. More chores mean more chances to win. You can enter the giveaway and track your progress here: Join the $777K Giveaway For community support and updates, join the official Little Pepe Telegram group: How to Get In Before Launch Buying $LILPEPE during the presale is straightforward: Go to Connect your Web3 wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, etc.) Choose to pay with ETH or USDT Confirm the transaction and secure your tokens After the presale, claim your tokens directly from the dashboard The token will list on major centralized exchanges (CEXs) at $0.003, meaning that early buyers at $0.0017 could already be looking at a 76% gain on launch day alone. If $LILPEPE follows the paths of SHIB, DOGE, or PEPE in its early hype stages, returns of 5,000% to 12,000% are not out of the question, especially with its dual appeal to meme investors and utility seekers. Conclusion While Ripple (XRP) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) are both set to deliver solid gains in 2025, serious meme coin enthusiasts and early investors may want to look toward Little Pepe ($LILPEPE) for exponential upside. With its own Layer 2 blockchain, utility-focused tokenomics, and a presale that's almost completely sold out, $LILPEPE could be the next big thing, and early entry could make all the difference. Don't miss out, buy $LILPEPE Now on Presale. For more information about Little Pepe (LILPEPE) visit the links below: Website: Whitepaper: Telegram: Twitter/X:
The Hindu
18 hours ago
- The Hindu
NCAA tennis programme facing threat of elimination at multiple colleges
This should be an exhilarating moment for college tennis. Wimbledon featured a record 26 current or former college players in men's singles and nine more in the women's draw. TCU's Jack Pinnington Jones and San Diego's Oliver Tarvet, who reached the second round, played for their college teams just this spring. Ben Shelton, a 2022 NCAA singles champion at Florida, reached the quarterfinals. All of this is occurring as the threat of elimination faces numerous tennis programs. Prairie View A&M became just the latest Division I college to eliminate tennis when it announced on Monday it was dropping its men's and women's programmes. According to the International Tennis Association, which governs college tennis, other Division I schools cutting tennis since 2023 include Central Arkansas (women), Eastern Illinois (men and women), Lindenwood (men), Louisiana-Monroe (women), Radford (men and women), St. Francis College (men and women), San Francisco (men and women), Seattle (men) and UTEP (women). Former San Francisco men's player Asaf Friedler noted the Dons hadn't even finished the 2024 season when the athletic director emailed about a meeting the following day, where they learned the program would be dropped in a matter of weeks. Asaf Friedler practices for the 2024-25 season at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana. | Photo Credit: AP Friedler remembers players crying at practice later that day. He said a recruit had committed to San Francisco just a couple of days before the announcement, a sign that even coaches were caught off guard. 'We were all like in shock,' Friedler said. 'We didn't know what to say. We looked at each other and we were very confused.' READ | NCAA Outdoor Track and Field Championships 2025: How did Indian athletes fare? During the pandemic, nearly two dozen men's or women's tennis programs were eliminated. But the latest cuts come as colleges across the country deal with the hard choices and financial realities of the USD 2.8 billion House settlement. Revenue sharing tends to favour football and basketball, and there are roster caps. The calculations are different for each school. David Mullins, CEO of the ITA, says college tennis is a great pathway to the pros. 'Our position within the tennis industry has never been better,' Mullins said. 'But on the other side, we're dealing with all these things happening with the NCAA model. Probably the challenges that we're facing from the collegiate side domestically have never been greater.' John Hartwell, who announced on Monday that he was stepping down as Louisiana-Monroe's athletic director to pursue other opportunities, noted earlier this summer that schools opting into the settlement must sponsor at least 16 sports. Louisiana-Monroe had 17 sports before eliminating women's tennis. 'Probably a factor for some folks is the squad size, that probably has something to do with it,' Hartwell said. 'Facilities are a challenge, too. I think those are probably key components. But I also think a lot of these schools that have more than required 16 sports are analysing everything cost-wise.' Cutting tennis saved Louisiana-Monroe about USD 250,000. Hartwell said the scholarship funds that went to tennis now will be directed toward the school's other women's teams. Roster size also leaves tennis vulnerable. Dropping a different sport with more team members leaves more athletes disappointed. 'When you're cutting a sport, it's not a fun position to be in,' Central Arkansas athletic director Matt Whiting said. 'You have to factor in numbers in those situations. (Tennis) certainly has a smaller roster.' ALSO READ | Krishna Jayasankar goes beyond basketball lineage, becomes first Indian woman to compete in NCAA finals Schools that eliminate tennis programs generally allow players to remain on scholarship throughout their time at the school. Many choose to transfer, searching for a new school while adjusting to a new country. Mullins estimates about 60 per cent of the players on Division I teams generally come from outside the U.S. Alex Aldaz, who is from Spain and played for Eastern Illinois this year, said his team got the news after the season already had ended and many of them were already back in their home countries. 'Their faces were like they didn't know how to react,' Aldaz said. 'They were lost... sad and angry.' Aldaz is now at Mercer. Friedler, who is from Israel, played for Tulane this past season. Many of their former teammates at their original schools weren't as fortunate. Many college tennis programs don't have facilities on campus, forcing them to rent local courts. Whiting said Central Arkansas had a facility on campus that required an estimated USD 1.5 million to USD 2 million in repairs. Hartwell said Louisiana-Monroe's tennis facility needed about USD 750,000 in improvements. Mullins said the US Tennis Association has offered grants to colleges opening full-service tennis centres to foster the sport's growth in their communities. Those schools then can make money by renting out their courts when their teams aren't using them. South Carolina is the latest school to attempt this, hiring Dainyell Fox as the Carolina Tennis Center's operations manager within the past year. Fox has started organising tennis lessons and classes while also exploring other potential revenue options. 'Our goal isn't going to necessarily put us completely in the black, but it reduces the financial footprint of men's and women's tennis,' South Carolina deputy athletic director Judy Van Horn said. The list of former Gamecocks includes Francisco Cerundolo, who is in the top 25 of the ATP rankings. Just as a growing number of former major-conference players succeed on the pro circuit, the struggle to survive is real for plenty of smaller programs. 'Our position is strengthened with each passing Grand Slam,' Mullins said. 'But on the other side, we have all these challenges here domestically that we're not able to control.'
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
NCAA: No Expansion Of Basketball Tournaments Beyond 68 teams This Season
The NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments will not expand beyond 68 teams in 2026, but future growth remains on the radar. 'Expanding the tournament fields is no longer being contemplated for the 2026 men's and women's basketball championships," Dan Gavitt, NCAA senior vice president of basketball, said in a statement on Monday. "However, the committees will continue conversations on whether to recommend expanding to 72 or 76 teams in advance of the 2027 championships.' NCAA President Charlie Baker has said adding teams could add value to the tournament, and he said the NCAA already has had 'good conversations' with TV partners CBS and Warner Bros., whose deal runs through 2032 at the cost of around $1.1 billion a year. The NCAA Tournament expanded from 64 to 68 teams in 2011. The change introduced the First Four round, a set of pre-tournament games in which the four lowest-seeded at-large teams and four lowest-seeded conference champions compete for spots in the traditional 64-team bracket. Baker indicated in May that the current formula has flaws and said it would be beneficial to give more opportunities to worthy teams. 'If you have a tournament that's got 64 or 68 teams in it, you're going to have a bunch of teams that are probably among what most people would consider to be the best 68 or 70 teams in the country that aren't going to make the tournament, period,' Baker said then. 'The point behind going from 68 to 72 or 76 is to basically give some of those schools that were probably among the 72, 76, 68, 64 best teams in the country a way into the tournament.' Coaches have expressed different opinions about an expanded bracket. Tom Izzo, Nate Oats and Dan Hurley have indicated they like the field at 68 but Texas coach Sean Miller told CBS Sports he wouldn't mind expansion. 'Never before has the tournament felt more even, with few exceptions," Miller said. "On any given night in a 40-minute game, it's just amazing what can happen. I think adding depth to that will only make what's already good even better.' SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey said the league backs expansion 'but you just don't jump into it.' 'So, if there are reasons from a broadcast point, a financial point, logistics point or competitive realities that don't support expansion, again, we're going to be fine,' he said at SEC football media days last month." But I think this is the right direction to at least explore.' Kansas coach Bill Self said fellow Big 12 coaches seem to favor an NCAA tourney expansion. The Big 12 had seven bids in 2025, half the total of the SEC. 'There was a little bit that was brought forth and the consensus among the coaches, even though it was very little, would be in favor of that,' he said earlier this year. 'I don't know if you could make it where it was totally equitable all the way across the board for everybody.'
