Germany's Merz: Alleged Chinese laser targeting of German aircraft ‘completely unacceptable'
Hours earlier, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning denied the German allegations in remarks to reporters: "What Germany has said is fully inconsistent with the facts.'
Merz noted that the Chinese ambassador had been summoned over the incident but that he had not yet been briefed on how China sought to explain the alleged encounter.
Such an "attack" on a German aircraft requires clarification, Merz said at a joint afternoon press conference with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in Berlin.
The incident allegedly occurred earlier this month, when a German military aircraft patrolling off the coast of Yemen as part of the EU's Aspides mission was targeted by a laser from a Chinese warship in the Red Sea.
A spokesperson for the German ministry said the Chinese vessel acted without warning or reason, adding that the aircraft aborted its flight mission and diverted to a base in Djibouti.
The Aspides mission is an EU maritime surveillance operation aimed at protecting the Red Sea shipping lanes from Houthi attacks that have disrupted a vital trade route for Europe.
'Putting German personnel at risk and disrupting the operation is completely unacceptable,' the German foreign ministry said in a post on X on Tuesday.
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said he was "more than irritated" over the incident in an interview published Wednesday by Germany's RND news outlet.
"Such interference with our aircraft, as well as any other unprovoked endangerment of our units, is unacceptable," he said.
Berlin's public accusations came just after Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited Berlin as part of a broader European tour.
Chris Kremidas-Courtney, a senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre and an expert on hybrid threats, told Euractiv that the use of lasers is a common tactic employed by Beijing.
In 2022, 'Chinese vessels used lasers to blind an Australian aircraft off the northern cost of Australia,' they said.
According to Spiegel, a German naval frigate had previously been targeted by Chinese lasers while sailing through the Taiwan Strait in the autumn. The attack, which was intended to "blind" the vessel, was reported to Berlin but not publicly addressed by the German government at the time.
Kremidas-Courtney said that pointing a laser at an aircraft disrupts the engine's reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities, and is commonly used as a 'harassment technique'.
'The question is, how will we respond to this escalation?' Kremidas-Courtney asked.
This story was updated to include German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's remarks on the alleged incident.
(bts, de)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
The president who wasn't there
Welcome to the Capitals by Eddy Wax, with Nicoletta Ionta. We welcome feedback and tips here. Sign up here. In today's edition: VDL is safe, and long gone Race to run DG COMP Budget digest Today's edition is powered by CEN and CENELEC Standards support European competitiveness CEN and CENELEC welcome Denmark's Presidency of the EU Council. We are ready to leverage the strength of standards to help Europe complete the Single Market, drive innovation, strengthen competitiveness and ensure effective regulation across strategic sectors. Read more. À la carte Ursula von der Leyen is so chilled about today's motion of censure against her Commission that she's not even here. Rather than wait for a vote that will fail to topple her, von der Leyen left Strasbourg last night for the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome where she will also meet US Senator Lindsey Graham, whose tough sanctions bill against Russia is advancing through Congress. But that wasn't before making two concessions to the Socialists in Parliament, who had been threatening to abstain from today's midday vote. Abstaining would not bring down the Commission but could expose how little support there is for von der Leyen and the EPP in the centre of the political spectrum, and feed a narrative that the German Christian Democrat is losing her grip on the Parliament. Last night, after negotiating directly with von der Leyen, top Socialist MEP Iratxe García said she had got a cast-iron guarantee from the Commission that the European Social Fund+ – an instrument that funds things like job training and social inclusion schemes, and is projected to be worth around €150 billion over the next seven years – will be retained in the next EU budget. Until now, the Commission had been toying with the idea of simply earmarking money as societally friendly, an idea that was a non-starter for the centre-left, according to a Socialist official. Renew Europe will also vote down the motion rather than abstaining, but said in a press release last night that the next key moment will be von der Leyen's annual State of the Union address in September. 'It must mark a shift in leadership style – from unilateralism to partnership,' the liberals said. Fading Support for Ukraine Ukraine opens a high stakes Recovery Conference in Rome today, with Volodymyr Zelenskyy aiming to secure energy deals and defence investment. But Western allies admit options are dwindling, and a €100 billion EU support plan remains blocked by Hungary. A separate summit on security guarantees, chaired by France and the UK today, is also expected to deliver little. The resulting picture, a senior NATO official told Alexandra Brzozowski, is bleak. 'Ukraine continues to show a lot of innovative spirit,' they said. 'But we are in for a stressful and difficult summer.' Parliament backs money laundering watchlist On Wednesday, the European Parliament approved an updated list of high-risk third countries for money laundering and terrorist financing, choosing not to oppose the European Commission's proposal. The revised list removes the UAE, Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, and Uganda. The move marks a shift from last year, when MEPs strongly opposed the Commission's bid to delist Gibraltar, Panama, and the UAE, citing evidence that the countries had failed to curb sanctions circumvention, particularly in relation to Russia. The competition to lead DG COMP The European Commission's powerful competition authority – responsible for slapping Google and Apple with billion-euro fines, probing Big Oil, and reining in corporate power across the EU – is facing a leadership vacuum. Oliver Guersent, the French civil servant who has led DG Competition since 2020, will step down on 31 July, setting off a scramble for one of the EU's most politically sensitive posts. Names like Anthony Whelan – acting economics advisor in von der Leyen's cabinet – and DG Energy chief Ditte Juul Jørgensen are being floated in Brussels corridors, as first reported by the FT. Whelan is seen as almost too qualified for the job. 'The president won't let him go that easily,' one senior EU official told Euractiv. Jørgensen, a former chief of staff to Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, brings the advantage of coming from a smaller member state – a factor that would ease tensions around nationality balance and reduce friction with major capitals. A Frenchman, Guersent's exit also raises questions about the mix of nationalities at the top of the Commission. That also weakens the case for another French contender, Céline Gauer, who runs the Commission's Reform and Investment Task Force. She is widely seen as highly competent, having negotiated the recovery plans with EU capitals. Still, there are signs that the Commission will go for a simpler option: a DG-level reshuffle rather than promoting someone still finding their feet. In that regard, Linsey McCallum is seen as a strong contender. With a proven track record as deputy director-general for antitrust, she's already navigating the most politically charged files in the building. 'She's extremely respected, has the courage to act when needed, and knows how to be political while remaining deeply respectful,' an antitrust economist noted. MFF digest Less than a week before the Commission presents the bulk of its 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework, virtually all parts of the proposal have been leaked. Our chief diplomatic correspondent Alexandra Brzozowski writes that the Commission will propose combining different external action programmes and funds into a single 'Global Europe Fund', divided between six regions. It will suggest, for the first time in a budget proposal, to directly link the EU's foreign aid to recipient countries' efforts in preventing migration into the bloc. Another key element of the EU executive's proposal will be a Ukraine fund to be incorporated into the EU budget, to guarantee long-term financing for Kyiv from 2028 to 2034. Likelihood of success on a scale from 1 to Hungary: Unlikely. Read more here. Chief defence correspondent Aurélie Pugnet writes that defence start-ups are to get a specific fund named "DARPA" under the Horizon Europe research programme. DARPA is the name of the US Pentagon's key agency channelling billions of dollars in defence innovation, which does not have an equivalent at EU level. A European DARPA (mimicking the US agency which invests in defence innovation) could help complete the EU defence fund currently marked at €8 billion. Euractiv's Claudie Moreau writes that the Commission is preparing to merge the Creative Europe and Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values (CERV) funding programmes. The new proposal, obtained by Euractiv, would fund culture, media, audiovisual services, and projects aimed at supporting EU values. This is a hit for cultural industries that rely heavily on Creative Europe and feared combining it with other funding objectives may dilute their own share of the EU budget. Read more. Meanwhile, Euractiv's Jacob Wulff Wold writes that there are few details so far on the two thirds of the budget reserved for farmers and the regions. The latter have been promised a "dedicated" budget with a preserved two pillar structure of direct farmer support and rural development funds. A Monday German parliamentary cable, seen by Euractiv, suggests only the direct payments will be truly ring-fenced within the national partnerships, with the rest of CAP and cohesion subject to 'horizontal flexibility'. But the fight may last until the final whistle on Wednesday. Around the bloc GERMANY | German Chancellor Friedrich Merz acknowledged trouble with France over the joint next-generation fighter jet project on Wednesday, but expressed confidence that the aircraft remains needed and will get back on track. Read more. FRANCE | The European Court of Human Rights on Wednesday rejected French far-right leader Marine Le Pen's request to suspend a Paris Criminal Court ruling that bars her from holding public office. The court found that "no imminent risk of irreparable harm to a right protected by the European Convention on Human Rights or its protocols has been established". ITALY | Italy's Tribunal of Ministers is weighing criminal charges against Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and top officials over the government's controversial release of a Libyan general wanted by the International Criminal Court. Read more. SPAIN | Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez ruled out resignation on Wednesday, unveiling a sweeping anti-graft strategy as his Socialist party faces mounting scrutiny over corruption allegations. Read more. CZECHIA | Czech President Petr Pavel will present a plan for Ukraine's post-war reconstruction at Thursday's international recovery conference in Rome. The plan focuses on stabilising and modernising Ukraine's economy, attracting investment, facilitating the return of refugees, and accelerating Ukraine's EU accession path. Read more. Also on Euractiv
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
The hypocrisy of the left has gone too far
Loránt Vincze has been an EPP Member of the European Parliament since 2019 on behalf of the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania (RMDSZ). He is the EPP coordinator in the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the International Secretary of the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania (RMDSZ), and Chair of the EP Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and Languages. The political left in Europe has mastered the art of selective principles. They champion the rule of law – until it no longer serves their narrative. They demand institutional transparency and an ethics body – as long as the committee of "independent experts" is made up of NGO representatives from their own ideological corner. They defend civil society and non-governmental organisations – so long as those organisations follow the GMW ideology: Green, Migration, and Woke. But let's be honest: what they really want is for GMW-aligned NGOs to receive unchallenged access to EU funds. They talk of accountability while turning a blind eye when these same organisations use public money to lobby the very institutions that fund them – only to return and ask for more. We value the work of NGOs, grassroots organisations, and civic groups that genuinely contribute to dialogue and problem-solving in their communities. NGOs can be ideological, and that's part of healthy democratic debate. But public authorities must not treat those aligned with left-wing causes as more legitimate than conservative ones. Increasingly, grant applications are disregarded unless they explicitly endorse GMW priorities, narrowing pluralism and undermining trust in the fairness of EU funding. This is not principled politics. This is not public service. This is GMW fundamentalism, a form of ideological extremism no less harmful than any coming from the far right. It's rigid, intolerant of dissent, and deeply disconnected from the everyday concerns of European citizens. In Brussels, the political arena has become dominated by this double standard. The so-called 'EU bubble' often demands the political downfall of the centre-right and the right. The message is clear: there is room only for the approved narrative, only for the acceptable ideology. But the left must come down from its moral high horse and step into the real world – the world outside the plenary chamber and beyond the Brussels think tanks. Go and meet the people. Speak to workers, farmers, small business owners, teachers, and families. Listen to what they care about. You'll quickly find that the GMW ideology might stir debate on social media, but it's not what keeps people up at night. Their real concerns? Rising living costs, educational opportunities, access to healthcare, decent wages, honest entrepreneurship, dignified pensions, peace and security. Ironically, many of these are traditionally seen as centre-left issues. But today, they are better addressed by the European People's Party (EPP) and its commitment to the social market economy – a model rooted in responsibility, solidarity, and practical solutions. The centre-right represents the backbone of Europe: families, communities, entrepreneurs, farmers. These are not abstract interest groups; they are real people with real lives and real hopes. And we fight for them. It seems to surprise when the EPP Group pushes back. In truth, we should do it more often – and more firmly. We are Christian Democrats . We stand for European values, for the European way of life, for subsidiarity, for national responsibility in European coordination, and for a strong Europe that acts with purpose in a rapidly changing world. For the EPP, citizens and communities are at the centre – not ideology. And when policies are put to the test in the European Parliament, outcomes may surprise you. In fact, voting records show that in the past year, during final votes there were more than twice as many majorities formed between the Socialists and the right against the EPP than between the EPP and the right against the Socialists. Numbers aside, the EPP will not shy away to get a majority behind rightful decisions. In the end, the verdict on the left's hypocrisy will not be rendered by editorial pages, political spin, or virtue-signalling speeches. It will come at the ballot box – by citizens who are tired of being lectured, and ready to be heard.
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
Sweden rejects EU plan to fund budget with tobacco tax
Swedish Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson has strongly opposed an EU proposal to use revenue from higher tobacco taxes to help fund the bloc's next long-term budget, calling it "completely unacceptable". The proposal, referenced in a document from Germany's International Affairs Liaison Office in Brussels and submitted to the German parliament, suggests new EU revenue sources for the 2028–2034 budget could include levies on electronic waste and tobacco. Though not yet officially confirmed by the European Commission, the idea adds to growing pressure from at least 15 EU member states to raise excise duties on tobacco products. As Euractiv reported last month, the European Commission is considering a 139% tax hike on cigarettes, along with steeper levies on alternative products such as e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches, and heated tobacco. Sweden now joins Italy, Greece, Romania, and Bulgaria in opposing the move, primarily to defend snus – a moist tobacco pouch banned in the EU since 1992 but legal in Sweden under an EU accession treaty exemption, which allows domestic sale only if it is not marketed elsewhere in the bloc. In a post on X, Svantesson called the proposal would result in 'a very significant tax increase on white snus,' and that the Commission wants the tax revenue 'to go to the EU and not to Sweden.' She said she had raised the issue with Commissioner for Climate, Net Zero and Clean Growth, Wopke Hoekstra, who is also responsible for EU tax matters and pledged to 'continue to fight for Swedish snus.' Sweden has positioned itself as a model for tobacco harm reduction, citing a smoking rate of just 5% and a decline in smoking-related cancers.
