Rubio calls Russian counterpart to discuss outcome of negotiations between Ukraine, Moscow
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday (May 17, 2025) called his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, to discuss the outcome of Friday's direct negotiations between delegations of Kyiv and Moscow in Istanbul.
In the first ever direct talks in three years, Russian and Ukrainian delegation at their meeting lasting less than two hours agreed to swap 1,000 prisoners of war from each side and draft their respective proposals for a ceasefire to end the fighting which has entered into its fourth year.
At Friday's talks, Ukraine demanded a direct meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and President Vladimir Putin.
'Marco Rubio welcomed the agreements reached on the exchange of prisoners of war and the intention of each side to prepare its own proposals outlining the conditions necessary for a ceasefire.
"He reaffirmed Washington's readiness to continue supporting efforts towards a negotiated settlement,' a Russian Foreign Ministry statement posted on its web portal said.
'From his side, Minister Lavrov acknowledged the constructive role played by the United States in encouraging Kiev to finally accept President Vladimir Putin's proposal to resume negotiations in Istanbul. He reiterated Moscow's willingness to continue working with US colleagues in this context.' the Foreign Ministry said in its readout.
According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, Mr. Lavrov and Mr. Rubio also touched on a number of other international and regional issues. The sides exchanged views on the continuation of Russian-American contacts.
Meanwhile, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov did not rule out a meeting between President Putin and Mr. Zelenskyy once ''agreements were ready'.
However, diplomats and experts opine that given the huge gap between the Russian and Ukrainian stands, a solution could be possible only after a meeting of President Trump and Putin, which itself requires a thorough groundwork.
Probably, Mr. Rubio's call to his counterpart on Saturday indicates that both Moscow and Washington are working on an early US-Russian summit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk renews criticism of Trumps big bill as it faces key Senate vote
Washington, Elon Musk on Saturday doubled down on his distaste for US President Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,' Musk wrote on X on Saturday as the Senate was scheduled to call a vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, whose birthday is also Saturday, later posted that the bill would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party". The criticisms reopen a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency and the administration he recently left. They also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Musk previously made his opinions about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clear. Days after he left the federal government last month with a laudatory celebration in the Oval Office, he blasted the bill as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination". 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote on X earlier this month. In another post, the wealthy GOP donor who recently forecasted that he'd step back from political donations threatened to fire lawmakers who 'betrayed the American people". When Trump clapped back to say he was disappointed with Musk, back-and-forth fighting erupted and quickly escalated. Musk suggested without evidence that Trump, who spent the first part of the year as one of his closest allies, was mentioned in files related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein. Musk ultimately tried to make nice with the administration, saying he regretted some of his posts that 'went too far". Trump responded in kind in an interview with The New York Post, saying, 'Things like that happen. I don't blame him for anything.' It's unclear how Musk's latest broadsides will influence the fragile peace he and the president had enjoyed in recent weeks. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Musk has spent recent weeks focused on his businesses, and his political influence has waned since he left the administration. Still, the wealthy businessman poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's campaign in 2024, demonstrating the impact his money can have if he's passionate enough about an issue or candidate to restart his political spending. ARI This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
How can a new regime in Iran be in India's interest? Yet Delhi said little: Bruno Maçães
Bruno Maçães A former secretary of state for European Affairs in Portugal, Bruno Maçães wears many hats — he advises global corporations on geopolitical and technological risk, is a member of the European Council on Foreign Relations , and has written books on the new world order as well as China's belt and road strategy. In an interview with Sunday Times , he argues that India must take a more proactive approach to securing its strategic interests. A truce has been called with the US, Israel and Iran all claiming victory. How do you assess these competing narratives? Israel was fundamentally interested in bringing the regime down. US president Trump showed considerable ability in how he avoided being dragged into a prolonged war most of his supporters were against. At the same time, no fundamental problem was addressed. Iran may even feel this is the right moment to pursue a nuclear weapon. The main obstacle in the past was political and may have been removed now that Ayatollah Khamenei has lost influence. He has consistently opposed a final decision on weaponising nuclear power. Regime change could lead to a military dictatorship in Iran and that would move it much closer to China. For India, this might well be a disaster and my conversations with friends in Delhi actually showed there was some awareness of the risk. But India needs to be more active in pursuing its strategic interests. In this multipolar world, India has had to do a balancing act with the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Middle East. How successful has this strategy been? India needs to develop a vision on what kind of principles and priorities it has and then apply those principles to ongoing crises. I consider India a civilization state but a civilization state needs to offer an organising theory of world order. How can it be in India's interest for Iran to be destroyed or for a new regime aligned with China and Pakistan to take root there? And yet we heard very little from Delhi in opposition to the wild adventures that were openly being discussed in Israel and Washington. On Russia's invasion of Ukraine, India, a country without territorial ambitions of its own, should be more critical of territorial invasions. I would have liked a stronger position and a stronger role against the return of the old European imperialism as represented by Russian president Putin . You have described the Israel attack on Iran as 'neoconservatism on steroids.' Can you explain? The old neoconservatism was about regime change. I think this is a more radical form of neoconservatism where the goal is regime destruction or collapse but there is no vision of what will replace it. Over the past two decades, Israel and the US have created a landscape of destruction in West Asia, all the way from Egypt to Pakistan. Syria is only now starting to recover, and a lot depends on whether it manages to get back on its feet and the wider region starts to recover. Unfortunately, Israel seems to believe the best future for itself is to become a fortified garrison amidst a landscape of destruction. There is no future in this vision, not even for Israel itself. I n your latest book 'World Builders', you argue that geopolitics is no longer about controlling territory but about technology. How do you see China's DeepSeek, and the fears in Europe that Trump could weaponise the tech dominance of the US? Europe has fallen behind. We need to realise technology is not above geopolitics. We are becoming more dependent on the US and that comes at the cost of our prosperity and independence. Regulation is not enough. In order to regulate technology, you first need to create it. We made a mistake 30 years ago to think it did not matter whether the main internet platforms in Europe were American or European. That was a tragic mistake. China did not make the same mistake, and now they have strong indigenous capabilities as shown by DeepSeek. Now, we find ourselves in a position of extreme dependency. Did you see how Nato's secretary general, who is European, referred to Europeans as 'they'? It reminded me of those nawabs in India who were so aligned with the East India Company that they referred to Indians as 'they'. In both cases, military dependence led to a kind of mental dependence. How do you think India will fare in this race for technology? Already, India is the only real rival to China in the race to control and deploy solar energy. Europe and America are out of this competition. I suspect in other areas too the contest for technological dominance will increasingly be between China and India. Right now, I think India is looking for a model. American-type financialisation will not work for India, but neither will the party leadership system of China. When you need to move fast in developing ideas and implementing them, the most important thing is a political model that fits your circumstances. Ultimately, India needs a political model that aligns with its culture and history which is the topic of my next book. A model is also necessary to organise discovery. What will be the technologies of the future? No one knows. But we know that it all starts with organised discovery. We already know that whoever masters solar energy and artificial intelligence will rule the world, but the details will decide everything. Can you tell us what your impressions were after your recent India visit, and what your next book will be focusing on? I spent two months this year visiting Ayodhya, the Mahakumbh and other places in India, as well as meeting many people and having intense discussions. My book will deal with the revival of Hindu civilization. I am spending a lot of hours reading the complete works of Vivekananda , Aurobindo, Coomaraswamy. These are writers of unmatched power but also complexity. I want to discuss the terms of this revival and also, what the Indian case can teach us about the fundamental political entity of the future: the civilization state, that is a state that is neither liberal nor national but based on a distinct civilization, a view about human life and society. I hope to be able to travel for several months across India next year to present these ideas.
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Rubio urges Iran to ensure safety of IAEA personnel amid rising tension, ‘Execution of IAEA Director unacceptable'
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Saturday (local time) that Iran has a responsibility to guarantee the safety and security of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) personnel. In a post on X, Rubio said, "Calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of IAEA Director General Grossi are unacceptable and should be condemned." He added, "We support the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran and commend the Director General and the IAEA for their dedication and professionalism. We call on Iran to provide for the safety and security of IAEA personnel." Earlier this week, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, in his first public remarks since a ceasefire, said Iran had "slapped America in the face" by launching missiles at a major US base in Qatar in retaliation for American strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz.
