logo
John Purser: Well-orchestrated lessons

John Purser: Well-orchestrated lessons

The National09-06-2025
At the same time, a touch of something approaching arrogance is helpful.
My fellow composition student at the Royal Scottish Academy of Music was John Geddes. I remember once we were in the back row of the Royal Scottish Academy of Music choir in the alas no more St Andrew's Hall.
Ranked below us were the rest of the choir, the full body of the Scottish National Orchestra, and a team of solo singers of major repute. As the conductor, Alex Gibson, came on to the usual applause, John turned to me and, with an expansive gesture spreading his arms to indicate the vast forces ranged below, announced: 'These are the rocks that I chisel!'
John chiselled some magnificent rocks, especially in his Second Symphony.
Books on orchestration are all very well and some remarkably insightful – notably Ebeneezer Prout's two-volume work The Orchestra. Poor man, with a name like that his credibility is shot to hell before you even read a word or hear a note. His Clarinet Concerto and Organ Concerto No 1 are on YouTube. They sound a lot better than his name.
The best lessons come from following orchestral scores, attending orchestral rehearsals, asking your fellow students to try things out, and listening to professional musicians. Orchestral musicians are a tough bunch and not all of them will smooth your path if difficulties arise.
The one utterly unforgivable thing is mistakes in the parts. They waste time and annoy the hell out of everybody, not least the conductor whose business it is to fight your corner. Even with modern part extraction from computer typeset scores, mistakes can occur.
Computer typesetting is a wonderful thing, but it does deprive the musicians of that sense of direct contact with the composer which you can get from her or his hand-written parts. It's the difference between a handwritten and a typed letter. This particularly applies to the full score which is used by the conductor.
Each composer has to work out his own style of orchestration, her own palette. The composer picks the instrumental forces and lays them out in a conventional order, so readers of the score know what is where.
For full symphony orchestra with choir and soloists, woodwind instruments are at the top, brass section next, then percussion and keyboard instruments, soloists and vocal lines: finally the string section. These, if you like, are the tubes of paint.
My first lessons were from Frank Spedding but mostly he left me to my own devices, following the Gordon Jacob and Walter Piston books on orchestration. These provided the basics – the ranges of the various instruments and their fundamental characteristics.
There were little extra snippets of information. If you have only two trumpets and want the effect of four, you can slip in a couple of low flutes if the music is quiet. The audience won't be any the wiser so long as you dove-tail them. The same trick can work blending horns and bassoons.
It wasn't all technical. Gordon Jacob, I was told, once criticised a student of orchestration for overuse of the snare drum, declaring that it would 'sound like somebody pissing into a biscuit tin'.
Two of my composition teachers had diametrically opposed approaches to orchestration. Tippett was all for 'gestures', featuring the different tonal qualities of the instruments. Hans Gál was more for blending the sounds.
A master at both was Tchaikovsky and on one occasion he set up a deliberate surprise. The Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy, in The Nutcracker features the celesta. In Tchaikovsky's day the instrument (invented around 1886) was a newcomer and very few had heard its fairy-like silvery tones. So keen was Tchaikovsky to spring this sound as a surprise on his audiences that he had the instrument secretly imported by his publisher and kept well out of hearing until the premiere.
He wrote: 'Have it sent direct to Petersburg; but no-one there must know about it especially not Rimsky-Korsakov and Glazounov who might make use of the new effect before I could. I expect the instrument will make a tremendous sensation.'
It did. Its predecessor had been invented in Glasgow by Thomas Machell – the dulcitone, first made in 1860 and used by the French composer Vincent d'Indy in Le Son de la Cloche in the 1880s. In the celesta, the hammers hit metal plates: in the dulcitone they hit metal tuning forks.
These days, however, composers often introduce instruments from indigenous cultures and even archaeological reconstructions such as Bronze Age horns.
As for the Highland bagpipes, they were first used with orchestra by Aloys Fleischmann in Cork, then Ian Whyte in his ballet Donald of the Burthens, then by Edward MacGuire in Calgacus and then in a kitsch colonialist scenario by Peter Maxwell Davies in Orkney Wedding with Sunrise.
It used to be the best known, being in the 'Donald, where's your troosers?' class of artistry, but Bear McCreary's Outlander has overtaken it by an American mile. Anyway, there's no manual for combining bagpipes and symphony orchestra, not even Norman del Mar's magnificent Anatomy of the Orchestra.
Norman (above) was not to be messed with – a large man with a formidable intellect. To orchestral musicians, he was variously known as 'The Mass of Life' (a pun on the title of a composition by Delius), 'The Greatest Waste of Space' (which was not fair), 'The Butcher' (on account of his decisive but inelegant beat), and, more affectionately 'Bubble Bum'.
Confronted by more than 60 hardened professional musicians, many of whom had served in the Second World War and knew what it was like to be made to run 10 times round the parade ground carrying a heavy shell for playing a wrong note, even a Del Mar was put to the test. On one such occasion, he was guiding the BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra through a mountain of challenging scores – Strauss's Till Eulenspiegel and the like – deliberately thrown at him by the BBC in London because public protest had prevented them from axing the orchestra.
Norman had a desk with scores to the right of his conductor's podium – the In-Tray, and another to the left – the Out-Tray. They had no time for proper rehearsals, only run-throughs, and Norman was running them.
At one point, in the frantic passage of scores and decisive beating of time, Norman's baton flew out of his hand and fell to the floor. He was a tall man, standing on a podium and barked out: 'My baton please!' Quick as a flash, the principal violinist, Peter Gibbs (who had piloted Spitfires during the Battle of Britain) deliberately dropped his bow and turned to the second desk of violins and demanded: 'My bow please!'
But Norman loved these people and understood them better than many a conductor, taking in his stride the fourth horn, Billy Bull who, on being told by Del Mar that he couldn't see him, replied: 'Ah cannae see you either, sir, but ah can feel your presence.' Never was a truer word spoken.
So I was frightened but fortunate that Norman gave an early piece of mine a run-through with the same orchestra. It made use of sundry effects – singing at the same time as playing, different kinds of mute and so on. Norman was immensely encouraging but also warned me against striving for effect.
A year later, I got my comeuppance in that department from the timpanist in the Radió Teilefis Éireann Symphony Orchestra.
His name was Kurt Hans Goedicke and this was back in 1962 so I was only 19 and he was still in his 20s. He subsequently acquired an international reputation and is more or less a legend in his own time.
I had won the Radió Éireann Carolan Prize for orchestral variations on Amhran Dochais.
One of the variations had a fanfare for the brass, followed by a solo for the timpani. Four timpani, one timpanist. I was really looking forward to hearing this. I thought it would sound spectacular. The brass section sounded great but the timpani bit was very disappointing. Too slow, almost stumbling.
During the coffee break Kurt came to me with the timpani part. The conversation went as follows, he with a thick German accent: 'Zees timpani part – she is ver difficult. Ver difficult indeed.'
'I'm sorry. I thought it would be fine.'
'You see, I cannot keep crossing my arms like zis.'
He demonstrated the knots he would get into when one arm had to cross over the other and the first one had to be retrieved from underneath in no time at all to get to the next of the four timpani. Truly impossible and I hadn't thought of it.
'O-o-oh! I'll try to re-write it then.'
'But zis is ze original inspiration, ja?'
'It's what I first thought of ... I ...'
'Oh ve must not change. Ve must not change ze original inspiration!'
'I'd rather change it and make it work better.'
'No, no. I tell you vat I do! I praaaactice!'
And with that he forewent his coffee and spent the break trying to make the impossible possible. He got as close as could be but what he really achieved was the very kindliest of lessons in correcting incompetence, and I remain grateful to him to this day.
The improper installation of a Rumford chimney was what won me that Carolan Prize. I composed it in St Kevin's Cottage in Co. Wicklow with the score opened out on the kitchen table.
I was completing a double-page spread a day and the fine turf (peat) ash was falling on the pages and the smoke circulating promiscuously. As soon as you took the anonymous score out of the brown envelope you could smell the turf.
Orchestral scores are not easy to judge and this no doubt saved everyone the bother. I imagine a judge exclaiming as he extracted the manuscript: 'Can you smell that now! Straight from the bogs! That's the winner. No discussion!'
Not imaginary is the sixpence I attached to the start of the trombone part of my Opus 7, adding a signed 'with sympathy'. It came about because I was concerned about the top D. In those days, top Ds on a tenor trombone were not commonplace, and this was a held note in an already high-pitched passage.
I asked him how he would manage it and his answer explains all! 'Well, it's like this, John. When you're going for the top D, you take a sixpence, stick it up your arsehole, squeeze like hell, and when it bends you know you've got it!'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Very special' film with perfect rating will leave 'everyone sobbing'
'Very special' film with perfect rating will leave 'everyone sobbing'

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Very special' film with perfect rating will leave 'everyone sobbing'

Nowhere Special, starring James Norton, has been awarded a 100 per cent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and has been described as a 'measured, emotional ripper' Nowhere Special, a certified tearjerker, is the brainchild of Uberto Pasolini, who served as its producer, writer, and director. ‌ The film poignantly narrates the tale of John, a single father who, after receiving a terminal cancer diagnosis, must find a suitable adoptive family for his four year old son, Michael. ‌ Set against the backdrop of Northern Ireland, Nowhere Special subtly delves into themes of love, loss, and profound familial bonds as John embarks on the heartrending task of ensuring his son's future. ‌ Inspired by a true story, Pasolini reportedly drew from an article he read about a terminally ill father who had to secure a new family for his son before his impending death. Nowhere Special made its world debut at the Venice Film Festival in September 2020 and subsequently hit UK cinemas on 16 July 2021. The film saw its US theatrical release on 26 April 2024, reports the Express. The deeply moving drama features James Norton and Daniel Lamont in lead roles, with support from Eileen O'Higgins, Valene Kane, Keith McErlean, and Valerie O'Connor. Norton's compelling portrayal of the terminally ill John earned him a nomination for Best Actor at the British Independent Film Awards in 2021. ‌ With a stellar 100 per cent critics approval rating and an audience approval rating of 93 per cent on review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, Nowhere Special has certainly left a lasting impression on both critics and viewers alike. One critic praised the film, saying: "This Irish drama is what happens when little movies get it right - respecting the situation instead of exploiting it, and exploring a difficult choice instead of suggesting that the built-in emotion of the challenge is all that's needed." ‌ Another described it as: "A measured, emotional ripper... a 35-year-old window cleaner and single father who must find a home for his four-year-old son when he learns he has only a few months to live... Details accrue; anger steels. A steady hand gets the story through." A third critic was moved by the film, writing: "Nowhere Special is something special indeed. If you aren't shedding well-earned tears by the end of this film you simply are not human." Meanwhile, another reviewer noted: "For a film about loneliness and death, it's tender, intelligent and life-affirming without ever being maudlin and mawkish. A rare and distinguished film indeed." ‌ Audience reactions were equally heartfelt, with one viewer commenting: "Difficult to watch in places (particularly if you are the father of a young boy) but astonishing performances by the two leads make this one of the best films I have ever seen." One fan raved: "I watched it and it was amazing. I haven't seen a film this good in many years. I suggest having a box of tissues handy. Right from the start it starts to pull on your heartstrings and doesn't let go. James Norton and the young newcomer, Daniel Lamont were brilliant onscreen together. This is a film I would recommend to others." Another viewer shared their thoughts, saying: "Sad, poignant story that'll make you cry but a lovely performance from James Norton in the lead and delightful chemistry with his on screen son Daniel Lamont." Nowhere Special can be rented for a cosy night in on Apple TV+ and Amazon Prime Video at the cost of £3.49.

Emmerdale exit 'confirmed' in early ITVX release as Robert faces John's wrath
Emmerdale exit 'confirmed' in early ITVX release as Robert faces John's wrath

Metro

time8 hours ago

  • Metro

Emmerdale exit 'confirmed' in early ITVX release as Robert faces John's wrath

The following article contains spoilers from an episode of Emmerdale that hasn't aired on ITV1 yet, but can be viewed on ITVX. John Sugden (Oliver Farnworth) has uncovered some huge information about Robert Sugden (Ryan Hawley) in Emmerdale. The two siblings have been involved in a tiresome back and forth ever since Robert returned to the village. John wants Robert gone because he's worried about Aaron Dingle (Danny Miller) getting back with him, while Robert wants to see the back of John because he's convinced he is too good to be true. Robert's views on John were highlighted in this evening's episode when Liam Cavanagh (Jonny McPherson) arrived at his house. The local GP had been asked by John to check in on Robert, believing his time in prison was having a serious impact on his mental health. Liam wanted to talk to Robert about life behind bars, and how the trauma has impacted him today. When Robert found out that Liam was only visiting because John asked him, he focused on the fact he thinks his sibling is bad news, rather than opening up about his past. Unbeknownst to them both, John was listening in on this conversation as a result of planting an audio bug in the living room. More Trending While Robert didn't tell Liam anything that made John's ears prick up a great deal, he did say something that left John smirking later in the day. Want to be the first to hear shocking EastEnders spoilers? Who's leaving Coronation Street? The latest gossip from Emmerdale? Join 10,000 soaps fans on Metro's WhatsApp Soaps community and get access to spoiler galleries, must-watch videos, and exclusive interviews. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications so you can see when we've just dropped the latest spoilers! As Liam left, John witnessed Ray (Joe Absolom) heading to Robert's door. Back in the van, John discovered that Robert was the one who stole the weed from Ross Barton (Michael Parr) and Mackenzie Boyd (Lawrence Robb) a couple of weeks ago, and then sold it to Ray. Before the week ends, John will find Ross in the street and reveals to him that he's discovered something about Robert. Ross doesn't like Robert at the moment because he's suspicious that he stole the weed. He currently doesn't have any confirmation it was him – so what will he do next if John reveals the truth? View More » MORE: All Emmerdale spoiler videos for next week as legend 'saves the day' MORE: Emmerdale fans blow holes in Owen and John 'suicide' twist MORE: Robert attacked in Emmerdale early ITVX release – and not by John

Emmerdale 'final showdown' as 'three characters will take down John'
Emmerdale 'final showdown' as 'three characters will take down John'

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Emmerdale 'final showdown' as 'three characters will take down John'

Emmerdale viewers are convinced that three characters could bring an end to John Sugden in a 'final showdown' with another sad death also predicted on the ITV soap Viewers of Emmerdale think they've sussed out how the John Sugden storyline will end. ‌ With one character onto the killer and no going back, and a "life-changing" storyline on the way for two characters linked to him, fans think it's all about to come to a head. We have another resident dangerously close to unravelling the dark truth about John too, and fans think it's only a matter of time before his criminal ways come to light. ‌ Robert Sugden wasted no time in deciding his long-lost brother John was a "creep" and a baddie when they met just a few months ago. A showdown in prison amid their rivalry over Aaron Dingle, John's husband and Robert's ex-husband, left Robert unnerved. ‌ He was determined to expose John to everyone, sensing something wasn't right with him and that he was hiding something dark. Since then, he's remained on the case to figure out what John is capable of. John didn't help matters by threatening his sibling, but that said he's won over the entire village who have no idea the things he's done. He's targeted a number of residents over the past year, from drugging people, to causing a deliberate allergic reaction and even killing Nate Robinson. ‌ He framed a character for a harassment campaign he'd set up, and all of this was to play the hero as well as be needed by those in the village. It paid off and no one, asides Robert is suspicious. At one point Mackenzie Boyd was and he became an enemy of the character, only to pay the price and be blamed for a slurry leak on his sister Moira Dingle's farm. John feigned support and Mack believed he was a good guy and left him alone. But Robert is slowly unravelling John's behaviour, and he isn't the only one. Paddy Kirk is volunteering on a helpline, the very helpline a guilty John has been messaging and calling after struggling with his guilt. ‌ Paddy is the exact person who has been messaging John, urging him to open up and speak over the phone. Neither of them realise yet who they are speaking to, but surely it's only a matter of time before one or both of them figure it out, and if John confesses to a crime or two before then, the game could be up. Factoring all this in, fans are convinced it will be these three characters, Mack, Paddy and Robert, who ultimately put the pieces of the puzzle together and expose John. They think events will lead to a "final showdown" and that the trio will team up and end his reign of terror. ‌ Some fans think Aaron will figure it out too and could be someone who brings his own husband down, while Cain Dingle and Victoria Sugden have also been suggested. It's clear Robert is a threat to John, just like Mack once was, so will he put a stop to his investigation? Could Robert or even Mack lose their life in a last death, given Aaron and Mack's mystery upcoming storyline? Taking to social media, one fan theorised: "Robert is obviously suspicious, but won't be believed. And obviously, he only has an instinct that John is a wrong 'un, and a belief that there's police have got it wrong about Nate's death. "He's a long way from understanding what has really been going on. I think they'd is still a role for Mack to play in exposing all John's secrets (and presumably Paddy, too). There'd be great drama in seeing Mack, Rob and Paddy all coming together to save Aaron in some big final showdown." ‌ Another fan said: "I hope he ends up confessing to Paddy via the helpline chat thing and Paddy works with Robert to piece it together." A third viewer predicted: "I actually think it will be Paddy, Mack, Aaron or Vic. And later Robert will be like I told you so. "I'm enjoying the storyline and can't wait to wait it all play out." As of the possible final kill, another fan commented: "I wouldn't be surprised if John kills Mack when he's about to be exposed, being caught by Aaron. And then Aaron is kidnapped by John, leading to a Robert, Cain and Paddy team up." Get the latest drama from the Dales by joining our Emmerdale WhatsApp group As drama continues to unfold in the Yorkshire Dales, the Mirror has launched its very own Emmerdale WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest breaking news, secrets, and spoilers delivered straight to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store