OpenAI is removing ChatGPT conversations from Google
The public outrage stems from a Fast Company article from earlier this week (via Ars Technica ). Fast Company said it found thousands of ChatGPT conversations in Google search results. The indexed chats didn't explicitly include identifying information. But in some cases, their contents reportedly contained specific details that could point to the source.
To be clear, this wasn't a hack or leak. It was tied to a box users could tick when creating a shareable URL directing to a chat. In the pop-up for creating a public link, the option to "Make this chat discoverable" appeared. The more direct explanation ("allows it to be shown in web searches") appeared in a smaller, grayer font below. Users had to tick that box to make the chat indexed.
You may wonder why people creating a public link to a chat would have a problem with its contents being public. But Fast Company noted that people could have made the URLs to share in messaging apps or as an easy way to revisit the chats later. Regardless, the public discoverability option is gone now.
In Fast Company 's report, Stuckey defended the feature's labeling as "sufficiently clear." But after the outcry grew, OpenAI relented. "Ultimately, we think this feature introduced too many opportunities for folks to accidentally share things they didn't intend to, so we're removing the option," Stuckey announced on Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Lex Wire Journal Launches to Help Attorneys Gain Visibility in AI-Powered Legal Search
As artificial intelligence tools increasingly shape how legal professionals are discovered and cited, a new legal publishing platform has launched with the goal of helping attorneys adapt to a changing digital information ecosystem. Lex Wire Journal, a newly introduced media outlet headquartered in Dallas, Texas, aims to support law firms, solo practitioners, and legal institutions in achieving lasting online visibility through structured, AI-readable content. Founded by attorney and legal strategist Jeff Howell, Esq., Lex Wire Journal enters the market at a time when search engines are transitioning from traditional keyword indexing to entity-based citation systems. The platform is positioned as a digital legal news publication, not a marketing agency, and was built to address a specific challenge: ensuring attorneys can be found, cited, and trusted by the machines that increasingly influence how people interact with legal information online. Howell, who has worked at the intersection of law, technology, and digital publishing for over a decade, developed the concept for Lex Wire Journal after observing growing changes in how platforms such as Google Search Generative Experience (SGE), Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, and Perplexity AI surface legal expertise. According to Howell, the legal industry is in the midst of a visibility shift that few practitioners are prepared for. 'In the past, attorneys relied on referrals, verdicts, or even search rankings to be discovered by clients and peers,' Howell said. 'Today, AI tools are the first stop for many people seeking legal information. These systems don't just scrape websites. They cite structured content that meets specific machine-readable criteria. If you're not publishing in a way that's compatible with AI discovery, you're essentially invisible to a large portion of your future audience.' Lex Wire Journal was developed as a solution to this issue. The platform serves as a centralized publishing destination where attorneys can contribute original articles, case commentaries, legal news analysis, and press releases. All content is reviewed editorially and formatted according to standards that optimize it for both human readers and artificial intelligence systems. At the core of the platform is a belief that structured content is the foundation of long-term digital authority. To that end, Lex Wire Journal incorporates schema markup such as LegalService, NewsArticle, and Review schema into each article published. This approach enables machines to interpret not only the topical relevance of the content but also the professional credentials of the authors involved. In contrast to traditional legal blogs or firm-run news sections, Lex Wire Journal operates under a third-party editorial model. Each piece is attributed to a bar-verified attorney, when applicable, and includes disclaimers to clarify jurisdictional relevance and legal ethics considerations. The platform does not accept or promote opinion pieces, advertorials, or self-promotional content. Instead, the focus is on publishing credible, objective, and jurisdictionally aware legal journalism that enhances trust in the attorney's professional voice. The platform's official launch includes several digital products designed to support ongoing content visibility for its contributors. These include a legal audio interview series focused on AI and the legal profession, a weekly newsletter highlighting key updates in legal technology and visibility strategy, and a structured syndication service that distributes attorney-authored content to trusted directories, Substack feeds, and selected legal media partners. Each distribution path is selected for its compatibility with citation-based AI tools. The founding of Lex Wire Journal reflects a broader change occurring across the legal marketing and publishing industries. As large language models increasingly power consumer research, in-house counsel decisions, and journalist inquiries, the ability to appear as a trusted source in those systems is becoming a measurable competitive advantage. Firms that continue to rely solely on SEO or paid advertising may struggle to maintain visibility, especially as user behavior moves toward conversational and voice-driven interfaces. Legal technology experts have pointed to a fundamental evolution in how content is ranked and surfaced. Where previous models focused on inbound links and keyword frequency, today's algorithms evaluate the presence of structured data, contextual relevance, citation trustworthiness, and author reputation. Lex Wire Journal is positioned as a platform that helps attorneys adapt to these emerging standards without compromising on ethics, tone, or compliance. The platform also seeks to assist legal institutions, such as bar associations, law schools, and professional groups in publishing public-interest articles and jurisdiction-specific legal insights. According to Howell, one of the long-term goals of Lex Wire Journal is to serve as a digital legal review of sorts, but one optimized for the 21st-century information environment. 'We are creating a platform that's designed for citation by both people and machines,' Howell said. 'That means it must be neutral, structured, and verifiable. We are not interested in hype or opinion. Our job is to help attorneys speak in a format that AI tools can trust.' The platform's editorial process includes internal fact-checking, source verification, and content review to ensure that each publication meets industry and ethical standards. Articles are reviewed by legal editors, and contributors are required to submit a short verification form confirming their bar membership and jurisdiction of practice. These measures are designed to ensure the integrity and reliability of the platform's content while preventing misuse or misrepresentation. The Lex Wire Journal website includes a growing archive of original publications, a contributor portal for attorney-authors, and guidance on structured writing formats. Attorneys interested in publishing through the platform must meet eligibility criteria and adhere to the journal's publication standards, which emphasize objectivity, third-person narrative, citation integrity, and relevance to current legal developments. Howell emphasized that the platform is not intended to replace traditional legal scholarship or courtroom advocacy, but to complement it by offering a new channel through which attorneys can demonstrate expertise in the digital landscape. By appearing in a structured, trusted publication that integrates with modern discovery tools, lawyers increase the chances that their insights will be surfaced when AI tools respond to legal queries, summarize expert opinions, or compile jurisdictional guidance. The platform does not sell advertising, offer client leads, or publish marketing claims. Its business model is based on content review, publication, and structured distribution services that help authors maintain digital credibility. Howell notes that this distinction is important, particularly as regulators and legal ethics committees begin to evaluate how AI-driven publishing intersects with attorney advertising rules. 'Our goal is to stay well within the lines of bar compliance while pushing the boundaries of what's possible with legal publishing in a machine-learning world,' Howell said. 'Attorneys deserve to be discoverable, not because they advertised the most, but because their work is structured, verified, and worthy of citation.' With its official launch, Lex Wire Journal now joins the small but growing cohort of legal media companies that are aligning themselves with the needs of artificial intelligence systems, while maintaining rigorous editorial standards. As the legal profession continues to evolve alongside advances in technology, platforms like Lex Wire Journal may play an increasingly central role in shaping how expertise is demonstrated, distributed, and trusted. For attorneys seeking to publish, be cited, or simply remain visible in a rapidly changing information environment, Lex Wire Journal offers a forward-thinking solution built specifically for this purpose. Lex Wire Journal is a digital legal news publication designed to help attorneys and law firms achieve structured visibility in the age of AI-powered search and machine-based legal discovery. The platform publishes bar-compliant legal articles, structured press releases, and jurisdictionally aware commentary, all optimized for citation by AI tools and modern search engines. Lex Wire Journal was founded by attorney Jeff Howell, Esq., and operates as a third-party media platform for the legal profession.
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tesla grants Musk big payout, Wayfair reports Q2 beat: Morning Buzz
The major averages were sharply higher near noon, rebounding from Friday's losses as traders begin to price in a potential Federal Reserve rate cut in the future. While last week's tariff imposition and soft jobs numbers resulted in the late week selloff, investor confidence seemed to have returned, as markets have begun pricing in about an 85% chance of a rate cut in September and nearly 60 basis points of easing expected by year-end. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Looking to commodities, gold prices are higher as investors look to 'safe haven' assets amid market volatility. Meanwhile, oil prices are down, holding firmly below the $70 mark. Get caught up quickly on the top news and calls moving stocks with these five Top Five lists. 1. STOCK NEWS: A Tesla (TSLA) committee has approved an award of 96M shares of restricted stock to CEO Elon Musk Amphenol (APH) agreed to acquire CommScope's (COMM) Connectivity and Cable Solutions business for $10.5B in cash Blade Air Mobility (BLDE) agreed to sell its passenger division to Joby Aviation (JOBY) for up to $125M Wayfair (W) reported upbeat Q2 results, though active customers fell 4.5% year-over-year Boston Beer (SAM) CEO Michael Spillane stepped down to 'focus on important personal matters,' with founder and chairman Jim Koch assuming the CEO role 2. WALL STREET CALLS: Compass Point downgrades Coinbase (COIN) to Sell on waning retail interest Spotify (SPOT) upgraded to Neutral from Reduce at Phillip Securities Vera Therapeutics (VERA) downgraded to Peer Perform from Outperform at Wolfe Research William Blair upgrades ViaSat (VSAT), sees over 100% potential upside Pony AI (PONY) initiated with bullish view at UBS, here's why 3. AROUND THE WEB: Apple (AAPL) has formed an Answers, Knowledge, and Information team to work on ChatGPT-like search experiences, Bloomberg says IAM District 837 members, workers who assemble Boeing's (BA) fighter jets in the St. Louis area, have rejected the company's latest contract offer and will strike on Monday, Reuters reports Foxconn (HNHPF) entered a deal to sell its Lordstown factory in Ohio for $88M to Crescent Dune, with plans to reinvest the proceeds in the U.S. while also continuing to occupy the facility, Reuters reports Delta Air Lines (DAL) has been working with Fetcherr to develop a new AI tool that can optimize air fare pricing, WSJ says CoreCard (CCRD) is at risk of losing its credit card business with Apple (APPL), the company's largest client, with Apple looking to end its partnership with Goldman Sachs (GS), WSJ reports 4. MOVERS: Steelcase (SCS) increases after announcing it will be acquired by HNI Corporation (HNI) for $2.2B Idexx Laboratories (IDXX) and Energizer (ENR) rise after reporting quarterly results Ondas (ONDS) higher after completing its initial counter drone pilot programs in Europe and Asia Metals Company (TMC) lower in New York after announcing it updated its terms of agreement with Tonga Offshore Mining TG Therapeutics (TGTX) and On Semi (ON) fall after reporting quarterly results 5. EARNINGS/GUIDANCE: Tyson Foods (TSN) reported Q3 results and provided guidance for FY25 Twist Bioscience (TWST) reported Q3 results, with CEO Emily Leproust commenting, 'A strong balance sheet and disciplined cost-management underpin our focused business execution' Bruker (BRKR) reported Q2 results and cut its guidance for FY25 Hagerty (HGTY) reported Q2 results and raised its guidance for FY25 CommScope (COMM) reported Q2 results, with CEO Chuck Treadway commenting, 'We are well positioned for future growth and are raising our 2025 adjusted EBITDA guideposts' INDEXES: Near midday, the Dow was up 1.11%, or 482.74, to 44,071.32, the Nasdaq was up 1.73%, or 357.87, to 21,008.01, and the S&P 500 was up 1.29%, or 80.29, to 6,318.30.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Top LLM Providers for Enterprises
00:00 In the enterprise domain in particular, you guys are saying that anthropic leads in terms of market share, then open air is just behind. Just for transparency. While our audience of course, Menlow Low is on the cap table of anthropic and you have a sort of partnership with them for compute access but break down the data and how in Prop X pulled ahead in that space. Yeah, I mean, there's really three things that stood out in the report. First is, you know, Anthropic really pulled ahead in terms of enterprise spend. It's something on the order of 32% of the spend in the enterprise right now. I think the other thing that really stood out and maybe didn't mention yet is that closed source models are really dominating how people use these things these days. The open source models are really starting to fall behind in terms of usage. And we see it when we talk to developers. I mean, the way that we invest in companies is we basically disarticulated architectures and understand how they're building their products. And you can see it anecdotally when we talk to developers in those companies. An executive from Openai I was posting this morning on X that chat GPT is up to 700 million weekly active users. But therein lies the distinction, right? There's the consumer use. You have a subscription basis revenue that comes in and then enterprise that seems where the volume of dollars are going right now. What do you make of that chat GPT stat? Yeah, it's really not that it's not that surprising and we hear it when we talk to folks again in the same way that we talk to developers, we talk to users of these products. It's pretty well known in Silicon Valley, at least in the circles that Openai sort of really wins in the consumer space, at least for now. Anthropic is really winning in the enterprise spend with developers who use it programmatically. Tim I'm really interested to go more on this close source versus open source, considering that the action plan really is leaning into this open moment. At the same time, people reading between the lines from matter's earnings, for example, and Mark Zuckerberg's put pitch that maybe because of safety they'll have to build more close rather than fully open as they had previously seem committed to. What does an enterprise need right now? Yeah. What really an enterprise needs is what's in these syntactical circles called the so-called ellipses of a product, the manageability of the product, the security, the observability, everything that sort of comes with being able to run that product. It's really hard to just take the weight of a model and just go run it. I couldn't, you know, put weight of the model, put it on a hard drive and just hand it to you and say, Hey, go run it. There's a lot of services and sort of software that has to stand up around it to be able to make it usable. And so that's really what you're seeing is is reaching for enterprise, closed for solutions that have programmatic access to these capabilities. And going back to anthropic numbers, leading enterprise data provider, 32% of the market. How early are we, though, in this rush on this commitment to money by companies into large language models? How much more is there to take? How quickly could we see the landscape shift? I think you're still seeing early days, the amount of spend that's going to you're going to see from model spend over over the next few years is going to continue to increase. In the report you saw just in the last six months, spend went from 3.5 billion to 8.4 billion, which is more than double again just in the last six months. So it's early days and I think the spend is going to continue to increase dramatically. So I've I've read through the report and I always look for data that kind of gives us the other side of the story. So you have all this enterprise revenue coming in anthropic, but what is that cost? OpEx cost compute cost on a per token basis, Like is that data that you track that tells us if these companies will ever be profitable? Yeah, that's not data that we put into the report, but Dario has been pretty open that he feels like the gross margins in the company are going to be respectable and increase over time. And I think what you're going to see is efficiency gains from the models and how they're used. You're going to see things like token caching really start to dominate how people use the models, and so they'll become more efficient over time and the cost of running them will sort of go down over time, I fully expect.
