Crackdown on social media ads promoting small boat crossings to the UK
An amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill – currently going through parliament – will introduce a new, UK-wide offence to criminalise the creation of material for publication online which promotes or offers services facilitating a breach of UK immigration law.
This could include small boat crossings, the creation of fake travel documents like passports or visas, or explicitly promising illegal working opportunities in the UK.
While facilitating illegal migration is already a crime, the government said the proposed changes would 'add another string to law enforcement's bow, better enabling them to disrupt the gangs while they are publicising people smuggling activities and provide an additional tool when building a case against those peddling this content'.
Approximately 80 per cent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials that they used social media during their illegal journey to the UK, including to locate or communicate with an agent or facilitator associated with an organised crime group, according to Home Office analysis.
Individuals caught by the offence could receive a prison sentence of up to five years and a fine.
It comes after the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 in record time, after some 898 people made the journey in 13 boats on Wednesday – the third highest daily number of crossings this year.
The home secretary said ministers are 'determined to do everything we can' to prevent people smuggling gangs from helping people to make the dangerous crossing.
'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country – whether on or offline – simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral', said Yvette Cooper.
'These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media.'
She added: 'We have to stay one step ahead of the ever-evolving tactics of people-smuggling gangs and this move, part of our Plan for Change to boost border security, will empower law enforcement to disable these tactics faster and more effectively, ensuring people face proper penalties.'
Rob Jones, director general of the National Crime Agency, said: 'We know many of the people-smuggling networks risking lives transporting people to the UK promote their services to migrants using social media.
'The majority of migrants arriving in the UK will have engaged with smugglers in this way. This is why we work with social media companies to target smugglers' accounts, and we've increased the pace of takedowns.'
In 2025 so far, 25,436 people have made the dangerous journey across the Channel – up 51 per cent on this point last year (16,842) and 73 per cent higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,732), according to PA news agency analysis.
It is the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018.
Last year, the figure was passed on 22 September, and in 2023, it was on 2 October.
With Nigel Farage's Reform UK surging in the polls, the figures come as a fresh blow to Sir Keir Starmer, whose pledge to tackle small boat crossings is a central pledge of his mission for government.
The high numbers of crossings come despite the prime minister announcing a major 'one in, one out' returns deal with France last month. While it is hoped the deal will bring the spiralling numbers under control, the crossings have so far continued at pace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
Starmer must find REAL ways to solve migrant crisis – not pathetic sticking plaster ‘solutions' voters will see through
THE Home Secretary's plans to fast-track the asylum appeals process are, on the face of it, a welcome development. Because asylum seekers awaiting the results of appeal are entitled to state support, including both a weekly allowance and accommodation in the infamous hotels, it means any delay in processing claims is a direct cost on the taxpayer. 4 Yet there are good reasons to doubt that it will provide anything more than a short-term palliative to a chronic, structural problem with the asylum regime – and perhaps not even that. One of the biggest challenges facing the Home Office has long been deporting people whose claims are rejected. Even if their country of origin is deemed 'predominantly safe', as Yvette Cooper put it, some governments make it very difficult to return their citizens. In other cases, deportation is made extremely difficult because asylum seekers often destroy their passports. Rejected asylum seekers have to be housed and supported by the state, just like those awaiting appeal. This creates a very obvious incentive for politicians to turn any fast-track scheme into a rubber-stamping exercise, 'clearing the backlog' by waving people into the country. It wouldn't be the first time politicians and campaigners have resorted to interpreting a problem over-literally in order to pretend to have solved it. Just a few months ago, the Labour Government proposed to fix the problem of putting asylum seekers up in hotels . . . by having the Home Office buy up private rented housing instead. Then there are those who suggest 'safe and legal routes' as a solution to Channel crossings — a proposal that hinges on the idea that the problem is people coming here in boats rather than their coming at all. If that were the case, we could simply stop searching the lorries at the Channel Tunnel! Moment bus full of asylum seekers are 'snuck into' 4-star London hotel under cover of darkness despite UK-wide protests I don't want to sound like a partisan Tory here. The previous government's efforts to tackle the crisis were in much the same spirit. Whatever the merits of the Rwanda scheme, it was never going to accommodate more than a small fraction of the volume of illegal arrivals (although it nonetheless did seem to have some impact on the number of people trying to cross). Left or Right, when it comes to illegal immigration the motto seems to be: 'look busy'. Ministers keep tinkering around the edges of the problem, but nobody seems willing to confront the deep, structural pull factors which make Britain such an attractive target for migrants. Some of these, such as our language being so widely spoken, cannot be helped. But others, especially our non-contributory welfare system and the ease with which people can work in the black economy, could be tackled. That, however, would require fundamental and far-reaching reform, not least of the welfare state. We could also legislate to make deportations easier. The Home Secretary has pledged to tighten the rules around 'exceptional circumstances', which is a good start. TIED IN KNOTS But the Government could go a lot further, in particular on restricting appeals under Article 8 of the ECHR — the ' right to family life ' — which underpins many of the most egregious decisions made by asylum tribunals. For all the debate around whether or not the UK should quit the European Convention on Human Rights, we don't actually need to. Under the British constitution, the ECHR only applies if given effect by domestic law, and Parliament can legislate as it pleases. Labour should know this well: it was none other than Tony Blair who defied Strasbourg to refuse prisoners the vote. Sir Keir Starmer is unlikely to be enthusiastic about such measures. Lord Hermer, his friend and hand-picked Attorney General, has written to ministers rejecting the very idea that Parliament could legislate in any way that breached international law. But the Prime Minister should learn from the fate of his predecessor. 4 Like Starmer, Rishi Sunak promised the nation he would stop the crossings. He and his team were also — again like Starmer — unwilling to change or challenge any of Britain's existing legal or treaty commitments. The result was that they tied themselves in knots trying to make the Rwanda scheme compliant with the ECHR, only to fail — and paid a historically heavy price at the ballot box the following year. Labour MPs are already worried the same fate may befall them. They are right to worry: while the Government's majority is huge, this is actually the most marginal parliament since 1945 in terms of seat majorities. It would not take a big shift in public opinion to unseat dozens, or even hundreds, of Labour MPs at the next election. So which is more important to Sir Keir: the future of his government or the good opinion of the Attorney General? For so long as Hermer remains in post, the odds of this Government finding a lasting solution to the crisis are very small indeed. MY Conservative Home colleague Tali Fraser opened our editorial meeting yesterday with the claim that 'too many HENRYs are leaving the UK'. Now I quite agree that you can never have enough of us, but this wasn't merely an effort to please the boss. 4 'HENRY' apparently stands for 'high net worth, not rich yet' (I wish) and according to new research by the Adam Smith Institute and Onward, this country is developing a serious problem persuading young, well-educated Brits that they have a future here. No fewer than 28 per cent of 18- to 30-year-olds are either actively planning a move overseas or seriously considering emigrating, according to the report The Prosperity Package. That's very bad news. At present, only about a third of British adults are net contributors to the Exchequer. If the next generation of high earners are driven off by stagnant wages and a sky-high cost of living, that will only deepen our dependence on immigration. It also raises important questions about our focus on 'net immigration'. Yes, subtracting emigration gives a better picture of the raw numbers being added to our population – but it has perhaps made us too complacent about who is leaving.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Swinney welcomes bringing Gaza children to UK but ‘regrets' it wasn't sooner
First Minister John Swinney has criticised the UK Government for not acting sooner to bring children from Gaza to the UK for medical treatment. Mr Swinney welcomed reported plans that up to 300 children could be flown from Gaza to be treated on the NHS. But he said he regretted the action did not come sooner. The SNP leader said he had written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on July 9 urging such action to be taken. He said: 'We have been consistently clear that the suffering being inflicted on the people of Gaza is beyond any justification. 'People in Gaza are being bombed and left to starve by Israel on a massive scale. 'I wrote to the Prime Minister on 9 July to request support from the UK Government in meeting the call from Unicef to provide medical care for children from Gaza. 'If the UK Government is prepared to evacuate Palestinians for medical treatment it would be entirely welcome. 'My only regret is the UK Government has taken this long to act. 'I urge the UK Government to do everything in its power to move swiftly so that lives can be saved. And Scotland will play our part.' The evacuation plans are reportedly set to be announced within weeks. A parent or guardian will accompany each child, as well as siblings if necessary, and the Home Office will carry out biometric and security checks before travel, the Sunday Times reported. This will happen 'in parallel' with an initiative by Project Pure Hope, a group set up to bring sick and injured Gazan children to the UK privately for treatment. More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. Sir Keir said last week that the UK was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.'
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Two more men charged over Epping migrant hotel disorder
Two men have been charged in connection with disorder outside a migrant hotel. It brings the total number of people charged by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) after protests in Epping, Essex, to 11. Charlie Land, 23, has been charged with violent disorder and criminal damage. Luke Fleming, 21, has been charged with violent disorder. Both will appear at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Monday. Nine others have already been charged by the CPS. Shaun Thompson, 37, is charged with violent disorder and criminal damage; Lee Gower, 43, is charged with violent disorder and assault on an emergency worker; Aaron Elles, 28, Jonathan Glover, 47, Stuart Williams, 36, and Dean Smith, 51, are charged with violent disorder; Keith Silk, 33, is charged with violent disorder and criminal damage; and Phillip Curson, 52, is charged with violent disorder. Martin Peagram, 33, has been found guilty of violent disorder. The charges came after weeks of protests outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, which is used to house asylum seekers. Demonstrations began on July 13 after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. Essex Police had recently put dispersal orders in place ahead of some protests, giving officers powers to direct anyone suspected of committing anti-social behaviour to leave the area. The force has also used Section 60AA orders to prevent people from wearing face coverings.
