
Relaxing the planning rules
Sir, – Planning rules are devised for safety and structural integrity and for ensuring a minimum quality of life for inhabitants. I am appalled at the suggested relaxation of rules for attics, extensions, garden cabins and division of houses.
The description 'race to the bottom' is the first that comes to mind, as, of course, renters will be the primary victims of these proposed changes.
Unscrupulous landlords all over the country must be licking their chops. Are we about to lose all sense of decency, justice and empathy for renters with this half-baked attempt to solve the housing crisis? – Yours, etc,
MARGARET FARRELL,
READ MORE
Rathfarnham,
Dublin.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
44 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on trade and tax: the rules-based system is breaking down
As a small country, Ireland is best served by a stable international economic backdrop and a rules-based system governing areas such as trade and taxation. Unfortunately, the key institutions overseeing the international economic system are now under heavy pressure, as Donald Trump pursues his nationalistic economic agenda. The most recent demonstration of this came in recent days as the other G7 countries acceded to a US demand to rewrite a part of the global corporate tax deal that took years to put together under the aegis of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). The entire deal is now weakened and may even crumble completely. The issue for the US was a part of the agreement which would have allowed other countries, including Ireland, to collect top-up tax from American multinationals who were judged not to have paid the minimum rate of 15 per cent elsewhere. Washington saw this as an infringement of US tax sovereignty. The same issue lies behind new trade tensions between the US and Canada, What is notable is that the G7 countries agreed to unpick the agreement to meet the US demands, as was announced on social media by US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The other 140 plus countries who negotiated and signed the agreement are yet to be consulted. The big players are calling the shots. READ MORE In return, the US administration is asking Congress to withdraw a part of the new budget bill which would have given the US the power to levy punitive taxes on investors and companies from countries who were judged to be treating US firms unfairly. As in the field of trade, US threats are being met by significant concessions. The OECD's status as a mediator of the corporate tax deal has been undermined and the future of the whole agreement is now in serious doubt. In the same way, the World Trade Organisation looks on powerlessly as the rules of international trade are torn up. In this context, the suggestion last week from Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, that the EU investigates a new regime with a group of Asian countries who are part of a trade bloc – which the UK has also joined – was ill-judged to say the least. This new dominance by the big players and the tearing up of existing rules is worrying for Ireland. The previous government had hoped that by signing up to the OECD tax deal the controversy over the Irish system would be put to bed and there would be no further demands for change. Now this is all back in the melting pot. Meanwhile, Ireland has thrived under the rules-based trade system which brings certainty to those exporting from this country, whether multinationals or domestic businesses. Ireland needs to stick close to the EU to make it case and hope that Europe can find its voice on these issues more effectively than it has to date.


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Report on Coalition plan to restrict social housing for migrants dismissed by campaigners
Campaigners have dismissed a report about a Government plan to clamp down on the provision of social housing to migrants, saying it is an attempt to solve a problem 'that does not exist'. The Sunday Times reported this weekend that the Coalition wants to limit access to social housing to people with strong and long-term connections to the Republic, with restrictions also coming in for emergency homeless accommodation. Focus Ireland director of advocacy and research Mike Allen said previous legislative forays into this area had been 'exposed as a poorly drafted response to a problem that does not exist'. 'Nobody believed that social housing should be allocated to people with no right to live in Ireland, but the Government was unable to give any evidence that it was happening and needed complex legislation to stop it,' he said. READ MORE Sunday's report outlined that after extensive legal advice, the Coalition was preparing to revisit proposals first made in a law early last year, but which were later dropped. Citing plans due to go to Cabinet in the next fortnight, the report suggested Ministers would be told the law is needed to eliminate ambiguity over existing rules for non-Irish nationals who want to apply for social housing. It said similar rules were planned for accessing emergency accommodation, with local authorities not required to assess households unless they are legally and habitually resident in the State. Mr Allen said the proposals to restrict the capacity of local authorities to provide emergency shelter on a short-term humanitarian basis would result in more people being forced to sleep on the streets. He said there will be 'inevitable consequences' for people's health and for public areas if such a condition were imposed. The Opposition also criticised the proposals, with Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin calling it a 'deeply disingenuous and dangerous briefing'. He said it sought to shift blame for the housing and homelessness crises on to migrant communities. The Dublin Mid-West TD said residency rules are already applied to social housing applications and when accessing emergency accommodation. He said his understanding was that the mooted Bill intends to put existing practice into primary legislation. He accused Minister for Housing James Browne of 'wasting his officials' time drafting a Bill that is not needed'. In a reply to a recent parliamentary question put down by Mr Ó Broin, Mr Browne outlined the conditions applied by local authorities when determining a 'local connection' as part of a social housing application. These include having lived in the area for five years at any time, being employed in the area or within 15km of it, being in full-time education or receiving specialist medical care there, or having a relative living in the area for two years or longer.

Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Teacher and SNA resign from Dublin school over alleged ‘harassment' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves
Two staff members at a primary school in Dublin resigned after claiming they were 'harassed and bullied' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves, T-shirts and a tattoo in support of Palestine . The man and woman, a teacher and a special needs assistant (SNA), expressed disappointment with the school's handling of the issue, claiming a small group of parents were 'allowed to harass and bully with impunity'. The pair said they handed in their resignation this month and are due to cease employment in August. They claimed they were asked to stop wearing keffiyeh scarves at work following complaints from parents who accused them of 'blatant anti-Semitism' and 'psychologically abusive behaviour'. One parent also allegedly complained about a T-shirt worn by the SNA that, the parent said, bore a 'watermelon covering the full state of Israel ' and about a tattoo on the male teacher's arm 'with the pre-1967 borders of my country, which is interpreted by many as a call for the annihilation of my people'. READ MORE In a complaint seen by The Irish Times, the parent claimed the SNA's T-shirt 'promotes the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel'. The teacher said he had been wearing a keffiyeh to work since he began teaching at the school in September. Following initial complaints over the scarf, he claimed, he was told to remove it while on school premises in a decision made by the school's board of management. Despite this, he said he continued to wear the keffiyeh and claimed his photo was subsequently taken on multiple occasions by a parent, which he described as 'extremely intimidating'. 'It's been so stressful and so deeply upsetting. We go home every day and we have a live-streamed genocide on our phones along with the fact that we were being harassed and bullied by this small group,' the teacher said. The SNA claimed that on one occasion earlier this month, a parent confronted her over the clothing while another 'shouted' at her in an encounter she described as 'intimidating and distressing'. 'I just couldn't continue to work there,' she said, adding that she raised a grievance with the school, though is 'incredibly disappointed' by the response. While saying staff should not be seen taking sides in times of war and conflict, she claimed, 'this isn't a war or a conflict, it's apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing, and if you're not taking a side, you have taken a side'. Both say they exhausted 'every avenue' with the school in an attempt to resolve the issue, including calls for a dress code, which they say is not currently in place. The issue was raised with Tánaiste Simon Harris in the Dáil on Thursday by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who claimed the staff members were 'pressured by school management' not to wear the keffiyeh scarves. 'When Russia invaded Ukraine, schools organised shows of solidarity with Ukraine. But when it comes to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, some teachers are being silenced, and their clothing choices are being policed,' he claimed. In response, the Tánaiste said: 'There should always be a very high bar before you interfere with anybody's clothing', adding that he would discuss the matter with the Minister for Education. In a statement, the school's board of management said it 'places the welfare and education of the children at the centre of all decisions'. 'As a diverse and equality-based school community, including children, families and staff from over 40 nationalities, the board is committed to ensuring that all actions taken are respectful, inclusive and welcoming to every child and family. 'The board will not be commenting on any individual staff matter, in line with its responsibilities as an employer,' it said.