Monmouthshire Upcycle celebrates ten years in Chepstow
The busy hub runs vans for free removals of unwanted household furniture and offers affordable moving services. The reuse facility transforms donated items such as furniture, appliances, books, and more, into affordable goods for the community. It reduces waste while providing employment and training opportunities for those in need of a new start, work experience or just people with time to spare who want to help build and help communities.
Speaking about the project's vision, founder Matt Jones said: 'We believe in second chances, not just for furniture, but for people and futures.'
Locals can donate unwanted items or purchase refurbished ones at a fraction of the original cost. From wardrobes and lamps to kitchen tables and baby goods, the selection is wide-ranging and constantly evolving. Delivery services make sustainable living even more accessible.
Mechanic led police on 'erratic' high-speed chase and stole petrol from garages
'Pioneering' charity founder steps down after more than 30 years of involvement
Beyond retail, Chepstow's upcycling efforts promote circular economy values. The project's expansion reflects growing demand and community support, proving that sustainability and compassion go hand in hand. As Matt puts it: 'The more money we make, the more people we can employ.'
Staff and volunteers are a vibrant, creative bunch. The on-site café hosts a Repair Café on the first Friday of each month, where locals bring broken items and volunteers help fix them, keeping goods out of landfill and building connections.
At the heart of the café is Natalia Lutiaenko, a Ukrainian refugee from Odessa who's been in the UK for three years. She's managed the café for 18 months and also works in a local school. With fellow Ukrainian Liliya Onopa, Natalia now serves traditional dishes like borscht, plov, varenyky, and holubtsi on-site. She jokes: 'All you need to know, pre-Google, is don't eat borscht while wearing a white top.'
She loves British humour—especially Philomena Cunk—and fondly recalls how warmly she and her children were welcomed by a British family and the happy way of life here.
Joining them is retired teacher and ceramicist Mariam Eastwood: 'I retired to become my late mother's carer. As a neurodiverse person, there was no pressure here—it was so welcoming. I was dealing with grief, and this place helped. After that, I was asked if I wanted a job'
What began in Chepstow has now grown into a cross-border concern, with outlets in Cwmbran, Cinderford, and Swindon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
8 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire Upcycle celebrates ten years in Chepstow
Chepstow is home to a vibrant upcycling initiative led by Monmouthshire Upcycle, a charitable project operated by the Forest Upcycling Project. Located at Station Yard Industrial Estate, next to the town's railway station, the site is an Aladdin's cave,not just of trinkets and bric-a-brac, but of solid furniture and practical goods. The busy hub runs vans for free removals of unwanted household furniture and offers affordable moving services. The reuse facility transforms donated items such as furniture, appliances, books, and more, into affordable goods for the community. It reduces waste while providing employment and training opportunities for those in need of a new start, work experience or just people with time to spare who want to help build and help communities. Speaking about the project's vision, founder Matt Jones said: 'We believe in second chances, not just for furniture, but for people and futures.' Locals can donate unwanted items or purchase refurbished ones at a fraction of the original cost. From wardrobes and lamps to kitchen tables and baby goods, the selection is wide-ranging and constantly evolving. Delivery services make sustainable living even more accessible. Mechanic led police on 'erratic' high-speed chase and stole petrol from garages 'Pioneering' charity founder steps down after more than 30 years of involvement Beyond retail, Chepstow's upcycling efforts promote circular economy values. The project's expansion reflects growing demand and community support, proving that sustainability and compassion go hand in hand. As Matt puts it: 'The more money we make, the more people we can employ.' Staff and volunteers are a vibrant, creative bunch. The on-site café hosts a Repair Café on the first Friday of each month, where locals bring broken items and volunteers help fix them, keeping goods out of landfill and building connections. At the heart of the café is Natalia Lutiaenko, a Ukrainian refugee from Odessa who's been in the UK for three years. She's managed the café for 18 months and also works in a local school. With fellow Ukrainian Liliya Onopa, Natalia now serves traditional dishes like borscht, plov, varenyky, and holubtsi on-site. She jokes: 'All you need to know, pre-Google, is don't eat borscht while wearing a white top.' She loves British humour—especially Philomena Cunk—and fondly recalls how warmly she and her children were welcomed by a British family and the happy way of life here. Joining them is retired teacher and ceramicist Mariam Eastwood: 'I retired to become my late mother's carer. As a neurodiverse person, there was no pressure here—it was so welcoming. I was dealing with grief, and this place helped. After that, I was asked if I wanted a job' What began in Chepstow has now grown into a cross-border concern, with outlets in Cwmbran, Cinderford, and Swindon.
The National
16 hours ago
- The National
UK politicians are in the pockets of the rich. Is that democracy?
At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, Keir Starmer responded to a question from Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay about growing calls to introduce a tax on wealth for the super-rich – those with assets above £10 million – by saying he wouldn't 'take advice' from the Greens, and insisting that 'we can't just tax our way to growth'. We can, it seems, cut our way to growth though, as long as it's those already at the greatest risk of poverty who'll bear the brunt. On Wednesday evening, 333 Labour MPs voted to cut disability benefits by £2 billion per year, halving the health element of universal credit for new claimants, and cutting it altogether for new claimants aged under 22. At a certain point, when the faces and the colour of the rosettes change but the glaring injustices remain the same, we have to ask ourselves why. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: Yui Mok) A common refrain among politicians is that right-wing policies that make life harder for social security claimants – or immigrants, or any other marginalised group – are popular. So popular that they have no choice but to implement them with gusto, because that's the will of the people, I guess. Meanwhile, I suppose we are to imagine that the average British voter is kept up at night worrying about the prospect of millionaires and billionaires being asked to pay more into our public services. As Tory leader Kemi Badenoch put it at PMQs, a wealth tax would be 'a tax on all of our constituents' savings, their houses, their pensions'. Who among us doesn't know and love someone with more than £10m in assets lying around? And surely we can all agree that they're the real victims? Back in the real world, a YouGov poll last week found that 75% of people in the UK would support introducing a wealth tax of 2% on wealth above £10m. Earlier this year, YouGov conducted another poll on behalf of Oxfam which found that 79% of over 16s in Scotland would rather the government tax the richest than make cuts to public spending. (Image: YouGov) And while it's true that some voters do believe that the welfare system is too generous, and the immigrants are draining the country of resources, it's important to remember that large sections of the British media, with their own vested interests, have spent not years but decades pushing precisely this narrative. It's disingenuous at best to persuade someone of something and then behave as though it was their idea all along. Alongside campaign groups Tax Justice UK and Patriotic Millionaires UK, Oxfam identified that the government could raise up to £24bn per year through a wealth tax which would apply to only 0.04% of the population. At the same time, charities and experts from across the UK and beyond – extending to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – have highlighted the damage that cuts to social security could cause to people's ability to make ends meet or simply live with dignity. So, if it's not the electorate telling politicians which policies to pursue, and it's not the data or the impassioned pleas of experts that persuade them, then what is it that drives them to make these decisions? READ MORE: Mark Brown: Why I plan to join Scotland's new radical left party Surely the answer is obvious by now. Time and again, right-wing and supposedly centrist politicians prove that nothing matters to them than the feelings of their rich donors and supporters – and nothing matters more to those wealthy individuals and large corporations than money. Successive governments' inaction on a range of urgent issues – from climate change, to energy prices, to raising taxes to fund crumbling public services – becomes far easier to understand once you realise that standing up to behemoth corporations and their numerous beneficiaries could cost these politicians dearly. If power for power's sake is the goal, if fuelling the party machine with big donations is a worthwhile end in and of itself, and if securing oneself a cushy position after – or perhaps during – your time in office is the ultimate prize, then making an enemy out of the 1% is a senseless endeavour. The dramatic decline in political party membership numbers over the past several decades mean that parties have become more and more reliant on a small pool of wealthy donors. Analysis by the Electoral Reform Society found that, during the 2024 election campaign, Labour received £6.7m from 'mega-donors', which made up 68.5% of their total donations up to polling day. This equates to 42 times the amount they took from the same type of donors during the 2019 election campaign. David Lammy secured a personal donor a job at the Foreign Office (Image: PA) When we ask ourselves how it is that the Labour Party have sold out on so many principles in such a short period of time, the answer is in the question. What chance does the average person – or community – stand to have their voice heard and acted upon by those in power while principles and policies are being sold to the highest bidder? Just last week, it was revealed by the Democracy for Sale substack that Foreign Secretary David Lammy gave a taxpayer-funded job in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to the former UK president of multinational PR company WPP after she donated £5000 to his office ahead of the election. This is only the latest in a series of jobs for donors that Labour have been scrutinised over. Under the ideal of democracy which we are encouraged to believe the UK represents, every eligible voter should have an equal say in elections and, by extension, an equal opportunity to have a say in the decisions the elected parliament makes. How far must our political leaders stray from this principle before we recognise that we are no longer ruled by democracy but plutocracy: a society controlled by people with great wealth or income? Consider that the UK's 50 richest families hold more wealth than 50% of the population, according to analysis from the Equality Trust. And while the top 20% hold 63% of the UK's wealth, the bottom fifth have only 0.5% of the wealth. READ MORE: The best way to defeat Reform UK? Expose the gaping holes in their politics Polls might show that the vast majority of the British public want to see the wealthy taxed more, but to imagine that this information would seize the Prime Minister with an urgency to act would be to believe that all views, experiences, voices or lives are equal. You only need to look at how this government – the progressive alternative to the old government – treats the most vulnerable to know that isn't true, not under this system. As long as money talks and those without are silenced, most of us will be out here screaming into the void. In case that seems too bleak a note to end on, a reminder: it doesn't have to be this way. Just look at the growing fervency with which the Tories and now Labour have sought to quash dissent through the criminalisation of peaceful protest, and the proscription of activist groups they don't like as terrorists. Even the frantic efforts of the Government to censor a rap group, Kneecap, over political statements is revealing. These are the actions of power under threat. They are terrified of ordinary people speaking their minds and telling them in no uncertain terms that enough is enough. That, alone, should act as motivation to keep doing just that.
Scottish Sun
21 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Huge percentage of BBC staff in top-paying jobs that were privately educated revealed
News will increase claims of elitism at the broadcaster BEEB PAY ROW Huge percentage of BBC staff in top-paying jobs that were privately educated revealed Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE percentage of privately educated BBC staff is four times higher in top-paying jobs than in the lowest salary bracket, its own figures reveal. The news will increase claims of elitism at the broadcaster. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up Only seven per cent of Brits have a private education, but 32 per cent of BBC roles with a salary of £150,000 or more are occupied by those who do. And just 6.8 per cent of jobs there with pay of under £30,000 are taken by the privately educated. Social mobility expert Prof Lee Elliot Major said: 'The BBC's disproportionate representation of privately educated individuals in its highest-paying roles starkly illustrates the persistent class barriers in British society. 'The BBC was founded to serve the whole nation — yet we have a public institution that looks and sounds out of step with the lives of the people it is intended to serve and represent. 'It isn't healthy when the most powerful roles come from the same small slice of society. "It means news organisations are fishing in a narrow talent pool, missing out on the perspectives of people from different backgrounds.' The BBC said: 'We're doing more than ever to bring people to the BBC from all backgrounds.' In 2023, an Ofcom report said low-income audiences found the Beeb too 'politically correct'. Breakfast legend returns to BBC daytime for the first time four years after quitting sofa
