logo
The Grim Lessons of Guadalcanal: Why Japan Lost Its First Major Battle

The Grim Lessons of Guadalcanal: Why Japan Lost Its First Major Battle

Japan Forward2 days ago

このページを 日本語 で読む
In 1942, a battle took place between Japanese and American forces on Guadalcanal Island — known in Japan as "Gato"— in the Solomon Islands. It marked the first major retreat by Japan during the Greater East Asian War.
Widely seen as a turning point in the conflict, the campaign resulted in over 20,000 Japanese deaths. Roughly 70% of these were caused by starvation and disease following the collapse of supply lines. The island earned the grim nickname "Starvation Island."
Japan's loss of sea and air superiority played a critical role in the battle. But the decisive factor in its defeat was the lack of coordination between the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy. Both operated under separate commands and often pursued conflicting strategies.
Guadalcanal sits along a vital strategic line linking the United States and Australia. Roughly 1,000 kilometers from both Japan's logistics hub in Rabaul and the US base on Espiritu Santo, the island was of critical importance to both sides in the Pacific theater.
In July 1942, the Imperial Japanese Navy began constructing an airfield on Guadalcanal. Their aim was to disrupt US-Australia coordination and establish a forward operating base. But on August 7, over 10,000 US Marines landed and seized the airfield.
In response, the Imperial General Headquarters ordered a joint counteroffensive by the Army (General Staff Office) and Navy (Naval General Staff). Although the two services agreed to cooperate, they maintained separate chains of command, an arrangement that would prove costly.
At the outset, the Imperial General Headquarters severely underestimated the strength of American forces. It dispatched the lightly equipped Ichiki Detachment, just 900 Army troops. Overwhelming US firepower decimated the unit upon arrival.
Subsequent reinforcements, including the Kawaguchi Detachment, the 2nd Division, and the 38th Division, were likewise repelled in succession.
A key factor behind these repeated failures was the collapse of Japan's supply lines. US forces systematically sank transport ships departing from Rabaul, leaving Japanese troops on Guadalcanal without adequate weapons, food, or medical supplies.
"Japan failed to coordinate strategy between the Army and Navy," says Lieutenant Colonel Tatsushi Saito (60) of the National Institute for Defense Studies. "As a result, it couldn't concentrate its combat power," he adds, highlighting the deep communication breakdown between the two services. Lieutenant Colonel Tatsushi Saito of the National Institute for Defense Studies
The Army believed that "securing logistics and transporting supplies to the units was a prerequisite for capturing the airfield." Meanwhile, the Navy insisted that "capturing the airfield must come first in order to enable transportation." Within the Combined Fleet, some even argued that attacking the main US fleet was the true priority, and that escorting transport ships fell outside the Navy's proper role.
The Guadalcanal campaign proceeded without ever reconciling these conflicting views. It was an internal contradiction that would prove disastrous.
By contrast, the US military carried out a fully integrated joint operation in the South Pacific. In addition to leading the campaign, the Navy exercised command over both Marine and Army units. American forces initially faced severe supply shortages, at one point even considering abandoning the island.
However, Admiral Chester Nimitz, Supreme Commander in the Pacific, replaced the pessimistic theater commander with Vice Admiral William Halsey. Under Halsey's leadership, the US Navy launched aggressive operations and, aided by superior codebreaking and radar technology, secured control of both the seas and skies.
"Setting clear objectives and concentrating forces is a basic tenet of military strategy," notes Saito. The Battle of Guadalcanal exposed critical flaws in Japan's organizational command and inter-service coordination.
More than 80 years later, amid rising concerns over a potential Taiwan contingency, reports are that China is closely studying these very lessons.
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill made clear during the 1944 Normandy landings that the Navy's mission was to ensure the Army could safely cross the straits. It was also directed to support their landing by all available means and guarantee the timely arrival of reinforcements and supplies, regardless of dangers from the enemy or the sea.
The same principle should have applied to the Imperial Japanese Navy. But in the Guadalcanal campaign, it failed to fulfill this vital role.
Telling statistics from both the Japanese and American sides highlight the disparity in naval effectiveness during the Guadalcanal campaign. Between August and November 1942, Japanese submarines sank six transport ships while American submarines sank a staggering 62. This tenfold difference underscores how aggressively the US targeted Japan's supply lines and how poorly the Imperial Japanese Navy defended them.
In response, Japan resorted to using destroyers, designed for combat, not transport, to ferry supplies under the cover of night. The tactic became known as "Rat Transportation" ( nezumi yuso ), likened to rats stealthily bringing food back to their nest. But the ships' limited capacity meant only small amounts could be delivered at a time. Even when landings succeeded, American air attacks often destroyed the supplies before they could reach frontline troops.
One record grimly notes: "Due to insufficient transport capacity […] there were frequent cases of going several days without food […] In mid-December, when landing supplies became particularly difficult, there were periods of starvation lasting five days to a full week."
A supply document titled Record of Provisions Unloaded and Delivered on 'G' Island vividly illustrates the desperation on the ground. Japanese troops, isolated in the jungle, endured severe hunger, and their combat effectiveness deteriorated rapidly.
By November 1942, discussions of withdrawal had quietly begun within the Imperial General Headquarters. Yet no one dared raise the issue formally, as doing so would amount to admitting the operation had failed. It wasn't until December 26 that the Army officially requested a withdrawal to the Navy. The decision was finally approved at an Imperial Conference held on December 31.
On January 4, 1943, the Imperial General Headquarters issued Operation "Ke," a withdrawal plan that was executed in early February after a period of preparation. Nearly three months had passed since the idea of pulling out was first raised.
Of the roughly 30,000 Japanese troops who had landed on Guadalcanal, more than 20,000 perished. An estimated 5,000 to 6,000 were killed in combat, while the remaining 15,000 died from starvation and disease.
Saito criticizes the delayed withdrawal, noting that decisive action by field commanders was almost nonexistent in the Japanese military. Decisions, he explains, were made bureaucratically by the Imperial General Headquarters, with no clear sense of accountability.
"The key," he says, "is acting before troops become a lost cause. Timing is crucial if they are to be preserved as an effective fighting force. That's what a real military organization should understand."
"Why did they have to die in such a distant place?" That question struck this writer with force eleven years ago on Guadalcanal Island, some 5,600 kilometers south of Japan. As I walked the jungle paths once trodden by Japanese soldiers struggling to retake the airfield, the weight of that thought only deepened.
Despite being called an island, Guadalcanal is vast, about the size of Chiba Prefecture. Its terrain is cloaked in dense jungle, dim even in daylight, and heavy with suffocating humidity. A former soldier who joined the visit recalled, "Back then, we didn't even have maps. We had to hack our way forward with nothing but a compass."
Japan's wartime expansion extended not only southward, but also west to Burma (now Myanmar) and north to the Aleutian Islands. The Guadalcanal campaign was largely initiated at the urging of the Imperial Navy. Having constructed an airfield on the island, it used Rabaul as a forward base to protect Truk Island, the Combined Fleet's main stronghold.
The Army's decision to commit forces simultaneously to New Guinea and Guadalcanal revealed a troubling lack of strategic focus. Yet the Navy was equally adrift. Many of the same senior commanders who had played roles in the Nomonhan Incident, the outbreak of war with the US, and ultimately Japan's defeat reappeared in the Guadalcanal campaign. Despite repeated failures, they continued to be entrusted with key decisions.
More than 80 years later, deep within the jungles of Guadalcanal, the remains of the soldiers who died there still lie where they fell — unrecovered, and unreconciled with history.
Author: Shoko Ikeda, The Sankei Shimbun
このページを 日本語 で読む

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HII Christens Guided Missile Destroyer Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129)
HII Christens Guided Missile Destroyer Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129)

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

HII Christens Guided Missile Destroyer Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129)

PASCAGOULA, Miss., June 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- HII (NYSE: HII) christened today the future USS Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129), the third Flight III Arleigh Burke -class destroyer to be built at the company's Ingalls Shipbuilding division. The ship's name honors former U.S. Sen. Jeremiah Denton Jr., a Vietnam War veteran who was awarded the Navy Cross for his heroism as a prisoner of war. Denton spent 34 years as a naval aviator, including eight years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. He is known for his act of genius during a televised broadcast in captivity, when Denton spelled out the word 'torture' through Morse code using his eyes to blink the code. Following his Navy career, Denton was elected to the U.S. Senate representing his home state of Alabama in 1980. 'Today, we honor the skilled work of our Ingalls shipbuilders and the enduring spirit of Adm. Jeremiah Denton, a man who, under unimaginable pressure, exemplified strength, sacrifice, leadership and resilience,' Ingalls Shipbuilding President Brian Blanchette said. 'When we christen a ship, we celebrate a joint mission with our Navy industry partners, one that connects the work we do here in Pascagoula to the safety and security of our nation and the free world.' Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research Development and Acquisition Brett Seidle was the keynote speaker. He highlighted the importance of naval ships, the legacy of the ship's namesake, and recognized the shipbuilding workforce as a vital national asset. Photos accompanying this release are available at: 'Today we christen not just a ship, but we make a statement — a powerful steel forged testament to America resolve,' Seidle said. 'The future USS Jeremiah Denton will sail as a reminder to the world, much like her namesake, the United States does not back down. The United States does not break and we do not forget our heroes. That is the legacy that this warship carriers forward.' The ship's co-sponsors and daughters of the namesake, Madeleine Denton Doak and Mary Denton Lewis, performed the traditional bottle-breaking ceremony against the bow to formally christen the ship. Madeline represented the family by providing remarks and paying tribute to her late father and mother who were Alabama natives. 'This magnificent ship was built by their neighbors (Mississippi), men and women who understand their skills, hard work and precise attention to detail that are vital in keeping our world safe.' Flight III Arleigh Burke -class destroyers represent the next generation of surface combatants and incorporate a number of design modifications that collectively provide significantly enhanced capability. Upgrades include the AN/SPY-6(V)1 Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) and the Aegis Baseline 10 Combat System required to keep pace with the threats well into the 21 st century. Ingalls has delivered 35 Arleigh Burke -class destroyers to the U.S. Navy including the first Flight III, USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125), in June of 2023. In addition, Ingalls Shipbuilding has five Flight IIIs currently under construction including Ted Stevens (DDG 128), Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129), George M. Neal (DDG 131), Sam Nunn (DDG 133) and Thad Cochran (DDG 135). Video of the ceremony, along with additional information on DDG 129, and the Arleigh Burke -class program, can be found at Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129) Christening - HII. About HII HII is a global, all-domain defense provider. HII's mission is to deliver the world's most powerful ships and all-domain solutions in service of the nation, creating the advantage for our customers to protect peace and freedom around the world. As the nation's largest military shipbuilder, and with a more than 135-year history of advancing U.S. national security, HII delivers critical capabilities extending from ships to unmanned systems, cyber, ISR, AI/ML and synthetic training. Headquartered in Virginia, HII's workforce is 44,000 strong. For more information, visit: HII Contact: 228-355-5663

The Grim Lessons of Guadalcanal: Why Japan Lost Its First Major Battle
The Grim Lessons of Guadalcanal: Why Japan Lost Its First Major Battle

Japan Forward

time2 days ago

  • Japan Forward

The Grim Lessons of Guadalcanal: Why Japan Lost Its First Major Battle

このページを 日本語 で読む In 1942, a battle took place between Japanese and American forces on Guadalcanal Island — known in Japan as "Gato"— in the Solomon Islands. It marked the first major retreat by Japan during the Greater East Asian War. Widely seen as a turning point in the conflict, the campaign resulted in over 20,000 Japanese deaths. Roughly 70% of these were caused by starvation and disease following the collapse of supply lines. The island earned the grim nickname "Starvation Island." Japan's loss of sea and air superiority played a critical role in the battle. But the decisive factor in its defeat was the lack of coordination between the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy. Both operated under separate commands and often pursued conflicting strategies. Guadalcanal sits along a vital strategic line linking the United States and Australia. Roughly 1,000 kilometers from both Japan's logistics hub in Rabaul and the US base on Espiritu Santo, the island was of critical importance to both sides in the Pacific theater. In July 1942, the Imperial Japanese Navy began constructing an airfield on Guadalcanal. Their aim was to disrupt US-Australia coordination and establish a forward operating base. But on August 7, over 10,000 US Marines landed and seized the airfield. In response, the Imperial General Headquarters ordered a joint counteroffensive by the Army (General Staff Office) and Navy (Naval General Staff). Although the two services agreed to cooperate, they maintained separate chains of command, an arrangement that would prove costly. At the outset, the Imperial General Headquarters severely underestimated the strength of American forces. It dispatched the lightly equipped Ichiki Detachment, just 900 Army troops. Overwhelming US firepower decimated the unit upon arrival. Subsequent reinforcements, including the Kawaguchi Detachment, the 2nd Division, and the 38th Division, were likewise repelled in succession. A key factor behind these repeated failures was the collapse of Japan's supply lines. US forces systematically sank transport ships departing from Rabaul, leaving Japanese troops on Guadalcanal without adequate weapons, food, or medical supplies. "Japan failed to coordinate strategy between the Army and Navy," says Lieutenant Colonel Tatsushi Saito (60) of the National Institute for Defense Studies. "As a result, it couldn't concentrate its combat power," he adds, highlighting the deep communication breakdown between the two services. Lieutenant Colonel Tatsushi Saito of the National Institute for Defense Studies The Army believed that "securing logistics and transporting supplies to the units was a prerequisite for capturing the airfield." Meanwhile, the Navy insisted that "capturing the airfield must come first in order to enable transportation." Within the Combined Fleet, some even argued that attacking the main US fleet was the true priority, and that escorting transport ships fell outside the Navy's proper role. The Guadalcanal campaign proceeded without ever reconciling these conflicting views. It was an internal contradiction that would prove disastrous. By contrast, the US military carried out a fully integrated joint operation in the South Pacific. In addition to leading the campaign, the Navy exercised command over both Marine and Army units. American forces initially faced severe supply shortages, at one point even considering abandoning the island. However, Admiral Chester Nimitz, Supreme Commander in the Pacific, replaced the pessimistic theater commander with Vice Admiral William Halsey. Under Halsey's leadership, the US Navy launched aggressive operations and, aided by superior codebreaking and radar technology, secured control of both the seas and skies. "Setting clear objectives and concentrating forces is a basic tenet of military strategy," notes Saito. The Battle of Guadalcanal exposed critical flaws in Japan's organizational command and inter-service coordination. More than 80 years later, amid rising concerns over a potential Taiwan contingency, reports are that China is closely studying these very lessons. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill made clear during the 1944 Normandy landings that the Navy's mission was to ensure the Army could safely cross the straits. It was also directed to support their landing by all available means and guarantee the timely arrival of reinforcements and supplies, regardless of dangers from the enemy or the sea. The same principle should have applied to the Imperial Japanese Navy. But in the Guadalcanal campaign, it failed to fulfill this vital role. Telling statistics from both the Japanese and American sides highlight the disparity in naval effectiveness during the Guadalcanal campaign. Between August and November 1942, Japanese submarines sank six transport ships while American submarines sank a staggering 62. This tenfold difference underscores how aggressively the US targeted Japan's supply lines and how poorly the Imperial Japanese Navy defended them. In response, Japan resorted to using destroyers, designed for combat, not transport, to ferry supplies under the cover of night. The tactic became known as "Rat Transportation" ( nezumi yuso ), likened to rats stealthily bringing food back to their nest. But the ships' limited capacity meant only small amounts could be delivered at a time. Even when landings succeeded, American air attacks often destroyed the supplies before they could reach frontline troops. One record grimly notes: "Due to insufficient transport capacity […] there were frequent cases of going several days without food […] In mid-December, when landing supplies became particularly difficult, there were periods of starvation lasting five days to a full week." A supply document titled Record of Provisions Unloaded and Delivered on 'G' Island vividly illustrates the desperation on the ground. Japanese troops, isolated in the jungle, endured severe hunger, and their combat effectiveness deteriorated rapidly. By November 1942, discussions of withdrawal had quietly begun within the Imperial General Headquarters. Yet no one dared raise the issue formally, as doing so would amount to admitting the operation had failed. It wasn't until December 26 that the Army officially requested a withdrawal to the Navy. The decision was finally approved at an Imperial Conference held on December 31. On January 4, 1943, the Imperial General Headquarters issued Operation "Ke," a withdrawal plan that was executed in early February after a period of preparation. Nearly three months had passed since the idea of pulling out was first raised. Of the roughly 30,000 Japanese troops who had landed on Guadalcanal, more than 20,000 perished. An estimated 5,000 to 6,000 were killed in combat, while the remaining 15,000 died from starvation and disease. Saito criticizes the delayed withdrawal, noting that decisive action by field commanders was almost nonexistent in the Japanese military. Decisions, he explains, were made bureaucratically by the Imperial General Headquarters, with no clear sense of accountability. "The key," he says, "is acting before troops become a lost cause. Timing is crucial if they are to be preserved as an effective fighting force. That's what a real military organization should understand." "Why did they have to die in such a distant place?" That question struck this writer with force eleven years ago on Guadalcanal Island, some 5,600 kilometers south of Japan. As I walked the jungle paths once trodden by Japanese soldiers struggling to retake the airfield, the weight of that thought only deepened. Despite being called an island, Guadalcanal is vast, about the size of Chiba Prefecture. Its terrain is cloaked in dense jungle, dim even in daylight, and heavy with suffocating humidity. A former soldier who joined the visit recalled, "Back then, we didn't even have maps. We had to hack our way forward with nothing but a compass." Japan's wartime expansion extended not only southward, but also west to Burma (now Myanmar) and north to the Aleutian Islands. The Guadalcanal campaign was largely initiated at the urging of the Imperial Navy. Having constructed an airfield on the island, it used Rabaul as a forward base to protect Truk Island, the Combined Fleet's main stronghold. The Army's decision to commit forces simultaneously to New Guinea and Guadalcanal revealed a troubling lack of strategic focus. Yet the Navy was equally adrift. Many of the same senior commanders who had played roles in the Nomonhan Incident, the outbreak of war with the US, and ultimately Japan's defeat reappeared in the Guadalcanal campaign. Despite repeated failures, they continued to be entrusted with key decisions. More than 80 years later, deep within the jungles of Guadalcanal, the remains of the soldiers who died there still lie where they fell — unrecovered, and unreconciled with history. Author: Shoko Ikeda, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む

Squeal on them: Wild super-porkers on the loose spark public awareness campaign
Squeal on them: Wild super-porkers on the loose spark public awareness campaign

Vancouver Sun

time3 days ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Squeal on them: Wild super-porkers on the loose spark public awareness campaign

The question posed by rural Canadians (probably): what do you do about the 30 to 50 feral hogs that run into your yard within three to five minutes while your small kids play? Answer: You squeal on 'em . The Invasive Species Council of B.C. is launching its contribution of a cross-border public awareness campaign on Wednesday, highlighting the real damage that invasive feral pigs cause to ecosystems, farmland and infrastructure. They tear up the ground while searching for roots and bugs to eat, though they will eat just about anything they can get in their mouths. The humorous campaign features pigs in places they shouldn't be — grocery stores, tractors and kitchen cupboards — but underscores its serious message: invasive pigs are a real threat. Wild swine have been a problem in Canada and the U.S. for years, including American fears of Canadian 'Super Pigs' flying south across the border from Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba and running rampant in rural states. '30-50 feral hogs' day is one of the great days in the history of Twitter. With sows capable of having two litters a year, averaging six piglets a litter, they're capable of explosive population growth. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'We've seen the damage invasive pigs can cause in other provinces, and we have a real opportunity in B.C. to prevent that from happening here,' said Gail Wallin, executive director of the Invasive Species Council of B.C. 'That's why we've launched this campaign — to raise awareness and remind people that their observations matter. Whether you're on the land every day or out for a weekend hike, early reporting of pigs on the land makes all the difference.' It's not just the physical damage that is of concern. Should a disease like African swine fever ever reach the Canadian wild population, the feral population could act as a reservoir and make future outbreaks difficult to contain. That could devastate Canadian pork farm stock. B.C. law requires all farm pigs to be securely fenced. Pigs aren't native to North America, but were introduced from Europe, Asia and North Africa for farming, hunting and as pets. The porkers who went on the lam crossbred with wild boars, with their hybrids — which can range from 75 to 250 pounds — becoming Canada's most destructive large mammal. The problem has been around for decades, when farmers used to raise wild boar. But when the market dried up, many stocks were just set free to roam the country, surprisingly proving resistant to harsh Canadian winters. Watch for their tracks and signs of wallows — large, shallow muddy pits — which they use to cool down in and protect their skin. Use the Invasive Species Council of B.C. website or call their toll-free number 1-888-933-3722 to make a report. Invasive pigs have been seen across B.C., but especially in the Peace River region, east Chilcotin and west of Kamloops.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store