Asteroid 2003 MH4, Flying At 14 Kilometres Per Second, Will Miss Earth By This Much On May 24
According to NASA, the asteroid will come within 6.68 million kilometres of Earth, which the space agency says is a close shave.
An asteroid nearly the size of three football fields is heading toward Earth for what astronomers are calling a 'close approach", prompting heightened surveillance by NASA's planetary defence teams. Named Asteroid 2003 MH4, this 335-metre-wide object is set to pass near Earth on May 24, 2025, travelling at a blistering speed of 14 kilometres per second – fast enough to cover the distance between Delhi and Mumbai in under a minute.
According to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the asteroid will come within 6.68 million kilometres of Earth. While that might sound comfortably distant in everyday terms, in the vast realm of space, it's a narrow miss. NASA classifies any object over 150 metres wide and approaching within 7.5 million kilometres as a 'Potentially Hazardous Asteroid". 2003 MH4 meets both criteria, making it a serious subject of scrutiny by scientists at the Centre for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS).
This massive space rock is part of the Apollo group, a class of Earth-crossing asteroids named after the first of their kind discovered in 1932. With over 21,000 known members, the Apollo group includes numerous objects whose orbital paths intersect with Earth's, occasionally raising alarms about future impacts. NASA continues to track these celestial wanderers using a combination of ground-based telescopes and sophisticated computer models.
Although there is no imminent danger of 2003 MH4 striking Earth during this flyby, experts remain cautious. Its orbit, combined with its considerable size, warrants close monitoring. Scientists note that the asteroid completes a full orbit around the Sun every 410 days, increasing the chances of future close encounters. Should its trajectory shift – even slightly due to gravitational interactions or other factors – future flybys could pose a greater risk.
This isn't the only asteroid keeping scientists on their toes. Asteroid Apophis, once feared to impact Earth in 2029, has since been cleared of that risk after extensive observation. Meanwhile, other near-Earth objects like 2024 YR4 and 2025 FA22 remain under close study. Particularly, 2025 FA22 is expected to come uncomfortably close in the year 2089, though current models estimate the probability of collision at a mere 0.01%.
As May 24 approaches, scientists around the world will be watching 2003 MH4 closely; not because it poses an immediate threat, but because it reminds us of the precarious cosmic neighbourhood we inhabit.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
May 19, 2025, 15:05 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk wants to shut down the International Space Station for which Donald Trump just sanctioned $1.25 billion; says time to focus on ...
The world's richest man and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has triggered a debate by urging the retirement of the International Space Station (ISS), calling it a relic that's holding back humanity's cosmic ambitions. On July 3, Elon Musk took to Twitter to repost a summary of space-related funding in President Donald Trump's latest tax bill, which allocates $1.25 billion to sustain the ISS through 2030. Musk's blunt response: 'It's time to retire the Space Station and focus on Mars'. Musk's post sparked a heated online debate, with supporters cheering his bold vision and critics defending the ISS as a cornerstone of global scientific collaboration. The ISS, said to be a marvel of engineering orbiting 250 miles above Earth, has been a hub for groundbreaking research since its first module launched in 1998. But at over two decades old, the station is showing its age. NASA has acknowledged that critical systems, including life support and structural components, are nearing the end of their operational life. The tax bill also includes $325 million to fund a safe deorbit process by 2030, signaling that the station's days are numbered. Last year, NASA awarded SpaceX an $843 million contract to build a U.S. Deorbit Vehicle to guide the ISS to a controlled reentry, ensuring it burns up safely over a remote part of the Pacific Ocean. Why Elon Musk wants ISS deorbited Elon Musk argues that the ISS's mounting maintenance costs -- estimated at $3-4 billion annually -- are a drain on resources that could be better spent on humanity's next frontier: Mars. 'The ISS was a great achievement, but it's a 20th-century project,' Musk said in a follow-up post on Twitter. 'If we want to become a multi-planetary species, we need to stop tinkering with old hardware and go all-in on Mars.' His vision for a self-sustaining Martian colony has been a cornerstone of SpaceX's mission since its founding in 2002, with the company's Starship rocket designed to carry crews and cargo to the Red Planet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo What supporters of International Space Station say Critics, however, argue that Musk's push to abandon the ISS overlooks its ongoing contributions. The station hosts experiments in microgravity that have advanced medical research, materials science, and our understanding of long-term space habitation -- knowledge critical for Mars missions. 'The ISS isn't just a lab; it's a symbol of what nations can achieve together,' said Dr. Ellen Stofan, former NASA chief scientist, in a statement to Reuters. 'Dismissing it prematurely risks losing that momentum.' The ISS is a joint effort of the United States, Russia, Europe, Japan, and Canada, and its cooperative framework has weathered geopolitical tensions, including recent strains with Russia over Ukraine. Elon Musk's 'time to retire ISS' divides the internet Public reaction on Twitter too reflect the divide. 'Musk is right—ISS is a money pit. Mars is the future,' posted user @SpacePioneer2030, echoing sentiments from those who see the station as outdated. Others, like @AstroGeek42, countered: 'The ISS still delivers science you can't get anywhere else. Why ditch it before we're ready?' The debate underscores a broader tension in space policy: balancing immediate scientific gains with long-term exploration goals. NASA's current plan keeps the ISS operational until 2030, with private space stations like Axiom Space's proposed orbital habitat expected to fill the gap. But Musk's comments suggest he'd rather see that transition happen sooner. SpaceX, which already ferries astronauts and supplies to the ISS, is positioned to play a key role in both the station's end and the next chapter of space exploration. The company's reusable rockets have slashed launch costs, making ambitious projects like Mars missions more feasible. The tax bill's funding for the ISS and its deorbit underscores a pragmatic reality: the station's end is inevitable. Yet Musk's call to shift focus to Mars raises questions about priorities in an era of constrained budgets and competing global challenges. As one senior NASA official, speaking anonymously, told The Washington Post, 'Elon's not wrong that Mars is the big goal, but the ISS is still teaching us how to get there. It's not an either-or situation—yet."
Indian Express
11 hours ago
- Indian Express
Life on Mars? Thick clay layers on red planet might hold the answer
The possibility of life on Mars is something scientists and astronomers have been trying to figure out for decades. With rapid advancements in science in the last century, scientists have stumbled across various clues as to how and where life could be hidden on the red planet. While meteorites, liquid water and water ice at the planet's poles have hinted that the planet may once have been ideal for life, new research suggests that the thick, mineral-rich layers of clay were ideal for life to survive for a long time. These layers, which are said to have formed about 3.7 billion years ago, had warmer and wetter conditions than the rest of the planet. Researchers say they analysed 150 clay deposits using NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and analysed their shape and locations to see how they resembled ancient lakes and rivers on the planet. In a statement to Rhianna Moore, a researcher and postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas' Jackson School of Geosciences, said, 'These areas have a lot of water but not a lot of topographic uplift, so they're very stable. If you have a stable terrain, you're not messing up your potentially habitable environments.' For those wondering, deposits like these on Earth can be found in certain landscapes and climatic conditions. Researchers say they noticed that most of the clay layers were formed in low areas near ancient lakes, but they weren't close to the valleys where water once flowed. In a new study published in the journal Nature Astronomy, scientists say these clay minerals were found in areas where chemical weathering was favoured over physical erosion.' Since tectonic activity is pretty much non-existent on Mars, CO2 released by volcanoes on Mars likely stayed in the planet's atmosphere for a long time, making it warmer and wetter. This may have also contributed to the formation of the clay layers. Speculation also has it that the clay absorbed water and captured chemical byproducts like cations, which prevented them from reacting with the rocks surrounding them. However, it is still unclear how the planet's topography and climate affected the formation of these clay layers.
News18
12 hours ago
- News18
From Beef Paste To Gajar Ka Halwa, How Do Astronauts Eat in Zero Gravity? Explained
Last Updated: Freeze-dried foods first made their way into space during NASA's Gemini Program, designed to sustain astronauts on missions lasting up to two weeks Imagine a bowl of your favourite warm soup. Now imagine it floating upside down as you struggle to get a mouthful. For astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS), this is how every meal is—a delicate dance of science, engineering, and appetite. From vacuum-sealed tacos to rehydrated scrambled eggs, eating in space is less about fine dining and more about surviving in zero gravity—without letting your lunch float away. But how exactly do astronauts fill their stomachs hundreds of kilometres above Earth? Let's start with the history of eating in space. According to NASA, on April 12, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri A Gagarin also became the first person to eat in space, 'squeezing beef and liver paste from an aluminum tube into his mouth. For dessert he had a chocolate sauce, eating it using the same method". Astronaut John H Glenn became the first American to eat in space as he relished apple sauce from a toothpaste-like tube. His fellow Mercury astronauts on slightly longer missions consumed other food items also from tubes. Freeze-dried foods first made their way into space during NASA's Gemini Program, designed to sustain astronauts on missions lasting up to two weeks. To eat, crewmembers would inject water from the spacecraft's supply into the food packets to rehydrate them. By the time of the Apollo missions to the Moon, the menu had expanded to around 70 items, ranging from main courses to condiments and drinks—all still freeze-dried and sealed in pre-packaged containers. As the Apollo programme progressed, enhancements were introduced, such as the option to use hot water for rehydration and food pouches that allowed astronauts to eat with a spoon, making meals slightly more familiar. While sandwiches were tested, they quickly proved problematic: the bread spoiled easily and crumbs floated freely in the cabin, posing risks to equipment and even the astronauts' eyes and lungs. With Skylab, America's first space station, the variety of food didn't grow significantly, but preservation methods improved thanks to the addition of a freezer. According to Charles Bourland, the NASA food scientist who helped develop Skylab's meal system, about 15 per cent of the onboard food could now be frozen, allowing astronauts to enjoy items like ice cream and lobster Newburg. The rest of the meals were canned, offering both convenience and long shelf life. HOW DO ASTRONAUTS EAT IN SPACE? In microgravity, food can float away, so meals aren't served on plates or in bowls. Instead, astronauts eat out of special containers like thermostabilised pouches (like vacuum-sealed bags), cans, and rehydratable packets (foods that need water added before eating). Many space foods are freeze-dried to save weight and prevent spoilage. Astronauts inject hot or cold water into these packets to bring the meals back to life before eating. This is exactly how Indian astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla, who has been in space for more than a week at the International Space Station (ISS), would have had his favourite gajar ka halwa and moong dal ka halwa that he carried from home. Beverages such as tea and coffee or the aamras that Shukla's family specially packed for him are usually in powder form, which can be mixed with water before consumption. There is provision for heating the food on the ISS. Astronauts mostly use spoons with magnetic or Velcro grips, straws (with clamps) for drinking from sealed beverage bags, and scissors to cut open food packets. Since crumbs and loose liquids float and can clog air filters or damage sensitive equipment, bread is often replaced with tortillas, and sticky, viscous foods (like peanut butter or oatmeal) are preferred because they don't drift easily. Seasonings such as salt and pepper are available, but they are typically dissolved in water which can be added to the food through droppers, Indian Express reported. After meals, used food packets are disposed of in designated waste compartments, while utensils are wiped clean with special towelettes. Since water is limited and can't be used for washing, traditional cleaning methods aren't possible in space. Growing food in space is a major focus for space agencies like NASA for both practical survival and long-term sustainability in deep space missions. For missions to Mars or deep space, resupplying food from Earth isn't feasible—it would take months or even years for deliveries. Growing food onboard means astronauts can become self-reliant, reducing dependency on Earth. Also, launching food from Earth is expensive and inefficient. Every extra kilogram adds to the cost and fuel load of a mission. Producing food in space drastically reduces the need to launch large food reserves. Plants don't just provide food—they also release oxygen through photosynthesis, absorb carbon dioxide, and help recycle water in closed-loop systems. This supports the entire life support system and creates a more sustainable habitat. Packaged space food has a long shelf life, but nutrients (especially vitamins) degrade over time. Freshly grown food offers better nutrition, more fibre and natural hydration. top videos View all From the emotional and mental perspective, caring for plants and eating something freshly grown helps astronauts feel more connected to Earth. It reduces isolation and monotony in long missions, improving morale, which is crucial for mental health in confined, high-stress environments. So far, NASA has grown lettuce, radishes, mustard greens, and chili peppers on the ISS, while China successfully sprouted cotton and potato seeds on the Moon (Chang'e-4 mission). Future missions now plan to test more crops, soil substitutes, and artificial light systems. tags : International Space Station ISS nasa Shubhanshu Shukla Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 05, 2025, 16:46 IST News explainers From Beef Paste To Gajar Ka Halwa, How Do Astronauts Eat in Zero Gravity? Explained
