logo
Fly away, Dick Foxton; your work is done

Fly away, Dick Foxton; your work is done

News24a day ago

When someone passes away, there is a line that gets trotted out during tributes that it has largely lost meaning: 'He/she touched a lot of lives.'
Then there are those times when it actually means exactly that. And more. This was the case with Richard Foxton, more commonly known as Dick or by the fun nickname Foxy.
Foxton passed away at the weekend at the age of 82 after a life lived to the full. A veteran media man, he managed Newsweek's operations for nearly a decade during the early days of African independence. He shuttled between his beloved Nairobi and Johannesburg, the city he would later learn to love more than any other. Although born in India, he spent his formative youth years in Kenya, a period about which he had warm memories.
Moving to South Africa in 1971, he joined the famed Group Editors, a public relations firm made up of some of Johannesburg's newsroom veterans. It grew to be one of the country's most influential communications companies, boasting blue chip clients who wanted the brains and experience housed under that roof.
Ever the consummate networker, he was ready to branch off on his own by 1981 and launched Foxton Communicating. This lowly newspaperman often reminded him that the reason the business became so successful was that it was started in the year the great Tottenham Hotspur won the 100th edition of the FA Cup in a classic victory over Manchester City.
It was in this role as the founder and head of Foxton Communicating that Foxton's larger-than-life persona became legendary. The business model was innovative. He represented chairmen (yes, that's what they were called), CEOs and most of the deputy CEOs as well. The uniqueness of the model was that he would connect the company leadership directly to editors so that they could get a picture of the state of play first-hand.
Over long, liquid lunches, editors would also share their perspectives on how they saw the respective companies. At results time or when a crisis hit, a direct line had been established. Moreover, the editors had a better understanding of the headwinds and undercurrents affecting the business climate.
But there was an added benefit for the CEOs: they were interacting with individuals who had the pulse of the nation and could get insights that would be useful in their strategic planning and in future interactions with government policymakers and decision-makers.
Everybody was the winner: the editors and industry leaders got inside each other's heads and the facilitator obviously got his cheques. But, for Foxton, it was not just about a payday. He genuinely enjoyed connecting people and relished the conversations he was privy to, and he appreciated it even more when they were no longer dependent on him.
His connections extended to the political sphere, stretching to the highest offices in the land, where he proffered his services and advice on a pro bono basis. His generous pro bono work also extended to causes he believed in, touching the lives of many.
But it wasn't just his work that made Foxton the person who filled up the room with his personality; it was the gregarious, humorous raconteur in him that made him irresistible company. In a tribute to him in Business Day this week, the newspaper's former editor Peter Bruce fondly recalled that 'he was a fabulous name-dropper and he had really been around'.
And around he certainly had been. If you have lived the life that he lived, you can be given a free pass on that so nobody begrudged the stories, which were often on repeat and delivered with such panache. Many were serious stories, some were cautionary tales and several were hilarious takes.
The 'name-dropping' consisted of encounters with heads of state, ministers, sporting legends, religious leaders and corporate titans. Not many of us can regale others with stories from dinners, lunches or just audiences with figures as diverse as Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher, Mother Teresa, FW de Klerk, George Matanzima, Harry Oppenheimer, Donald Bradman, Middle East royalty and global music stars.
There would be jokes galore, also often told on repeat. But each time they were told, it would be just as funny as the first time. The liquids would flow forever, with Foxton encouraging willing and reluctant participants to have another, another and yet another.
He colourfully encouraged his lunch partners to 'drink like monks at the end of Lent' or to 'drink like there's an army of bloodthirsty terrorists marching up the road'.
Foxton would always talk about his children and grandchildren, and made a point of keeping up to date about yours.
Close friend Khulu Mbatha wrote in City Press this week how he had always had stories about Lelo 3, Lelo 4 and Lelo 5. This was in reference to a little grandchild who updated her name according to her age.
As anyone who interacted with Foxton would attest, no conversation would be complete without an ode to Thuli Madonsela, his life partner and absolute love of his life.
To the rest of the world, she was the courageous former public protector and social justice activist, but, to Foxton, she was the summer rain that made his life verdant.
Foxton never held high office in the public or private sector, but the life he lived had much impact on South African society. Most importantly, however, he was just a blerry nice guy.
As we bid goodbye to this amazing South African, it is worth sending him off with the words of Bob Marley and the Wailers' song Rastaman Chant.
'One bright morning when my work is over
Man will fly away home
One bright morning when my work is over
Man will fly away home
Say one bright morning when my work is over
Man will fly away home.'
Your work is over now, Dick. You may fly away home to that sweet place called Paradise.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines
Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines

Forbes

time3 hours ago

  • Forbes

Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines

The Washington Post Building at One Franklin Square Building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew ...) I didn't think I'd be back writing about the troubles at The Washington Post so soon, following my last piece from just a few days ago, but here we are. That earlier piece, which you can read here, focused on the Post having lost tens of thousands of subscribers over the last several years, with the paper's current average daily paid subscriptions now at a new low. Despite the financial backing of owner Jeff Bezos, the reality is that Post hasn't been able to convert fleeting interest from readers into long-term loyalty; worse still, internal dysfunction and shifting editorial strategies continue to cloud the Post's identity and future. And, unfortunately, two new developments suggest the challenges aren't letting up anytime soon. Another misstep at The Washington Post Let's start with a newsroom experiment that executive editor Matt Murray detailed in a company memo. It's a new initiative that will allow individuals mentioned in the Post's stories to annotate those articles directly on the site. The movie is being framed as a way to 'deepen the conversation' and keep reader engagement on the Post's platform, rather than that discussion migrating away to X, Reddit, or elsewhere. But, come on: It's an absolute certainty that this is going to end up backfiring in spectacular fashion. This initiative is the kind of idea that looks fantastic on a whiteboard: Start letting some of the sources who are quoted in articles add annotations to the articles they're mentioned in. More engagement = everybody wins. Or something like that. In reality, the idea of real-time rebuttals next to reported journalism opens up an unnecessary Pandora's box. What happens when a powerful figure – or anyone, really – uses the feature in bad faith to undermine verified facts? Or tries to insert spin into the conversation? Will readers trust the original reporting, or will the very presence of a sidebar reply create the illusion of 'two sides' to a matter of fact? Reporters will technically be able to respond, but as I see it this risks adding 'debate monitor' to their job description. That the paper's management decided to embark on such an initiative at all, meanwhile, should also put this next bit of negative news into context. A rebuke of The Washington Post's Bezos era Pamela Alma Weymouth, granddaughter of the late Post publisher Katharine Graham, has written a personal and extremely scathing commentary in The Nation about the situation at the Post — among other things, accusing Bezos of systematically dismantling the institution her grandmother once protected. She lays the blame for much of the Post's woes at the feet of the Amazon founder. 'In the face of a more tyrannical Trump,' she writes, 'Bezos has retreated. He's muzzled his editorial page. Exceptional writers, editors, cartoonists have fled. Eight days before the election, the Post canceled a scheduled endorsement of Kamala Harris — breaking with decades of precedent. Four hundred Post journalists signed a protest letter. Two hundred and fifty thousand readers canceled their subscriptions.' Things got worse earlier this year, she continued, when Bezos dictated that Opinion writers would be expected to align with 'personal liberties and free markets,' leaving little or even no room for dissenting views. Editor David Shipley and others resigned, and another wave of subscription cancellations followed. Weymouth continues: 'If the free press can be manipulated by politicians, if truth is viewed as optional, if The Washington Post goes dark under Bezos, then we lose more than a legend. We lose the very thing that makes America a democracy.' Weymouth's commentary is particularly damning in light of recent revelations about Bezos' companies engaging with Trumpworld while the Post, at the same time, shifted its own editorial voice. It's the kind of rebuke that ought to cut deep, given that it's rooted in the legacy of the family that once owned The Washington Post — their ownership now relegated to a bygone era of journalism. To be sure, none of this means the Post is finished. There are still plenty of talented reporters who fill its newsroom, but decisions from the leadership have nonetheless put the paper in a precarious spot. Legacy isn't a business model. Without a clear editorial mission and a bold plan to rebuild reader loyalty, the fact of the matter is that even a paper as storied as The Washington Post won't be able to successfully right the ship — and avoid the inevitable.

South Africa's DA Stays in Coalition; to Boycott Dialogue
South Africa's DA Stays in Coalition; to Boycott Dialogue

Bloomberg

time6 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

South Africa's DA Stays in Coalition; to Boycott Dialogue

South Africa's fractious coalition government survived after the second-largest party opted against leaving following its ultimatum to President Cyril Ramaphosa for firing one of its members from his executive, while saying it will boycott his national dialogue. Ramaphosa set up a panel that includes business leaders, actors and the captain of its national rugby team to guide the talks on the country's development path amid a weak economy. The project is set to cost about 740 million rand ($42 million).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store