
No further action of minimum wage revision till discussions held with industries, government assures Karnataka High Court
An undertaking in this regard was given by the government advocate before a Bench of Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde on June 30, during the hearing on a petition filed by Nanjappa Hospitals, Shivamogga-Davangere. The petitioner-hospitals have questioned the April 11 and 19 notifications issued by the Labour Department proposing revision of minimum wages.
However, the court said that the petitioners are at liberty to move the court to seek appropriate relief if the notifications are sought to be implemented during the pendency of the petition.
It was argued on behalf of the petitioners that the proposal to fix uniform wages irrespective of the industry and irrespective of the region is contrary to the object of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 while pointing out that the government is yet to convene a meeting with the industries to discuss the proposal even though the petitioners have already filed their objections to the proposed revision.
Meanwhile, the Karnataka Employers' Association has claimed that the steep increase proposed in the minimum wages would deal a crippling blow to the business as a whole and to the employers as rates proposed in the draft notifications are 40% to 60% higher than the previous hike and thereby making these rates highest in the country.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Notice to govt on wage revision plea
Bengaluru: The high court ordered notice to the govt in response to a petition challenging the notifications issued by the labour department in April, proposing to revise in 80 scheduled employments. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde directed the govt to reply to the petition filed by Nanjappa Hospitals, Shivamogga. The judge recorded the govt advocate's submission that no further action would be taken unless a meeting is held and representatives of the industry concerned are heard. If the notification is sought to be implemented, petitioners are at liberty to move this court to seek appropriate relief, the judge added. The petitioner claimed the steep increase proposed in minimum wages would deal a crippling blow to business as a whole and to employers. According to the petitioner, rates of minimum wages in respect of 34 scheduled employments were revised during 2022-23. The govt is proposing to fix uniform wages irrespective of industry and region, which is contrary to Minimum Wages Act, 1948.


The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
No further action of minimum wage revision till discussions held with industries, government assures Karnataka High Court
The State government has promised the High Court of Karnataka that no further action would be taken on the proposed draft notifications, issued in April 2025, for revision of minimum wages across 80 scheduled employments, unless meetings/discussions are held with representatives of the industry concerned. An undertaking in this regard was given by the government advocate before a Bench of Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde on June 30, during the hearing on a petition filed by Nanjappa Hospitals, Shivamogga-Davangere. The petitioner-hospitals have questioned the April 11 and 19 notifications issued by the Labour Department proposing revision of minimum wages. However, the court said that the petitioners are at liberty to move the court to seek appropriate relief if the notifications are sought to be implemented during the pendency of the petition. It was argued on behalf of the petitioners that the proposal to fix uniform wages irrespective of the industry and irrespective of the region is contrary to the object of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 while pointing out that the government is yet to convene a meeting with the industries to discuss the proposal even though the petitioners have already filed their objections to the proposed revision. Meanwhile, the Karnataka Employers' Association has claimed that the steep increase proposed in the minimum wages would deal a crippling blow to the business as a whole and to the employers as rates proposed in the draft notifications are 40% to 60% higher than the previous hike and thereby making these rates highest in the country.


The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Lokayukta police seek nod from Karnataka High Court to continue probe into case of extorting money from public servants citing possibility of raids
The Lokayukta police on Monday sought permission from the High Court of Karnataka to continue investigation into the case of its sleuths allegedly blackmailing several public servants with the threat of possible raids. The public are 'losing faith in the anti-corruption action of the Lokayukta police wing and are writing letters raising questions about its integrity' owing to recent allegations of extortion of crores. The continuation of the investigation, which has been stayed by the court, was needed, it was argued on behalf of the Lokayukta police. The submissions were made before a Bench of Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar during the hearing on a petition filed by IPS officer Srinath Joshi M., who was till recently serving in the Lokayukta police, regarding the notice issued to him to appear for questioning in the case. Case background Mr. Joshi was asked to appear for questioning as the Lokayukta police had found him having links with Ningappa G. alias Ningappa Savant. The latter had allegedly collected crores of rupees from several officers in various government departments by telling them that the Lokayukta police had sufficient information about their ill-gotten wealth and were likely to conduct raids. Ningappa was found to be frequently visiting the Lokayukta police office in Bengaluru to meet some officers, it was alleged. The court had stayed the notice to Mr. Joshi besides staying an investigation against Ningappa, a former head constable, who has been treated as a prime accused in the case by the Lokayukta police. Why it is essential As the court had ordered the release of Ningappa after finding a procedural flaw in his arrest, advocate for the Lokayukta police said that investigation is essential in the case as there is information about alleged involvement of insider. The allegations require a thorough investigation as the incident harmed the reputation of the Lokayukta institution while pointing out that investigation material, available in a sealed cover, would disclose reasons for registering the case under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act as there is alleged involvement of some public servants in the case.+