Ahilyabai Holkar pioneered revival of Sanatan heritage: Yogi
At a ceremony marking the queen of Indore's 300th birth anniversary at Indira Gandhi Pratishthan here, he recalled that during an era marked by foreign invasions and widespread temple destruction, Lokmata Ahilyabai Holkar courageously undertook the restoration of sacred sites from Kashi to Rameshwaram.
'In doing so, she embodied the Vedic principle 'Dharmo rakṣati rakṣitaḥ' (dharma protects those who protect it). Her legacy should inspire every citizen to contribute to the revival of India's ancient cultural glory,' he said.
Adityanath said Ahilyabai undertook the task of re-establishing Sanatan Dharma in the country.
Quoting her words — 'My path is the path of dharma; the path of dharma is the path of justice, and only justice can make us powerful and capable', the CM noted that this credo shaped both her statesmanship and service.
The present-day splendour of the Kashi Vishwanath temple, he reminded the gathering, rests on the foundations she laid between 1777 and 1780 with her personal resources — work that Prime Minister Narendra Modi described in 2021 as the forerunner of the modern Kashi Vishwanath Dham Corridor.
'Ahilyabai's efforts stretched far beyond Kashi. She rebuilt and renovated Kedarnath, Rameshwaram, Somnath, Haridwar, Mahishmati, and numerous other holy sites, while commissioning ghats, wells and step-wells to ensure pilgrims' comfort and access to pure water,' CM said.
Celebrating her as an enduring symbol of 'nari shakti', Adiytyanath highlighted her dharma-aligned, people-centric administration and her trail-blazing work in social justice and women's empowerment. She promoted the sari industry in Mahishmati to foster women's self-reliance, encouraged widow remarriage and moved to end child marriage.
Drawing a parallel with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel's post-Independence restoration of Somnath, Adityanath said Ahilyabai had sown the same seeds of cultural resurgence centuries earlier. He also invoked Adi Shankaracharya's four 'peethas' as proof of India's enduring cultural unity.
The CM noted that, under Prime Minister Modi's leadership, monumental projects in Kashi, Ayodhya, Ujjain, and Maa Vindhyavasini Dham carry forward this legacy.
'Let us,' he said, 'take inspiration from Maharani Ahilyabai's life and commit ourselves wholeheartedly to restoring India's timeless splendour and the vitality of Sanatan culture.'
Addressing the gathering, the CM emphasized that the double-engine government is implementing numerous schemes to empower women and foster self-reliance. Programmes like the 'Lakhpati Didi Yojana', launched under the leadership of the Prime Minister, had empowered over one crore women across the country.
Similarly, initiatives such as the Kanya Sumangala Yojana, Mukhyamantri Samuhik Vivaah Yojana, Ujjwala Yojana, and Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana were providing women with opportunities to demonstrate their abilities, whether in village panchayats, households, or on the nation's frontiers.
Giving an example, he said the presence of women workforce in UP went up from just 10,000 in 2017 to 40,000 now.
During the ceremony, deputy chief minister Brajesh Pathak, BJP state president Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary and Rajya Sabha MP Kavita Patidar aso presented their views on the contribution and relevance of Ahilyabai, appealing to party workers to take her deeds to each and every individual.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Founded by Savarkar, revived by Godse's niece: Abhinav Bharat ‘vindicated', hails Malegaon acquittals
Originally floated by freedom fighter V D Savarkar in 1904 to carry out an armed struggle against the British and revived in post-Independence India, the Abhinav Bharat hit the headlines almost two decades ago after some of its members, including Lt Col Prasad Purohit, were accused of masterminding the 2008 Malegaon blasts. On Thursday, as a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the accused in the case, Milind Joshirao, a Pune resident who claims to be the organisation's head, said false allegations had been levelled against the outfit and the term 'saffron terror' was coined. 'The judgment shows that all allegations against Abhinav Bharat and Hindus arrested in the bomb blast case were false,' he said, hailing the verdict. Savarkar, also a Hindutva ideologue, had dissolved Abhinav Bharat in 1952, saying there was no need for an armed struggle in independent India and urged the youth to join the defence forces to serve the country. It was revived only in 2006 in Raigad by his brother Narayan's daughter-in-law Himani Savarkar, along with a group of historians, intellectuals, and activists. Himani, who later became the President of the revived organisation, is the daughter of Gopal Godse, the elder brother of Mahatma Gandhi's assassin Nathuram Godse. According to Himani, Abhinav Bharat, which was registered as a Trust on February 9, 2007, was revived to 'generate a sense of patriotism among youth,' create awareness on social issues and apprise them about 'injustice being meted out against Hindus'. The organisation aimed to fulfil its aims through lectures, discussions and seminars in colleges and public platforms within and outside Maharashtra. According to investigators who probed the Malegaon blasts, the Abhinav Bharat was an 'organised crime syndicate' whose members had been active since 2003. It was alleged that Lt Col Purohit, who was accused of procuring explosives from Kashmir for the attack, played a key part in the organisation's revival. Investigators also claimed that the Abhinav Bharat wanted to 'turn India into a Hindu Rashtra called Aryavart and place a government-in-exile' as its members were 'dissatisfied with the Constitution'. Its members were also accused of planning to train people in guerrilla warfare to eliminate people who opposed a Hindu Rashtra. 'It is unfortunate that an organisation undertaking constructive activities for society was harassed,' Purohit said after the verdict. Maharashtra ATS chargesheet claimed that Himani, in her statement, mentioned that Purohit discussed the Malegaon location during a meeting in Bhopal for taking revenge against Muslims. However, in a January 2009 interaction with The Indian Express she denied making any such mention in her statement during the probe. She passed away in 2015. Her son Satyaki Savarkar said his mother 'suffered a lot due to this case as false narratives of saffron terrorism were propagated'. Another acquitted member of the Abhinav Bharat, Ajay Rahirkar, was the treasurer of the organisation at the time of his arrest in 2008. Investigators alleged that Rahikar's house in Erandwane of Pune served as the 'head office' of Abhinav Bharat. However, Rahikar's advocate Nitin Apte said the body is a registered Trust and was not banned by the government. Joshirao, whom the NIA declared hostile, said though Abhinav Bharat was branded as an extremist outfit and its documents were seized, it continued to work in the 'national interest'. 'I had told the court on record how I was threatened by ATS officers to implicate RSS leaders and (Uttar Pradesh CM) Yogi Adityanath,' he said.
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
India's enemies will be eliminated by Bundelkhand's Defence Corridor: Adityanath
He said that Lord Ram had taken a pledge from this soil to free the Earth from demons and the Defence Corridor in Bundelkhand is being developed in this spirit. Addressing a public gathering in Rajapur during his visit to Chitrakoot, Adityanath said, 'I always said that if Pakistan dared to act aggressively, the tanks built in Bundelkhand would deliver such a blow that it would be forced to rub its nose on the ground.' 'And this time, the BrahMos missile broke Pakistan's back in such a way that it was left shouting for help globally, but no one came forward,' he added. Chitrakoot (UP), Jul 31 (PTI) Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Thursday said the BrahMos missile 'broke Pakistan's back', leaving it to 'cry before the world' while no one came to its aid. 'The task of eliminating India's enemies will be carried out by Bundelkhand's Defence Corridor, with the youth forming a strong wall in the nation's security,' the chief minister said. During his visit to Rajapur on the occasion of Goswami Tulsidas's birth anniversary, Adityanath highlighted the region's cultural and spiritual significance. He said Chitrakoot is set to emerge as a hub of faith, security and self-reliance. The chief minister offered prayers at Tulsi Janmkutir and viewed the handwritten manuscript of the Shri Ramcharitmanas at Manas Mandir. He also attended the Tulsi Sahitya Sammelan at Tulsi Resort, where he met spiritual leaders Murari Bapu and Jagadguru Rambhadracharya. In his address to seers, he reiterated Chitrakoot's proud spiritual legacy and said the area would become a model of religious devotion, safety and self-reliance. Later, at the Krishi Vigyan Kendra in Ganiwan, Adityanath unveiled a statue of Goswami Tulsidas and planted Harishankari saplings to promote environmental awareness. He also visited exhibitions by the Agriculture Department and interacted with children at the Parmanand Ashram Paddhati Vidyalaya, distributing chocolates and posing for photographs. During his address to the public gathering he reminded them that Lord Ram had spent more than 11 years in Chitrakoot and noted that it had been the 'karmabhoomi' of revered figures like Goswami Tulsidas, Maharishi Valmiki and social reformer Nanaji Deshmukh. Adityanath also outlined ongoing government initiatives, including development of the Ram Van Gaman Marg, the Bundelkhand Expressway, the Defence Corridor and integrated tourism infrastructure in Chitrakoot. He announced a proposed riverfront along the Yamuna to boost tourism and local employment. He said the region had seen a significant increase in crop production — particularly pulses, oilseeds and maize — and assured continued support for farmers through soil testing and crop insurance. The chief minister said Chitrakoot today is a place free from fear and rich in spiritual energy. He highlighted ongoing development of pilgrimage and educational sites such as Gramodaya University, Ashram Paddhati Vidyalaya, Valmiki Ashram, and Kamadgiri. Earlier in the day, Adityanath paid tributes to Goswami Tulsidas on his 500th birth anniversary, praising his unwavering devotion to Lord Ram amid the political complexities of his time. 'Five hundred years ago, when this village might have been grappling with a lack of resources and hardships, a divine soul was born and, in his childhood, dedicated himself to the feet of Prabhu Shri Ram,' he said. Drawing a contrast with the Mughal era, he said that while the court of Emperor Akbar attracted those seeking power, Tulsidas chose not to serve any courtier but dedicated himself solely to spiritual devotion. 'Tulsidas emerged as a wonderful confluence of devotion, power, and awakening public consciousness choosing the path of defiance not through the sword, but through Ramlila and Ramcharitmanas,' he said according to a statement. He further remarked, 'Akbar presented a soft face of his rule, but the cruelty behind it is still visible to us today. The tradition of saints at that time firmly resisted it.' Recalling his visit to Mauritius, Adityanath said that during the era of slavery, when Indians were taken there as labourers, the Ramcharitmanas was their only solace. 'They were uneducated but preserved their culture through the Manas. Today, their descendants are heads of state and Ramcharitmanas is still worshipped in their homes,' he said. Criticising efforts to malign seers, Adityanath said those who try to make saints controversial are themselves surrounded by controversies. He concluded that while such people would continue to create obstacles, there must be a collective effort to protect Sanatan Dharma and preserve India's rich heritage, without being deterred by such attempts. PTI CDN NAV OZ OZ This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
What R N Ravi's criticism of linguistic states misses
Amid a recent resurgence of language politics in the country, Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi on Tuesday stirred up a fresh row by criticising the linguistic division of states which, he said, had turned a large section of the populace into 'second-class citizens'. 'Within a decade of our Independence, there had to be a linguistic reorganisation of Bharat… When we created linguistic states, a large population became second-class citizens…,' Ravi said at an event in Gandhinagar. Scholars have long argued, however, that the linguistic organisation of states has been critical in ensuring India's continued unity and integrity. Here's a brief history. Before first reorganisation The British had administered India with two systems running in parallel — a system of direct control in its provinces, and a system of indirect control across 565 princely states. The provincial boundaries India inherited in 1947, were thus products of colonial administrative exigencies and the historical process of integration of erstwhile principalities and kingdoms into the Empire. The Constitution, which came into force on January 26, 1950, declared India to be a 'Union of States'. The country, at the time, was divided into 28 states, falling under four categories. * There were nine Part A states (governors' provinces in British India), which were ruled by elected legislatures. These were: Assam, Bihar, Bombay, East Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. * There were eight Part B states (former princely states or group of princely states), which were ruled by elected legislatures and a rajpramukh. These were: Hyderabad, Jammu & Kashmir, Madhya Bharat, Mysore, Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU), Rajasthan, Saurashtra, and Travancore-Cochin. * The ten Part C states included both the former chief commissioners' provinces and some princely states, and were governed by a chief commissioner appointed by the President. These were: Ajmer, Bhopal, Bilaspur, Coorg State, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Kutch, Manipur, Tripura, and Vindhya Pradesh. * There was only one Part D state, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which was governed by a lieutenant governor appointed by the President. The reorganisation of 1956 Pre-Independence, the Congress had supported the formation of linguistic provinces. But after witnessing Partition, New Delhi was not too keen on immediately creating further linguistic divisions. The so-called JVP committee set up in 1949, comprising Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, head of the States Ministry Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Congress president Pattabhi Sittaramaya, cautioned against the 'disintegrative effects of reorganisation'. But by the early 1950s, there was momentum in many regions for the creation of linguistic states. On October 19, 1952, Potti Sriramulu, a 51-year-old railway engineer, went on a hunger strike demanding the creation of a Telugu-speaking Andhra state. His death, after a 58-day-long fast, triggered widespread public outcry and protests. Two days later, on December 17, Nehru announced the creation of Andhra, which would officially become a state on October 1, 1953. The creation of Andhra opened a floodgate of demands for linguistic statehood. Less than three months after the state officially came into being, the Centre set up the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) under Justice Fazl Ali. 'The greater development of political consciousness among the people and the growing importance of the great regional languages led gradually to demands for the formation of certain States on a linguistic basis. Each such separate problem was however closely interrelated with other problems, and any formation of a new state necessarily affected a number of other States. It thus became increasingly difficult to consider any such problem in isolation…,' the Centre said in its resolution to create the SRC. Justice Ali submitted a 267-page report on September 30, 1955. Based on the SRC's recommendations, the political map of India was redrawn to comprise 14 states and six Union Territories (UTs). Language not the only criteria In its December 1953 resolution on the SRC in Parliament, the Centre had made clear that language would not be the only criterion for the reorganisation of states. 'The language and culture of an area have an undoubted importance as they represent a pattern of living which is common in that area… in considering a reorganisation of States, however, there are other important factors which have also to be borne in mind. The first essential consideration is the preservation and strengthening of the unity and security of India. Financial, economic and administrative considerations are almost equally important, not only from the point of view of each State, but for the whole nation,' it had said. The final report too reflected this sentiment. '…After a full consideration of the problem in all its aspects, we have come to the conclusion that it is neither possible nor desirable to reorganise States on the basis of the single test of either language or culture, but that a balanced approach to the whole problem is necessary in the interests of our national unity,' the SRC report stated. Notably, the Bhararitya Jana Sangh, the forerunner of the BJP, reacted to the SRC report by saying that it was 'satisfied that the Commission had rejected the suggestion of creating states merely based on language' and demanded the 'quick implementation of the recommendations'. In fact, most of the criticism directed at the SRC and the Centre was that it was not doing enough to recognise linguistic demands. For instance, the SRC recommended the creation of a bilingual Bombay state that stretched from Kutch in the northwest to Vidarbha in the east and bordered Goa in the south. This was in spite of their being vibrant movements, which could be traced to well before Independence, for both a Marathi- and a Gujarati-speaking state. On the other hand, the Centre rejected the SRC's recommendation of bifurcating the Punjabi- and Hindi-speaking regions of Punjab, primarily to strengthen the border state that had already been split by the Partition less than a decade ago. Bombay and Punjab thus saw continued protests, often violent, for linguistic division. While the Centre would eventually cave to these demands — Bombay State was split into Gujarat and Maharashtra in 1960, and united Punjab was split into Punjab and Haryana, with certain Hindi-speaking areas merged with Himachal Pradesh, then a UT — Nehru more than once expressed his displeasure with the principle of unilingualism. 'We do not stand for this principle of unilingualism. We may have a unilingual State… but basically we stand for something different from that… Language should not be confused with the boundaries of a State. It may be that sometimes the boundaries may be linguistic… [But] we can never function in this country unless we cooperate with each other, unless the Tamil cooperates with the Telugu and the Kannada, the Malayalee and the Marathi and the Gujarati and the Bengali and the Punjabi and so on,' he famously said on August 10, 1956, while the State Reorganisation Bill was being debated. A success story Historian Ramachandra Guha wrote in India After Gandhi (2007): 'Some Western observers… believed that [the] profusion of tongues would be the undoing of India… Linguistic states they regarded as a grievous error… that would further divide the states from each other [and] heighten the impulse toward secession'. But quite the opposite has happened. As Guha put it, 'the sustenance of linguistic pluralism has worked to tame and domesticate secessionist tendencies.' This is in stark contrast to India's immediate neighbours Pakistan and Sri Lanka where the imposition of a single language has been a cause for division and deadly conflict rather than unity. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) report of 2008 stated: 'The resolution of linguistic conflicts was one of the major achievements after Independence… Continuance of a common language has provided the basis for administrative unity and efficiency within the State. Interestingly, the three major movements for secession in independent India, namely those in Nagaland, in Punjab in the 1980s, and in Kashmir, were organised around the issue of historical ethnicity, religion and territory and not around language'. Shyamlal Yadav is one of the pioneers of the effective use of RTI for investigative reporting. He is a member of the Investigative Team. His reporting on polluted rivers, foreign travel of public servants, MPs appointing relatives as assistants, fake journals, LIC's lapsed policies, Honorary doctorates conferred to politicians and officials, Bank officials putting their own money into Jan Dhan accounts and more has made a huge impact. He is member of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). He has been part of global investigations like Paradise Papers, Fincen Files, Pandora Papers, Uber Files and Hidden Treasures. After his investigation in March 2023 the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York returned 16 antiquities to India. Besides investigative work, he keeps writing on social and political issues. ... Read More
