Footprints lead to discovery of mystery 23,000-year-old culture in breakthrough
A "remarkable" archaeology breakthrough has placed humans in North America 10,000 years earlier than previously thought, upending decades of established understanding.
Researchers have analysed sets of fossilised footprints found in the arid White Sands National Park, a significant archaeological site in New Mexico, and discovered that a mysterious group of people walked the area's ancient lakebeds between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago. The new project has challenged a nearly 100-year-old consensus that the Clovis, an archaeological culture, were the first human inhabitants on the continent, with breakthroughs in 1929 suggesting the settlers had been present there 13,000 years ago.
READ MORE: Archaeologists baffled as they uncover 'mystery' 3,600-year-old Pharaoh's tomb in Egypt
Researchers involved in the study, which was published in Science Advances, used radiocarbon dating on ancient mud layers at the site which contained the footprints, and had their results corroborated by independent laboratories.
They found three types of material - mud, seeds and pollen - which were dated by three separate labs, all of which produced consistent results. For the latest study, lead researcher Vance Holliday, a University of Arizona archaeologist and geologist, and Jason Windingstad, a doctoral candidate in environmental science, returned to White Sands in 2022 and 2023.
There they dug a new series of trenches for a closer look at the geology of the lake beds, with Professor Holliday hailing the accuracy of the "remarkable" record.
He said: "It's a remarkably consistent record. You get to the point where it's really hard to explain all this away. As I say in the paper, it would be serendipity in the extreme to have all these dates giving you a consistent picture that's in error." Mr Windingstad said: "It's a strange feeling when you go out there and look at the footprints and see them in person.
"You realise that it basically contradicts everything that you've been taught about the peopling of North America." Professor Holliday said the footprints suggested early hunter-gatherers may have briefly visited the area, as they left no artefacts or settlements.
The discovery rewrites a significant chapter in the story of human migration to the Americas, offering the earliest direct evidence of people on the continent and prompting fresh debate about how and when the first Americans arrived. Researchers from Bournemouth University and the US National Park Service excavated the footprints in 2019 and published their paper in 2021.
They were formed in soft mud on the margins of a shallow lake that, in the 21st century, forms part of Alkali Flat, a large playa in the White Sands, Bournemouth University's study explained.
They appeared to have primarily come from teenagers andyounger children, with occasional adults interspersed among the crowd of travelling hunter-gatherers. Humans weren't the only people believed to have made tracks, however, with ancient megafauna also detected, including gian ground sloth, dire wolves and some birds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Key climate change reports removed from US government websites
Legally mandated US national climate assessments seem to have disappeared from the federal websites built to display them, making it harder for state and local governments and the public to learn what to expect in their back yards from a warming world. Scientists said the peer-reviewed authoritative reports save money and lives. Websites for the national assessments and the US Global Change Research Program were down Monday and Tuesday with no links, notes or referrals elsewhere. The White House, which was responsible for the assessments, said the information will be housed within Nasa to comply with the law, but gave no further details. Searches for the assessments on Nasa websites did not turn them up. Nasa did not respond to requests for information. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which coordinated the information in the assessments, did not respond to repeated inquiries. 'It's critical for decision-makers across the country to know what the science in the National Climate Assessment is. That is the most reliable and well-reviewed source of information about climate that exists for the United States,' said Kathy Jacobs, a University of Arizona climate scientist, who coordinated the 2014 version of the report. 'It's a sad day for the United States if it is true that the National Climate Assessment is no longer available,' Jacobs added. 'This is evidence of serious tampering with the facts and with people's access to information, and it actually may increase the risk of people being harmed by climate-related impacts.' Harvard climate scientist John Holdren, who was Barack Obama's science adviser and whose office directed the assessments, said that after the 2014 edition, he visited governors, mayors and other local officials who told him how useful the 841-page report had been. It helped them decide whether to raise roads, build seawalls and even move hospital generators from basements to roofs, he said. 'This is a government resource paid for by the taxpayer to provide the information that really is the primary source of information for any city, state or federal agency who's trying to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate,' said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who has been a volunteer author for several editions of the report. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in Noaa's library. Nasa's open science data repository includes dead links to the assessment site. The most recent report, issued in 2023, includes an interactive atlas that zooms down to the county level. It found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority and Native American communities often disproportionately at risk. The 1990 Global Change Research Act requires a national climate assessment every four years and directs the president to establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Program. In the spring, the Trump administration told the volunteer authors of the next climate assessment that their services weren't needed and ended the contract with the private firm that helps coordinate the website and report. Additionally, Noaa's main website was recently forwarded to a different Noaa website. Social media and blogs at Noaa and Nasa about climate impacts for the general public were cut or eliminated. 'It's part of a horrifying big picture,' Holdren said. 'It's just an appalling whole demolition of science infrastructure.' The national assessments are more useful than international climate reports put out by the UN every seven or so years because they are more localized and more detailed, Hayhoe and Jacobs said. The national reports are not only peer-reviewed by other scientists, but examined for accuracy by the National Academy of Sciences, federal agencies, the staff and the public. Hiding the reports would be censoring science, Jacobs said. It's also dangerous for the country, Hayhoe said, comparing it to steering a car on a curving road by only looking through the rearview mirror: 'And now, more than ever, we need to be looking ahead to do everything it takes to make it around that curve safely. It's like our windshield's being painted over.'
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Key climate change reports removed from US government websites
Legally mandated US national climate assessments seem to have disappeared from the federal websites built to display them, making it harder for state and local governments and the public to learn what to expect in their back yards from a warming world. Scientists said the peer-reviewed authoritative reports save money and lives. Websites for the national assessments and the US Global Change Research Program were down Monday and Tuesday with no links, notes or referrals elsewhere. The White House, which was responsible for the assessments, said the information will be housed within Nasa to comply with the law, but gave no further details. Searches for the assessments on Nasa websites did not turn them up. Nasa did not respond to requests for information. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which coordinated the information in the assessments, did not respond to repeated inquiries. 'It's critical for decision makers across the country to know what the science in the National Climate Assessment is. That is the most reliable and well-reviewed source of information about climate that exists for the United States,' said University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs, who coordinated the 2014 version of the report. 'It's a sad day for the United States if it is true that the National Climate Assessment is no longer available,' Jacobs said. 'This is evidence of serious tampering with the facts and with people's access to information, and it actually may increase the risk of people being harmed by climate-related impacts.' Harvard climate scientist John Holdren, who was President Obama's science adviser and whose office directed the assessments, said after the 2014 edition he visited governors, mayors and other local officials who told him how useful the 841-page report was. It helped them decide whether to raise roads, build seawalls and even move hospital generators from basements to roofs, he said. 'This is a government resource paid for by the taxpayer to provide the information that really is the primary source of information for any city, state or federal agency who's trying to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate,' said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who has been a volunteer author for several editions of the report. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in Noaa's library. Nasa's open science data repository includes dead links to the assessment site. The most recent report, issued in 2023, included an interactive atlas that zoomed down to the county level. It found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority and Native American communities often disproportionately at risk. The 1990 Global Change Research Act requires a national climate assessment every four years and directs the president to establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Program. In the spring, the Trump administration told the volunteer authors of the next climate assessment that their services weren't needed and ended the contract with the private firm that helps coordinate the website and report. Additionally, Noaa's main website was recently forwarded to a different Noaa website. Social media and blogs at Noaa and Nasa about climate impacts for the general public were cut or eliminated. 'It's part of a horrifying big picture,' Holdren said. 'It's just an appalling whole demolition of science infrastructure.' The national assessments are more useful than international climate reports put out by the UN every seven or so years because they are more localized and more detailed, Hayhoe and Jacobs said. The national reports are not only peer reviewed by other scientists, but examined for accuracy by the National Academy of Sciences, federal agencies, the staff and the public. Hiding the reports would be censoring science, Jacobs said. And it's dangerous for the country, Hayhoe said, comparing it to steering a car on a curving road by only looking through the rearview mirror: 'And now, more than ever, we need to be looking ahead to do everything it takes to make it around that curve safely. It's like our windshield's being painted over.'
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Footprints lead to discovery of mystery 23,000-year-old culture in breakthrough
The discovery of a mysterious culture're path through the White Sands National Park pushes the understanding of North American human history back by 10,000 years A "remarkable" archaeology breakthrough has placed humans in North America 10,000 years earlier than previously thought, upending decades of established understanding. Researchers have analysed sets of fossilised footprints found in the arid White Sands National Park, a significant archaeological site in New Mexico, and discovered that a mysterious group of people walked the area's ancient lakebeds between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago. The new project has challenged a nearly 100-year-old consensus that the Clovis, an archaeological culture, were the first human inhabitants on the continent, with breakthroughs in 1929 suggesting the settlers had been present there 13,000 years ago. READ MORE: Archaeologists baffled as they uncover 'mystery' 3,600-year-old Pharaoh's tomb in Egypt Researchers involved in the study, which was published in Science Advances, used radiocarbon dating on ancient mud layers at the site which contained the footprints, and had their results corroborated by independent laboratories. They found three types of material - mud, seeds and pollen - which were dated by three separate labs, all of which produced consistent results. For the latest study, lead researcher Vance Holliday, a University of Arizona archaeologist and geologist, and Jason Windingstad, a doctoral candidate in environmental science, returned to White Sands in 2022 and 2023. There they dug a new series of trenches for a closer look at the geology of the lake beds, with Professor Holliday hailing the accuracy of the "remarkable" record. He said: "It's a remarkably consistent record. You get to the point where it's really hard to explain all this away. As I say in the paper, it would be serendipity in the extreme to have all these dates giving you a consistent picture that's in error." Mr Windingstad said: "It's a strange feeling when you go out there and look at the footprints and see them in person. "You realise that it basically contradicts everything that you've been taught about the peopling of North America." Professor Holliday said the footprints suggested early hunter-gatherers may have briefly visited the area, as they left no artefacts or settlements. The discovery rewrites a significant chapter in the story of human migration to the Americas, offering the earliest direct evidence of people on the continent and prompting fresh debate about how and when the first Americans arrived. Researchers from Bournemouth University and the US National Park Service excavated the footprints in 2019 and published their paper in 2021. They were formed in soft mud on the margins of a shallow lake that, in the 21st century, forms part of Alkali Flat, a large playa in the White Sands, Bournemouth University's study explained. They appeared to have primarily come from teenagers andyounger children, with occasional adults interspersed among the crowd of travelling hunter-gatherers. Humans weren't the only people believed to have made tracks, however, with ancient megafauna also detected, including gian ground sloth, dire wolves and some birds.
