
‘Elite mindset': HC junks Manimajra RWA plea against street vendors, imposes ₹1 lakh cost
Terming it a 'motivated attempt' to destabilise vendors, the court imposed a cost of ₹1 lakh—₹50,000 on each petitioner — to be deposited with the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation for the welfare of street vendors and their families.
The ruling, delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Meenakshi I Mehta, condemned the misuse of legal process to target livelihoods.
The petitioners had alleged that fruit sellers, hawkers, and other vendors were encroaching on roads, footpaths, and parks, obstructing traffic and harming their businesses. They relied on a 2019 High Court order against shopkeeper encroachments and submitted photos of golgappa and vegetable vendors — none of whom were party to the case.
Rejecting the plea, the bench upheld vendors' rights under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. Citing Supreme Court rulings in Gainda Ram v. MCD (2010) and Sodan Singh v. NDMC (1989), the court affirmed street vending as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g).
Calling out class bias, the judges observed, 'There is an elite class still following the Britishers, who looks down upon their own countrymen doing small business and treat them as if they are mafias.' India, they said, remains an agrarian society shaped by rural migration to cities, and the judiciary must rise above elitist impressions.
Noting that vendors can't be evicted without a proper five-yearly survey by the Town Vending Committee, the court acknowledged instances of misuse by shopkeepers and individuals falsifying records. It directed the Municipal Corporation to create a dedicated cell to curb such practices 'with integrity and dutifully.'
The court also ordered that fees collected from vendors be placed under a separate budget head and used exclusively for their welfare, including medical and insurance benefits.
(CWP No. 10327 of 2022)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Illegal constructions in Mumbai: Maharashtra Speaker Rahul Narwekar asks govt to submit report
Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar Monday directed the state government to submit an action-taken report (ATR) on illegal constructions across various wards of Mumbai before the conclusion of the ongoing Monsoon Session Friday. The directive came in response to a question raised by BJP MLA Parag Alvani, who sought accountability regarding unauthorised construction on a Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) plot in Vile Parle (East). Responding during the Question Hour, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde assured the House that stern action would be initiated against erring officials, including assistant municipal commissioners, if found shielding illegal constructions. He said instructions would be issued to Municipal Commissioner Bhushan Gagrani to prepare a category-wise list of unauthorised structures in the city and take necessary action. 'The government will not support any illegal construction. If officials are found protecting such structures, strict action will be taken against them,' Shinde said. The Deputy CM further clarified that while several illegal structures in the Vasai-Virar region have already been demolished, some remain due to stay orders from the courts. 'Those too will be removed as soon as the legal restrictions are lifted,' he said. Shinde, however, noted that immediate action at some locations during the monsoon may not be feasible, as residents are currently occupying these structures. 'After monsoon, we will take steps to remove even those constructions,' he added. Referring to the case flagged by Alvani, Shinde informed the House that unauthorised sheds had been erected on BMC-owned plot number 256 in Vile Parle East. The civic body demolished the sheds on March 24, 2025. A subsequent complaint regarding illegal parking on the same plot led to further action, and the encroachments were cleared on June 3, 2025. Several legislators, including Yogesh Sagar, Jitendra Awhad, Dilip Walse Patil, Varun Sardesai, Murji Patel, Ajay Choudhari, and Bala Nandgaonkar, raised supplementary questions over the issue. Minister of State for Urban Development Sandhya Misal informed the House that action against illegal constructions is being taken under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act. She urged MLAs to report instances from their constituencies, assuring that departmental action would follow and concerned officials would be held accountable.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Bihar Mahagathbandhan has frozen out Pappu Yadav, but why it may need him
As the Opposition hit the streets of Bihar last week to protest against the electoral roll revision in the state and attempted to enforce a bandh, an awkward situation unfolded. Video clips from the march against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) showed security officials physically stopping the Independent MP from Purnia, Pappu Yadav, from boarding the vehicle carrying Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi, state LoP Tejashwi Yadav, and other leaders of the Mahagathbandhan (Grand Alliance). While there were videos of Gandhi's party colleague Kanhaiya Kumar also facing a similar treatment — allegedly not to ruffle Tejashwi — Pappu Yadav subsequently became the bigger talking point. Though the Purnia MP insisted it was 'not an insult', claiming that he had fallen, and added that it he did not mind getting insulted for the public – 'not just once but even a million times' – the episode revealed that the Independent MP continues to remain out in the cold, on the margins of Opposition politics in the state. The truck incident came a year after the five-term MP with considerable influence in the Seemanchal region turned the tables on the Mahagathbandhan, after his attempts to join it failed. Before the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, he failed to merge his Jan Adhikar Party with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), and when that fell through, he merged it with the Congress. His wife Ranjeet Ranjan is a Congress Rajya Sabha MP from Chhattisgarh. But when an expected ticket from his new party did not materialise as Purnia was allotted to the RJD during the seat-sharing talks, Pappu Yadav rebelled, alleging the Mahagathbandhan was trying to end his political career. He contested the election on his own and defeated Janata Dal (United) candidate Santosh Kumar by 23,847 votes. The RJD finished a distant third, polling only 27,120 votes. This act of disobedience earned him the Opposition alliance's wrath and he has been shut out ever since. The latest episode comes at a time when the Purnia MP has oscillated between touting his loyalty to the alliance and chafing at his exclusion. He has joined Opposition protests, including one against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, but the Mahagathbandhan has kept him at an arm's length. However, given the importance of Pappu Yadav in Muslim-dominated Seemanchal, the Opposition may need to rethink its strategy when it comes to him and has been careful in framing what happened during the July 9 march. Both the RJD and the Congress said the MP's exclusion from the protest march was down to 'security protocols' that are in place around Gandhi, the LoP. 'Every leader has their own identity and the Congress respects that. However, we must adhere to the protocols set by the security officer. Above all, it is crucial to stay focused on the issue for which we are marching, for the millions of people in Bihar. The Opposition is together and we are fully committed to addressing the concerns of the people of Bihar and raising objections to the verdict issued by the Election Commission. We will not allow them to infringe upon the voting rights of EBCs (Extremely Backward Classes), OBCs (Other Backward Classes), Adivasis, and other marginalised communities,' said Congress spokesperson Gyan Ranjan Gupta. RJD spokesperson Mrityunjay Tiwari also said it was a matter of protocol and that the Congress decides who should be up on the stage with Gandhi. 'The Congress provided the names and based on those, the security personnel granted permission. In such a large crowd, not everyone could have been on stage. At events with such large crowds, security personnel need to maintain special security as per the protocol and it is important that everyone respects that,' he said. However, JD(U) leader and state minister Ashok Kumar Choudhary said Pappu Yadav and Kanhaiya were removed because Tejashwi 'does not like them' and that it had exposed fissures in the alliance. 'The RJD dictates how the Congress should work in Bihar … It was deeply embarrassing, you can't even share the stage with Rahul Gandhi just because your alliance partner doesn't like it. Is this a way to treat a partner?' Contrary to his earlier image of a political figure on the periphery of state politics, Pappu Yadav has now established roots in the Kosi–Seemanchal belt, largely because of his public service and relief efforts. His regular social initiatives, from health camps to disaster relief, have significantly bolstered his on-the-ground image. During the Covid-19 second wave in 2021, he became known as one of Patna's 'oxygen men,' moving from hospital to hospital to arrange free oxygen cylinders and critical medicines for patients and providing essential aid to struggling families at no cost. When north Bihar faced floods late last year, the Purnia MP toured Saharsa and Darbhanga on a motorcycle, distributing cash and relief supplies and setting up community kitchens. Actions such as these have solidified Yadav's grassroots influence and independent electoral appeal in the region, helping him maintain a strong connection with a network of young volunteers. Given his grip in the region, where the ongoing SIR will likely pose a threat to the RJD and the Congress's vote base of the poor and minorities, Yadav may end up being either a valuable ally or a challenging figure for the Opposition alliance.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
YouTube videos of animal killings result in criminal cases in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh
HYDERABAD: Recent incidents of animal cruelty, some uploaded on YouTube, have led to criminal action in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh following complaints by PETA India and allied organisations. On Wednesday, a preliminary offence report (POR) was registered in Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, after videos surfaced showing two Russell's Vipers being bludgeoned to death, and a hare trapped and killed in agricultural fields near P Kotakonda village, Devanakonda mandal. Snakes are protected under Schedule I and hare under Schedule II of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The POR was registered under multiple provisions of the Act. These are non-bailable offences with punishments ranging from three to seven years imprisonment and a minimum fine of 25,000. The main accused was taken into custody by the forest department, which is continuing its investigation. In another incident on July 7 in Jakkapur village, Narayanraopet mandal of Siddipet district, a video showed a man biting a goat on the neck and tearing it apart with his teeth, assisted by others. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Earn Upto 5k Daily By This Method of Intraday Trading TradeWise Learn More Undo An FIR was filed at Chinnakodur police station after a complaint by Adulapuram Goutham of Stray Animal Foundation of India (SAFI), Hyderabad. The accused was booked under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Earlier on June 28, Adibatla Police in Rachakonda registered an FIR under BNS and PCA Act after five community dogs were allegedly poisoned in Sri Sri Aerocity. While four died, one survived due to intervention of a caregiver. A post-mortem was conducted on one of the deceased dogs. Meanwhile, a central govt-appointed inspection panel on June 26 recommended immediate rehabilitation of over 1,200 animals at Palamur Biosciences in Mahabubnagar, following a PETA-led expose.