logo
Mehul Choksi takes ‘kidnapping' allegations against India to UK court; claims denied

Mehul Choksi takes ‘kidnapping' allegations against India to UK court; claims denied

Hindustan Times17-06-2025
Mehul Choksi, the businessman wanted in India to face charges in the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case, is suing the Indian government and five individuals in the High Court in London as conspirators for his alleged 'kidnap, torture and attempted rendition'.
The Indian authorities have denied the allegations and objected to the UK jurisdiction on the basis of 'state immunity' and also sought permission for expert evidence on Indian law and the Indian Constitution to be taken into account.
During a case management hearing listed before Justice Freedman on Monday, the court was told that Choksi claims to have been tortured back in May 2021 as part of a kidnap attempt 'orchestrated by the government of India'.
'For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in these submissions is intended to waive or should be interpreted as waiving India's state immunity,' the court was told this week by the Indian side.
Choksi was accused of making 'extremely serious allegations against India, alleging it masterminded an international plot to kidnap and harm him'.
'It is India's position that the present claim is being pursued principally with the (misguided) intention of attempting to cause embarrassment to India and obtain leverage in the Claimant's international attempts to avoid extradition,' barrister Harish Salve argued on behalf of the Indian authorities.
Choksi's lawyers, led by barrister Edward Fitzgerald, allege that there was a collusion between five individuals in the attack on him in Antigua to be forcibly taken to Dominica in the Caribbean with the purpose of being 'rendered' to India.
'The Defendants thereby entered into an unlawful means conspiracy whereby the Defendants agreed to, and then did, inflict unlawful and injurious acts on the Claimant by means of assault, battery, false imprisonment, unlawful detention, and/or unlawful restriction of liberty,' Choksi's legal claim reads.
The businessman, meanwhile, remains in custody in Belgium, fighting against his extradition to India. He is wanted in India along with his nephew, Nirav Modi, who remains behind bars in London after repeated attempts at bail have been denied by the English courts.
There are three sets of criminal proceedings against Nirav in India – the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case of fraud on PNB, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case relating to the alleged laundering of the proceeds of that fraud and a third set of criminal proceedings involving alleged interference with evidence and witnesses in the CBI proceedings.
In April 2021, then UK home secretary Priti Patel had ordered his extradition to face these charges in the Indian courts after a prima facie case was established against him. But recent court hearings in London have alluded to a "confidential" impediment to his extradition, believed to be an asylum application.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Week in Explainers: The shocking murder of tennis player Radhika Yadav in Haryana
This Week in Explainers: The shocking murder of tennis player Radhika Yadav in Haryana

First Post

time38 minutes ago

  • First Post

This Week in Explainers: The shocking murder of tennis player Radhika Yadav in Haryana

The murder of Radhika Yadav, a state-level tennis player, at her residence in Gurugram has shocked the country. Her father, Deepak Yadav, allegedly fired multiple shots at the 25-year-old in a 'fit of rage'. But what was his motive? All this and much more in our weekly wrap from India read more Advertisement Radhika Yadav was shot dead at her Gurugram house. Image courtesy: X It was a sombre week for India. Two Indian Air Force (IAF) pilots lost their lives after a Jaguar fighter jet crashed in Rajasthan, making it the third such plane to come down this year. A father allegedly killed his daughter, Radhika Yadav, a 25-year-old tennis player, at their home in Haryana's Gurugram. The horrific murder has sent shockwaves across the country. Did Pakistan really shoot down India's French-made Rafale planes during aerial strikes after Operation Sindoor? Islamabad claims so, but it might have been fooled into believing that it brought down an Indian fighter jet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here's all this and more in our weekly roundup of stories. 1. Two IAF pilots suffered fatal injuries after a Jaguar fighter jet that they were onboard crashed in an agricultural field in Bhanoda village in Rajasthan's Churu district. The pilots were identified as Squadron Leader Lokendra Singh Sindhu (44) and Flight Lieutenant Rishi Raj Singh (23). According to the IAF, its 'Jaguar Trainer aircraft met with an accident during a routine training mission', coming down in Churu. This was the third Jaguar plane to crash this year , bringing the issues related to the ageing aircraft to the spotlight. Sources have previously said that the Jaguar fighter jet has suffered more than 50 incidents in its 45-year service with the IAF, some of which were fatal. As the aircraft sees another fatal crash, who were the two IAF pilots who lost their lives? We take a look in this report . 2. Pakistan has claimed it shot down three of India's Rafale fighter jets during clashes in May. New Delhi has rejected these claims, with Defence Secretary RK Singh calling them incorrect. Now, reports say that Islamabad was tricked into believing that it brought down India's French-made plane. India used Rafale Advanced Defense System's X-Guard – an AI-powered decoy system – to dupe Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. An expert has described the Indian Air Force's deployment of the system as 'the best spoofing and deception we've ever seen.' But what is this decoy and how was it used by India? Read our report to find out . STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 3. The killing of Radhika Yadav, a state-level tennis player, allegedly by her father, has garnered nationwide attention. Deepak Yadav is said to have fired multiple shots at his daughter in a 'fit of rage' at their house in Gurugram's upscale Sushant Lok area, leading to her death. Deepak Yadav is accused of killing his daughter, former tennis player Radhika Yadav, in Gurugram on July 10. PTI There were tensions between the duo over shutting down the tennis academy that Radhika ran. The athlete's mother, Manju Yadav, was also present at the residence when the shooting took place, described her husband as 'obsessive' and 'angry'. According to the police, the father has confessed to the crime. But what drove him to 'kill' his own daughter? Here's our story . 4. Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud is embroiled in a controversy. He has overstayed at the official residence CJI residence, even nearly eight months after he retired. Reports have emerged that the administration of the Supreme Court has raised the issue with the Central government. It wrote a letter to the housing ministry to get the official residence vacated and returned to the Supreme Court's housing pool. After the letter was published by various news outlets, the former CJI revealed the heartbreaking reason behind his decision to continue staying at the official residence. Read our report to know more. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 5. Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan and his family have suffered a legal setback. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a decades-old trial court ruling that had made him, his two sisters and their mother the sole legal heirs to the properties of the erstwhile Nawab of Bhopal. Saif Ali Khan has inherited the Bhopal royal properties. PTI/File Photo Their inheritance was challenged by other family members of Hamidullah Khan, the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal. The Hum Tum actor inherited the royal properties from his grandmother, Sajida Begum, who had married Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi, the Nawab of Pataudi. Saif Ali Khan is also engaged in another legal battle over these royal assets, which were declared as 'enemy property' in 2014. We explain both cases in this story . 6. Have you ever wondered what chemicals your makeup has? The Indian government is now considering this question and mulling a ban on mercury-based cosmetics. This comes after a recommendation from the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) to ban such formulations. Mercury can be found in a range of products, including anti-ageing creams, eye makeup, skin-whitening lotions and nail polishes. But why do these products have the metal? Is it toxic to human health? Read our report to find out. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is all we have for you this week. If you like reading our explainers, you can bookmark this page .

ED raids in Punjab, Har in ‘donkey route' case
ED raids in Punjab, Har in ‘donkey route' case

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

ED raids in Punjab, Har in ‘donkey route' case

The Enforcement Directorate on Friday conducted fresh searches in Punjab and Haryana as part of a money laundering investigation into a 'donkey route' case related to illegal Indian immigrants who were deported by the US this year, official sources said. Raids are being undertaken at seven locations at Mansa in Punjab and Kurukshetra and Karnal in Haryana under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), they said. The latest raids are based on 'credible' inputs gathered during the first round of searches conducted on July 9 at 11 locations in these two states, the sources said. Post the July 9 searches, the federal probe agency on Thursday said in a statement that it has recovered 30 original passports and got hold of the names of various agents and immigration agencies running the 'donkey route' business of sending Indians abroad illegally on a 'large-scale'. Inputs gathered shows that human traffickers were used to arrange illegal route resources outside India in connivance with donkers (human trafficking conduits), the sources said.

Judge Blocks ICE From Randomly Stopping Suspected Migrants
Judge Blocks ICE From Randomly Stopping Suspected Migrants

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Judge Blocks ICE From Randomly Stopping Suspected Migrants

(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge in Los Angeles issued a temporary order barring US immigration authorities from stopping people for questioning without cause, the latest fallout from the Trump administration's controversial crackdown on migrants in California and across the US. A temporary restraining order sought by a group of Southern California residents, workers and advocacy groups was granted Friday by US District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, escalating another legal clash between immigrant rights groups and President Donald Trump's administration. The judge barred agents in the Los Angeles area from stopping and questioning individuals without reasonable suspicion that they're in the US illegally. The order forbids the agents from basing their suspicion on race, ethnicity, speaking Spanish, speaking English with an accent, the type of the work they do or where they are located. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The groups argued that federal officials 'must have an objective, particularized basis' to believe that a person is in the US illegally before they can stop them and require they answer questions. To do otherwise, they argue, amounts to illegal racial profiling. They also asked the judge to order that anyone detained be provided access to lawyers. The order by Frimpong, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, is a rebuke to the administration's raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in public spaces to make mass arrests. It comes as a wide swath of the most populous state's Democratic elected officials, from Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to Governor Gavin Newsom, have slammed President Donald Trump's administration for what they describe as heavy-handed tactics. The disputed tactics include using National Guard troops to protect ICE agents during immigration sweeps and deploying US Marines in downtown Los Angeles to help quell protests, both of which triggered separate lawsuits. But the targeting of suspected migrants by masked and armed immigration agents has been a focal point of Democratic criticism. 'Armed to the hilt, masked, and driving unmarked cars, they have adopted a central strategy of grabbing people first and asking questions later,' the groups said in their request for a restraining order. Trump has argued that his tactics are in line with the president's constitutional authority to carry out immigration policy and that voters elected him to follow through on his vow to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. Trump has frequently portrayed migrants as criminals who pose a threat to Americans, but court records show many are law-abiding noncitizens have been swept up across the country. The groups that sued in Los Angeles, the second-largest US metropolitan area and a focal point of Trump's effort, argued in court filings that federal immigration agents are violating the Constitution by conducting stops 'without reasonable suspicion' that the individuals were in the US illegally. The agents are trying to meet 'an arbitrary quota for 3,000 daily arrests imposed by the White House,' the groups said. 'But while defendants may believe that immigration enforcement can be a numbers game, the Fourth Amendment requires that seizures be reasonable,' they said in a filing. The filings cite detailed examples of alleged wrongdoing by federal agents, including a man who says he was 'grabbed' at a car wash and interrogated by agents who knew 'nothing more at the time than that he had brown skin and was present at the car wash.' Another man, a plaintiff in the suit, was detained at a tow yard where he was working on his car. 'He told them he was American, but they violently persisted in their questioning, demanding that he tell him what hospital he was born in, and only let him go after he showed them his Real ID, for which they had not even asked,' according to the filing. The plaintiffs argue that 'roving patrols' targeting day laborers, street vendors, farm workers and other were 'expressly directed' by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who told high level officials at ICE to 'just go out there and arrest' unauthorized noncitizens by rounding them up in public spaces like 'Home Depot' and '7-Eleven' stores, according to court filings. The group alleges that similar racial profiling has been underway at raids in agricultural sites, bus stops, packing houses and churches. --With assistance from Robert Burnson. More stories like this are available on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store