Barnard College settles suit brought by Jewish students, agreeing not to meet with anti-Israel group
In the statement, Barnard's president, Laura Ann Rosenbury, said the agreement 'reflects our ongoing commitment to maintaining a campus that is safe, welcoming, and inclusive for all members of our community.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The terms of the deal also drew immediate pushback from some students and faculty, who accused the university of capitulating to a legal strategy aimed at stifling legitimate pro-Palestinian activism on campus.
'This settlement appears to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism,' said Nara Milanich, a Barnard history professor who is Jewish. 'That is a problem for critical thought and academic freedom.'
As part of the agreement, the college will adopt contentious federal guidance to 'consider' the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism and its examples, which include certain critiques of Israel.
Advertisement
A newly-appointed Title VI coordinator will oversee compliance with the policy and produce an annual report on antisemitism for university leaders.
Additionally, the university's leaders agreed not to recognize, meet or negotiate with Columbia University Apartheid Divest, the coalition behind last spring's student encampments. The group has called on both Columbia and Barnard to sever ties with companies that do business with Israel.
As part of the deal, the university will also affirm that its endowment will not be used for expressing political positions, including 'taking actions for the purpose of penalizing the government of a country or the commercial/financial activity within that country.'
The agreement follows a federal lawsuit brought last February that accused Barnard and Columbia of allowing Jewish and Israeli students to be 'bombarded' by antisemitism during protests that erupted against Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
The litigation against Columbia remains ongoing — though the university has already agreed to revamp its policies around protests, among other concessions made under threat from the Trump administration.
New York University and Harvard University have entered into their own legal settlements following lawsuits focused on antisemitism.
In the lawsuit against Columbia and Barnard, Jewish and Israeli students said they were subject to unchecked harassment during protests by 'mobs of pro-Hamas students and faculty.' Those who participated in the protests, including many Jewish students, have strongly disputed that characterization.
The lawsuit also claimed that students who served in Israel's military were singled out, with some left 'overwhelmed and unable to concentrate in class' after encountering signs accusing Israel of committing genocide and social media posts from fellow students.
Starting next semester, students will be reminded that they can be subject to discipline for off-campus conduct, including social media posts.
Advertisement
Barnard will also restrict where, when and how students can protest. And the university will ban face masks at demonstration used to 'intimidate or interfere with the enforcement' of school policies.
'Barnard's commitment to take meaningful actions to combat antisemitism demonstrates its leadership in the fight against antisemitism and upholding the rights of Jewish and Israeli students,' said Marc Kasowitz, an attorney for the plaintiffs. 'I encourage other colleges and universities to do the right thing and follow Barnard's lead.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Morning Joe baffled that AOC, Mamdani, Sanders are Dems only hope! Robby Soave
Morning Joe baffled that AOC, Mamdani, Sanders are Dems only hope! Robby Soave | RISING Robby Soave delivers radar on MSNBC's Joe Scarborough questioning why the three most compelling figures in the Democratic Party currently are NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), as opposed to more moderate figures. Piers Morgan, Owen Jones clash over Israel's response to Oct. 7 | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage discuss British journalist Owen Jones and Piers Morgan arguing over the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Meanwhile, President Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House. Trump faces backlash over using term viewed as antisemitic; POTUS denies ill intent | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage discuss President Trump using an antisemitic slur during remarks promoting his, 'big, beautiful bill.' Dem voters tell lawmakers they must be willing to 'get shot' for Trump resistance: Report | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage discuss Democratic voters saying party lawmakers needs to be willing to, 'get shot,' to fight President Trump's agenda. Epstein client list does not exist, disgraced financier killed himself: FBI, DOJ memo | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage discuss a new Axios report on bombshell conclusions that the DOJ and FBI reached about Jeffrey Epstein's 'client list' and cause of death. Tucker Carlson asks Iranian president if they've backed assassination attempt on Trump | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage weigh in on Tucker Carlson's interview with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Mark Ruffalo blasts Joe Rogan over being late to Trump deportation criticism | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage react to actor Mark Ruffalo calling out Joe Rogan for not speaking out against ICE sooner. Joy Reid suggests 2026 elections may not be 'free and fair' | RISING Robby Soave and Niall Stanage react to two former cable news stars, Joy Reid and Jim Acosta, floating conspiracy theories about President Trump and the 2026 midterms.
Los Angeles Times
38 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women and girls
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants Tuesday for the Taliban's supreme leader and the head of Afghanistan's Supreme Court on charges of persecuting women and girls since seizing power nearly four years ago. The warrants also accuse the leaders of persecuting 'other persons non-conforming with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression; and on political grounds against persons perceived as 'allies of girls and women.'' The warrants were issued against Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhunzada and the head of the Supreme Court, Abdul Hakim Haqqani. The warrants came just hours after the United Nations adopted a resolution Monday over U.S. objections that called on the Taliban to reverse their worsening oppression of women and girls and eliminate all terrorist organizations. They are the latest high profile suspects named in arrest warrants issued by the Hague-based court that also has sought the arrest of other leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government. The court said in a statement that the Taliban have 'severely deprived, through decrees and edicts, girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion. In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.' The court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, sought the warrants in January, saying that they recognized that 'Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban.' Global advocacy group Human Rights Watch welcomed the decision. 'Senior Taliban leaders are now wanted men for their alleged persecution of women, girls, and gender non-conforming people. The international community should fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court's warrants,' Liz Evenson, the group's international justice director, said in a statement. ICC judges approved a request in 2022 from the prosecutor to reopen an investigation into Afghanistan. The probe was shelved after Kabul said it could handle the investigation. Khan said he wanted to reopen the inquiry because under the Taliban, there was 'no longer the prospect of genuine and effective domestic investigations' in Afghanistan. Khan's predecessor, Fatou Bensouda, got approval in 2020 to start looking at offenses allegedly committed by Afghan government forces, the Taliban, American troops and U.S. foreign intelligence operatives dating back to 2002. When Khan reopened the probe, he said he would focus on crimes committed by the Taliban and the Afghan affiliate of the Islamic State group. He said he would 'deprioritize' other aspects of the investigation, such as crimes committed by Americans. The warrants for Taliban leaders were issued while Khan has stepped down temporarily pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct. Khan has categorically denied accusations that he tried for more than a year to coerce a female aide into a sexual relationship and groped her against her will. Corder writes for the Associated Press.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
What Progressives Have to Learn From Zohran Mamdani
An emphatic advocate of Palestinian rights has won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor by 12 points—a shocking margin that he owes, in part, to the support of an outspoken Zionist. The partnership between Zohran Mamdani and New York City Comptroller Brad Lander doesn't just showcase an unusual alliance. It provides a road map for Democrats, whose future success will require a different kind of politics than the left currently favors: one that sets aside purity tests and commits to building coalitions across ideological divides. For many promoters of the Palestinian cause, Lander is far from an obvious ally. The city's highest-ranking Jewish official backs Palestinian statehood and has long condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government. But Lander defends Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state—identifying himself as a 'progressive Zionist'—and opposes the BDS (boycott, divestment, sanctions) movement. These views make him anathema to large swaths of the left, particularly in New York City, where even bookstores and community gardens occasionally try to ban Israel's supporters. (One of us—Alexis—is a co-founder of Pythia Public Affairs, a political-strategy firm that advised Lander's 2021 campaign for comptroller.) Mamdani's campaign shows the political futility of this closed-minded approach. He and Lander organized a coalition that both liberal Jews and pro-Palestinian Muslims could embrace. Crucially, the two candidates didn't hide their differences. Mamdani has affirmed Israel's right to exist, but not as a Jewish state. He has also defended the slogan ' Globalize the intifada,' which understandably outraged many Jewish New Yorkers and even vociferous critics of Israel. The phrase 'absolutely makes me uncomfortable,' Lander told CNN. 'People might mean something different, but all I can hear when you say that is Open season on Jews.' Lander acknowledged that he didn't completely agree with Mamdani on Israel and Palestine. But, he said, 'we're not running for foreign policy. We're running for the city of New York.' Jonathan Chait: Why won't Zohran Mamdani denounce a dangerous slogan? By admitting their differences, Mamdani and Lander ultimately made their alliance more credible: They encouraged voters to prioritize shared goals, not ignore disagreement. Each persuaded his supporters to place the other one second on their ranked-choice ballots, which gave a significant boost to Mamdani. The effect was particularly evident in the district that Lander once represented on the city council—an area that's home to the largest Reform Jewish congregation in Brooklyn as well as several Conservative synagogues, yet still resoundingly backed the Muslim Mamdani. Across the city, Lander's supporters almost certainly made up the bulk of the 99,000 votes that went to Mamdani in the decisive third round of tabulation. Although the specific tactic of cross-endorsing is uniquely suited to ranked-choice elections, Mamdani and Lander's model of coalition building can be replicated across Democratic politics. To be sure, Lander's endorsement didn't erase the skepticism that many in the Jewish community feel toward Mamdani. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, Mamdani's main opponent, did his best to amplify that skepticism—often cynically, as many of his Jewish critics argued. But Mamdani himself occasionally amplified it too. In late June, he shared a social-media post mourning the death of a Jewish woman. According to authorities, she had been attacked by a man who shouted that he wanted to 'kill all Zionist people.' But Mamdani neglected to acknowledge the role that anti-Semitism played in her death, much less the role that many of his ideological peers have played in fomenting anti-Semitism. The oversight invited another round of blowback. Still, Mamdani made a greater effort to appeal to Jewish voters than many of his fellow progressives have. During the campaign, he condemned Hamas's October 7 attacks as a war crime. And when he criticized Israel, he made a point of quoting Israelis, including former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the historian Amos Goldberg. Immediately after Mamdani won the primary, his campaign made clear that he would continue making an effort to reach out to the Jewish community. On election night, he pledged to 'reach further to understand the perspectives of those with whom I disagree.' This approach separates Mamdani from the Democratic Socialists of America, of which he's a member. The group's national leadership includes defenders of Hamas, and many of its chapters have demonized Zionism. Last year, DSA withdrew its endorsement of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of democratic socialism's most popular exponents, in part because she attended an event focused on combatting anti-Semitism. This kind of exclusionary politics has led many Jews to conclude that they are unwelcome or unsafe on the left, even though some Zionists agree with much of the left's platform. Many Zionists (including Lander) support a cease-fire in Gaza, for example, and oppose the occupation of Palestinian territories as well as settler violence in the West Bank. The left has often alienated these voters by enforcing an anti-Zionist orthodoxy. Michael Powell: The magic realism of Zohran Mamdani As Mamdani prepares for the general election, he would do well to avoid getting dragged into fights about Israel. This doesn't mean he needs to reverse his positions. It means he should continue focusing on issues—such as housing, transportation, and food security—that made up the core of his campaign and animate a broad share of New Yorkers. If Mamdani wins office, he can look to London Mayor Sadiq Khan for a model of coalitional progressive politics. A Muslim member of the Labour Party, Khan was reelected to a third term last year thanks to significant support from Muslim and Jewish voters. He earned the trust of these groups by addressing both Islamophobia and anti-Semitism, and by adopting priorities—such as free school meals and affordable housing—that were popular well beyond his electoral base. If the left wants to prove that it can run the largest municipal government in America, it can't double down on ideological purity, whether about the Middle East or anything else. Anti-Israel hard-liners will have no choice but to work with people they previously deemed pariahs. Mamdani and Lander just showed them how rewarding that collaboration would be.
