Sault Ste. Marie police board chair and vice-chair resign amid tensions with city council
Former chair John Bruno and vice-chair Ian MacKenzie stepped down Friday, their resignations come amid growing tensions over the police force's financial management and board governance.
Both had served on the board for several years and resigned as the city continues its search for a new police chief.
MacKenzie opposed the board's decision not to consider former chief Hugh Stevenson for reappointment. After seven years as chief, Stevenson resigned in March to run as a federal Conservative candidate and later expressed interest in returning.
In a statement to CBC News, Mayor Shoemaker said the resignations followed a May 12 council meeting where the board chair was asked to respond to concerns about back-to-back budget deficits totalling nearly $5 million.
"Nearly two months later – before responding to Council – the Chair and Vice-Chair resigned instead of providing the responses they had been preparing for months," Shoemaker said in the statement.
"Contrary to the suggestions in their resignation letters, this line of questioning is not an act of inappropriate politicization – it is a necessary and responsible response to a deeply troubling situation. You cannot simply hand-wave aside a $5 million deficit. Hard questions must be asked so the public can receive honest answers and the organization can move forward."
Shoemaker said that the former chair and vice chair are now deflecting scrutiny by questioning the motives of those asking legitimate questions.
"I have seen this dynamic play out repeatedly since I rejoined the Police Services Board in February – shortly before the deficit came to light," he said.
Shoemaker will serve as vice-chair of the police board for the remainder of the current term.
The board met the day after the resignations and named former city solicitor Nuala Kenny as chair.
In a statement, the board thanked Bruno and MacKenzie for their service and said it remains "fully committed to its mandate of ensuring adequate and effective policing."
The board said hiring a new police chief remains a top priority, with interviews underway and a new appointment expected by the end of August. Ward 4 Coun. Marchy Bruni will take Bruno's place on the recruitment committee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
8 minutes ago
- National Post
DND to start construction on new F-35 hangars despite review
Article content 'We'll be taking possession of those 16 F-35 fighter jets in the next several months, by the new year at the latest,' McGuinty told journalists on June 10. Article content That, however, isn't true. Article content The DND statement to the Ottawa Citizen noted that Canada would receive its first four jets in 2026, followed by four in 2027 and four in 2028. The first eight will go to Luke Air Force Base in the United States to enable the training of Canadian pilots, and the first aircraft will come to Canada in 2028, according to the statement. Article content Auditor General Karen Hogan revealed June 10 that the cost of Canada's F-35 purchase had skyrocketed by nearly 50 per cent from $19 billion to $27.7 billion. Article content Another $5.5 billion will be needed to achieve full operation capability for the planes, Hogan added. Article content Part of the increase was because of U.S. concerns over the original design of hangars and other facilities for the stealth fighters to be built at Cold Lake and Bagotville. Those facilities had to be redesigned. Article content Article content Some retired military officers as well as defence analysts from DND-funded think tanks have argued that Canada should proceed with its entire F-35 purchase because it needs to remain a strong ally of the U.S. Article content But retired Lt.-Gen. Yvan Blondin, the air force general who recommended Canada buy the F-35 fighter jet, now says the purchase should no longer go forward as planned because the U.S. has become so untrustworthy. Article content Critics have pointed out that the U.S. also controls all aspects of software upgrades needed for the F-35 to continue flying. That, in turn, could pose a security risk because of the U.S. shift to a more hostile relationship with Canada.
CBC
10 minutes ago
- CBC
Walpole Island First Nation holds protest against Dresden landfill expansion
Fire keepers from Walpole Island First Nation watched over a sacred fire near the bank of the Sydenham River over the weekend as part of a series of events in response to a planned landfill expansion in Dresden — and Ontario legislation that appear designed to expedite it. Knowledge keepers from the community stood on the shore and sang a water song in Anishinaabemowin as more than a dozen canoes and kayaks glided down the river from Dresden to Wallaceburg, praying as they paddled. "The legal protections. They were there for a reason. I'm confused on why we're going backwards and why we're not protecting our homes like we used to," said Chloe White-Deleary, one of the paddlers. "It counts on humans, all of us, to be stewards of the land. And in my culture, we think about not just us, but like what are we doing to protect the next seven generations?" Waste management company York1, is proposing to expand the landfill site, located just over a kilometre from the edge of Dresden, to cover 25 hectares and receive 6,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste each day. A spokesperson told CBC in a statement in early June that it plans to use the site to turn clean wood into mulch, compost, and raw materials for particleboard and paper manufacturing; to turn mixed wood waste into alternative low-carbon fuels; and to prepare rock and rubble for use in cement and concrete production, aggregate replacement in construction, base for sports fields or running tracks and decorative use in landscaping. But the proposal has faced significant community opposition from local residents and environmental groups concerned about the impact on nearby bodies of water. And that opposition has grown since the Ford government introduced Bill 5, which became law on June 5 and which exempts "specified activities relating to the Chatham-Kent waste disposal site" from Part II.3 of the Environmental Assessment Act, which requires applications for projects under the section to be accompanied by environmental assessments. Walpole Island First Nation Chief Leela Thomas told CBC Windsor Morning Tuesday she thinks the government's actions violate Section 35 of the Canadian Constitution, which includes a duty to consult First Nations before making decisions that could impact their rights. It also violates the Treaty of Niagara and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, she said, which requires governments to seek free, prior and informed consent for developments on their lands. "Our family members use those waterways for hiking, fishing, harvesting and our ceremony," Thomas said. "And we have those treaty rights to protect our rights to fish, to hunt and harvest and practice our culture on our own ancestral lands and waterways." Nine First Nations are seeking an injunction to prevent government from using Bill 5 and federal Bill C-5 to fast-track infrastructure projects, arguing that both pieces of legislation authorize "the Crown to unilaterally ram through projects without meaningful or any engagement with First Nations" and "violate the constitutional obligation of the Crown to advance ... reconciliation." In response to a request for comment about the legal challenge, the office of Ontario Premier Doug Ford said it had begun "productive conversations with First Nations who share our vision of unlocking economic opportunity and critical infrastructure in their community, and will continue these consultations throughout the summer." "These consultations will shape the regulations and criteria for new special economic zones and Indigenous-led economic zones." Thomas said she is honoured to have so many community members, especially young ones, who are vocal about the impact of Bill 5. She is also grateful for generations of community members who have been dedicated to protecting the land and water and passing those teachings on to younger generations. The goal of the fire was to create a peaceful gathering where decisions affecting future generations could be made collectively with full understanding of the consequences, said Amy White, a councillor with the First Nation. White had a powerful experience at the fire when she saw three immature eagles circling overhead in a clockwise direction, she said. "I shared that with the elder who I get [advice] from," White said.
CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
B.C. mother ordered to pay over $4K for son's dirt bike thefts, tribunal finds
A mother has been ordered to fork out for her child's wrongdoing after a B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal determined her to be responsible for her son's involvement in the theft and subsequent damage of three dirt bikes. A decision on the dispute posted July 10 outlines how three Honda dirt bikes belonging to the applicant, referred to as Mr. S, were 'intentionally taken and damaged' in September 2023. The bikes were later found at the home of the mother of one minor, referred to as B, and the home of his friend, EW, after the two had taken them in the night and removed their parts, the decision read. In B.C., a minor is defined as anyone under the age of 19. The tribunal member was tasked with determining whether B or his mother was financially responsible for the damage caused after the mother, named Ms. R, argued she had no financial responsibility for her child's actions. Tribunal member Alissa Reynolds referred to The Parental Liability Act, particularly section 3, which says that if a child intentionally takes, damages, or destroys another person's property their parent is liable for the loss of or damage to the property. Reynolds said Ms. R had a possible defence, however, if she could prove that she both 'exercised reasonable supervision' over her son at the time of the incident, and 'made reasonable efforts to prevent or discourage B's conduct.' Ultimately the defence collapsed after Reynolds noted how B had been 'behaving inappropriately' for several months before the bikes were taken, and that Ms. R hadn't been surprised by the latest actions of her son. Reynolds said Ms. R was unable to provide evidence 'about her house rules, whether B has a curfew, or steps she takes to ensure he is home during the night,' which implied she had not been carrying out a reasonable level of supervision when her son and his friend stole the bikes around 2 or 3 a.m. that morning. The mother also 'did not give any evidence of steps that she took to improve her parenting skills before this incident,' the decision read. Based on those factors, Reynolds found that Ms. R had not established she was reasonably supervising her son on the night of the incident, or 'that she made reasonable efforts to prevent or discourage' his conduct. 'I find that Ms. R is liable for B's actions in damaging the dirt bikes,' she said Ms. R and her son were ordered to pay a total of $4,106.63, in damages within 30 days of the decision being made.
