Dems warn House Republicans will pay price at ballot box for passing Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
"We're going to hold Republicans accountable and there will be a price to pay," Rep. Suzan DelBene of Washington State, the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, emphasized as she pointed to next year's midterm elections during a Fox News Digital interview.
Republicans are holding onto an extremely razor-thin majority in the chamber right now, and Democrats only need a three-seat pickup to win back the House majority in the 2026 elections.
Additionally, they view the sweeping and controversial GOP-crafted measure stocked full of Trump's second-term priorities on tax cuts, immigration, defense, energy and the debt limit – which is currently making its way through numerous votes and hurdles in the House – as political ammunition.
Inching Closer: House Speaker Johnson Reaches Tentative Agreement With Some Holdout Gop Lawmakers
"This is a terrible piece of legislation," DelBene argued.
Read On The Fox News App
Democrats from across the party are shining a spotlight on the Republicans' restructuring of Medicaid, the nearly 60-year-old federal government program that provides health insurance for roughly 71 million adults and children with limited incomes.
"Let's be clear, all Republicans are talking about right now is how many people and how fast they're going to take away healthcare. They have these huge cuts to Medicaid, 14 million people lose healthcare across the country, and they're talking about how fast they can do that," DelBene charged on Tuesday.
She claimed that House Republicans are "all blindly following the president and going to blindly follow him off the cliff."
Rep. Ted Lieu of California, another member of the House Democrat leadership, argued as he took questions from reporters that the bill "has the largest cut to healthcare in U.S. history."
Gop Holdouts Unmoved By Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' Trip To Capitol Hill
The cuts to Medicaid, being drafted in part as an offset to pay for extending Trump's 2017 tax cut law, which is set to expire later this year, include a slew of new rules and regulatory requirements for those seeking coverage. Among them are a new set of work requirements for many of those seeking coverage.
"When you go across the country and talk to folks, folks are outraged, and they're scared. They're scared about the cuts to healthcare, not only cutting 14 million people off of healthcare but then raising costs beyond that for everyone and things like rural hospitals closing," DelBene argued. "This would have devastating impacts across the country. This is policy that Republicans are fighting for, cutting nutrition health programs so that families don't even have healthy food."
House Republicans push back against the Democrats' attacks and say what they are doing is putting an end to waste, fraud and abuse currently in the Medicaid system, so the program can work for the public in the way that it was intended.
They call any talk that they are cutting aid to mothers, children, people with disabilities and the elderly a "flat out lie."
First On Fox: These Republican Governors Say They 'Stand United' In Support Of Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill'
DelBene countered, saying, "we're not buying the argument because what we've seen in committee, what they've written down on paper is massive cuts in healthcare and all to pay for tax breaks for the wealthiest in our country. This isn't a bill about helping working families. This bill is devastating for working families."
However, her counterparty, Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, told Fox News Digital in a statement that "Republicans are ending waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicaid so the most vulnerable get the care they need."
Additionally, Hudson argued that "Democrats are lying to protect a broken status quo that lets illegal immigrants siphon off billions meant for American families. We're strengthening Medicaid for future generations by protecting taxpayers and restoring integrity."
Dating back to last year's presidential campaign, Trump has vowed not to touch Medicaid. On Tuesday, as he made a rare stop on Capitol Hill to meet behind closed doors with House Republicans in order to shore up support for the bill, Trump's message to fiscally conservative lawmakers looking to make further cuts to Medicaid was "don't f--- around with Medicaid."
While there are divisions between Republicans over Medicaid, and a chasm between the two major parties over the longstanding entitlement program, there is one point of agreement – this issue will continue to simmer on the campaign trail in one form or another long after the legislative battles on Capitol Hill are over.Original article source: Dems warn House Republicans will pay price at ballot box for passing Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
As MAGA world focuses on Epstein, Trump focuses on anything else
During a fusillade of posts on the social network he owns, Trump even released a 3-minute mash-up of clips that would seem more at place on-screen at a sports bar than in a President's official feed: a woman snatching an approaching snake from the grass, a car sliding under a truck barreling along a highway and no fewer than four people doing tricks on motorcycles and jet skis. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up On Monday, Gabbard added another item to the list - announcing the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the 1968 assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Advertisement The through-line connecting those disparate posts? They have nothing to do with the political problem that has dogged Trump for weeks - the 2019 death of Jeffrey Epstein. As the controversy over Epstein, the wealthy financier and sex offender, has refused to dissipate, Trump and those closest to him have tried repeatedly to divert attention to other subjects, with limited success. Republican strategist Alex Conant said the Epstein episode has called into question Trump's ability to evade electoral consequences of actions that would kneecap other politicians. Advertisement 'Nobody turns the page better than Donald Trump,' Conant said. 'His entire first term was constantly changing narratives. We lost track of all the dramas because he's always adding a new one to distract from the previous ones. 'This is different because he's in a real fight with his base. Normally his base helps change the topic by latching on to a new outrage. But now he's in a fight with his base, and the Democrats and the mainstream media are more than happy to fan those flames,' Conant said. The fight started because many of Trump's loyal supporters were angered that the administration was refusing to follow through on promises to release more details about the Epstein case. The politically connected multimillionaire, who died in 2019, has been the subject of years of elaborate conspiracy theories, many of them fanned by people who now hold senior positions in Trump's administration, including FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino. Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 1997. DavidoffEpstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to state charges in Florida of soliciting a minor for prostitution. He was indicted on federal sex-trafficking charges in 2019 and died in jail later that year while awaiting trial. His death was ruled a suicide, though some prominent Trump supporters questioned that and alleged, without evidence, that he had been killed to protect rich and powerful friends who may have also been involved in his abuse of young girls. During an interview on Fox News in March, Attorney General Pam Bondi said she'd be releasing 'truck loads' of new information about Epstein. Instead, the Justice Department released a memo this month saying it had conducted an 'exhaustive review' and found no evidence of an 'incriminating 'client list'' or anything else that warranted public release. Advertisement That set off an apoplectic response from some in Trump's base, which the administration has spent two weeks trying to tamp down. Trump has questioned why his supporters had not moved on to more important topics, even suggesting that continued interest in the conspiracy theories benefited Democrats. 'Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bull----,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social last week. 'They haven't learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years.' That and other efforts to change the subject have been so far unsuccessful, experts and observers say. Instead, new attention has focused on Trump's own well-documented friendship with Epstein, especially after a Wall Street Journal article about a salacious drawing Trump allegedly contributed to a 50th birthday present for the financier in 2003. Trump denied the story and has sued the Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch. By insisting that he is the victim of an unfair media attack, he has rallied some of his most prominent supporters around him. But polls show that large majorities of the public believe the government is hiding facts about the Epstein case. As a result, the president whose ascent has been linked to a litany of unproven claims now finds his political power threatened by a conspiracy theory he can't shake. 'Donald Trump is the one who cast himself as the elite who doesn't side with the elites. He's the elite who sides with the people. He's going to drain the swamp,' said Russell Muirhead, a professor of democracy and politics at Dartmouth College and a Democratic state legislator from New Hampshire. Advertisement 'But when he says 'there's nothing to look at here. We're not going to release what the Justice Department has, and forget about that list' … it looks like he's just another elite, corrupt like all the rest and that impression will remain, to some extent, regardless of whether this particular story is at the top of people's attention.' The president has attempted to make some concessions on the issue, including an announcement Thursday shortly after the Wall Street Journal published its story that he had directed the Justice Department to petition the courts to release grand jury testimony related to Epstein. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt answered questions from reporters outside the White House on Monday, July 21. Kevin Dietsch/Getty On Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected claims that Trump is paying a political price for his handling of the Epstein case, noting that he enjoys high approval ratings among Republicans. 'The president is the leader and the creator of the Make America Great Again movement. It's his baby that he made and he knows what his supporters want,' she said during an impromptu news conference outside the White House, where nearly a quarter of the questions were about Epstein. 'It's transparency, and he has given them that on all accounts when it comes to everything his administration has done.' Democrats, seeing an opening, have demanded that Epstein records be released and have blasted Republicans' at times conflicting stances on the question. How quickly the public may move on from paying attention to the Epstein case might be more due to organic movement in the news cycle than any effort Trump makes, said Conant, the Republican strategist. Advertisement 'It's hard to keep a story like this alive unless there's fresh oxygen. Part of why it's become such a big story is because Trump himself keeps talking about it,' he said. It's not a coincidence this is happening in the dog days of summer. There's no big legislative fight. There's no national crisis. Fast forward two months and we're going to be facing a government shutdown. Time is on the President's side here.' Jonathan Edwards and Scott Clement contributed to this report.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump 'serious' about blocking Washington Commanders relocation to DC, White House says
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump isn't kidding around with his threat to the NFL's Washington Commanders, the White House says. 'The president was serious,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters July 21 when asked about Trump's new warning to block a proposed stadium deal that would return the Commanders to Washington if the team doesn't adopt its former name, Redskins. Washington retired the name Redskins in July 2020 amid nationwide protests over race, initially becoming the Washington Football Team for two seasons, and then rebranding as the Washington Commanders in 2022. Longtime owner Daniel Snyder in 2023 sold the team to a new ownership group led by billionaire investor Josh Harris, who has elected to keep Commanders as the name and has called the debate settled. Leavitt did not address how Trump has the power to restrict the team's planned relocation back to the site of Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium in D.C., which served as Washington's home stadium from 1961 to 1996, before the team's move to Landover, Maryland. Trump's ability to unilaterally scrap the team's deal for a new stadium to return to the RFK site appears doubtful after Congress passed a law in December that transferred ownership of the RFK stadium site from the National Park Service to the District of Columbia. The $3.7 billion stadium deal, which includes $1.1 billion in local taxpayer funds, is in the hands of the D.C. Council, which is nearing a vote on the project. However, Trump has shown a willingness in other political battles to threaten federal funding from states, cities, colleges and universities to get his way. Another route could be to lobby Republicans in Congress to rescind the land transfer bill they passed last year. More: Trump threatens Washington Commanders' stadium plans if franchise doesn't change name White House doubles down on Trump's threat Leavitt pointed to Trump's reputation as a dealmaker. 'As part of the 'art of the deal,' part of his negotiating skills, as you know, sports is one of the many passions of this president and he wants to see this team's name changed,' she said. When asked to explain Trump's authority to block the Commanders' stadium deal, a White House official directed USA TODAY to Leavitt's remarks. More: DC locals on Trump's attempt to force Commanders' name change: Stay in your 'own lane' The Commanders, which enjoyed its most successful season in decades after making it to the NFC Championship Game last year, have not commented since Trump brought up the team's name in a Truth Social post on Sunday. In the same post, Trump called on another professional sports team that was previously named for native Americans ‒ the Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Indians ‒ to go back to its old name. "The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this," Trump wrote. "Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!" Trump had previously voiced support for the team's former name, but it marked the first time he has used his position to call for a name change. He followed it up with a subsequent post suggesting he might hold up the team's stadium plans if it doesn't ditch Commanders and go back to its former name. "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,'" Trump wrote. "I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone." DC mayor focuses on council, not Trump Under the Constitution, Congress has authority over the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia Home Rule Act, signed by President Richard Nixon in 1973, gave the city local governance including an elected mayor and city council. However, Congress can still review all legislation passed by the D.C. Council and retains authority over the district's budget. No sign off from Trump is required for approval of the Commanders' stadium deal. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, who helped orchestrate the stadium deal, deflected when a reporter asked her Monday whether she believes Trump has the power to block the Commanders' stadium deal. "I think the thing that we should focus on in D.C. is doing our part," Bowser said, adding that the council still needs to approve the stadium deal. "We need to complete our part." Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has often talked about taking over the governance of D.C., a city he has long derided for crime and homelessness. Nevertheless, Trump hosted Bowser and the Commanders' Harris at the White House in May to announce Washington's National Mall would host the 2027 NFL Draft. 'I think you've seen the president gets involved in a lot of things that most presidents have not," Leavitt said when asked why changing the Commanders' name is a priority for Trump. "He's a nontraditional president. He likes to see results on behalf of the American people.' She added that Trump is getting behind something most Americans want. "If you actually poll this issue with sports fans across the country and even in this city, people actually do support the president's position on this and the name change," Leavitt said. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Native Americans rail against Trump's call to change Commanders' name back.
Native American groups had fought for years to get Washington's NFL team to change its name. Trump just renewed the battle. WASHINGTON ‒ Native American groups fought for years to get this city's National Football League team to change its name. Now, President Donald Trump wants to change it back to a moniker many Native Americans consider offensive and disrespectful. 'No Native American child should have to sit through a pep rally or in a stadium where their culture is being mocked,' said Jacqueline De León, senior staff attorney for the Native American Rights Fund. Trump threatened over the weekend to block a deal to build a stadium in Washington, D.C., if the Washington Commanders team refuses to revert to the name it had from 1937 when the team moved from Boston until 2022. "The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team," Trump posted on his Truth Social site. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders.'' In a post the same day, Trump said Native Americans would welcome the change. "Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen," he wrote in a post that also encouraged the Cleveland Guardians to revert to a former name. "Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' But that's not what USA TODAY found when reaching out to Native American activists. Native Americans are not mascots, said Savannah Romero, a member of the enrolled member of the Eastern Shoshone Nation, who urged city officials not to yield to the name change. 'We are language keepers, land protectors, survivors of attempted genocide, and a part of sovereign nations," Romero, co-founder and deputy director of the BLIS (Black Liberation-Indigenous Sovereignty) Collective Collective, said in a statement. "To equate Native people with cartoonish mascots alongside animals is a gross and ongoing tactic of dehumanization.' 'Disrespectful to the pain and suffering' Trump's move comes in the wake of efforts across the country to ban the use of Native American mascots and logos in schools, including in New York. The Native American Rights Fund supported efforts in New York to ban the use of such mascots. It recently released a video pushing back against the use of Native American mascots. In a June 17 announcement, the Department of Education called the ban 'an unlawful attempt to ban mascots and logos that celebrate Native American history.'' De León said that challenge is part of the larger narrative by the Trump administration to muddy the waters and undermine civil rights protections. It's not racist to push back against racism, she said. 'Native Americans are being used as tools for a distraction,' De León said. 'That's very disrespectful to the pain and suffering imposed on Native people by inaccurately depicting our culture.' More: Why some Native American citizens worry about getting caught in ICE's net Beth Wright, a member of Pueblo of Laguna, said the United States has long tried to erase Native identity and culture, including through federal Indian boarding schools, banning Native religious and cultural practices and seizing control over Native lands. 'Native people are still working to revitalize what the United States tried to erase,'' said Wright, a staff attorney with the Native American Rights Fund. 'Native mascots work directly against these efforts by perpetuating false historical narratives about Native people and false depictions of who Native people are today.'' 'It's a slur' In 2013, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more than 200 groups, approved a resolution calling for owners of the Washington team to change its name. The resolution called for the elimination of names and mascots 'that promote negative stereotypes and connotations or that trivialize Native American cultures.'' De León, who had lived in the Washington, D.C., area for several years, said it hurt when she saw people wearing shirts with the old name. 'I don't even like to say the word because it's a slur,' she said.
