Leading baby food brands making high-sugar meals, study finds
The discovery has spurred on groups to call for ministers to strengthen regulation in the market, saying that the current state of affairs will negatively affect child growth and development.
Researchers at the University of Leeds School of Food Science and Nutrition found that some brands also carried misleading marketing claims, leading them to urge the government to 'act now' in imposing the same traffic light system found on chocolate bars and ice-cream.
Ella's Kitchen pear and peach baby rice was found to have a rice content of only 3%; while sugar made up 60% of its calories.
Heinz fruity banana custard gets 71% of its total calories from sugar, with its ingredients only containing 4% milk powder; while its Baby Oat porridge is 29% sugar.
The study, funded by the Which? Fund, looked at 632 food products marketed towards babies and toddlers under three.
It found that 41% of main meals marketed for children had sugar levels that were too high and that 21% of ready-to-eat fruit products, cereals and meals were too watery and not providing adequate nutrition.
It also discovered that many early weaning foods were being sold as being suitable for babies aged four months, which goes against NHS and World Health Organization guidance.
The study also found that a quarter of the products analysed were so high in sugar they would require a sugar warning label on the front of the pack, in accordance with WHO guidelines. According to NHS guidelines, babies aged one should have no more than 10g of sugar per day, and no more than 14g per day for children aged two and three.
The sugar recommendation is applicable to naturally occurring free sugars and added sugars.
The report also surveyed more than 1,000 parents. It found that 70% of parents agreed that high sugar baby foods should have front-of-pack warning labels; while 59% were concerned about the high levels of naturally occurring sugars in food.
Dr Diane Threapleton, the lead author of the study, said: 'Voluntary guidelines are often ineffective, and so regulation is needed to make sure that change happens.
'With around 1.7 million children between six and 36 months in the UK, 'baby food' is a massive market. Widespread availability of inappropriate products with poor nutritional quality will negatively impact child growth and development.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Dr Vicky Sibson, the director of First Steps Nutrition Trust, said: 'As a result of pervasive misleading marketing, parents are unwittingly buying products that are simply not good enough nutritionally. Stronger, mandatory baby food regulations are long overdue.'
Sue Davies, the head of food policy at Which?, said: 'The government urgently needs to update the out-of-date laws for commercial baby foods to ensure there are tighter controls on their composition – including limits on their sugar and salt content – make labelling clear and upfront and clamp down on any misleading marketing claims that suggest products are healthier than they really are.'
A spokesperson for Ella's Kitchen said: 'There is nothing misleading about the name of this product. It follows strict legislation on how foods must be named, and clearly reflects exactly what is in the pouch – pears, peach and baby rice – in order of quantity.
'Our 'no added sugar' claim is legally approved – and absolutely accurate. We never add sugar to our weaning products; all the sweetness comes naturally from the fruit and veg we use to make them.'
A spokesman for Kraft Heinz said: 'We're proud of the role we play in families' lives and remain committed to the health and wellbeing of infants and young children. We provide quality products based on nutrition science that meet the nutrient requirements specific to this life stage and adhere to stringent UK/EU regulation.
'Our convenient, resealable pouches, made from natural ingredients with no added sugars, should be used as a complementary part of a varied weaning diet (six+ months) and are designed to be squeezed into a bowl or straight on to a spoon – as communicated on pack.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Existing laws already set nutrition needs for baby foods, and we support enforcement against any product that does not meet these expectations.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
13 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
North Wales health board to remain at highest level of special measures
A troubled North Wales health board is to remain at the highest level of special measures - level 5. Despite some improvements "significant challenges remain" for the beleaguered Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board. Wales' largest health board has "by far the largest proportion, and the longest waits, in Wales," a health report states. The board was placed back under the control of the Welsh Government (WG) around two years ago (February 2023). Prior to that, it was under the highest level of special measures from the summer of 2015 to November 2020. This followed concerns about board effectiveness, organisational culture, service quality and reconfiguration, governance, patient safety, operational delivery, leadership and financial management. The health board has more than 19,000 staff and serves more than 700,000 patients in hospitals across Anglesey, Gwynedd, Conwy, Denbighshire, Flintshire and Wrexham, and manages a budget of £1.87 billion It coordinates the work of 96 GP practices, and NHS services provided by 78 dental and orthodontic practices, 70 optometry practices and opticians and 145 pharmacies in North Wales Escalation levels are considered at least twice a year. Measures are imposed if a board or trust fails to meet expected standards of care and needs external support to improve. A letter to the board's chief executive, Carol Shillabeer, from NHS Wales CEO Judith Paget CBE, from July 15, confirmed that the board would remain under WG oversight: "I am writing to you to confirm that following a recent assessment, the escalation status of your organisation will remain unchanged at level 5 (special measures). "We will continue to hold quarterly special measures assurance board meetings to monitor progress against the agreed special measures framework and de-escalation criteria." Ms Shillabeer, in a chief executive report for July 2025, to be presented at a meeting tomorrow noted that "the Welsh Government report indicates there has been steady and measurable improvement made across key areas including leadership, governance, clinical quality, and financial management over the past two years". However Ms Shillabeer, in her report, acknowledged "significant challenges remain – especially in planned and urgent and emergency care, which will require additional focus during the coming months. "The priority is to improve operational grip and control, agree and implement a new operating model, improve performance and build the necessary foundations for sustainable, system wide improvement." The Welsh Government had noted that the board had "made many changes," over the last two years, she added. "Year one had seen improvements in corporate governance, financial governance and performance, and board leadership, while year two has seen a focus on quality and safety, with the board responding to many legacy issues in an open and transparent manner." "This year, the focus is on reducing the number of long waits and the overall size of the waiting list – bringing it back to pre-pandemic levels – and tackling outpatient appointments-in the most challenged specialities, as well as taking action to improve waiting times for urgent and emergency care services. "This is a priority for the health board as it has by far the largest proportion, and the longest waits in Wales," Ms Shillabeer said.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Drastically improve your posture with three doctor-approved exercises
An NHS GP has shared three simple exercises that can help you improve your posture, as he said he would never recommend a posture-correcting brace to his patients Many people live sedentary lifestyles, sitting for prolonged periods. Whether they're desk-bound at work or spend weekends binge-watching TV, such habits can wreak havoc on their backs and posture. For those struggling with posture issues and seeking solutions, you might have seen online ads for wearable braces that promise to realign your spine and correct your posture. However, one medical expert warns that these devices could do more harm than good. Doctor Suraj Kukadia, an NHS GP and emergency doctor, has spoken out against using posture-correcting braces. Instead, he offers three straightforward exercises to enhance your posture without any risks. Known as Dr Sooj on TikTok, the doctor shared his advice in a video: "I have never recommended one of those posture-correcting braces, because they actually weaken your back muscles, which are responsible for your posture. So here are three simple exercises you can do to improve your posture." 1. Hip flexor stretches Dr Sooj points out that our modern lifestyle means we're often sitting down – whether it's watching TV, driving, commuting, or working at desks – leading to "internally rotated" hips. To counteract this, he suggests a hip flexor stretch as the first exercise. The stretch begins with you kneeling on one knee, ensuring "everything at 90 degrees". Next, tilt your pelvis "posteriorly" - meaning toward the back - and then lean forward. Dr Sooj revealed he could feel a "wonderful stretch" in his thighs, which is precisely the sensation you're aiming for. To enhance the stretch, twist your upper body away from the muscle being stretched or lean to the opposite side. For the best outcome, Dr Sooj suggests maintaining the stretch for 30 to 60 seconds on each side. 2. Chest muscle stretch Those who spend hours slouched over a computer might notice their chest becoming internally rotated. Dr Sooj's second exercise, requiring nothing more than a doorframe, can counteract this issue. To open up your chest muscles, grasp the doorframe with one hand and extend your arm fully. Then pivot your entire body away, keeping your arm outstretched. You'll feel the pull across your pectorals. Dr Sooj assures that the height of your arm isn't crucial during this stretch, and you can adjust the angle to suit your comfort and mobility level. As with the thigh stretch, aim to hold this position for 30 to 60 seconds. 3. Strengthen the back The last exercise focuses on fortifying the back and is performed standing with arms extended in front. It involves several steps, but once mastered, it should become quite simple. Dr Sooj detailed the routine, saying: "We pull our shoulder blades back to engage our back muscles, elbows back to 90 degrees, and then rotate up. Rotate down, forward, and relax. So shoulder blades, elbows, rotate. Do that 15 to 20 times, multiple times a day." Wrapping up his instructional clip, he added: "Have a go with those three exercises and let me know how you get on."
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming
When thousands of ambulance workers went on strike on 21 December 2022 to demand better pay and conditions, the then shadow health secretary, Wes Streeting, wasn't shy in pointing out who was responsible. In their refusal to negotiate, he tweeted, Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay had driven NHS staff to strike, leaving patients 'in no doubt who is to blame for this chaos'. Three years and one general election later, the surgical slipper is firmly on the other foot. Resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – have just finished a five-day strike, demanding a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Among placards on picket lines calling for 'pay restoration' and an end to 'cuts so deep that even a surgeon couldn't fix it' were printed copies of Streeting's tweet. Gone is the relaxed attitude displayed by the health secretary towards the British Medical Association (BMA) in 2024, when he agreed a deal with doctors that set them on a 'journey to pay restoration'. He has called this latest strike a 'gift to Nigel Farage' and urged resident doctors to cross picket lines and join their colleagues still 'turning up to work'. He has described the strike not only as 'reckless', but as an action that 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement'. Union general secretaries have been quick to shoot back, with Dave Ward of the Communication Workers Union calling Streeting's comments 'shameful', and the Public and Commercial Services Union's Fran Heathcote accusing the health secretary of 'carping in the Murdoch press' instead of negotiating a settlement. For a government whose relationship with organised labour has so far been largely harmonious – apart from Unite's suspension of Angela Rayner over the Birmingham bin strikes – Streeting's denouncement of the BMA is the closest Labour has come to picking a fight with the unions. Is this the government's industrial shot across the bows? While on the face of it, the row might seem like the first real sign of confrontation between Labour and the unions, it's worth taking a closer look at what is happening. Underlying Streeting's intervention are a number of factors that make the BMA an easy target for a government that's keen to display that it can be tough on unions and not in the pocket of its 'union paymasters'. The BMA is not affiliated to Labour, nor is it part of the Trades Union Congress, making Labour's institutional link to it much weaker. There's also the fact that resistance to the strike isn't coming only from the government's side: other healthcare unions have expressed unease over existing discrepancies in NHS pay offers. Last month, the Royal College of Nursing called the government's decision to award resident doctors a 5.4% pay increase while offering nursing staff 3.6% 'grotesque'. In a video posted on X about the strike, Streeting plays into those divisions within the movement, stoking tension between resident doctors and other NHS workers. He talks about 'working hard with … staff that aren't paid as much as doctors to make sure that your pay and your career progression and the conditions that you work in are also good for you'. Add to that the older consultants and medical professionals who have been having their say: that a strike would 'further diminish the ability of the NHS to deliver', that 'it is too soon to go again', or simply that resident doctors are being 'very greedy'. Then there's the drastic lurch by the Tories – both in government and opposition – to the right on industrial matters, with Kemi Badenoch proposing this week to ban doctors from taking strike action, putting them under the same rules that apply to police, prison officers and soldiers. This approach gives Streeting more room to present himself as tough but reasonable. This isn't to defend Streeting, who is probably more than happy to use strike action to justify further NHS privatisation. Nor is it to undermine how galling his comments are for those standing out on the picket lines. One doctor has called them a 'slap in the face', while another asked where the Streeting of 2022 had gone: 'He was making some good points.' But government condemnation of the strike does not necessarily reflect a wider shift in its strategy towards unions. Amid frenzied attacks by Tories and their media allies on Labour's link with the unions, the reality of the relationship is all too often drowned out. That makes it harder to understand key dynamics: it's likely to be transport unions that the government hopes to take on, not only industrially but politically. It also makes it harder to spot how unions' different industrial priorities inform their relationship with the government. With so much of Labour's employment rights bill left to secondary legislation, general secretaries still have eyes on the prize of getting their sectoral needs met, whether that's Unison pushing for fair pay agreements or the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers for zero-hours contract reform. Then there's the fact that there are those in Labour who are itching to embrace the spirit of the 1980s and launch a full-frontal attack on the movement. The country is once again facing the prospect of widespread public sector industrial action, with nurses and teachers potentially set to join the strike action. A decade of suppressed public sector pay, inflation and increases in the cost of living has challenged the idea that certain professions' wages are always guarantees of a good life. On a basic starting salary of £38,831 and saddled with as much as £100,000 of student debt, it's no longer enough for new resident doctor recruits to simply wait to earn more at some distant point in the future. While there are grievances specific to the resident doctors' strikes – a shortage of speciality training posts and having to spend thousands of pounds on exam fees, courses and equipment such as stethoscopes – many of their concerns are felt deeply across the movement. Stubborn mountains of student debt, housing costs that utterly eclipse wages and crumbling public services that drive down working conditions are not unique to the BMA. For this dispute, Labour has used inter-union tensions over NHS pay – as well as the outdated idea that all resident doctors are middle-class professionals – as a political opportunity to dodge blame for the strike. But that strategy won't work for all strikes. As public sector unrest continues to unfold, the government's battle with the unions might well begin in earnest. Polly Smythe is labour movement correspondent at Novara Media
