logo
Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming

Wes Streeting's divide and rule tactics may have won against the doctors – but more strikes are coming

The Guardian6 days ago
When thousands of ambulance workers went on strike on 21 December 2022 to demand better pay and conditions, the then shadow health secretary, Wes Streeting, wasn't shy in pointing out who was responsible. In their refusal to negotiate, he tweeted, Rishi Sunak and Steve Barclay had driven NHS staff to strike, leaving patients 'in no doubt who is to blame for this chaos'.
Three years and one general election later, the surgical slipper is firmly on the other foot. Resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – have just finished a five-day strike, demanding a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Among placards on picket lines calling for 'pay restoration' and an end to 'cuts so deep that even a surgeon couldn't fix it' were printed copies of Streeting's tweet.
Gone is the relaxed attitude displayed by the health secretary towards the British Medical Association (BMA) in 2024, when he agreed a deal with doctors that set them on a 'journey to pay restoration'. He has called this latest strike a 'gift to Nigel Farage' and urged resident doctors to cross picket lines and join their colleagues still 'turning up to work'. He has described the strike not only as 'reckless', but as an action that 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement'.
Union general secretaries have been quick to shoot back, with Dave Ward of the Communication Workers Union calling Streeting's comments 'shameful', and the Public and Commercial Services Union's Fran Heathcote accusing the health secretary of 'carping in the Murdoch press' instead of negotiating a settlement. For a government whose relationship with organised labour has so far been largely harmonious – apart from Unite's suspension of Angela Rayner over the Birmingham bin strikes – Streeting's denouncement of the BMA is the closest Labour has come to picking a fight with the unions. Is this the government's industrial shot across the bows?
While on the face of it, the row might seem like the first real sign of confrontation between Labour and the unions, it's worth taking a closer look at what is happening. Underlying Streeting's intervention are a number of factors that make the BMA an easy target for a government that's keen to display that it can be tough on unions and not in the pocket of its 'union paymasters'.
The BMA is not affiliated to Labour, nor is it part of the Trades Union Congress, making Labour's institutional link to it much weaker. There's also the fact that resistance to the strike isn't coming only from the government's side: other healthcare unions have expressed unease over existing discrepancies in NHS pay offers. Last month, the Royal College of Nursing called the government's decision to award resident doctors a 5.4% pay increase while offering nursing staff 3.6% 'grotesque'.
In a video posted on X about the strike, Streeting plays into those divisions within the movement, stoking tension between resident doctors and other NHS workers. He talks about 'working hard with … staff that aren't paid as much as doctors to make sure that your pay and your career progression and the conditions that you work in are also good for you'.
Add to that the older consultants and medical professionals who have been having their say: that a strike would 'further diminish the ability of the NHS to deliver', that 'it is too soon to go again', or simply that resident doctors are being 'very greedy'.
Then there's the drastic lurch by the Tories – both in government and opposition – to the right on industrial matters, with Kemi Badenoch proposing this week to ban doctors from taking strike action, putting them under the same rules that apply to police, prison officers and soldiers. This approach gives Streeting more room to present himself as tough but reasonable.
This isn't to defend Streeting, who is probably more than happy to use strike action to justify further NHS privatisation. Nor is it to undermine how galling his comments are for those standing out on the picket lines. One doctor has called them a 'slap in the face', while another asked where the Streeting of 2022 had gone: 'He was making some good points.'
But government condemnation of the strike does not necessarily reflect a wider shift in its strategy towards unions. Amid frenzied attacks by Tories and their media allies on Labour's link with the unions, the reality of the relationship is all too often drowned out. That makes it harder to understand key dynamics: it's likely to be transport unions that the government hopes to take on, not only industrially but politically.
It also makes it harder to spot how unions' different industrial priorities inform their relationship with the government. With so much of Labour's employment rights bill left to secondary legislation, general secretaries still have eyes on the prize of getting their sectoral needs met, whether that's Unison pushing for fair pay agreements or the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers for zero-hours contract reform. Then there's the fact that there are those in Labour who are itching to embrace the spirit of the 1980s and launch a full-frontal attack on the movement.
The country is once again facing the prospect of widespread public sector industrial action, with nurses and teachers potentially set to join the strike action. A decade of suppressed public sector pay, inflation and increases in the cost of living has challenged the idea that certain professions' wages are always guarantees of a good life. On a basic starting salary of £38,831 and saddled with as much as £100,000 of student debt, it's no longer enough for new resident doctor recruits to simply wait to earn more at some distant point in the future.
While there are grievances specific to the resident doctors' strikes – a shortage of speciality training posts and having to spend thousands of pounds on exam fees, courses and equipment such as stethoscopes – many of their concerns are felt deeply across the movement. Stubborn mountains of student debt, housing costs that utterly eclipse wages and crumbling public services that drive down working conditions are not unique to the BMA.
For this dispute, Labour has used inter-union tensions over NHS pay – as well as the outdated idea that all resident doctors are middle-class professionals – as a political opportunity to dodge blame for the strike. But that strategy won't work for all strikes. As public sector unrest continues to unfold, the government's battle with the unions might well begin in earnest.
Polly Smythe is labour movement correspondent at Novara Media
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down
CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down

Reuters

time19 minutes ago

  • Reuters

CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down

LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Britain's Ofwat said on Tuesday its chief executive, David Black, would step down following a government decision last month to abolish the water regulator. In a statement, which came after Sky News first reported the story, Ofwat announced that Black has decided the "time is right to pursue new opportunities" and would step down at the end of August. An interim replacement is set to be appointed in due course, the regulator added. It comes after environment minister Steve Reed said last month he had agreed to abolish Ofwat as part of a regulatory overhaul. Britain will create a new powerful regulator for its water industry following public fury over sewage spills.

GPs warned using AI to record patient notes can lead to dangerous inaccuracies
GPs warned using AI to record patient notes can lead to dangerous inaccuracies

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

GPs warned using AI to record patient notes can lead to dangerous inaccuracies

GPs have been warned to look out for 'inaccurate or fabricated' information when using AI to write their medical notes. Family doctors are increasingly using tools that listen to their consultations with patients and automatically add summaries to their records. But the Royal College of GPs has warned AI can misinterpret the nuance of conversations, with potential dangerous consequences. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) also says there is a 'risk of hallucination which users should be aware of, and manufacturers should actively seek to minimise and mitigate the potential harms of their occurrence'. The safety watchdog is now urging GPs to report issues with AI scribes through its Yellow Card Scheme, which is typically used to report adverse reactions to medicines. This should include 'suspected inaccuracies', trade publication GP Online reports. The British Medical Association's GP Committee said earlier this year that 'the adoption of passive scribes in general practice has gathered significant pace', with practices using standalone systems or tools rolled out with other common software. Dr Phil Whitaker, a UK GP who recently moved to Canada, wrote in the New Statesman that an AI tool he used was 'not to be trusted'. He said it misinterpreted conversations with patients who asked him about his move from the UK - and recorded notes suggesting patients had recently moved to Canada instead. He added: 'I've caught it recording findings of examinations I haven't performed and detailing advice I haven't given. 'The company that makes it advises users to check its output carefully. 'For me, the time spent reading and editing outweighs any productivity gains.' And an article published by Fortune last month outlined a case in which 'a patient in London was mistakenly invited to a diabetic screening after an AI-generated medical record falsely claimed he had diabetes and suspected heart disease'. However, despite this growing use of AI and the recognition of potential problems, the MHRA said a search of its database revealed 'no adverse incident reports related to the use of AI scribes'. The government's 10-Year Health Plan says it intends to 'accelerate the adoption and spread of AI technology, such as AI scribes, by streamlining AI regulation'. A new national procurement platform will be set up next year to support GP practices and NHS trusts to adopt new technology safely. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the RCGP, said: 'AI has enormous potential for transforming the future of our health and patient care. Fewer than one in three Britons are comfortable with the prospect of using new AI features in the NHS App to diagnose their issues, a poll reveals. Health secretary Wes Streeting announced plans to revamp the app as part of Labour's 10-Year Health Plan so every patient could have a 'doctor in their pocket'. But a new survey found 44 per of the public are 'uncomfortable' with trusting the diagnosis and management of their conditions to artificial intelligence, with this figure rising to 60 per cent among pensioners. Only 31 per cent of the 2,030 respondents to the Savanta poll, for the Liberal Democrats, said they are 'comfortable' with the idea. Helen Morgan, the Liberal Democrat's health spokesperson, praised Labour for tackling bureaucracy but added: 'Making the NHS more efficient is of course welcome but it cannot come at the cost of leaving people behind as they try to grapple with digitised services rather than a real life doctor. 'Ministers need to allay these fears by offering support to those who are not digitally literate and older people to ensure that these sweeping changes benefit everyone.' Speaking at the Plan's launch last month, Mr Streeting said: 'The NHS App will become a doctor in your pocket, bringing our health service into the 21st century.' It will use patients' medical records and artificial intelligence to provide instant answers to users' questions and direct them to the best place for care. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, which campaigns for elderly Britons, said at the time 'Elderly people will be sceptical about whether the plan will be delivered and concerned that greater reliance on the app could exclude them from accessing timely care. 'For some, the doctor in their pocket will be padlocked.' 'However, its use is not without risks and so its implementation in general practice must be closely regulated to guarantee patient safety and the security of their data. 'GPs are always open to introducing new technologies that can improve the experience of patients and help cut the administrative burden, and an increasing number of GP practices are now using AI scribing tools to improve the quality and efficiency of their consultations. 'While these tools can offer real benefits, particularly at a time of significant GP workforce pressures, there are some important concerns - particularly around data security of sensitive patient records, data controllership and the risk of inaccuracies. 'We are aware that AI scribes can produce inaccurate or fabricated details, and that they can also misinterpret the nuance of conversations. 'It is important that clinicians review AI-generated documentation for accuracy before adding it to the patient record.' The MHRA said: 'The MHRA is aware of this potential issue in AI enabled tools generally and this includes AI scribe tools. 'We recommend that GPs and healthcare professionals only use tools which are registered medical devices which have been determined to meet the required standards of performance and safety. 'Recently published MHRA guidance clarifies how these technologies qualify as medical devices and while this is specific to digital mental health, the principles apply across digital health applications. 'While not published by the MHRA, NHS England guidance encourages the use only of registered medical devices when used in a clinical context. 'We strongly encourage that all suspected adverse incidents, including suspected inaccuracies are reported to the MHRA via the yellow card scheme.' The watchdog said the yellow card scheme website had been updated to include 'a standalone page for software and AI as medical device'. Earlier this year, the BMA advised practices to pause use of AI scribes until they had carried out data protection and safety checks and sought assurances that the products meet NHS standards.

OpenAI changes ChatGPT to stop it telling people to break up with partners
OpenAI changes ChatGPT to stop it telling people to break up with partners

The Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

OpenAI changes ChatGPT to stop it telling people to break up with partners

ChatGPT will not tell people to break up with their partner and will encourage users to take breaks from long chatbot sessions, under new changes to the artificial intelligence tool. OpenAI, ChatGPT's developer, said the chatbot would stop giving definitive answers to personal challenges and would instead help people mull over issues such as breakups. 'When you ask something like: 'Should I break up with my boyfriend?' ChatGPT shouldn't give you an answer. It should help you think it through – asking questions, weighing pros and cons,' said OpenAI. The US company said new ChatGPT behaviour for dealing with 'high-stakes personal decisions' would be rolling out soon. OpenAI admitted this year that an update to ChatGPT had made the groundbreaking chatbot too agreeable and altered its tone. In one reported interaction before the change, ChatGPT congratulated a user for 'standing up for yourself' when they claimed they had stopped taking their medication and left their family – who were supposedly 'responsible' for radio signals emanating from the walls. In the blog post OpenAI admitted there had been instances where its advanced 4o model had not recognised signs of delusion or emotional dependency – amid concerns that chatbots are worsening people's mental health crises. The company said it was developing tools to detect signs of mental or emotional distress so ChatGPT can direct people to 'evidence-based' resources for help. A recent study by NHS doctors in the UK warned that AI programs could amplify delusional or grandiose content in users vulnerable to psychosis. The study, which has not been peer reviewed, said this could be due in part to the models being designed to 'maximise engagement and affirmation'. The study added that even if some individuals benefitted from AI interactions, there was a concern the tools could 'blur reality boundaries and disrupt self-regulation'. OpenAI added that from this week it would send 'gentle reminders' to take a screen break to users engaging in long chatbot sessions, similar to screen-time features deployed by social media companies. OpenAI said it had convened an advisory group of experts in mental health, youth development and human-computer-interaction to guide its approach. The company has worked with more than 90 doctors including psychiatrists and paediatricians to build frameworks for evaluating 'complex, multi-turn' chatbot conversations. 'We hold ourselves to one test: if someone we love turned to ChatGPT for support, would we feel reassured? Getting to an unequivocal 'yes' is our work,' said the blog post. The ChatGPT alterations were announced amid speculation that a more powerful version of the chatbot is imminent. On Sunday Sam Altman, OpenAI's chief executive, shared a screenshot of what appeared to be the company's latest AI model, GPT-5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store