logo
‘No excuse': British PM Starmer, Glastonbury slam ‘death to' Israeli military chant at performances

‘No excuse': British PM Starmer, Glastonbury slam ‘death to' Israeli military chant at performances

Straits Times3 days ago
During their show on June 29, the duo chanted 'Death, death, to the IDF' in reference to the Israel Defence Forces, the formal name of the Israeli military. PHOTO: AFP
GLASTONBURY, England - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Glastonbury organisers said on June 29 they were appalled by on-stage chanting against the Israeli military during a performance at the festival by Punk-rap duo Bob Vylan.
During their show on June 29, the duo chanted 'Death, death, to the IDF' in reference to the Israel Defence Forces, the formal name of the Israeli military.
Police said they were considering whether to launch an investigation, but did not name Bob Vylan or Irish rap band Kneecap, who appeared on the same stage and also criticised Israel.
'Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation,' Avon and Somerset Police, in western England where the festival is held, said on X late on June 29.
'There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech,' Mr Starmer said in a statement. 'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence.'
The festival organisers criticised the chanting by Bob Vylan, which comprises the guitarist-singer with the stage name Bobby Vylan and a drummer known as Bobbie Vylan.
'Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for anti-semitism, hate speech or incitement to violence,' it said on June 29.
The Israeli Embassy in Britain condemned the 'inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed' on stage.
Bob Vylan's band members did not respond to a request for comment.
Mr Starmer also criticised British broadcaster the BBC, which transmits much of the festival live, for showing the performance. 'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast,' he said.
The BBC said some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive.
'During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language,' a spokesperson said.
'We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.'
Kneecap next on stage
Bob Vylan's show on the festival's West Holts stage took place just before controversial Irish rap trio Kneecap played to a huge crowd, leading chants against Mr Starmer and also taking aim at Israel.
During the show, frontman Liam Og O hAnnaidh accused Israel of committing war crimes, saying: 'There's no hiding it.'
Known by the stage name Mo Chara, he was charged with a terrorism offence last month for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah at a concert. He has denied the charge.
Mr Starmer had said it was 'not appropriate' for Kneecap to play at the festival.
A senior member of his government, Health Secretary Wes Streeting, earlier on June 29 criticised the chants by Bob Vylan but added that he was also appalled by violence committed by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank.
'I'd also say to the Israeli Embassy, 'Get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank',' Mr Streeting told Sky News.
Political commentator Ash Sarkar said it was typical of punk musicians to spark controversy.
'Don't book punk bands if you don't want them to do punk stuff,' said Mr Sarkar, a contributing editor to Novara Media, a leftist media organisation. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hiroshima mayor urges Trump visit after A-bomb comments
Hiroshima mayor urges Trump visit after A-bomb comments

Straits Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Hiroshima mayor urges Trump visit after A-bomb comments

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Around 140,000 people died in Hiroshima and about 74,000 others in Nagasaki. TOKYO - US President Donald Trump should visit Hiroshima to see the effects of nuclear weapons, the Japanese city's mayor said on July 2, after Mr Trump likened the 1945 atomic bombings to recent air strikes on Iran. 'It seems to me that he does not fully understand the reality of the atomic bombings, which, if used, take the lives of many innocent citizens, regardless of whether they were friend or foe, and threaten the survival of the human race,' Mayor Kazumi Matsui told reporters. 'I wish that President Trump would visit the bombed area to see the reality of the atomic bombing and feel the spirit of Hiroshima, and then make statements,' Mr Matsui said. The United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima on Aug 6, 1945, and then another on Nagasaki three days later. Shortly afterwards, Japan surrendered, ending World War II. Around 140,000 people died in Hiroshima and about 74,000 others in Nagasaki, including many from the effects of radiation exposure. It was the only time that atomic weapons were used in warfare. On June 22, 2025 , following days of Israeli strikes on the Islamic republic, the United States bombed Iranian nuclear facilities. Soon afterwards, Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire, ending their 12-day war. 'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing,' Mr Trump said on June 25. 'That ended that war and this ended (this war),' Mr Trump said at a Nato summit in The Hague. His comments prompted anger from survivors and a small demonstration in Hiroshima. Last week, the city's assembly passed a motion condemning remarks that justify the use of atomic bombs. Japan's atomic bomb survivors' group Nihon Hidankyo won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 , and while accepting the prize, called on countries to abolish the weapons. AFP

7 albums from local bands that have shaped the Singapore sound
7 albums from local bands that have shaped the Singapore sound

Vogue Singapore

timean hour ago

  • Vogue Singapore

7 albums from local bands that have shaped the Singapore sound

Getty First came the golden age of the '60s, where our music scene thrived, giving rise to a steady slew of local bands such as The Crescendos and The Quests. With many being formed by students, these bands gained popularity for covers of British and American songs, as well as original compositions that featured a unique blend of Asian and Western styles. A distinct subgenre of Malay popular music known as pop yeh yeh surfaced, influenced by British pop and rock, while incorporating Malay melodies and lyricism. Yet, sentiments against rock n' roll, as well as the withdrawal of British and American troops in the country—a significant audience for live music—led to a steady decline of the music scene in the '70s. Still, certain bands stood strong, including rock pioneer Sweet Charity, who went on to inspire a new generation of rock acts in the mid-1980s. By the time the '80s rolled around, Singapore was in the middle of what could perhaps be considered its most transformative stage in music yet. Led by groups such as The Oddfellows, the independent and alternative scene slowly flourished—opening the door for the local bands that we know of today to blossom. Below, we round up seven albums from across the years to showcase the Singapore sound in its many diverse facets Courtesy of Philips Records 1 / 7 The Boy Next Door by The Crescendos (1965) Formed in 1961 by schoolmates looking to participate in a talent contest, The Crescendos was the first Singaporean act to be signed by an international record label. Their first single, a cover of 'Mr Twister', became an instant hit and sold over 10,000 copies—with the band's next two singles, a cover of 'In The Good Old Summertime' and original composition 'The Boy Next Door' following suit. At the height of their popularity in 1966, the band decided to take a break to focus on their education and careers. However, an unfortunate accident in 1970 led to the death of then-22-year-old lead singer Susan Lim, and the band never regrouped. Courtesy of Philips Records 2 / 7 Happy Happy Birthday, Baby! by Naomi & The Boys (1965) In the '60s, a subgenre of Malay popular music known as pop yeh yeh surfaced. It was influenced by British pop and rock, while incorporating Malay melodies and lyricism. Among the bands that emerged was Naomi & The Boys, whose cover of 'Happy Happy Birthday, Baby!' became a household hit—topping the radio charts in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, and becoming the song of the year in Singapore and Malaysia in 1965. Courtesy of Columbia Records 3 / 7 Questing by The Quests (1966) One of the most popular local bands of the 1960s, whose success extended to Malaysia and Hong Kong, The Quests achieved a long list of firsts for a Singaporean band. Among which, their first release 'Shanty' displaced The Beatles' 'I Should Have Known Better' to become the first song by a local band to top the local charts—where it stayed for 12 weeks. Their LP, Questing , was also the first album by a Singapore band to be recorded in stereo. Courtesy of Warner Elektra Atlantic 4 / 7 Pelarian by Sweet Charity (1980) Fronted by legendary singer-songwriter Ramli Sarip, rock pioneer Sweet Charity made such a big impact on the music scene in Singapore and Malaysia that it inspired a new generation of rock acts in both countries in the mid-1980s. The band went from playing gigs at weddings and small bars to headlining shows at the now-demolished National Theatre—before releasing hit songs like 'Kamelia', 'Pelarian' and 'Musibah' that turned them into a household name. In October 2023, the group reunited for a tour to celebrate their fifth decade together. Courtesy of BMG 5 / 7 Teenage Head by The Oddfellows (1991) Leading the alternative and indie wave that would shape the music scene through the '90s was The Oddfellows— who had independently financed and produced their debut album Teenage Head before record label BMG picked it up for distribution in 1991. Their single 'So Happy' became the first local song to top the charts of Perfect 10 98.7FM, the radio station of choice among the youth back then. When UK punk legends Buzzcocks performed in Singapore in 1992, The Oddfellows opened the show. Courtesy of Snakeweed Studios 6 / 7 Hiss by Wormrot (2022) For the uninitiated, grindcore is an extreme subgenre that fuses heavy metal with hardcore punk. It's a niche space, but iconic Singaporean group Wormrot has certainly made their name known within the scene. Recognised for their innovative, vicious sound, they are one of the top grindcore bands in the world and the first Singaporean act to play at the Glastonbury Festival. Courtesy of Dog Knights Productions 7 / 7 Get In Losers, We're Going to Eternal Damnation by Forests (2022) Emo band Forests' success reaches far beyond Singapore, with a global cult following that has seen them touring countries like the US and Japan. Their music, a unique, distinct blend of '90s emo and math pop, has been hailed by fans and critics alike—earning them a spot as the only Asian band highlighted on Vulture's list of 100 Greatest Emo Songs of All Time. Vogue Singapore's July/August 'Home' issue will be out on newsstands from 13 July and available to preorder online.

The US' bombing of Iran was a win for ... Putin
The US' bombing of Iran was a win for ... Putin

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

The US' bombing of Iran was a win for ... Putin

THE consensus after Israel's 12-day war with Iran seems to be that it ended in humiliation – not just for the Islamic Republic, but also Russia, which failed to lift a finger for a loyal ally and lost a supplier of critical drones. But this profoundly misreads both Russian President Vladimir Putin's priorities and the timescale on which he conducts his foreign policy. There is no doubt that Putin's ambition to reassert Russia as a force in the Middle East has been set back. The fall of President Bashar Al-Assad in Syria was a significant loss. His failure to come to the aid of Iran, with whom he had just signed a 20-year strategic partnership, was embarrassing. A year ago, that would indeed have hurt Moscow's war effort in Ukraine, but Russia now makes its own version of the Iranian Shahed drones. It is more important to understand where all this fits into Putin's world view and priorities. Destroying the Ukrainian state ranks much higher for him than any other foreign-policy goal, whether in the Middle East or elsewhere. And on that score, the US-Israeli attack on Iran was a net positive. In a broad sense, the outbreak of another war in the Middle East has sucked attention, energy and resources away from Ukraine, leaving Putin with a free hand. Even at last week's Nato summit, the core deliverable of a pledge to boost defence spending – to levels justifiable only by the threat from Russia – was shunted to the corner. Nobody wanted to anger Donald Trump during his victory lap. More concretely, Israel was able to blunt the impact of the Islamic Republic's missile barrages only by consuming a significant part of its air-defence stockpiles, as well as some from the US, which lent a hand using shipborne air-defence systems. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Equally, the US could only involve itself once it was confident it had enough Patriot batteries in place to protect its military bases around the region. The threat may have receded for now, but planners at the Pentagon are obliged to assume the war restarts and more air defence will be needed, making less available for Ukraine. So the recent dramatic boost in Russian missile and drone strikes on Ukraine was well-timed. Overnight on Monday, Russia launched its biggest single barrage since the start of the war, including 477 drones and decoys, as well as 60 ballistic missiles that require high-level interceptors, such as Patriots. The fact that Ukraine lost an F-16 and its pilot trying to shoot down some of the barrage is a clear indication of the strain on the country's air-defence systems. The attacks in previous days had been only a little smaller, so there was an air of desperation around Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's request for more Patriot interceptors when he met his US counterpart at Nato. There was also truth to Trump's comments afterward; he said he had told Zelensky that he would see what the US could do, but that the Patriots were hard to get, because 'we need them too. We were supplying them to Israel'. This is what matters to Putin, far more than the optics abroad of his failure to come to Iran's aid. For this war will define a legacy that he sees in the context of the Russian empire's construction over centuries. Or as his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, reportedly quipped in 2022, his boss has just three advisers: 'Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great and Catherine the Great.' Nothing that has happened in the last three years has dented this vision of the great Russian restoration. To Putin, not only is the very existence of Ukraine an affront, but the reabsorption of its resources – human, economic and military – into mother Russia is the sine qua non for Moscow's ability to remain at the top of the multipolar world order he sees replacing Western dominance. This is the reason for which Ukraine's plan to sign a trade treaty with the European Union so enraged him in 2013; it meant Kyiv would not join his own rival group, the Eurasian Union. 'All of Ukraine is ours,' Putin told an enthusiastic domestic audience at the annual St Petersburg Economic Forum on Jun 20. He was not shy about adding a new city, Sumy, as a new public target for occupation, either. Make no mistake, Odesa and Kharkiv would be next on the list, whose extent and end will be determined solely by what the Kremlin deems possible at acceptable cost. Ukraine is at a critical juncture. Until Trump came to office, it was evenly balanced whether Putin would be able to continue to exchange swathes of his armed forces for small increments of Ukrainian land long enough for Kyiv's defences to collapse. With Trump's withdrawal of US military support, those calculations have shifted and the long-range missile and drone war forms an essential part of Russia's path to victory. From the moment Ukraine runs out of air-defence interceptors, Russia's air force –still menacing in its scale and capabilities – would for the first time be able to impose air superiority across the country. The impunity that Israeli jets enjoyed over Iran should serve as a timely reminder of exactly what this could mean for Ukraine: A catastrophic collapse of defensive lines as its troops were bombed into submission from the air. Trump has switched from the moral obscenity of blaming Ukraine for being invaded, to complaining about Putin's disinterest in peace talks. But he needs to do better than that. He needs to recognise, at least to himself, that Putin has played him. The intelligence operative running the Kremlin has leveraged Trump's desperation for a ceasefire to further Russia's war aims, and at a time when he too has growing vulnerabilities, including a looming credit crisis. It may be years before anyone can say with certainty that the US military intervention in Iran was a success or failure. But if there is one conclusion Trump can draw from its success in imposing a ceasefire on Israel and Iran, it is that for peace-through-strength to work, you need to first show the strength – and that is something he has woefully failed to do in his dealings with the Kremlin. BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store