How will Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill impact the real estate sector in the IT capital?
The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill proposes to expand the city's administrative boundaries by including adjoining villages, towns, and peri-urban areas within Bengaluru's official limits. This restructuring aims to streamline governance across the rapidly growing metropolitan region.
Instead of a single municipal body, the bill envisions the creation of multiple smaller municipal corporations, each led by an elected mayor and responsible for specific zones. These corporations will function under a central authority to ensure cohesive urban planning and infrastructure coordination across Greater Bengaluru.
This proposed redefinition of city limits for the real estate sector is expected to drive up property prices, especially in the outskirts and peri-urban regions. However, experts caution that the extent of the price increase will depend on the actual rollout of infrastructure and improvement in mobility services.
'This move will likely lead to a surge in land prices in areas newly brought under the city's jurisdiction,' said Srinivas Alavilli, a fellow at WRI India. 'Many of these locations are already witnessing speculative growth, and official inclusion could further accelerate this trend.'
He said the bill may also pave the way for developing new commercial hubs, including business parks in previously underdeveloped zones. 'Today, Bengaluru's economic activity is concentrated in a few zones—Electronic City, Whitefield, ORR, Hebbal, and industrial areas like Bommasandra and Peenya. With better governance and planning under the proposed GBA, we could see more balanced growth, easing congestion in existing business districts.'
Also Read: Bengaluru real estate: Studio apartments under ₹30,000 you should check out
Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot has granted his assent to the landmark Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024. The legislation, aimed at restructuring the city's civic administration, proposes the division of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) into multiple, smaller municipal corporations
The Bill proposes a decentralised and participatory model of urban governance for the Greater Bengaluru Area. It plans to set up a Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA), which will act as a supervisory body to coordinate development and align planning across the city. The Bill also allows for the creation of up to 10 independent city corporations to improve administrative efficiency and deliver civic services more effectively to residents, urban experts told HT.com
The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill proposes to expand the city's administrative boundaries by including nearby villages, towns, and urban areas within Bengaluru's official limits. This move aims to bring fast-growing suburbs and peri-urban regions under a single governance structure.
Instead of one large municipal body, the bill suggests creating several smaller corporations. Each corporation will manage a part of the Greater Bengaluru area (through elected Mayors) but will work under a central authority to ensure coordination.
The exact boundaries of the Greater Bengaluru Authority are yet to be defined, but it is expected to cover around 1,000 sq. km, compared to BBMP's current 700+ sq. km. Alavilli, pointed out that this expansion will likely include the merging of adjacent areas and villages into the Bengaluru metropolitan area, said experts.
"The Greater Bengaluru Authority has the potential to improve urban planning and inter-agency coordination significantly. If it lives up to its promise, it could unlock large parcels of vacant land and enable the redensification of existing areas. This, in turn, would allow the city to better leverage its metro network, improve mobility, and reduce congestion," Srikanth Viswanathan, CEO of Janaagraha, said.
Also Read: Bengaluru real estate: If your apartment's value has doubled, is it time to cash out now?
For the real estate sector, expanding Bengaluru's limits may boost property prices, especially in the outskirts. However, this must be critically assessed against actual infrastructure delivery and mobility outcomes, they add.
"Such a redefinition will naturally impact real estate. Areas surrounding Bengaluru will likely see a rise in land prices as they begin to be officially identified as part of the city. This will create a ripple effect, especially in peri-urban areas, where land values are already high in anticipation," Alavilli said.
He said that the city will likely witness new commercial hubs, such as business parks in previously underdeveloped areas. "Currently, Bengaluru's major employment zones include Electronic City, Whitefield, Outer Ring Road, Hebbal, and industrial estates like Bommasandra and Peenya. With better planning and governance under GBA, we could enable more distributed development, reducing congestion and development stress on a few zones."
Experts say that while the GBA is expected to expand Bengaluru's administrative boundaries, it simultaneously dilutes critical planning functions, particularly land use and transport integration.
"For example, areas like Whitefield were developed without proper transport planning, resulting in serious mobility challenges. Though the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) was introduced to address such gaps, the GBA risks undermining it. Effective integration of land use and transport is fundamental to sustainable urban development. Still, that focus appears to be weakening in the proposed Act," Satya Arikutharam, former chief technical advisor to the state government, now an independent consultant, said.
BMLTA is a statutory body established to regulate and coordinate urban mobility initiatives within the Bengaluru Metropolitan Area (BMA). It aims to consolidate planning and oversight of transport policy in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Revisit digital search powers under the I-T Bill 2025
The Finance Minister recently introduced a proposal in Parliament to allow tax authorities to access, under the Income-Tax Bill, 2025, an individual's 'virtual digital space' during search and seizure operations. The justification is straightforward: as financial activity moves online, so must enforcement. However, this glosses over the far-reaching implications of such a shift, which raises significant concerns about privacy, overreach, and surveillance. A blurring, open-ended Currently, India's tax law already provides for search and seizure under Section 132 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. But those powers are limited to physical space such as a house, office, and locker. Since such operations are based on suspicion of undisclosed income or assets, there is a connection between the objective, which is finding undisclosed income and getting access to physical assets. The new Bill, however, blurs this link by including an individual's digital presence which is not only vast but often contains much more than what is relevant to a tax investigation. Without clear limits, such access can lead to disproportionate intrusion. For example, under the existing regime, what could be searched was what concerned only the individual under investigation. In contrast, digital spaces involve multiple stakeholders. Accessing a social media account also exposes friends, family, and professional contacts, through photographs and posts. The proposed definition of 'virtual digital space' includes access to emails, personal cloud drives, social media accounts, digital application platforms, and more. Crucially, the phrase 'any other space of similar nature' makes the list open-ended, potentially covering a wide range of digital platforms. Additionally, the proposed provision empowers tax authorities to override access codes to gain entry into electronic devices or virtual digital spaces. It still remains unclear though how this power will be operationalised in practice particularly in cases involving encrypted messaging apps such as WhatsApp, as explicitly cited by the Finance Minister in Parliament. The problem becomes even more of a concern when the individual involved is a professional whose work requires confidentiality. For instance, journalists whose devices and emails hold sensitive information, including confidential sources, unpublished material, and protected communications. If a search is conducted on flimsy or overly broad grounds, it not only violates their privacy but also endangers their ability to undertake reporting. Recognising the risks, the Supreme Court of India, in 2023, circulated interim guidelines on the seizure of digital devices and directed the Union Government to contemplate formulating necessary protocols. Moreover, the judicial interpretation of 'reason to believe' emphasises the need for tangible material beyond mere suspicion. Even under existing law, courts have construed that the provision ought to be exercised strictly, acknowledging that search and seizure is a serious invasion of privacy. A violation of transparency, accountability Yet, the proposed provision goes against these principles and is devoid of guardrails, judicial oversight, and has a lack of understanding of the stakes. It fails to acknowledge, let alone address, the sheer breadth and layered sensitivity of information stored on electronic devices. In line with the current law, the proposed provision prohibits disclosure of the 'reason to believe' clearly violating principles of transparency and accountability. Globally, privacy and transparency standards in search and seizure, especially where digital devices are involved, are grounded in statutory protections and procedural safeguards. In Canada, Section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the right to be secure against 'unreasonable search or seizure'. It is designed to prevent unjustified searches and sets a three-part default standard: prior authorisation; approval by a neutral and impartial judicial authority; and reasonable and probable grounds. In the United States, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, adopted by the Internal Revenue Service, affirms that taxpayers have the right to expect that any inquiry or enforcement action will be legally compliant and will not be more intrusive than necessary following due process rights, including search and seizure protections. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Riley vs California also necessitated a warrant before accessing digital data, given the deeply personal nature of information stored on phones and devices. Contradiction of proportionality test In contrast, India's proposed Income Tax provision grants sweeping access to digital personal data without warrants, relevance thresholds, or any distinction between financial and non-financial information. This directly contradicts the proportionality test upheld by the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union Of India. The Court has held that any restriction to an individual's privacy must meet a four-fold test, of which proportionality was key, requiring state action to pursue a legitimate aim, satisfy necessity and adopt the least intrusive means available. Allowing unfettered access to personal digital data, in the absence of judicial oversight or safeguards, fails this standard. The way forward is not to abandon digital enforcement altogether. Rather, it is to root it firmly in principles of proportionality, legality, and transparency. The right to privacy cannot and must not be eroded under the garb of regulatory action. Unchecked surveillance in the name of compliance is not governance but overreach. There is hope that the Select Committee which is currently reviewing the Bill narrows the definition of 'virtual digital space', and mandates prior judicial warrants and disclosure of reasons for such access to digital content in addition to establishing mechanisms of redress for aggrieved individuals. Mahwash Fatima is a Manager, Public Policy at TQH Consulting's technology practice in Delhi
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
Watch: Tejashwi Yadav ducks as drone crashes into podium at Waqf rally. What cops said
Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav was forced to momentarily duck for cover on Sunday when a drone came crashing down onto his podium during a political rally in Patna's Gandhi Maidan. The incident unfolded mid-speech as the former deputy chief minister addressed a crowd gathered for the 'Save Waqf, Save Constitution' protest, organised in opposition to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. Leaders from several opposition parties were present at the rally, many wearing black armbands to signal dissent against the legislation. The sudden drone crash sent a brief wave of panic across the stage, though Yadav quickly regained composure and continued his speech. Speaking to news agency PTI, Patna SP (Central), Diksha assured that the matter is under investigation. 'We are looking into the incident. It was a restricted area and such an object should not have landed there. The police team was busy managing the crowd when the rally was underway. But the matter will be definitely investigated thoroughly.' VIDEO | Patna: While addressing 'Waqf Bachao, Samvidhan Bachao Sammelan' at Gandhi Maidan, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav (@yadavtejashwi) narrowly escapes injury as a drone crashes into the podium. (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos – — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 29, 2025 NDA govt is 'on its way out' in Bihar, claims Yadav Using the platform to escalate political rhetoric, the RJD leader declared that the NDA government in Bihar was on its 'way out,' and vowed to repeal the controversial legislation if the Mahagathbandhan returns to power. The leader of the Opposition in the state assembly said, 'Our national president Lalu Prasad has made it clear that the RJD will oppose this law tooth and nail. Our MPs opposed it in both Houses of Parliament. We have also moved the court against the legislation.' 'I would also ask my Muslim brethren in Bihar to remember that the NDA government is on its way out. In November, a new pro-poor government will be installed in the state and it will consign the Waqf Act to the dustbin,' PTI quoted Yadav, who is all set to lead the INDIA bloc in the state Assembly polls which are due later this year. 'The BJP, which rules the Centre and shares power in the state, must be reminded that Independence was won by the virtue of sacrifices made by Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Christians alike and nobody should behave as if the country is his father's property (kisi ke baap ka desh nahin hai),' he added. 'Be on your guard against the Election Commission's bid to help the BJP by holding a special intensive revision of the voters' list. We have to fight it out and thwart any conspiracy to deprive people of their right to vote.'
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
'Just connecting the dots': Karnataka's IT-BT Minister Priyank Kharge defends proposed misinformation bill
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The Karnataka government recently drew national attention with the early workings of a Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025 , placed before the state cabinet last week. The bill aims to tackle misinformation and fake news on social media platforms, with violations attracting a penalty of Rs 10 lakh and seven years' imprisonment.A leaked 11-page draft noted broad provisions under the bill for anti-feminist content, superstition, and insults to Sanatan Dharma. This has sparked a backlash from civil society members and digital rights the bill is still under deliberation, state IT Minister Priyank Kharge said that it is being misinterpreted. In a conversation with ET, he cleared the air on what the state intends to achieve with the new 11-page document is not the draft. That is the opinion of a few people in the law department. They have to still bounce it off the Home and IT departments, only then will it be taken forward. When the law minister addressed the press after the cabinet meeting, he just said that they are bringing in three to four bills. It has not been consulted with evidence not me saying it's a problem. The World Economic Forum report said that India is number one in spreading misinformation. One of the top three people in our country, that is, the former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, has said that misinformation is extremely dangerous for Election Commission of the country, during the Parliament election of 2024, said that three Ms are extremely dangerous for the electoral process. That is muscle, money, and misinformation. Even Prime Minister Narendra Modi agrees that misinformation is a havoc and is a threat to democracy. When everybody acknowledges that, somebody needs to do something about not trying to change any policy. We're just trying to connect the dots that already exist and make a bill out of it. When we did the Information Disorder Tracking Unit (a fact-checking exercise that ran a 90-day trial during the Lok Sabha polls), we classified the information circulating online as disinformation, malinformation, or fake news. We just want to debunk such are not doing anything such as tampering with the IT Act, 2000. (The centre's bill attempts to regulate digital news and online content creators, previously under the purview of the IT Act, leading to questions about the overreach and a potential clash of regulatory powers.) We are merely categorising any public interest information as true or false. The Centre's bill attempts to take away one's privacy. They want to look into your phone, what you're shopping and want to control your are not deciding whether it is misinformation or fake news. We are getting professionals to do that. We would love it if even the Editors Guild of India, or the Press Council of India, or anybody else wants to be a part of it. If any trusted news outlet comes out and says, 'Look, this is misinformation, it is fake news,' won't it help us? That's all we are trying to do with the intent is to go to the source, who is trying to spread the misinformation. If someone is willingly forwarding some image or news which is fake, they will also be reprimanded. For example, you know your friends are going to murder somebody. You're not going to drive the knife in, but you are there. You did everything. You drove him. That is abetment of the said the bill will require a wider level of consultations and emphasised the government's take, focusing on accountability and transparency.
