The valuation matrix
Let's say you are buying a bicycle shop that made a net profit of RM1mil last year. If you pay RM5mil for the shop, then you are paying a price equivalent to a PE ratio of five times.
Cancel anytime. Ad-free. Full access to Web and App.
RM 13.90/month
RM 9.73 /month
Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.
RM 12.39/month
RM 8.63 /month
Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Anwar, govt succeed in removing names from Mukhriz's tax lawsuit
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and the government have successfully struck out their names in an application to initiate judicial review filed by Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir linked to an Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) additional tax assessment amounting to more than RM5mil. Mukhriz, 60, filed the application on Dec 20 last year. He named the LHDN CEO or director-general, Anwar in his capacity as the Finance Minister and the government as the first, second and third respondents, respectively. During yesterday's proceedings, Justice Amarjeet Singh allowed the application by Anwar and the government to strike out their names after hearing submissions from both parties. However, Justice Amarjeet dismissed Anwar and the government's application to strike out several paragraphs in Mukhriz's affidavit that mentioned them. Senior Federal Counsel Irmawatie Daud appeared for the applicants, while lawyer Syed Afiq Syed Albakri represented Mukhriz. On Jan 2, the High Court granted Mukhriz leave to challenge the tax notices by LHDN on grounds that there were issues. The court fixed Dec 16 to hear the application on its merits. In Mukhriz's judicial review application, he is seeking a court order to quash the first respondent's additional tax assessment notice for 2017, 2018 and 2019, amounting to RM5,020,707.18, on grounds that the action is illegal and unreasonable. The notices were for additional tax assessment for 2017 (RM2,558,875.90), 2018 (RM2,445,004.91) and 2019 (RM16,826.37). He is also seeking a declaration that the decision to impose the penalty on him under Section 113(2) of the Income Tax Act is void and beyond legal authority. Mukhriz contends that LHDN wrongfully considered his disposal of shares in Opcom Holdings Bhd and dividends received from M Ocean Capital Sdn Bhd as taxable income, although they were not taxable. He is also seeking general and exemplary damages against the respondents. In March, Anwar and the government had applied to strike out their names as they contended that there was no need to list them as respondents in the judicial review. They said the action of naming them in the lawsuit was 'clearly frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of court process that is obviously unsustainable'.
Borneo Post
4 days ago
- Borneo Post
SMJ Energy secures RM 94 million in revenue from crude oil sale
KOTA KINABALU (July 24): SMJ Energy on Thursday announced the successful 10th sale of its crude oil from its Samarang Production Sharing Contract (PSC), generating an estimated RM 94 million in revenue. This latest transaction further solidifies the company's commitment to generating long-term, sustainable value from its operations. Since acquiring a 50% participating interest in the Samarang PSC on May 31, 2023, SMJ Energy's robust performance in the market continues to yield impressive results. Cumulatively, the company has generated an estimated RM1.9 billion in revenue to date, or RM397 million since early 2025 through strategic sales of its crude oil and gas from Samarang PSC. Samarang PSC, located offshore Sabah, is expected to provide continuous and significant revenue streams to SMJ Energy. Samarang PSC also produces and supply gas to Kota Kinabalu Industrial Park (KKIP) and three gas power plants in and around Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. The sale of crude oil from the Samarang PSC reinforces SMJ Energy's position as a key player in Sabah's energy sector. The company's operations support the Sabah State Government's goals of driving economic growth, strengthening local content development, and advancing a sustainable energy future.
The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
High Court strikes Anwar's name and Govt from Mukhriz's tax assessment case
KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and the government have successfully had their names struck out from an application for judicial review filed by Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir, related to an Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) additional tax assessment exceeding RM5mil. Mukhriz, 60, filed the application on Dec 20 last year, naming the revenue CEO or director-general, Anwar in his capacity as the Finance Minister, and the government as the first, second, and third respondents, respectively. In Thursday's (July 24) proceedings, Justice Amarjeet Singh allowed the application by Anwar and the government to strike out their names after hearing submissions from both parties. However, Justice Amarjeet dismissed the application to strike out several paragraphs in Mukhriz's affidavit that mentioned Anwar and the government. Senior Federal Counsel Irmawatie Daud appeared for the applicants, while lawyer Syed Afiq Syed Albakri represented Mukhriz. On Jan 2, the High Court granted Mukhriz leave to challenge the tax notices by LHDN on grounds that there were issues needing exploration. The court fixed Dec 16 to hear the application on its merits. In Mukhriz's judicial review application, he seeks a court order to quash the first respondent's additional tax assessment notice for 2017, 2018, and 2019, amounting to RM5,020,707, on the grounds that the action is illegal and unreasonable. The notices were for additional tax assessments for 2017 (RM2,558,875); 2018 (RM2,445,004); and 2019 (RM16,826). He is also seeking a declaration that the decision to impose the penalty on him under Section 113(2) of the Income Tax Act 1967 is void and beyond legal authority. Mukhriz contends that LHDN wrongfully considered his disposal of shares in Opcom Holdings Bhd and dividends received from M Ocean Capital Sdn Bhd as taxable income, although they were not taxable. He is also seeking general and exemplary damages against the respondents. Earlier in March, Anwar and the government applied to strike out their names, contending there was no need to list them as respondents in the judicial review. They argued that naming them in the lawsuit was "clearly frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of court process that is obviously unsustainable."
