The EU targets Russia's energy revenue and shadow fleet with new sanctions over the war on Ukraine
'The message is clear: Europe will not back down in its support for Ukraine. The EU will keep raising the pressure until Russia ends its war,' Kallas said in a statement.
Kallas said the EU move amounts to 'one of its strongest sanctions packages against Russia to date' linked to the war, which is now in its fourth year. It comes as European countries start to buy U.S. weapons for Ukraine to help the country better defend itself.
The European Commission, the EU's executive branch, had proposed to lower the oil price cap from $60 to $45, which is lower than the market price to target Russia's vast energy revenues.
The EU had hoped to get major international powers in the Group of Seven countries involved in the price cap to broaden the impact, but conflict in the Middle East pushed up oil prices and the Trump administration could not be brought onboard.
In 2023, Ukraine's Western allies limited sales of Russian oil to $60 per barrel but the price cap was largely symbolic as most of Moscow's crude — its main moneymaker — cost less than that. Still, the cap was there in case oil prices rose.
Oil income is the linchpin of Russia's economy, allowing President Vladimir Putin to pour money into the armed forces without worsening inflation for everyday people and avoiding a currency collapse.
The EU has also targeted the Nord Stream pipelines between Russia and Germany to prevent Putin from generating any revenue from them in future, notably by discouraging would-be investors. Russian energy giant Rosneft's refinery in India was hit as well.
The pipelines were built to carry Russian natural gas to Germany but are not in operation. They were targeted by sabotage in 2022, but the source of the underwater explosions has remained a major international mystery.
On top of that, the new EU sanctions targeted Russia's banking sector, with the aim of limiting the Kremlin's ability to raise funds or carry out financial transactions. Two Chinese banks were added to the list.
The EU has slapped several rounds of sanctions on Russia since Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine in February 24, 2022.
More than 2,400 officials and 'entities' — often government agencies, banks, companies or organizations — have been hit with asset freezes and travel bans.
But each round of sanctions is getting harder to agree, as measures targeting Russia bite the economies of the 27 member nations. Slovakia held up the latest package over concerns about proposals to stop Russian gas supplies, which it relies on.
The last raft of EU sanctions, imposed on May 20, targeted almost 200 ships in Russia's sanction-busting shadow fleet of tankers. Friday's measures added more than 100 more ships to the list.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Denim Mills Say Clients Are Taking a More Measured Approach to Seasonal Sourcing
Ongoing tariff negotiations, combined with weakening global economies and broader political disruptions, have added complexity to the traditional process of developing a new product season. As a result, mills say clients are approaching their orders with caution, prioritizing pricing clarity, supply chain stability, and value-driven sourcing. 'Brands and stores across the board are looking for value from their supply chain so there is a refocused energy in that direction,' said Henry Wong, AGI Denim's VP, product development and marketing. More from Sourcing Journal US and EU Inch Toward Tariff Deal Trump Touts 'Largest Deal Ever Made' With Japan Tariff Ticker: ASEAN Nations Seek to Secure Trade Deals Ahead of August Deadline Umair Masood Tata, Naveena Denim Limited's director of marketing, said recent tariff revisions and rising logistics costs have impacted overall order volumes and timelines. 'As a denim mill, we're doing everything we can to stay competitive by controlling costs, staying consistent in quality, and supporting our clients through close collaboration,' he said. Mills are seeing clients approach the season with a sense of cautious optimism. 'While orders are moving forward steadily, the global market is currently shaped by a high level of uncertainty. Factors such as tariffs and geopolitical tensions are prompting buyers to be more deliberate and strategic in their purchasing decisions. Everyone is waiting for greater clarity before making bolder commitments,' said Anatt Finkler, Global Denim's creative director. This 'cautious stance' is especially true with U.S. brands, according to Aydan Tuzun, Naveena Denim Mills' senior vice president, sales and marketing. 'The introduction and ongoing uncertainty of new tariffs have caused hesitation in placing orders, with many clients choosing to delay decisions rather than take risks,' she said. 'Additionally, ongoing disruptions in shipping routes, especially due to the Red Sea blockage, have led to extended lead times. These logistical and geopolitical challenges are prompting clients to plan further ahead and remain flexible in their sourcing strategies.' China-based Prosperity has seen shifts in how clients are preparing for the season. 'Political influence plays a crucial role in shaping clients' decisions, particularly in times of uncertainty, before they finalize their orders,' said Stafford Lau, Prosperity director. 'Tariffs and other geopolitical issues appear to be significant contributing factors to this trend, affecting client confidence and the volume of orders placed.' By having production hubs in China and Mexico, Cone Denim has been able to offer clients some flexibility. Pierette Scavuzzo, Cone's design director, said clients are exploring all order options this season due to uncertainty around tariffs. 'Brands are investing extra time and effort into preparing various sourcing strategies so they can quickly adapt if needed, ensuring their deliverables and distribution remain unaffected. Having two production platforms in two different hemispheres has helped our customers seamlessly explore counter options with quick speed,' she said. Though Turkey's trade with the U.S. is relatively balanced and small compared to Canada, China, the EU and Mexico, Gizem Yaşar, Maritaş marketing chief, said it's crucial to understand the impacts of imposed tariffs on U.S. economy. The U.S. has consistently been Turkey's second-largest individual export market. 'Tariffs and trade policies play a crucial role in shaping costs and competition in the global textile and fashion industry. Trump's politicized approach to trade and tariffs has accelerated protectionism and fragmentation in the global trading system,' she said. Although the pace of fabric purchasing for collections has slowed down due to fluctuations in the global economy, Yaşar said brands are doing this with the aim of managing the process more deliberately. Still, consumers' wallets will be the hit hard. 'Companies big and small will face higher costs on the goods they buy from other countries—and could have little recourse but to hike prices themselves. For consumers, that will likely mean more expensive prices [for] everything. As experts say, stagflation risk is on the table,' she said. Maritaş' plan is to remain agile and adapt strategies to upcoming changes. Yaşar added that the company is already in a better position, having distanced itself from mass-market competition by focusing on advanced and sustainable product lines. Being based in Turkey means Orta can provide a speed advantage in sourcing compared to other countries from a geopolitical standpoint. However, Sinem Kahveci, Orta's marketing specialist, said uncertainties surrounding tariffs remain a concern. 'Like the brands, we closely monitor all developments and continue our operations with cautious and measured steps,' she said. Turkish companies are running into issues closer to home. In the last two years, Ibrahim Ethem Buyukpepe, Calik's acting general manager, said there has been a 20 to 30 percent contraction in consumption in Europe due to inflation and uncertainty expectations. Contraction continues, evident in the demand for fabrics this season. 'In terms of tariff, American brands that carry out price-oriented production have started to add Turkey and North Africa options to their logistics strategies and are carrying out feasibility studies. However, [because] no clear steps have been taken for customs tax processes, the effect of the process has not been clearly observed,' he said. As brands seek to navigate and mitigate supply chain disruptions, new opportunities are emerging for sourcing hubs that have previously remained under the radar. Sharbati has seen interest grow for its Egyptian production over the last couple of years. 'For sure tariffs have created a higher need for alternative solutions, and Egypt is seen as the best actual option being in the Mediterranean area, hence with faster and sustainable transit time,' said Stefano Dotto, Sharbati's product design manager. 'In general, clients are approaching their orders with caution due to ongoing uncertainty in the retail sector. The impact of geopolitical tensions and tariffs, particularly between the EU, U.S. and Asia has led several clients to diversify their production and sourcing bases,' said Maria Mas, Evlox's digital marketing director. As a result, she said Morocco is gaining traction as a reliable nearshore alternative for European brands, thanks to its logistical advantages and trade agreements. Clients are also more aware of the origin of their components. Mas said Evlox is seeing a shift toward more sustainable and traceable denim, with clients requesting recycled and organic cotton, and placing more emphasis on environmental certifications. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Europeans to test Iran's appetite for nuclear compromise as sanctions loom
By John Irish and Parisa Hafezi PARIS (Reuters) -France, Britain and Germany will hold face-to-face talks with Iran on Friday for the first time since U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in June, aiming to gauge Tehran's appetite for a compromise to avert sanctions, diplomats say. The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 deal - from which the U.S. withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. Friday's talks between senior diplomats from the so-called E3 group and Iran's negotiating team will be held in Istanbul. The United States held five rounds of talks with Iran prior to its airstrikes in June, which U.S. President Donald Trump, said had "obliterated" a programme that Washington and its ally Israel say is aimed at acquiring a nuclear bomb. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon. European and Iranian diplomats say there is no prospect of Iran re-engaging with the U.S. at the negotiating table for now. But the Europeans say negotiations must be revived due to a halt in inspections of nuclear facilities by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and as an October 18 deadline for the expiration of the 2015 deal draws closer. They also want answers over the location of 400 kg (880 pounds) of near-weapons grade highly enriched uranium, whose whereabouts have not been known since last month's strikes. "We are determined to do everything to reach a diplomatic solution," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told a press conference in Paris on July 18. SNAPBACK OR EXTENSION? Under the terms of the U.N. Security Council resolution enshrining the 2015 deal, U.N. sanctions could be reimposed before the agreement expires - a process that would take about 30 days. The E3, who do not want to lose leverage by letting the deal expire, have warned that unless there is a new nuclear accord they will launch the "snapback mechanism", which would restore all previous U.N. sanctions on Iran, including on the oil, banking and defence sectors. With Russia - an ally of Iran - taking over the Security Council presidency in October, the three European countries have signalled that the latest window to reactivate the sanctions would be the end of August. Three European, one regional and an Iranian diplomat said the meeting in Istanbul would focus primarily on the issue of the snapback mechanism. They said the E3 would float the possibility to Iran of extending the snapback mechanism by up to six months. In return, Iran would need to make commitments on key issues, including eventual talks with Washington, full cooperation with the IAEA, and accounting for its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Speaking to reporters at the U.N. on Wednesday, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who will be in Istanbul, said Tehran had agreed to allow a technical team from the IAEA to visit in the coming weeks. He warned that a triggering of the snapback mechanism would be met with a strong response from Tehran. It has previously threatened to leave the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) over the issue. Gharibabadi added that he had heard about the possibility of an extension. "That's very premature now to discuss the issue of the extension. We have almost about three months actually, till the deadline of 18th of October," he said. A Trump administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. was "coordinated" with the E3 when asked whether Washington was discussing the reimposition of sanctions with them, but declined to elaborate. Israel's Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer was in Paris on Thursday and due to meet French officials for talks on various subjects, including Iran, four sources said. Israel launched the attacks on Iran saying it wanted to remove any chance of its arch-foe developing nuclear weapons. (Additional reporting by Alexander Ratz in Berlin, Michelle Nichols at the United Nations and Matt Spetalnick in Washington;Editing by Helen Popper)
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Forget trade wars — the future isn't about physical goods, but data, ideas and services
Despite a U.S.-driven trade war with China, voters turning to populism across the globe and the risk of a recession, reports of globalization's demise are — at least for now — overblown. Washington's trade hawks would do well to read the signs. True, that may seem like pie in the sky. Messages from Washington are all about reshoring and decoupling of trade. As President Trump's reciprocal tariffs aims to reindustrialize the American economy, his vision is one of the manufacture of cars and smartphones moving away from Asia to assembly lines of obedient workers in America. But the chief engine of the U.S. economy is no longer found in physical factories. Instead, it lies in intangible investments, such as research and development, software, organizational structures and intellectual capital. These immaterial assets eclipse physical capital such as machinery and equipment, now accounting for over 60 percent of corporate capital investment and, by some estimates, 90 percent of the S&P 500's market value. This has led to new patterns of globalization, defined by invisible items — data, ideas, modern services and cross-border teams. As trade in physical goods began to sputter in the beginning of the 21st century, these invisible flows have soared over the past decade. They are largely immune to tariffs, decoupling and attacks of populist politicians. Even with chips nearshored, global U.S. companies like Qualcomm still earn a quarter of their profits by licensing ideas globally. Although the U.S. may start soon a full-blown trade war with the European Union, data flows between the two trade giants are set to soar in the next decade, according to the European Commission. And as U.S. multinationals exit China, they remain reliant on cross-border teams within these companies. Meanwhile, modern services trade has continued to grow by 10 percent well into 2024 without interruption. Contrary to common belief, intangible flows span both manufacturing and services. Take Coca-Cola. The multinational rarely produces any of its famous beverages anymore. Instead, it licenses its recipe to non-affiliated contract producers called bottlers, from whom it receives property income. Google runs on worldwide data flows to power its services globally. McKinsey predicts that by 2040, modern sectors such as cloud computing, shared autonomous vehicles, AI, space and biotechnology will account for 16 percent of global GDP, nearly double the share of today's leading sectors like industrial electronics and semiconductors, which currently make up 9 percent. These emerging sectors fuse manufacturing and services. These sectors are also rife with global intangible flows. Consider BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine. The underlying mRNA technology was licensed from the biochemist Katalin Karikó. Cloud‑based trial data zipped across borders and Pfizer's partnership turbo‑charged the research and development and scale‑up. The same blueprint was later licensed to Moderna for its vaccine. Intangible flows like these are powering modern U.S. multinational production networks and their supply chains. Just as a quarter to half of the trade in U.S. goods in the 20th century occurred within multinationals, so too will U.S. intangible flows mostly take place within global firms this century. These new flows clash with Trump's trade narrative. For starters, the American economy is well positioned to benefit, as it holds strong comparative advantages in these emerging industries. Second, they don't fit with populist views on the evils of trade deficits. Data, for instance, transcends borders as a global commodity, contributing neither to a country's trade deficit nor surplus. U.S. cross-border research and development and global teams remain largely unnoticed as an international flow. But their output has surged by respectively 95 and 30 percent since 2009, boosting income at home. Meanwhile, the U.S. has held the world's largest trade surplus in modern services for years, backing both high- and low-skilled jobs at home. The overall U.S. trade deficit in goods is not the problem, but rather the byproduct of America's greatest modern globalization success. These new globalization flows are difficult to grasp, hard to monetize and challenging to rein in behind countries' borders. They do not rely on ships, airplanes and trucks, but instead on the internet, human minds and collaboration. The paradox is that they have continued to grow despite the ongoing global turmoil, and they could put the U.S. in the driver's seat this century. The outlook for globalization is more positive than the populist doomsayers in Washington are claiming. However, new intangible flows rely on attracting the world's top talent, without undermining universities; on maintaining a predictable environment for global business, without disregarding court rulings; and on avoiding questionable policy initiatives, without blindsiding allies. If the U.S. truly wants to capitalize on its strengths, policymakers should change their global engagement strategy and embrace the next wave of globalization before it's too late.
