French president Macron says its time for an agreement on the Oceans
French President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday slammed the withdrawal of climate funding by the US, saying it was time to reach an agreement for the entire planet.
Macron said this on the eve of the 3rd United Nations Ocean Conference and amid rising pressure for nations to turn decades of promises into real protection for the sea.
Speaking to scientists at one of the sideline forums of the UN conference, the Fremch presidet said: 'Unfortunately, if we are more or less clear-headed, we are at a time when international science, which still depends a lot on American funding, is withdrawing this funding, where we have a lot of people who are questioning multilateralism and these agencies".
He called on nations to commit to a moratorium on deep-sea exploitation. "I want us to reach an agreement for the entire planet. Because it's completely crazy. It's completely crazy to go and exploit, to go and drill in a place we don't know. It's frenzied madness."
Host to the third edition of the UN Oceans conference, Macron said around 30 heads of state and government have committed to a moratorium on deep-sea exploitation.
"There are already about 30 of us who have agreed. We're not going to give up. It's completely crazy to go and exploit, to go and drill in a place we don't know. It's frenzied madness," he stressed.
More than 50 world leaders are expected to attend the UN conference, with a major focus of the weeklong summit being a push to ratify the High Seas Treaty, which would enable conservation in international waters.
Thousands of delegates, including scientists and environmental advocates, began to arrive on Sunday for the conference to confront growing threats to the ocean and the need to transform pledges into protection.
The United Nations has called the threats a global emergency facing the world's oceans as they confront rising temperatures, plastic pollution choking marine life, and relentless overexploitation of fish and other resources.
Activists on board the Madleen vessel en route to Gaza to provide humanitarian goods say they have been intercepted by Israeli soldiers.
Posting on Telegram, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) campaign organisation announced "connection has been lost" on the Madleen and later uploaded a photo of people sitting with their hands up in life jackets.
Israel's foreign ministry's latest updates on the aid boat said the yacht was "safely making its way to the shores of Israel," and its occupants were "expected to return to their home countries."
Shortly after, the Israeli foreign ministry released a video on X showing its navy giving orders to the Gaza-bound aid ship to divert and posted another footage that showed passengers of what it called the "Selfie Yacht" safe and unharmed.
Concern first mounted overnight for the safety of the Freedom Flotilla's Madleen crew after alarms went off on the boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists en route to Gaza to deliver humanitarian aid.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition said the situation caused panic and led many of them to take cover and put on life jackets in preparation for an intervention.
In a post on social media, it wrote, 'Alarm has been sounded on the Madleen. Life jackets are on, preparing for interception.'
Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on occupied territories, who claimed to be in contact with the flotilla's communication room in Catania, noted that around five vessels had been circling the aid boat, with two drones hovering over the vessel.
On Sunday, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Israel wouldn't allow anyone to break its naval blockade of the Palestinian territory, which he said was aimed at preventing Hamas from importing arms.
'To the antisemitic Greta and her fellow Hamas propagandists — I will say this clearly: You should turn back, because you will not make it to Gaza,' he said in a statement.
Climate activist Thunberg is one of 12 activists on board the Freedom Flotilla Coalition-run Madleen.
The boat left Sicily last Sunday on a mission to provide humanitarian goods and lift the naval blockade of Gaza while bringing attention to the escalating humanitarian situation two months into the Israel-Hamas conflict.
In May, the Freedom Flotilla's attempt to reach Gaza by sea failed when two drones struck one of the group's ships as it was cruising in international waters off Malta.
The said attack damaged the frontal part of the vessel, which the group blamed on Israel, a claim that Israel strongly refuted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Denmark assumes EU presidency in stormy times. Here's what to expect
Denmark has officially taken over the six-month rotating presidency of the EU Council, with two overarching priorities: security and competitiveness. The task is usually a tough challenge, but it will be more formidable as a result of the extreme uncertainty and volatility that the European Union faces today. "Europe is at a defining moment in time," Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said in her welcome message. "The world that secured our freedom and made us prosper can no longer be taken for granted." The country inherits from Poland the unenviable title of "honest broker": the chief arbiter among the other 26 member states, moderating complex and fraught debates, drafting tortuous compromises and sitting face-to-face with the European Parliament to negotiate legislation. For the Danes, this marks the eighth time they assume the rotating chairmanship. Their reputation in Brussels as pragmatic, efficient and cool-headed operators bodes well for navigating the sharp, often intractable divisions between capitals. Here's what you need to know about the Danish presidency. The T word Whether the Danish presidency runs smoothly or descends into chaos might not depend on Brussels but on a city that is more than 6,000 kilometres away. Donald Trump's return to Washington, DC has deeply rattled Europeans, forcing them into a reactive posturing to protect themselves against the shockwaves unleashed by the mercurial president. Take trade, where Trump is attempting to unilaterally redesign the post-WWII economic order with sweeping, across-the-board tariffs. The European Commission still hopes a preliminary deal can be achieved with the White House before the 9 July deadline to avoid the worst-case scenario of a 50% tariff. But if the agreement falls below expectations – or if there is no agreement at all – the executive is preparing to hit back with retaliatory tariffs against American-made products. As the presidency, Denmark will be tasked with ensuring the 27 act as one and close ranks behind the Commission. It is doubtless an out-of-character role: the country is a traditional advocate of free and open markets. Exports account for almost 70% of its GDP, with iconic brands like Lego, Ozempic and Carlsberg sold worldwide. But for Denmark, Trump does not only represent a trade irritant but also an existential threat: the US president has refused to rule out using military force or economic coercion to seize Greenland, the semi-autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. Elusive consensus Denmark comes into the presidency at a time when the EU feels besieged by countless international crises, starting with the one closer to home: Russia's war on Ukraine. From the start of the invasion, Denmark has been a vocal supporter of Ukraine, becoming one of the largest donors of military aid. According to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Denmark has individually pledged €8.60 billion in weapons and ammunition, surpassing bigger countries like France, Italy, Spain and Poland. The Danish presidency is eager to ramp up these deliveries at the EU level and make up for the diminishing aid provided by the Trump administration. At the same time, it is determined to tighten the screws on the Kremlin to cripple its war machine. Here, the presidency is off to a rocky start: Slovakia has vetoed the 18th package of sanctions over an unrelated dispute about the phase-out of Russian fossil fuels. Prime Minister Robert Fico has asked for financial "compensation", and Brussels seems to have little space left in its strained budget to accommodate the sudden request. Denmark will contend with yet another veto in another top priority: enlargement, which the official programme defines as a "geopolitical necessity". Hungary continues to block the opening of negotiating clusters with Ukraine, despite the Commission concluding the war-battered country has met all the criteria to kick-start the talks. Last week, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán showed up at the EU summit with the results of a controversial national consultation to justify his solitary veto. The impasse is so entrenched that officials and diplomats have begun mulling the idea of decoupling Moldova from Ukraine to allow the former to progress while the latter awaits. Frugal no more Vladimir Putin could be credited for prompting one of the most spectacular political reinventions in the bloc's recent history. Back in 2020, Mette Frederiksen joined a small group of like-minded leaders to advocate fiscal discipline and cautious spending in the next multi-annual budget, which was then paired with the history-making COVID-19 recovery fund. The Frugal Four was thus born: Denmark, together with the Netherlands, Austria and Sweden, stood up against the expansionary vision espoused by France and Southern Europe. Fast forward five years, and Frederiksen has switched sides. "As Danes, we will always be tough in the negotiations on the budget," she said last month. "But being a part of the Frugal Four is no longer the right place for us." In her view, Russia's war on Ukraine has irreversibly transformed the bloc's financial equation and put rearmament above "all other priorities and all other principles". If the EU fails to develop the capabilities to defend itself, "then it's game over", she warned. Frederiksen is not alone in her assessment. Ursula von der Leyen has also espoused a security-first mindset and is expected to put defence spending at the core of the next multi-annual budget (2028-2034), which she will present before the summer break. This means Denmark will be able to commence the debate on the proposed budget, take the temperature among member states and identify the first fracture lines. Germany, for example, has already ruled out common borrowing on a permanent basis. "The categories we've had in the past still exist, so the frugals versus the rest. But the groupings are changing, who is part of the frugals is changing," says Janis Emmanouilidis, deputy chief executive at the European Policy Centre (EPC). "A lot will depend on other member states (like Denmark) putting pressure on others who are still very much coming from a frugal approach." Red vs green Cutting red tape has become the dominating trend in Brussels. The Commission's economic agenda is head-on focused on simplifying regulation, reducing administrative burden and making it easier for companies and investors to do business. For many leaders, this big push should come at the expense of the Green Deal. Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Poland's Donald Tusk are among those openly calling for certain environmental laws to be outright repealed. Denmark disagrees with this approach and believes the green transition can go hand-in-hand with a competitive economy, drive prosperity and create high-quality jobs. The argument is hardly surprising: the Nordic country has managed to foster growth and innovation while rapidly slashing greenhouse gas emissions and deploying renewable energy, most notably offshore wind farms, to replace imported fossil fuels. As a declaration of intent, Frederiksen has invited the College of Commissioners to visit the Laura Maersk, the world's first container ship capable of sailing on green methanol. But with the bloc tilted to the right and the backlash against the Green Deal intensifying by the day, the presidency might soon find itself in a shrinking minority. Going Danish There is one policy area in which Denmark finds itself right in the mainstream: migration. Thanks to its decades-long opt-out clause from EU migration rules, the country has been able to deviate from the norm and adopt heavily restrictive measures to curb the number of asylum seekers and maintain a relatively homogenous population. Initially controversial, the so-called "Danish model" has become increasingly popular across the bloc, earning praise from leaders and attention from policy-makers. "What Denmark has achieved in recent years is truly exemplary, and together we are also moving towards new and stricter asylum rules in the European Union," Merz said recently. The Commission has dropped its long-standing hesitations and is now fully on board with exploring "innovative solutions" to manage irregular migration, including the construction of deportation centres in faraway countries to transfer rejected applicants. Copenhagen feels vindicated and is keen to use its presidency to advance the process, even if outsourcing remains plagued with logistical, financial and legal questions. "Denmark's model of migration control is being advertised as the gold standard and worthy of imitation because it aims to deter asylum-seekers from coming," said Céline Mias, EU director at the Danish Refugee Council (DRC). "Political winds can shift, but our values and obligations to the rule of law and asylum seekers and refugees must not."
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump cuts to foreign aid looms large at UN conference on international development
01:52 01/07/2025 Israeli ministers criticize settler attacks in West Bank 30/06/2025 Paris put on highest heatwave alert level Tuesday: French weather agency 30/06/2025 Scorching temperatures grip Europe, putting regions on high alert 30/06/2025 Israel strikes pound Gaza, killing 60, ahead of US talks on ceasefire 30/06/2025 France's public broadcasting reform: What would its impact be? 30/06/2025 Iran says usual cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog cannot go forward 30/06/2025 New York mayoral candidate Mamdani defends campaign despite Democratic unease 30/06/2025 Police inquiry after anti-Israel speech at Glastonbury 30/06/2025 'We have to do more with less' - international development challenges after USAID cuts
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Trump administration accuses Harvard of anti-semitism, threatens more cuts
US President Donald Trump 's administration said on Monday that an investigation had concluded Harvard University violated federal civil rights law for failing to address harassment of Jewish and Israeli students, though critics and some faculty say such probes are a pretext to assert federal control over schools. The announcement could lay the groundwork for further action against the school, which has already seen billions of dollars in grant money frozen by the administration as part of a broader campaign against Harvard and other universities across the country. Universities have said Trump's actions threaten academic freedom and free speech, as well as critical scientific research. The Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights accused Harvard of "deliberate indifference" toward discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students, according to a notice from the administration. The department outlined a series of harassment incidents and faulted Harvard's response for being "too little, too late." "Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources," lawyers for the administration wrote in a separate letter to Harvard President Alan Garber that was viewed by Reuters. The result of the probe was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. In a statement, Harvard said it had taken "substantive, proactive steps" to address antisemitism on campus, including updating its disciplinary processes and expanding training on antisemitism. "Harvard is far from indifferent on this issue and strongly disagrees with the government's findings," the school said. Monday's letter is the latest in a multi-pronged assault that Trump has waged against Harvard, the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, after it rejected sweeping demands to alter its operations. The administration has frozen some $2.5 billion in federal grant money to Harvard, moved to block it from enrolling international students and threatened to remove its tax-exempt status. Harvard has filed lawsuits challenging those moves. In addition to targeted funding freezes at specific schools, the administration's cutbacks at agencies such as the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health have also resulted in terminated grants to research universities. The president has taken particular aim at Harvard and Columbia, two of the nation's most prominent universities. Earlier this year, the administration said it had terminated grants and contracts to Columbia University worth $400 million, accusing the school of not protecting students from antisemitic harassment during massive campus protests against the Israel-Gaza war, which included some Jewish organizers. Civil rights groups in response have said the contract cancellations lacked due process and were an unconstitutional punishment for protected speech. However, Columbia agreed to negotiate with the administration over demands that the school tighten its protest rules. The school's interim president, Katrina Armstrong, stepped down days later. 01:38 In May, the Trump administration concluded that Columbia had violated civil rights law by failing to address antisemitism, just as it did on Monday regarding Harvard. Earlier this month, Trump's Department of Education said Columbia had failed to meet accreditation standards by allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from harassment. Other schools have also become targets for the pressure campaign. On Friday, the president of the University of Virginia, James Ryan, resigned under pressure from the Trump administration over the school's diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Last week, the Trump administration announced it would investigate hiring practices at the massive University of California system - which enrolls nearly 300,000 students - to examine whether they run afoul of anti-discrimination law.
