
Palestinians fear razing of villages in West Bank, as settlers circle their homes
'When we saw the masked settler, we knew he wanted violence,' said Awad, his eyes bloodshot. They were lucky this time: the settler disappeared into the darkness before police could show up.
The men in Masafer Yatta rarely sleep these days. They take turns standing watch at night, fearful that nearby Israeli settlers will attack under the cover of darkness.
Daylight brings little respite. Residents work with an ear pricked up for the sound of approaching vehicles, scanning the horizon for Israeli bulldozers which could signal their homes are next to be demolished.
Israel designated Masafer Yatta a military training zone – named firing zone 918, where no civilians can live – in 1981. It has been working since to push out the roughly 1,200 residents who remain. These residents have been fighting in Israeli courts for more than two decades to stop their expulsion, a battle which has slowed, but not stopped, the demolition of Palestinian homes there.
Recently, an Israeli administrative body issued a decision which legal experts and activists have said could remove the last remaining legal barriers for the demolition of homes in Masafer Yatta. The decision could lead to the forcible transfer of 1,200 people, something the UN warned could be a war crime.
'This would amount to forcible transfer, which is a war crime. It could also amount to a crime against humanity if committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack,' the UN human rights office said on 26 June.
On 18 June, the civil administration's central planning bureau, the Israeli military agency that issues construction permits in occupied Palestinian territories, issued a directive that all pending building requests in Masafer Yatta be rejected.
Previously, residents could file building planning requests and, while they were being examined, their structures could not legally be demolished. By cancelling all pending requests, the new directive dismisses all previously submitted cases without examining their particularities and gives demolitions the green light.
The decision was made at the same time as Israeli authorities are pursuing sharply increased numbers of demolitions across the West Bank and East Jerusalem, destroying 933 structures since the beginning of the year, a record-breaking pace, according to UN data. As structures are demolished, more Palestinians are killed in the West Bank, with at least 950 killed and 9,000 injured by Israeli forces and settlers since the start of the war in Gaza on 7 October 2023, according to Palestinian health authorities.
The new directive cites a military planning document issued a day earlier, which said that firing zone 918 was necessary for combat preparedness and that the presence of civilian structures prevented training exercises.
The document says: 'The practical condition for such [military training] access is the removal of the unauthorised constructions, thus enabling the IDF to conduct its training … No construction in the firing zone can be permitted.' It adds that for live-fire exercises to be conducted, the area needs to be 'sterile'.
According to a lawyer representing residents of Masafer Yatta, Netta Amar-Shiff, the new directive bypasses a previous legal ruling and abrogates local laws, and could rapidly expedite the destruction of villages.
'If this directive is activated, it means planning institutions can dismiss building requests under military auspices, so no civilian construction and development can be approved. It's easier for them to eliminate entire villages,' Amar-Shiff said.
Humanitarian organisations have long accused Israel of establishing firing zones as an excuse to push Palestinians off their land and expand settlement construction. About 18% of Area C, the parts of the West Bank under full Israeli control, has been designated as firing zones.
According to government meeting minutes in 1981, the then agriculture minister and future PM, Ariel Sharon, proposed the creation of firing zone 918 with the purpose of forcing Palestinians out of the area.
In the meeting, Sharon told the IDF he wanted to expand shooting zones 'in order to keep these areas … in our hands', pointing to 'the expansion of the Arab villagers' in the area.
In a comment, the Israeli military said the civil administration was 'holding ongoing discussions regarding villages built within the boundaries of firing zone 918' and that the military had a 'vital need for the area'.
'As a general rule, no approval will be granted for construction within the firing zone, which is designated as a closed military area,' the Israeli military said in a statement to the Guardian, adding that building permit requests were subject to approval by military command.
To Awad, last week's decision is the latest attempt in a long line of court decisions and policies by the Israeli government to expel the residents of Masafer Yatta from their homes.
In May 2022, Israel's high court ruled that the residents could be expelled and the land repurposed for military use, as it said villagers were not permanent residents of the area before the firing zone was declared. Residents and lawyers, relying on expert testimony and literature, said they had inhabited the area for decades.
'This decision was a clear way of cutting the last nerve of life that these people had,' said Awad, calling it part of a larger policy of 'ethnic cleansing of Palestinians'.
Awad and the other residents of Masafer Yatta have spent more than two decades filing petitions, appeals, proposing master plans and submitting documents to try to fight the destruction of their community.
'We tried for many years to supply different documents and proofs and plans to the courts. But, after years of this, a commander in the army says no and that's enough,' said Nidal Younis, head of the Masafer Yatta council, in a press briefing late last month.
As the residents navigate Israel's labyrinthine bureaucracy to stave off demolition orders, settlers have acted as the extrajudicial vanguard of displacement, making daily life nearly intolerable for Palestinians.
Almost every single resident has a story about being harassed or attacked by nearby settlers, whose presence has been slowly growing, with new outposts popping up on the area's hilltops.
In the early hours of 25 June, settlers set fire to Nasser Shreiteh's home in the town of Susiya, burning his kitchen and a bedroom almost entirely, running off as he tried to extinguish the fire.
'They want to evict everyone, they want everyone to disappear. But I am here, if they burn my house down, I will stay here, I have no other place to go,' said Shreiteh, a 50-year-old with seven children, as he overlooked the charred remains of his kitchen.
As he spoke, an Israeli military patrol passed and behind it roared a beaten-up sedan driven by settlers, swerving in circles as the car's trunk swung open. They pulled up to Shreiteh's driveway and made an obscene hand gesture before driving off.
Incidents of settler violence in the area have sharply increased since the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 and the subsequent war in Gaza. The rise of the far-right, extremist ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir has provided political cover, allowing settlers to act with virtual impunity.
Many settlers have been called to military reserves, where they serve around their settlements. Residents of Masafer Yatta said settlers would often walk around in military dress, such as combat trousers, which made it impossible to tell whether they were dealing with settlers or soldiers.
Settler violence has escalated the tighter residents have clung to their land. In late January, settlers torched Awad's car, which he had used to transport children to school and residents to legal hearings.
Souad al-Mukhamari, a 61-year-old resident of Sfai, another village in Masafer Yatta, complained that one of her granddaughters, a child, had been beaten and pepper-sprayed by a settler a month earlier. Her own home overlooked the debris of a school that was demolished in 2022.
Palestinians can do little to protect themselves from settler violence, and are severely punished if they attempt to do so. They complain that Israeli authorities fail to protect them and do not follow up on their complaints.
Legal advocates have said they expect little protection from Israel's legal system, but instead are looking to the international community to increase pressure on Israel to halt settlement construction and protect the rights of Palestinians.
'We don't see any possibility of internal change within Israel to protect these communities,' said Sarit Michaeli, an international advocacy officer at the Israeli human rights group B'tselem. 'The only way to stop this is whether there is clear international action to clarify to Israeli policymakers that actions have consequences,' she added.
The Trump administration has expressed little interest in addressing illegal settlement construction and violence, lifting Biden-era sanctions on settlers. Instead, Michaeli said the EU could play a role in pressuring Israeli officials, especially as it announced at the end of May that it is reviewing its association agreement with Israel over human rights compliance concerns.
As residents of Masafer Yatta wait for international action, they live under the constant threat of displacement and settler violence, their means of resistance all stripped away one at a time. Still, they are determined to stay.
'Just mentally we are preparing for more demolitions. There's nothing more on the ground we can do, besides putting our words in the media so they can reach farther than we can scream,' Awad said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's to send more weapons to Ukraine in major U-turn
President Donald Trump announced a sudden policy change that will once again ship powerful weapons to Ukraine – while sitting next to the the top official credited with unilaterally ordering the pause. The stunning U-turn came at an evening meeting with Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and top members of his security team. It followed a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin that drew a rare public rebuke from Trump, and returns the U.S. to the posture of sending lethal weaponry to its beleaguered ally. Trump was seated next to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during the event, which came just hours after the White House defended what it called a 'standard pause' to review the state of U.S. stockpiles, even admit Russia's relentless and ongoing attacks. 'We're going to send some more weapons. We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard. Now, they're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons, your defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess,' Trump said. Hegseth could be seen glancing at Trump and nodding repeatedly while the president spoke about Russia 's ongoing attacks on Ukraine. Also making noticeable gestures was CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who was seated next to Hegseth. Ratcliffe glanced quickly in Trump's direction, raised an eyebrow, then looked upward while taking a large breath. NBC reported July 4th that the Pentagon held up a shipment of weapons for Ukraine for a week amid concerns about the capacity of U.S. stockpiles. It said the move blindsided lawmakers, allies, and officials in Kiev and was a 'unilateral step' by Hegseth. Trump, who held an angry Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February where Vice President JD Vance accused Zelensky of not being thankful, on Monday called the war a 'horrible, horrible thing.' 'And I'm not happy with President Putin at all,' he said. Just hours before Trump announced the U.S. would be sending weapons, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had dismissed a question about whether Trump had ordered the change or if the Pentagon did it without his approval. 'This was a standard review by the Pentagon of all weapons and all aid and all support that the United States is providing,' he said, adding that it applied to regions around the world. 'When the Secretary of Defense took office, he directed the Pentagon to conduct this review to ensure that everything that's going out the door aligns with America's interests,' she said. 'So it's a pause to review, to ensure that everything the Pentagon is pushing out there is in the best interest of our military and our men and women.' The Pentagon confirmed the change, saying at Trump's direction the DOD 'is sending additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops,' spokesman Sean Parnell said. During the NATO summit, Trump fielded a question from Ukrainian Myroslava Petsa of the BBC, who asked if the US would sell Patriot missile defenses that Ukraine is using to defend against repeated Russian drone and missile attacks. Trump called it 'rough stuff.' The Telegraph reported Monday that Ukraine would get a third of the Patriot defense interceptors it was seeking. Trump had shared his frustration after his last Putin call, telling reporters: 'I didn't make any progress with him at all.' On Friday, shortly after they spoke, Russia unleashed its largest drone attack of the war on Kiev. Celebrating the news of the shipment was House Republican Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas. 'Glad to see this news. Vladimir Putin is a thug who feigns an interest in peace, then turns around and bombs entire cities. He must be stopped before his aggression extends beyond Ukraine. Thank you, @potus, for projecting peace through strength in every corner of the globe!' McCaul posted on X. Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blasted 'restrainers' in the administration and issued a statement attacking the 'strategic incoherence of underfunding our military and restricting lethal assistance to partners like Ukraine.' 'This time, the President will need to reject calls from the isolationists and restrainers within his Administration to limit these deliveries to defensive weapons. And he should disregard those at DoD who invoke munitions shortages to block aid while refusing to invest seriously in expanding munitions production,' he said. The statement tore into 'self-indulgent policymaking of restrainers' that he said 'has so often required the President to clean up his staff's messes.'


Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Israel's ‘humanitarian city' plan paves way for Trump's Gaza Riviera
One by one, displaced Gazans would pass through security checkpoints where they would be searched for weapons or signs of links to Hamas before being allowed into a new 'humanitarian city' built on ruins. Once inside, they would not be allowed to leave unless they want to follow a Trump-approved 'emigration plan' to start the mass deportation out of the Strip. That is the latest plan proposed by one of Israel's hard-line leaders, the foreign minister Israel Katz. Critics say it would amount to ethnic cleansing. Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer, described Mr Katz's plan as 'a crime against humanity'. 'It is nothing less than that,' he said. 'It is all about population transfer to the southern tip of the Gaza Strip in preparation for deportation outside the strip.' About 600,000 people, mostly those who are already displaced, would be moved in the initial phase, followed by the rest of the roughly two-million-strong population. The hawkish Mr Katz, an ally of Benjamin Netanyahu's, presented the scheme on Monday as part of the overall mission to finally defeat Hamas. It is difficult to know with any certainty what such an unprecedented undertaking would look like in practice. One analyst said Mr Katz had, in effect, just ordered the construction of the largest tented area in the world. However, clues can arguably be found in the ongoing initiative to feed civilians via a US backed firm, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), not least because some of its purpose-built distribution sites are in and around Rafah. According to eyewitness reports and some videos that have emerged, civilians are forced to walk for miles through a militarised wasteland where nearly all the buildings have been destroyed by the bombs or bulldozers of the IDF. They are typically corralled between large man-made berms of earth or high metal fences fringed with barbed wire while they wait for ID checks. Hundreds of civilians have been killed in mass-shootings near the sites, with Palestinians accusing Israeli troops. The IDF blames Hamas for deliberately sowing chaos. Mr Katz's comments have prompted alarm not only because of the added suffering it could inflict on ordinary Gazans, but because, some fear, the plan will be used to facilitate the forced displacement of the population. In other words, the highly controversial vision for Gaza as announced by Donald Trump in February. According to the president's so-called Middle East 'Riviera' idea the population would be moved in order to redevelop the Strip into a richman's paradise resembling Las Vegas or Dubai. In more recent months, particularly as he visited Arab leaders in the Gulf, Mr Trump had gone noticeably quiet on this topic. This led commentators to conclude that he had never meant it seriously, but instead used the provocative idea to force the Middle East into coming up with its own plan for post-war Gaza. However, during Mr Netanyahu's visit to the White House this week, the spectre of a 'Trump Gaza' has, arguably, re-emerged. One Israeli official in Washington was reported as saying that Mr Trump was still keen on the idea (although the president dodged the question at a press conference). Mr Netanyahu himself praised the president's 'brilliant vision' and said Israel was close to agreements with third countries to receive Gazan civilians. The prime minister was clear, as he has been since February, to frame the idea as a one of voluntary relocation. 'If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave,' he told reporters, fresh from having handed Mr Trump a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize. 'It shouldn't be a prison,' Mr Netanyahu continued. 'It should be an open place, and give people a free choice.' Human rights organisations say life is now so grim for Gazans civilians that, if even a half-safe third country was prepared to take them, they would have to agree to go. In other words, in practical terms, there would be nothing voluntary about it. That is the main reason why Mr Katz's plan for a so-called humanitarian city has caused such a stir. Often the most bellicose in Mr Netanyahu's Right-wing cabinet when it comes to the subject of Palestinians, he has consistently been the biggest cheerleader for the idea of relocation, other than the ultra-nationalist coalition partners. As defence minister, he previously ordered officials to prepare a mechanism to allow Gazans to resettle elsewhere. It is no coincidence that the subject of population transfer has re-emerged as formal talks continue with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal. It does Israel no harm to posit an extreme scenario for what might happen to the enclave if Hamas does not play ball. Although Mr Katz spoke of forcing civilians to the south in the context of a 60-day deal, Hamas will have several potent reasons to reject the proposal. The terror group thrives when surrounded by ordinary civilians – it is their preferred means of fighting. The Katz proposal would also cut them off entirely from incoming aid, emptying their already drained coffers and allowing the IDF to effectively starve them out over months. The humanitarian city would be run by international organisations, Mr Katz said, but did not specify which ones. Finally, their self-styled status as the Palestinian people's legitimate arm of resistance risks being trashed if they consented to rendering the entire population refugees within their own land, let alone – potentially – outside it. However, some analysts believe that Hamas, ground down by the relentless IDF assault, is gasping for a ceasefire and may show some flexibility on these points. An official close to the talks in Qatar said that while agreement had not yet been reached, the 'gaps are small'. If the multiple recent leaks from Israel's security cabinet in the last couple of weeks are to be relied on, the army's leadership is extremely sceptical of any plan that involves their long-term presence in Gaza as a governing power. The Israeli chief of staff, major-general Eyal Zamir, is said to have told ministers that his troops have gone as far as they can go without putting the remaining hostages – 20 are thought to be alive – at grave risk. It would take three brigades at least to secure Mr Katz's proposed 'humanitarian city'. To whatever extent Hamas has been causing unrest at the aid distribution sites, Israeli troops have a tendency to react aggressively when Palestinians come close. Having to police the entire population in a relatively small area raises the risk of further mass shootings and international outrage. Despite the potential for a deal in the coming days, or further down the line, it is clear that for the ultra-nationalists in Mr Netanyahu's government, and indeed others on the Right, population transfer in Gaza is not just a bargaining chip, but a goal. Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and Itamar Ben-Gvir, the national security minister, are enthusiastically behind it, and can bring down Mr Netanyahu's coalition if they choose. On Monday it was reported that a $2 billion (£1.5 billion) plan to create 'humanitarian transit areas' inside – and possibly outside Gaza – were already presented to the White House, possibly months ago. According to Reuters, the proposal bore the name of GHF, although the group denies any involvement. Either way, there are powerful forces who want this to happen.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump publicly burns Pete Hegseth with major U-turn on Ukraine weapons stance
President Donald Trump announced a sudden policy change that will once again ship powerful weapons to Ukraine – while sitting next to the the top official credited with unilaterally ordering the pause. The stunning U-turn came at an evening meeting with Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and top members of his security team. It followed a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin that drew a rare public rebuke from Trump, and returns the U.S. to the posture of sending lethal weaponry to its beleaguered ally. Trump was seated next to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during the event, which came just hours after the White House defended what it called a 'standard pause' to review the state of U.S. stockpiles, even admit Russia's relentless and ongoing attacks. 'We're going to send some more weapons. We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard. Now, they're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons, your defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess,' Trump said. Hegseth could be seen glancing at Trump and nodding repeatedly while the president spoke about Russia 's ongoing attacks on Ukraine. Also making noticeable gestures was CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who was seated next to Hegseth. Ratcliffe glanced quickly in Trump's direction, raised an eyebrow, then looked upward while taking a large breath. NBC reported July 4th that the Pentagon held up a shipment of weapons for Ukraine for a week amid concerns about the capacity of U.S. stockpiles. It said the move blindsided lawmakers, allies, and officials in Kiev and was a 'unilateral step' by Hegseth. Trump, who held an angry Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February where Vice President JD Vance accused Zelensky of not being thankful, on Monday called the war a 'horrible, horrible thing.' 'And I'm not happy with President Putin at all,' he said. Just hours before Trump announced the U.S. would be sending weapons, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had dismissed a question about whether Trump had ordered the change or if the Pentagon did it without his approval. 'This was a standard review by the Pentagon of all weapons and all aid and all support that the United States is providing,' he said, adding that it applied to regions around the world. 'When the Secretary of Defense took office, he directed the Pentagon to conduct this review to ensure that everything that's going out the door aligns with America's interests,' she said. 'So it's a pause to review, to ensure that everything the Pentagon is pushing out there is in the best interest of our military and our men and women.' The Pentagon confirmed the change, saying at Trump's direction the DOD 'is sending additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops,' spokesman Sean Parnell said. During the NATO summit, Trump fielded a question from Ukrainian Myroslava Petsa of the BBC, who asked if the US would sell Patriot missile defenses that Ukraine is using to defend against repeated Russian drone and missile attacks. Trump called it 'rough stuff.' The Telegraph reported Monday that Ukraine would get a third of the Patriot defense interceptors it was seeking. Trump had shared his frustration after his last Putin call, telling reporters: 'I didn't make any progress with him at all.' On Friday, shortly after they spoke, Russia unleashed its largest drone attack of the war on Kiev. Celebrating the news of the shipment was House Republican Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas. 'Glad to see this news. Vladimir Putin is a thug who feigns an interest in peace, then turns around and bombs entire cities. He must be stopped before his aggression extends beyond Ukraine. Thank you, @potus, for projecting peace through strength in every corner of the globe!' McCaul posted on X. Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blasted 'restrainers' in the administration and issued a statement attacking the 'strategic incoherence of underfunding our military and restricting lethal assistance to partners like Ukraine.' 'This time, the President will need to reject calls from the isolationists and restrainers within his Administration to limit these deliveries to defensive weapons. And he should disregard those at DoD who invoke munitions shortages to block aid while refusing to invest seriously in expanding munitions production,' he said. The statement tore into 'self-indulgent policymaking of restrainers' that he said 'has so often required the President to clean up his staff's messes.'