Breaking EU diplomats downbeat as US trade deal not yet reached
The deadline to reach agreement expires next Wednesday, when a 90-day pause on higher tariff rates runs out.
The assessment comes following a long briefing of EU ambassadors by the EU's trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Brussels this afternoon.
It followed his 48 hour trip to Washington where he held talks with the US trade, commerce and treasury secretaries.
According to one EU diplomat, the Commission believes the US will address various trading partners according to three separate categories early next week.
Under the first scenario, the current reciprocal tariff pause would remain for those trading partners where agreement in principle has been reached, with possible further tariff relief later.
A second scenario would see previous country-specific tariffs reinstated where there are ongoing negotiations, but no agreement in principle yet.
In that scenario tariffs on EU goods would revert to the 20% rate first announced on 2 April, during President Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" announcement and would remain until a final deal is done.
A third scenario would be a return to the previous 20% tariff rate which would remain until further notice.
"It's still unclear how Trump would classify the EU, but from these talks it's clear that in all scenarios above an imbalance in trade measures between the EU and US remains," said the diplomat.
"This begs the question, asked by a number of ambassadors today, how we prepare to remedy that imbalance."
The EU is currently subject to a 10% tariff across the board, while cars and car parts are subject to a 25% tariff, and steel and aluminium are tariffed at 50%.
The EU suspended €22 billion in retaliatory tariffs in response to the steel and aluminium tariffs, and has €95 billion worth of tariffs on US goods in reserve for further counter measures if there is no deal next week.
Sources have been pessimistic about a positive outcome next week, although diplomats say contacts will continue over the weekend.
Diplomats have said it is unclear if the US side has agreed to any sectoral carve outs, such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors or aviation - a key EU demand - as the minimum the EU has sought to rebalance the lingering 10% tariff.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump and Netanyahu to discuss new Gaza ceasefire deal at White House
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu said he hoped a meeting with US president Donald Trump would push forward a deal to release Israeli hostages in Gaza , as he left for Washington amid growing discontent in his cabinet about a potential ceasefire in the war with Hamas . Mr Netanyahu sent a negotiating team to Doha, Qatar on Sunday seeking to finalise a US-brokered deal to halt the fighting for 60 days, release 28 Israeli hostages and begin talks on a permanent end to the war. That came despite his office rejecting the Palestinian militant group's latest demands as 'unacceptable'. 'We're working to achieve this deal that has been discussed, according to the terms that we agreed to ... And I certainly think the conversation with President Trump can help advance this result that we're all hoping for,' Mr Netanyahu told reporters at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport on Sunday. Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Photograph: Stoyan Nenov/AP It will be Mr Netanyahu's third visit to the White House since the US president was inaugurated in January, more than any other world leader. It also follows last month's Israeli and US attacks on Iran . READ MORE Mr Netanyahu said he would thank Mr Trump for his 'strong enlistment on behalf of Israel ... against our common enemy, Iran,' as he vowed to 'remain vigilant' against any attempt by Tehran to obtain a nuclear weapon. Mr Trump told reporters on Sunday evening that 'we're close to a deal on Gaza' and 'we could have it this week'. 'I think there's a good chance we have a deal with Hamas during the week, during the coming week, pertaining to quite a few of the hostages. You know, we've gotten a lot of the hostages out, but pertaining to the remaining hostages, quite a few of them will be coming out,' he said. Mr Trump added that Iran would also be discussed with the Israeli prime minister. 'We're working on a lot of things with Israel, and one of the things is probably a permanent deal with Iran. Otherwise, they have to give up all of the things that you know so well,' he added. US president Donald Trump points to the new US flag, not pictured, on the South Lawn of the White House after arriving on Marine One in Washington, D.C. on Sunday. Photograph: Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Bloomberg The two leaders are also expected to discuss the possibility of normalising diplomatic relations or reaching other security deals between Israel and neighbouring Arab states such as Saudi Arabia and Syria . After the Iran war, 'clearly we have changed the Middle East beyond recognition, and we have an opportunity to change it even further,' Mr Netanyahu said on Sunday. Most Arab officials maintain that any move to normalise ties would require at the very least an end to the Gaza war, and probably a pathway to a future Palestinian state. Mr Trump has made clear his desire for a ceasefire in Gaza, and said on Friday that he was 'very optimistic'. Yet over the weekend pressure grew on Mr Netanyahu from far-right allies in his governing coalition, who voiced opposition to any halt in the war and any increase in the meagre aid allowed into the shattered enclave. More than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Gazan health authorities, in the conflict triggered by Hamas's October 7th, 2023 attack on Israel. As part of the proposal drafted by the US, Qatar and Egypt – seen by the Financial Times – over the course of the initial 60-day ceasefire a large influx of aid would take place through the UN and other international aid groups. This UN-led mechanism was halted in effect by Israel in March, as it first instituted a 10-week siege and then began implementing a private aid scheme, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, supported by the Trump administration. Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich criticised Mr Netanyahu on Sunday for not fulfilling what he said were previous government decisions to promote mechanisms designed to prevent aid from falling into the hands of Hamas. 'The decision made yesterday [by Mr Netanyahu's security cabinet], contrary to our position, to introduce aid in the old and bad way is unacceptable to us and we will consider our steps against it,' Mr Smotrich wrote on X. Smoke and debris billow after an Israeli strike on Gaza on Sunday. Photograph: Maya Levin/AFP via Getty Images Far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also criticised the proposal, demanding that Israeli military force reconquer the whole enclave, halt all aid and encourage Gazans to 'emigrate'. According to the draft proposals, 'serious negotiations' to end the war – a long-held Hamas demand – would start on day one, with mediators set to provide guarantees to extend the truce should more time be needed to reach a permanent ceasefire. More negotiations would be needed to determine the extent of the Israeli military's withdrawal during the truce, with Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails also being released in exchange for the hostages. Mr Netanyahu has consistently refused to commit to ending the war until 'total victory' over Hamas is achieved. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump calls Musk's formation of new party "ridiculous" and criticizes his own NASA pick
President Donald Trump on Sunday called Elon Musk's plans to form a new political party "ridiculous," launching new barbs at the tech billionaire and saying the Musk ally he once named to lead NASA would have presented a conflict of interest given Musk's business interests in space. A day after Musk escalated his feud with Trump and announced the formation of a new US political party, the Republican president was asked about it before boarding Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, as he returned to Washington upon visiting his nearby golf club. "I think it's ridiculous to start a third party. We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion," Trump told reporters. "It really seems to have been developed for two parties. Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous." Shortly after speaking about Musk, Trump posted further comments on his Truth Social platform, saying, "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks." Musk announced on Saturday that he is establishing the "America Party" in response to Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which Musk said would bankrupt the country. "What the heck was the point of @DOGE if he's just going to increase the debt by $5 trillion??" Musk wrote on X on Sunday, referring to the government downsizing agency he briefly led. Critics have said the bill will damage the US economy by significantly adding to the federal budget deficit. Musk said his new party would in next year's midterm elections look to unseat Republican lawmakers in Congress who backed the sweeping measure known as the "big, beautiful bill." Musk spent millions of dollars underwriting Trump's 2024 re-election effort and, for a time, regularly showed up at the president's side in the White House Oval Office and elsewhere. Their disagreement over the spending bill led to a falling out that Musk briefly tried unsuccessfully to repair. Trump has said Musk is unhappy because the measure, which Trump signed into law on Friday, takes away green-energy credits for Tesla's electric vehicles. The president has threatened to pull billions of dollars in government contracts and subsidies that Tesla and SpaceX receive in response to Musk's criticism. NASA APPOINTMENT 'INAPPROPRIATE' Trump, in his social media comments, also said it was "inappropriate" to have named Musk ally Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator, considering Musk's business with the space agency. In December, Trump named Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut, to lead NASA but withdrew the nomination on May 31, before his Senate confirmation vote and without explanation. Trump, who has yet to announce a new NASA nominee, on Sunday confirmed media reports he disapproved of Isaacman's previous support for Democratic politicians. "I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life," Trump said on Truth Social. "My Number One charge is to protect the American Public!" Musk's announcement of a new party immediately brought a rebuke from Azoria Partners, which said on Saturday it would postpone the listing of its Azoria Tesla Convexity exchange-traded fund because the party's creation posed "a conflict with his full-time responsibilities as CEO." Azoria was set to launch the Tesla ETF this week. Azoria CEO James Fishback posted on X several critical comments about the new party and reiterated his support for Trump. "I encourage the Board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO," Fishback said. - Reuters Read More Risk of further floods in Texas as death toll rises to 82
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
EU could crack down on fake digital ads by forcing online platforms to ensure they are dealing with a reputable entity
If you're a regular user of social media or search engines, you have probably seen adverts in your feed or search results trying to convince you to get in early with an unmissable investment opportunity, to buy the latest crypto that will go to the moon, or even to buy a bond that guarantees an attractive fixed return. The problem is there is a good chance that these adverts are fake, but how are you supposed to know that? This is the problem at the heart of the EU's new Digital Services Act (DSA). Unless you work in tech , you probably haven't heard of this legislation. Its main goal is to prevent illegal and harmful activities online and the spread of disinformation. It has included fraud and scams in the definition of illegal activities but while it has only been in operation for a little over a year, it has become clear that it can't protect consumers from online fraud. This is mainly due to the principle underpinning the DSA, which is it is the responsibility of general users (that's you) or 'trusted flaggers' to identify fraudulent adverts and report them to the platform. It is then the responsibility for the online platform to investigate these reports, and take action if deemed necessary. READ MORE In policymaking, this is a classic example of a good concept in theory, which doesn't work in the real world. Let me explain why. The most obvious problem is that scam adverts only need to be online for a very short time before they can successfully target someone. Many scam adverts involve getting someone to hand over their contact details, such as their mobile number or email address, so even if the advert disappears the scam continues directly between the criminal and the innocent victim. [ Stricter rules to combat scam social media adverts proposed by Government Opens in new window ] For larger investment scams, it can take weeks or months to convince a victim to send large sums of money. Then, the victim may only realise that they've been scammed when they try to withdraw funds – in some cases many months after the actual fraud took place. By then, of course, the original scam advert has long disappeared into digital oblivion. The next problem is that the vast majority of general users won't have any idea that they are being served fraudulent adverts and therefore won't report them to the platforms. Whack a mole doesn't even begin to describe the scale of the challenge The DSA tries to address this by creating trusted flaggers or sector experts in each EU country that can report suspected fraudulent adverts to the platforms and for the platforms to act quickly on these reports. However, digital adverts are not like adverts in a newspaper that everyone can see – they are targeted at specific categories of users based on what the platform algorithm decides to show them. A trusted flagger may never see a fake advert that is served up to you. And finally, digital adverts are practically unlimited. Criminals can create new accounts and new adverts and deploy them at speed and at scale. You might successfully remove one advert, only to see 10 other accounts serve up the same fake advert. Whack a mole doesn't even begin to describe the scale of the challenge. There is a simple solution. Within the EU and the UK, all firms that sell financial services must be authorised by a local or EU regulator. To prevent fraudulent adverts for financial services ever reaching the general public, online platforms should be obliged to check they are dealing with a regulated entity before they publish an advertisement – for which advertising service, let's not forget, they are charging a fee. This is a simple, practical solution that would prevent huge numbers of fake advertisements from ever being published. Financial scams and fraud, often originating online, are the new front line of financial crime. It is a serious criminal enterprise that steals billions from European consumers every year to fund other criminal enterprises including terrorism, drugs smuggling and human trafficking. [ Fake online ads using Micheál Martin's image believed to have originated in Belarus and Russia Opens in new window ] However, the Digital Services Act is not fit for purpose in tackling this serious problem. For this reason, the Irish Government is to be commended for having proposed changes to EU legislation to introduce advertiser checks for the very large online platforms. In a year when the EU is also looking at new proposals to support retail investing by everyday consumers, it needs to address the vast amount of online scams that will only discourage consumers from taking the leap into investing. The sooner that policymakers accept that the DSA is not the solution to this urgent problem, the quicker new protections can be rolled out to protect EU consumers and cut off a large revenue stream for criminality. Every day matters in the fight against criminal fraudsters. Susan Russell is chief executive of Retail Ireland at Bank of Ireland
