Trump quips 'they didn't die of COVID' when asked if Israel killed Iranian officials
After months of negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, Israel attacked Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure early Friday, taking out at least 20 senior Iranian commanders and inflicting a significant blow to Tehran's government. Two of the most prominent officials killed in the strikes were Gen. Hossein Salami, the leader of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces.
Bash spoke on Friday about her phone call with Trump, where she asked him about Secretary of State Marco Rubio's initial statement about Israel's strikes, which did not explicitly say that the U.S. supported them.
Trump Believes Israel's Strike On Iran Could Improve Chances For Nuclear Deal: Report
"We, of course, support Israel, obviously, and supported it like nobody has ever supported it," Trump said, according to Bash. "It was a very successful attack. Iran should have listened to me when I said - you know, I gave them, I don't know if you know, but I gave them a 60-day warning. And today is day 61."
"They should now come to the table to make a deal before it's too late. It will be too late for them. You know, the people I was dealing with are dead," he added, though he wouldn't give specific names, only that the "hardliners" were dead.
Read On The Fox News App
"This is as a result of the attack last night?" Bash asked him.
"Yeah. They didn't die of the flu. They didn't die of COVID," Bash described him saying "quite sarcastically."
Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture
Trump also told Fox News' Bret Baier on Friday that "The Iranians were hit 10 times worse than they thought they would be."
"They weren't ready to negotiate. I think they may be now. We'll see," Trump said regarding the future of Iran's nuclear program. Senior U.S. officials told Fox News that a long list of nuclear scientists and military leaders were targeted by Israel's surprise airstrikes Friday.
The officials added that 90% of Iran's top nuclear scientists, as well as other senior military officers and other Iranian leaders, may have been targeted in the strikes.Original article source: Trump quips 'they didn't die of COVID' when asked if Israel killed Iranian officials

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Pictures: Tearful politicians showing their sensitive side
The Chancellor's tears during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday sent shockwaves across Westminster. The precise cause of Rachel Reeves' distress on the front bench as the Prime Minister jousted with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch remains a matter of speculation but it was certainly uncomfortable to watch. She is far from the first politician to show her emotions by shedding tears though. Here, the PA news agency looks at some other examples over the years of politicians becoming tearful: – Theresa May Theresa May's tenure as prime minister was dominated by Brexit. The former home secretary had the unenviable task of bringing the country back together after a divisive referendum and negotiating the UK's exit from the European Union as she succeeded David Cameron in 2016. Mrs May ultimately failed to deliver the latter of those goals and the toll that responsibility had taken on her during her time in No 10 perhaps showed as she delivered her resignation speech outside Downing Street in May 2019. – Margaret Thatcher Known as the Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher portrayed strength during her 11-year reign as prime minister. However, she too, showed a more human side when she broke down in tears as she said goodbye to Downing Street in 1990. – George Osborne George Osborne wept as he attended Baroness Thatcher's funeral in 2013. Mr Osborne, who was chancellor at the time, was moved to tears during a sermon by then Bishop of London Lord Chartres. – Matt Hancock Matt Hancock raised eyebrows as he appeared to wipe away a tear during a live appearance on Good Morning Britain as he reacted to news that a man called William Shakespeare had become the second person in the UK to receive a Covid vaccine. 'It's been such a tough year for so many people,' the then health secretary told Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid in December 2020. – Gordon Brown Gordon Brown wept when he opened up about the death of his daughter Jennifer during a TV interview in 2010. The then prime minister's eyes filled with tears as he told Piers Morgan he knew that his newborn daughter was not going to survive. She died in 2002 aged just 10 days after suffering a brain haemorrhage. – Cherie Blair Cherie Blair broke down in tears in 2002 as she tried to explain away the controversy surrounding convicted fraudster Peter Foster's role in buying two flats for herself and her then prime minister husband Tony Blair. 'I know I'm in a very special position, I'm the wife of the Prime Minister, I have an interesting job and a wonderful family, but I also know I am not Superwoman,' she tearfully said in a statement to the press.


CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
How the retail industry is responding to Trump's trade deal with Vietnam
The retail industry is breathing a sigh of relief after it appeared to avoid the worst case scenario on Vietnam tariffs. But some executives believe the tentative trade deal President Donald Trump announced Wednesday is still bad for business and could have a chilling effect on consumer spending. "It's a lot better news than where we were on Liberation Day," one CEO of a popular consumer brand told CNBC after Trump said tariffs on Vietnamese imports would be 20%, down from the 46% levy he proposed on April 2, then later suspended. The new rate would be double the 10% duty currently in place. Another executive called the news "bad" but agreed that a 20% tariff was better than the 46% duty Trump originally imposed, however unrealistic the proposed rate was. "I guess Trump needs 'positive' news," a third executive said. "I think things are going to evolve. Let's see if this is definitive." Trump's announcement on Wednesday came only days before the 90-day suspension of the steep tariffs he proposed in April expires next week, and as his administration scrambles to strike agreements with dozens of trading partners. Even so, he did not say when the deal with Vietnam would take effect, or whether both sides have agreed to the tariff rates. In the months between Trump's April 2 tariff rollout and his announcement on Wednesday, retail executives in the apparel and footwear industries fretted over the potential that Vietnam imports could face tariffs nearly as high as the cumulative 55% duties for Chinese imports. Over the last decade, some of America's top retailers, including Gap, American Eagle and Nike, have all reduced their reliance on China to shield themselves from both high tariffs and the region's geopolitical turbulence. Many sought refuge in Vietnam, where the factories, some owned by Chinese businesses, are known to produce products at a similar quality and price as China. They also started manufacturing in other countries in southeast Asia, such as Cambodia, Bangladesh and Malaysia. Those countries were facing tariffs of 49%, 37% and 24%, respectively, under Trump's April plan, but are subject to a 10% duty for now. Vietnam is now the second largest supplier for footwear, apparel and accessories sold into the U.S. market, according to the industry trade group the American Apparel & Footwear Association. It has become an essential part of the footwear supply chain, on pace to become the largest supplier of shoes to the U.S. in 2025, according to the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America, another industry trade group. If Trump's proposed 46% tariff on Vietnam had taken effect, it would mean much of the industry's work to leave China would have been for naught. Some companies are relieved the tentative deal would set the levy at 20% and the announcement agreement is also a sign that Cambodia, Malaysia and Bangladesh could reach similar frameworks. "Twenty percent is a sigh of relief," said Sonia Lapinsky, a partner and managing director at AlixPartners who advises fashion brands. "There's some positivity and some optimism that this is manageable. So at least there's that. This isn't business destroying, which is great. However, this does have real implications, right?" Most companies have plenty of tools to offset the impact of tariffs, such as working with their suppliers to share costs. But to avoid major hits to their profit margins, many including Nike are planning to raise prices. It's still unclear how those hikes will affect consumer spending because it will take time for the increases to trickle down in the supply chain. AlixPartners previously created pricing models for CNBC that examined how the price of Vietnamese-made sweaters and shoes could rise under Trump's proposed tariffs — if retailers do not pass any of the cost on to suppliers or shoppers. At a 10% levy, the cost of a $95 pair of men's shoes could rise by $7.42 to $102.42. With a 20% duty in place, the cost increase would be even larger. Many executives worry any tariff hike of this magnitude will be bad for businesses and consumers. Paul Cosaro, the CEO of Picnic Time, a supplier to top retailers like Target, Kohl's and Macy's, said if the clocks were wound back to April and Trump said there'd be a 20% tariff on Vietnamese imports, "no one would've been happy." "There could be threats of a 46% tariff and you come back with 20 and it's going to sound better but… it's just more money coming out of the consumers' pockets at the end of the day and they have less money to spend on picnic baskets and coolers and things like that," said Cosaro, who raised his prices between 11% and 14% earlier this year to offset the cost of China tariffs. "It's not good for the consumer. Ultimately, it's just increasing the prices … I don't think that's good news."


Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Jeffries speaks for hours on House floor against tax bill
Politics Jeffries speaks for hours on House floor against tax bill July 3, 2025 | 2:49 PM GMT House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said on July 3 Trump's bill would 'hurt the quality of life' for Americans if passed.