In Pictures: Tearful politicians showing their sensitive side
The precise cause of Rachel Reeves' distress on the front bench as the Prime Minister jousted with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch remains a matter of speculation but it was certainly uncomfortable to watch.
She is far from the first politician to show her emotions by shedding tears though.
Here, the PA news agency looks at some other examples over the years of politicians becoming tearful:
– Theresa May
Theresa May's tenure as prime minister was dominated by Brexit. The former home secretary had the unenviable task of bringing the country back together after a divisive referendum and negotiating the UK's exit from the European Union as she succeeded David Cameron in 2016.
Mrs May ultimately failed to deliver the latter of those goals and the toll that responsibility had taken on her during her time in No 10 perhaps showed as she delivered her resignation speech outside Downing Street in May 2019.
– Margaret Thatcher
Known as the Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher portrayed strength during her 11-year reign as prime minister.
However, she too, showed a more human side when she broke down in tears as she said goodbye to Downing Street in 1990.
– George Osborne
George Osborne wept as he attended Baroness Thatcher's funeral in 2013.
Mr Osborne, who was chancellor at the time, was moved to tears during a sermon by then Bishop of London Lord Chartres.
– Matt Hancock
Matt Hancock raised eyebrows as he appeared to wipe away a tear during a live appearance on Good Morning Britain as he reacted to news that a man called William Shakespeare had become the second person in the UK to receive a Covid vaccine.
'It's been such a tough year for so many people,' the then health secretary told Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid in December 2020.
– Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown wept when he opened up about the death of his daughter Jennifer during a TV interview in 2010.
The then prime minister's eyes filled with tears as he told Piers Morgan he knew that his newborn daughter was not going to survive.
She died in 2002 aged just 10 days after suffering a brain haemorrhage.
– Cherie Blair
Cherie Blair broke down in tears in 2002 as she tried to explain away the controversy surrounding convicted fraudster Peter Foster's role in buying two flats for herself and her then prime minister husband Tony Blair.
'I know I'm in a very special position, I'm the wife of the Prime Minister, I have an interesting job and a wonderful family, but I also know I am not Superwoman,' she tearfully said in a statement to the press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump To Issue Major Tariff Update
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump said he has signed letters to 12 countries, outlining the various tariff levels they will face on goods they export to the United States. The president made the remarks to reporters aboard Air Force One as he traveled to New Jersey on Friday night. He declined to identify the countries, but said it would be made public on Monday. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably 12," Trump said. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs and somewhat different statements." File photo: Donald Trump greets guests on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. File photo: Donald Trump greets guests on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, It Matters Trump in April announced a 10-percent base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, including some as high as 50 percent. But, after the announcement prompted a market meltdown, the president hit pause for 90 days to allow time for negotiations with individual counties, although high taxes were left in place on imports from China. Trump had initially promised to make "90 deals in 90 days," but few agreements have been finalized with just days until the pause ends on July 9. The president said last week that he was not planning to extend the 90-day pause and his administration would be notifying counties about the tariffs that will take effect unless deals are in place with the U.S. What To Know Asked if he may reach a deal with the European Union, Trump spoke about the difficulty of negotiating the deals. "I think the letters are better for us; I've said that all along," he said. "Because you have hundreds of countries, you know, you have over 200 countries and you can't sit down with 200 countries. I think the letters are better." Trump earlier on Friday told reporters at Joint Base Andrews in Prince George's County, Maryland, that some of the tariffs could be as high as 70 percent. "They'll range in value from maybe 60 or 70 percent tariffs to 10 and 20 percent tariffs, but they're going to be starting to go out sometime tomorrow," Trump said. "We've done the final form, and it's basically going to explain what the countries are going to be paying in tariffs." What People Are Saying Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an appearance on CNBC on Thursday that more deals could be struck before the July 9 deadline: "Of course, everyone waits till the last minute. They think that they can get the best deal. And as I've warned when I've done other media, these countries should be careful because their rate could boomerang back to their April 2 rate." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said during a news conference on Thursday: "Indeed what we are aiming at is an agreement in principle, because [with] such a volume, in 90 days, an agreement in detail, it's impossible … That is also what the U.K. did." What Happens Next Trump has said the tariffs are set to go into effect on August 1. He did not say whether any other trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline.
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Danes Hug Europe Tight as Geopolitical Challenges Loom
By and Jorge Valero Save Welcome to the weekend issue of Brussels Edition, Bloomberg's daily briefing on what matters most in the heart of the European Union. Join us on Saturdays for deeper dives from our bureaus across Europe. When US President Donald Trump floated the idea of taking over Greenland, it jolted Denmark into a rare moment of geopolitical prominence.
Time Magazine
4 hours ago
- Time Magazine
How Keir Starmer Squandered His First Year as Britain's PM
It was a moment that will remain etched in British minds. Finance minister Rachel Reeves became tearful in front of the entire nation on Wednesday, almost exactly a year after Labour took office with a huge majority in parliament. The episode came as the government was forced to U-Turn on cutting welfare benefits for millions of disabled people, after a rebellion from MPs that has raised questions over how long Reeves or even Prime Minister Keir Starmer might last in their posts. The wreckage lays bare a paradox that has beset Labour since it came to power. Its orientation is unfailingly orthodox and conservative, defined by 'fiscal restraint' and the defense of established institutions. Yet in a country that needs renewal rather than retrenchment, this kind of politics tends to generate perpetual crises—which have, in turn, caused the party to make a series of shambolic climbdowns that have eroded its credibility. It would be a stretch to say that Labour has deflated popular expectations. The party owed much of its election on July 4, 2024 to widespread anger at the Conservatives, who had governed for a 14-year period marked by austerity, a chaotic Brexit, perpetual scandals, and an infamous run on bond markets when one of the party's Prime Ministers, Liz Truss, tried to implement unfunded tax cuts for the superrich. (The Daily Star began a livestream to see whether Truss or a head of lettuce would have a longer shelf life; the lettuce won.) Labour took office with 64% of seats in parliament despite a modest 34% of the vote. Turnout was at a historic low, with some calling Starmer's victory a 'loveless landslide' or a 'majority without a mandate.' The party had not sought to distinguish itself from the Conservatives on the basis of ideology: both agreed on the necessity to rein in state spending, the primacy of the special relationship with Washington, and the need to cut migration. The dividing line was the issue of good governance, with Sir Keir—a decorated lawyer who once ran the country's Crown Prosecution Service—pledging to be a more capable manager. But the promise of fiscal discipline has become a straightjacket. Reeves has long ruled out tax rises, leaving the government in constant crisis over budgets. Its solution has been to maintain harsh measures like the Tory two-child welfare benefit cap. It has removed subsidies that help pensioners to stay warm during winter, sparking such public anger that Starmer vowed to restore them. Its attempt to force sick and disabled people into work by reducing benefits is just the latest backlash stemming from these self-imposed spending restrictions. The Labour government's pitch has long been that it can restart growth to better fund the state. It has gone about this by proving its 'credibility' with the markets and deregulating key sectors. Financiers are being encouraged to engage in more 'risk-taking' and asset management firms are being incentivized to buy up more of Britain's crumbling infrastructure in ways that will put rich investors first. This is a trickle-down agenda for the 2020s, based on giving big business everything it wants in the hope that the rest of the population may someday share in the wealth. The former head of Amazon U.K. has been put in charge of regulating private monopolies. The onetime CEO of Microsoft U.K. chairs the government's industrial strategy council. Executives from BlackRock have been granted extraordinary access to key ministers. But GDP growth remains slow and public services are still under enormous pressure. Diagnoses of Britain as a 'failed state' are increasingly common. Naturally, Britons are on the lookout for an alternative. One may be a potential new left-wing electoral vehicle launched by the former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and others. But for many today, the closest thing on offer is the beaming, cigar-puffing demagogue Nigel Farage, leader of the far right Reform party, whose unimaginative promise to 'Make Britain Great Again' and freeze immigration has gained ever more traction as the Labour government flounders. Although Reform won just five of 650 seats in the 2024 election, it triumphed in local elections in May. Recent polling put its support at 34%, and there is growing talk that Farage could become the next Prime Minister. Its surge has coincided with a series of riots across England and Northern Ireland, in which racists attacked asylum seekers and set fire to their accommodation. Rather than working out a consistent line to counter Farage, Starmer has often equivocated. First his government broadcast lurid videos of migrants being deported and pledged tough new restrictions to prevent Britain from becoming an 'island of strangers'—echoing the words of the infamous Enoch Powell in his 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Starmer would later apologize, saying that neither he nor his speechwriters were aware it resembled Powell's remarks. It was yet another example of Labour's dynamic of prevarication and self-sabotage: failing to win over Reform voters while alienating many of his own supporters. Senior party figures are now reportedly suggesting that Starmer could be forced out within months. The lesson is that, in today's Britain, the refusal to pursue meaningful change leads to perpetual turbulence and instability. Unless Starmer finds a way to avoid the latter, his political survival cannot be assured.
