Google Chrome Warning — Windows, Android, Mac And Linux Users Act Now
Update Chrome now.
Google users are accustomed to being urged to update now, which is hardly surprising, as its products and services are a magnet for cybercriminals due to the extensive user footprint they enjoy. Google has advised users to replace all Gmail passwords and update to a passkey instead, following numerous account takeover attacks, Google Messages is getting a critical security update, and then there's Chrome, of course. Hot on the heels of a June 10 urgent Google Chrome browser security update, just a week later, the technology behemoth has confirmed yet another security scare that requires users of the world's most popular web browser across all platforms with the exception of iOS to update now.
Google has now confirmed two new security vulnerabilities that impact users of Chrome across the Android, Linux, Mac and Windows platforms. The vulnerabilities, both given a high-severity rating and earning four-figure bounty rewards for the researchers who discovered and disclosed them, could enable a successful attacker to execute arbitrary code on your device with all the consequences that can bring.
It is for this reason that it's vital you don't wait for the update to reach your browser in the 'coming days and weeks,' as Google noted in its June 17 confirmation, but rather kickstart that process now and ensure the security patches have been activated and are protecting your system.
The two vulnerabilities are:
CVE-2025-6191: An integer overflow security vulnerability in Chrome's V8. JavaScript rendering engine.
CVE-2025-6192: A use-after-free security vulnerability in Chrome's Profiler function.
The Google Chrome update process actually happens automatically, but, as Google has noted, it can take some days to reach your browser. When it does, you will see a notification when the update to version 137.0.7151.119/.120. This alone does not mean that you are protected; you need to activate the update in order for it to do that. Err on the side of caution and kickstart the updating process so you can be sure your browser and the data it can access are appropriately protected immediately.
Kickstart your Google Chrome update now.
Head for the Help menu and select About Google Chrome. This will check for and download the update, and then all you have to do is activate it for instant security from these vulnerabilities. Don't worry, your tabs will reopen as well, so you won't lose them. So, what are you waiting for? Android users simply need to update the Chrome app.
Relaunch Google Chrome to activate security updates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
38 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
FBI, cybersecurity firms say a prolific hacking crew is now targeting airlines and the transportation sector
The FBI and cybersecurity firms are warning that the prolific hacking group known as Scattered Spider is now targeting airlines and the transportation sector. In a brief statement on Friday shared with TechCrunch, the FBI said it had 'recently observed' cyberattacks resembling Scattered Spider to include the airline sector. Executives from Google's cybersecurity unit Mandiant and Palo Alto Networks' security research division Unit 42 also said they have witnessed Scattered Spider cyberattacks targeting the aviation industry. Scattered Spider is a collective of mostly English-speaking hackers, typically teenagers and young adults, who are financially motivated to steal and extort sensitive data from company networks. The hackers are also known for their deception tactics, which often rely on social engineering, phishing, and sometimes threats of violence toward company help desks and call centers to gain access to their networks, and sometimes deploy ransomware. The FBI's statement added that the hackers may target large corporations and their third-party IT providers, meaning 'anyone in the airline ecosystem, including trusted vendors and contractors, could be at risk.' The warning comes as at least two airlines have reported intrusions this month. Hawaiian Airlines said late Thursday that it was working to secure its systems following a cyberattack. Canada's second largest airline, WestJet, reported a cyberattack on June 13 that remains ongoing and unresolved. Media reports have linked the WestJet incident to Scattered Spider. Techcrunch event Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW This fresh wave of Scattered Spider attacks comes soon after the cybercriminal gang targeted the U.K. retail sector and the insurance industry. The hackers have previously broken into hotel chains, casinos, and technology giants. Updated with an additional statement from the FBI.
Digital Trends
an hour ago
- Digital Trends
Windows has a major AI problem, and it's pushing me closer to Apple
Just over a year ago, Apple Intelligence was announced. It continues to be somewhat of a 'meh' affair compared to other rival products like Microsoft's Copilot and Google's Gemini. What was not 'meh' was the support for Apple's generative AI bundle, which extended all the way back to the M1 silicon introduced in 2020. Even the fresh batch of AI features — such as live translations and intelligent Shortcuts — are fully supported on the machines that will soon be five generations old. I can't say the same about Windows and its AI-powered rebirth with the Copilot package. Before confusion ensues, let me clear things up. Recommended Videos Copilot is a suite of AI features, just like Gemini or Apple Intelligence. Then we have Copilot+ machines, which is a branding for PCs that meet certain hardware-level requirements to enable AI-powered features on Windows laptops and PCs. Here's the weird part. A healthy bunch of Intel silicon launched in 2025 — even those in the powerful 'H' class — don't meet those AI processing requirements. All of it has created a weird kind of divide in the Windows ecosystem where certain advanced AI features are locked to a handful of cheaper machines, even if you paid a much higher price to get a laptop with a far more powerful processor. Oddly, it's not just the hardware, but the software experience that now feels different. Copilot+ is not merely AI hype Before we get into the hardware limitations, let's break down the features. Copilot+ machines require a powerful hardware chip for AI acceleration to enable certain features, down to the OS level. For example, in the Settings app, Microsoft is pushing its own Mu small language model (SML) that runs entirely on the NPU. The NPU on a chip, however, must meet a certain performance baseline, something not even Intel and AMD silicon launched in 2025 fulfill universally. Let's start with the AI-powered Settings app interactions. It can now understand natural language queries and make suggestions so that users can directly take action with a click. If you type something like 'My screen doesn't feel smooth,' the Settings app will show a dialog box underneath the search bar, where you get an actionable button to increase the refresh rate and make the interactions smoother. Apple is chasing something similar and has implemented it within the Spotlight system in macOS Tahoe. Next, we have Recall. It's like a time machine system that takes snapshots of your PC activity in the background and analyzes them contextually. In the future, if you seek to revisit or find something, you can simply type a natural language query and find a record of the activity, complete with a link to the webpage or app you were working with. It almost feels magical, and you can read more about my experience here. The crucial benefit is that a healthy bunch of Copilot+ AI features will run on-device, which means they won't require an internet connection. That's convenient, but in hindsight, it's a huge sigh of relief that all user activity remains locked to your device and nothing is sent to servers. Copilot+ hardware also enables a bunch of creative features such as Cocreator and Generative Fill in Paint, Super Resolution, Image Creator, and Restyle in the native Photos app. But there are a few that are meaningful for day-to-day PC usage. With Click to Do in the Snipping Tool, the AI analyzes the text and image on the screen, somewhat like Google Lens and Apple Intelligence. You can select text, look it up on the web with a single click, send email, open a website, summarize, rewrite, and take a wide range of image actions such as copy, share, visual search in Bing, erase objects, remove background, and do more — without ever opening another app. On the more practical side of things, we have translated Live Captions that cover over 40 languages. The translation and captioning happen in real-time and work during video calls and video watching, too. Finally, we have Windows Studio Effects, which can perform chores such as automatic frame adjustment, portrait lighting tweaks, switch background effects, minimize noise, and even make gaze adjustment. The Copilot+ hardware wall Even if you splurge $4,899 on a Razer Blade 18 with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor and Nvidia's top-of-the-line GeForce RTX 5090 graphics, your beastly gaming laptop still won't be able to run the Copilot+ features in Windows 11. That's because the NPU on this processor can only manage 13 TOPS, but a pint-sized $800 Microsoft tablet with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X processor can handle all the exclusive Copilot+ features just fine. It's disheartening, because the Copilot+ experiences in Windows 11 are meaningful OS advancements. Most of them, at least. I have used a few of them extensively, and they feel like a practical evolution. Yet, depriving machines that merely miss out on a powerful NPU, despite packing plenty of compute and graphics processing power, is simply unfortunate. Microsoft has laid out tight hardware requirements for machines that can bear the Copilot+ badge — 256GB of storage, 16GB DDR5 RAM, and a processor with a dedicated AI accelerator chip that can output a minimum of 40 TOPS performance. That's a bottleneck from both ends. First, there are still a healthy bunch of machines that ship with 8GB of RAM, and that too, the DDR4 type memory. Take, for example, the Asus Vivobook 17, which costs $700 and ships with 8GB of DDR4 memory on the entry-point configuration, even with the variant that packs a 13th-generation Intel processor. Let's say you pay up to reach 16GB of RAM. Despite that added stress on your wallet, you are still limited by the RAM type and won't be able to run Copilot+ tools on the machine. It's worth mentioning that there are a LOT of Windows machines that still pack 8GB of RAM, and even when they go up to 16GB capacity, they still rely on the DDR4-type memory. Now, it's time to address the elephant in the room. The silicon situation. The latest from Intel is the Ultra 200 series processor family, which is bifurcated across Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake lines. These Ultra 200 series processors are available in four formats: V-series, U-series, H-series, HX-series, and H-series. Out of the four brackets, only the V-series processors support Copilot+ experiences on Windows 11. Even the enthusiast-class H and HX series processors don't meet the NPU requirements, and as such, they are devoid of the Copilot+ AI features. As perplexing as the situation remains with Intel Core 200 series silicon, the situation with AMD and its Copilot+ readiness isn't too different. At the moment, only AMD's Ryzen AI 300 series processors fall under the Copilot+ bracket. That means if you invested in a top-shelf AMD silicon in the past few years, or even aim to build an AMD gaming rig this year, you either lose out on Copilot+ perks or must pick from the Ryzen AI 300 series line-up. Even older Macs do better The situation with Copilot+ is weird because it has created fault lines in the Windows 11 experience that don't make sense, neither from a price perspective, nor from a firepower angle. It even makes one feel bad about spending a fortune on a top-tier Intel processor, only to find it locked beyond next-gen AI features in Windows 11 because the NPU isn't up to the task. The only other option is to pick a Qualcomm Snapdragon X-series processor. But in doing so, you run into the compatibility hurdles that come with Windows on Arm. Plus, the GPU limitations rule out gaming or other demanding tasks where you need a powerful GPU. Right now, it seems like Copilot+ is a bag of serious caveats. And as Microsoft's team comes with more AI-first experiences, the gulf within Windows 11 is only going to widen. An $800 Copilot+ machine will run native AI experiences that even a powerful desktop won't be able to handle in the near future. The situation within the Apple ecosystem is just the opposite. Even if you have a nearly five-year-old M1 MacBook Air, you can run all the Apple Intelligence features just fine. Now, one can argue that AI is not the deciding factor for picking up a laptop. But as companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google deeply integrate AI packages such as Copilot, Siri, and Gemini across their OS at the native level, these AI features will essentially serve as a key computing evolution. Google has already given us a glimpse of how tightly interweaving Gemini across its Workspace tools can flesh out, and somewhat similar is the progress of Apple Intelligence within maCOS. But when it comes to the OS-level AI progress, it's Microsoft that finds itself in an odd place where a huge chunk of Windows 11 users are going to feel left out, while macOS users will move forward just fine even on aging hardware.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons to Buy QLD and 3 Reasons Not To
QLD is an ETF that aims to double the gains of the Nasdaq-100. But it also doubles your losses if the index declines. Its wild swings, dependence on swap contracts, and high expense ratio make it a very risky investment. 10 stocks we like better than ProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Qqq › ProShares Ultra QQQ (NYSEMKT: QLD) is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the Nasdaq-100 index. But unlike other Nasdaq-100 ETFs, which directly track the index, Ultra QQQ aims to double the performance of the Nasdaq-100. If the Nasdaq-100 rises 1% in a day, the Ultra QQQ should advance 2%. But it also doubles its losses: If the Nasdaq-100 declines 1%, the Ultra QQQ should drop 2%. It tries to consistently double those gains and losses with a mix of swap agreements, options, and other derivatives. Over the past five years, the Nasdaq-100 has rallied 114% as Ultra QQQ's price surged 191%. While it hasn't exactly doubled the Nasdaq-100's return -- since it needs to be constantly rebalanced -- it still outperformed the index by a significant margin. Is Ultra QQQ a good growth play for investors who can stomach the volatility? Let's review the three reasons to buy this ETF -- and the three reasons to avoid it -- to decide. Ultra QQQ might be worth buying for three reasons: The tech sector is booming, its derivatives strategy allows its investors to pursue riskier strategies with less capital, and it could be a useful tool for short-term traders who can stomach a lot of volatility. The Nasdaq-100's biggest companies include Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Apple, and Broadcom. These companies have plenty of exposure to the secular expansion of the cloud and artificial intelligence (AI) markets, and their stocks could continue to beat the market. If that happens, it might be smart to park your cash in an ETF that aims to double those returns. If an investor wants to replicate Ultra QQQ's aggressive strategies on their own, they may need to deploy a lot more cash or take on margin loans to fund their own derivative trades. Simply buying the ETF puts those decisions in the hands of its fund managers -- and frees up investors' cash for other investments. For short-term traders, Ultra QQQ could be a great way to amplify gains from temporary tailwinds, such as economic data, earnings reports, and other news-driven events. Ultra QQQ is a tough ETF to recommend for three reasons: Its dependence on swap contracts is risky, it magnifies losses, and it charges high fees. Ultra QQQ tethers most of its assets to swap contracts. This means that it strikes agreements with banks and other parties to receive double the gain of the Nasdaq-100 on a regular basis. In return, it continues to pay fees and interest to those banks. But if a bank struggles or goes bankrupt, that swap contract could collapse and leave Ultra QQQ empty-handed. It mitigates that counterparty swap risk by diversifying its contracts, but it could face major losses in the event of another credit crunch or financial crisis. The way it doubles the Nasdaq-100's losses also makes it a much riskier investment than other ETFs, such as the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ), which simply tracks the Nasdaq-100. While it may be an attractive ETF for short-term traders seeking to magnify their gains, it could easily backfire and burn investors during a market downturn. Lastly, the Ultra QQQ charges a gross expense ratio of 0.97% and a net expense ratio of 0.95%. In comparison, the Invesco QQQ Trust charges a total expense ratio (comparable to the gross expense ratio) of just 0.20%. Therefore, you're paying nearly five times the fees to try to double the Nasdaq-100's gains, but you're exposing yourself to double its downside potential. Warren Buffett famously told investors to be "fearful when others are greedy," and the Ultra QQQ ETF is a pretty greedy play. If you expect the Nasdaq-100 to keep rising and can stomach a lot of near-term volatility, this ETF might be worth nibbling on as a short-term trade. But if you're looking for a diversified, low-cost ETF to hold while sleeping soundly at night, the Ultra QQQ ETF isn't for you. Instead, you should either stick with a straightforward ETF, such as the Invesco QQQ Trust, or a less volatile one that tracks the S&P 500. Before you buy stock in ProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Qqq, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and ProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Qqq wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Leo Sun has positions in Amazon and Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons to Buy QLD and 3 Reasons Not To was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
