Exploding Data Consumption Signals New Era for Fiber Infrastructure, Zayo Report Finds
Nearly 200 million fiber miles will be needed to meet capacity projections by 2030 and avoid a bandwidth shortage
Article content
DENVER — Zayo, a leading global communications infrastructure provider, today released The Zayo Bandwidth Report: Key Trends Driving the Bandwidth Boom, analyzing bandwidth consumption trends from 2020 to 2024 across customers, network decision-makers, and third-party industry research. The research revealed that bandwidth demand is growing rapidly across hyperscalers, carriers, and enterprises, and a significant increase in fiber is needed to meet projected capacity strains. Specifically, Zayo's third-party research found that a projected 120 million long-haul fiber miles and 70 million metro fiber miles will be needed to meet capacity projections by 2030. Without this additional infrastructure, a bandwidth shortage is imminent.
Article content
'Increased connectivity demands from data centers, hyperscalers, and carriers are on track to create bandwidth scarcity in the near future. If you're not getting the bandwidth you need today, in 10 years it may be too late,' explains Bill Long, Chief Product & Strategy Officer at Zayo. 'Failure to address connectivity lags could lead to operational bottlenecks, resource shortages, and long-term competitive disadvantage.'
Key Findings:
Article content
Bandwidth's growth rate is astronomical: Between 2023-2024, metro dark fiber purchasing increased 268%. In the same timeframe, long-haul dark fiber purchasing increased 52.6%. According to Zayo's third-party research, metro fiber demand and long-haul fiber demand are expected to continue to grow by an average of ~20% and ~35%, respectively, year-over-year over the next five years.
Fueled by AI and digital transformation, large bandwidth use cases are consuming more than ever: Between 2020-2024, hyperscalers and carriers made 91.2% of all metro dark fiber purchases and 66.8% of all wavelength deals exceeding 1TB of capacity with Zayo. New AI use cases are spurring a record number of large-scale wavelength and fiber purchases, predominantly from hyperscalers, software, and tech companies looking to gain a competitive advantage through technology.
Emerging data center markets are gaining momentum: Demand for long-haul routes and metro wavelength connectivity skyrocketed in non-traditional, emerging data center hubs like Memphis and Salt Lake City, increasing by 4,300% and 348.28% year-over-year, respectively, from 2023 to 2024. These cities offer ideal geospatial optimization between fiber and power, ensuring enough fiber can be built in locations with more affordable energy sources to meet demand.
Vertical markets see record demand growth: The manufacturing sector experienced some of the largest growth in bandwidth demand as a result of digital acceleration and rapid reindustrialization across North America. Between 2020 and 2024, the sector saw a 364.34% growth in wavelength capacity purchased, surging from 1.88 TB to 8.71 TB. The software and technology industry also saw a massive 450% increase in wavelength capacity purchased, from 9.6 TB to 52.12 TB, as this sector continues to demand more bandwidth to handle growing data demands, power cloud services, and ensure seamless performance for cutting-edge applications.
Increased access to remote areas is causing additional demand: Partnerships between terrestrial giants and satellite providers aim to eliminate dead zones, boost emergency communication, and enhance network resilience, but they also drive up bandwidth demands. Seamless integration between terrestrial networks and satellites enables IoT adoption in remote areas, further increasing resource pressure.
Article content
What This Means
Article content
As widespread growth in bandwidth consumption continues and is projected to increase, it's clear that innovative organizations need more bandwidth to enable the usage of AI and emerging technologies. But building the fiber networks needed to deliver this bandwidth at scale is complex, costly, and risky without the right expertise in place.
Article content
As the only company to build long-haul fiber networks at scale in the last decade, Zayo is actively investing to deliver the critical fiber infrastructure to avert a potential bandwidth gap. In January, the company rolled out plans to build more than 5,000 long-haul fiber route miles to meet the growing demands of AI workloads. Zayo recently advanced construction on the first of this long-haul fiber commitment with a new 385-mile fiber route between Chicago and Columbus. In addition, in March, the company announced plans to acquire Crown Castle's fiber solutions business, which will add 100,000+ metro route miles to Zayo's network to support enterprise and AI-driven bandwidth growth.
Article content
To view the full report and learn how Zayo helps customers meet escalating digital demands while future-proofing their infrastructure, visit: https://www.zayo.com/info/the-zayo-bandwidth-report/ About Zayo For more than 17 years, Zayo has empowered some of the world's largest and most innovative companies to connect what's next for their business. The Zayo group of companies connects 400 global markets with future-ready networks that span over 19 million fiber miles and 147,000 route miles. Zayo's tailored connectivity solutions and managed services enable carriers, cloud providers, data centers, schools, and enterprises to deliver exceptional experiences, from core to cloud to edge. Discover how Zayo connects what's next at www.zayo.com and follow us on LinkedIn.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Musk says he does not support merger between Tesla and xAI
Elon Musk said on Monday he does not support a merger between his electric vehicle maker Tesla TSLA-Q and his artificial intelligence startup xAI, which owns the Grok chatbot and competes with the likes of OpenAI's ChatGPT. In response to a user post on X that asked Tesla investors if they supported a merger between the two companies, Musk replied 'No.' On Sunday, Musk had said he would ask Tesla shareholders to vote whether Tesla can invest in xAI, after earlier saying 'it would be great' if Tesla could do so. Tesla and xAI did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. xAI acquired X, formerly called Twitter and also owned by Musk, in a US$33-billion deal in March this year, valuing the combined group at $80-billion at the time. Sources told Reuters in June that xAI had been in talks to raise money at a valuation of more than $120-billion, while a valuation of as high as $200-billion was also discussed. The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that Musk's SpaceX had committed $2-billion to xAI as part of a $5-billion equity round.
Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
How ideology can trump self-interest
Dani Rodrik is professor of International Political Economy at Harvard Kennedy School, past president of the International Economic Association and the author of the forthcoming Shared Prosperity in a Fractured World: A New Economics for the Middle Class, the Global Poor, and Our Climate. Among the disasters of U.S. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' one is particularly stinging for political economists: it radically phases out the clean-energy subsidies introduced during former president Joe Biden's administration three years ago. These subsidies were considered by many as immune to a change of presidents, because they created new jobs and profit opportunities for firms in traditionally Republican-voting 'red' states. As allergic as the Trump-controlled Republican Party is to green policies, the conventional wisdom was that it would not dare take away these benefits. So where did the conventional wisdom go wrong? Scholars who study how political decisions are made tend to focus on economic costs and benefits. They reason that legislation that creates material gains for organized, well-connected groups at the expense of diffuse losses to the rest of society are more likely to be passed. Many elements of Mr. Trump's bill are indeed well explained by this perspective: in particular, it engineers a dramatic transfer of income to the wealthy at the expense of the poor. By the same token, legislation that creates concentrated losses for powerful economic interests is unlikely to make much headway. This explains, for example, why raising the price of carbon, a requirement for fighting climate change but a big hit to fossil-fuel interests, has been a politically toxic non-starter in the U.S. Opinion: Trump's green-bashing is precisely why it's a good time to buy green Mr. Biden's green-energy program, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), was designed to overcome this political obstacle. Instead of wielding a stick – carbon taxation – it offered carrots in the form of subsidies for solar, wind, and other renewables. The idea was that in time, as people benefitted from the subsidies and the green lobbies strengthened, perhaps even a direct push against fossil fuels would become politically feasible. These hopes have been shattered. The green lobbies did try to soften the bill's anti-IRA provisions, and they managed to delay the phasing out of wind and solar tax credits until mid-2026. But while the IRA has not been repealed in full, the Democrats' anticipated green transition now lies in tatters. Those who subscribe to the materialist version of political economy will find ways to rationalize the reversal. The regressive tax cuts for the rich required that revenues be found elsewhere, so perhaps a less influential interest group was sacrificed for a more powerful one. Or maybe three years were not enough for IRA subsidies to create a strong enough lobby in their favour. Ultimately, though, these excuses ring false. We need to accept that ideology sometimes trumps material interests. There can be little doubt that many Republican lawmakers voted against their constituents' economic interests – some because they feared reprisals from Mr. Trump, others because they truly are climate skeptics and, like the President, oppose anything that smacks of green activism. Regardless, ideas about what is important and how the world works prevailed over economic lobbies or vested interests. There is a broader lesson here: Narratives can be as important as interest-group politics in gaining traction for a party's agenda. The ability to shape worldviews and ideologies – of elites as well as ordinary voters – is a powerful weapon. Those who have it can persuade people to make choices that seem to conflict with their economic interests. In fact, interests themselves, economic or otherwise, are shaped by ideas. In order to figure out whether we gain or lose from a particular policy, we need to know how the policy will play out in the real world, and also what would happen in the absence of the policy. Few among us have the ability or inclination to figure it out. Ideologies offer shortcuts to such complicated decision-making processes. Some of these ideologies take the form of stories and narratives about how the world works. A right-wing politician, for example, might say 'government intervention always backfires'; others focus on increasing the salience of various types of identities – ethnic, religious, or political. Depending on context, the message could be 'immigrants are your enemy' or 'Democrats are your enemy.' Importantly, the concept of 'self-interest' itself relies on an implicit idea about who the 'self' is: who we are, distinct from others, and what our purpose is. These ideas are not fixed in nature or at birth. An alternative tradition in political economy views interests as socially constructed rather than determined by material circumstances. Depending on whether we identify as 'white male,' 'working-class,' or 'evangelical,' for example, we will see our interests differently. As constructivists might say, 'interest is an idea.' So for Mr. Trump's opponents to succeed, they must do more than produce well-designed policies that yield material benefits for targeted groups. Whether it is in fighting climate change, promoting America's national security, or creating good jobs, they need to win the larger battle of ideas – particularly the ideas that shape voters' understanding of who they are and where their interests lie. Democrats, in particular, must recognize that the narratives and identities they promoted until recently left many ordinary Americans behind – just like the pre-Biden economic policies that contributed to Mr. Trump's rise. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
CN Tower workers ratify tentative agreement, ending 2-week lockout: union
Workers at the CN Tower have voted to ratify a tentative agreement with their employer, ending a lockout that lasted nearly two weeks, the union representing them says. Members of Unifor Local 4271 approved the agreement with Canada Lands Company — the federal Crown corporation that owns and operates the CN Tower — in a vote held on Sunday, according to a Unifor news release. The new three-year collective agreement includes increases in wages and improves benefits across health, dental and vision care, the union said. Workers who do not earn gratuities will see annual increases of 4.25 per cent, the union said. Those who do earn gratuities will see a 4 per cent raise in the first year, followed by 2.5 per cent increases in each of the next two years. Le Café cooks will additionally receive a $1 per hour raise, and utility attendants will receive 50 cents more per hour, the news release said. The agreement also improves annual retirement allowances and the gratuity policy, the news release said. It includes a commitment to "stabilize hours of operation" and the hiring of a third-party consultant to review the pension plan, the union said. Coverage for hearing aids and safety shoes will be expanded, and the waiting period for part-time employees to access benefits will be reduced from two years to one. Unifor Local 4271 represents more than 250 food and beverage workers at the CN Tower, including hosts, wait staff, bartenders, chefs, cooks and butchers, the news release said. The union began negotiating with Canada Lands Company in April. Talks reached a standstill in late June, and workers were locked out from the CN Tower the day before Canada Day.
