Portillo's to make a crucial final decision this summer
Although a controversial opinion among Americans, no one does hot dogs better than Chicago. The Chicago-style dog consists of an all-beef frankfurter wrapped in a poppy seed bun, garnished with green pickle relish, chopped onions, sliced tomato, and peppers, topped with yellow mustard, and finished off with a classic dill pickle.
💵💰 💵💰
Thousands of restaurants nationwide serve hot dogs, but none compare to the Chicago-based Portillo's. For over 60 years, it has served its beloved Chicago-style hot dogs, Italian beef sandwiches, and homemade chocolate cake.Although it is a smaller chain compared to rival fast-casual chains, it has grown at an astonishing rate. No one would've expected a humble hot dog stand built in 1963 from a small trailer to become a popular restaurant chain with 94 locations across nine states.
Portillo's () is best known for its Chicago-style dogs. However, due to popular demand and growing competition, it recently made an unexpected change in its classic menu.
The restaurant chain launched its first-ever breakfast menu in April, featuring signature morning staples that Chicago locals love, including various breakfast sandwiches, chocolate cake donuts in collaboration with Stan's Donuts, multiple sides, and handcrafted coffee beverages.
Portillo's is testing its new breakfast menu at five restaurants in the Chicago area from 6:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The morning offerings can be ordered at Niles, Chicago -South Loop, Shorewood, Elmhurst, and Tinley Park locations, as stated on its website.The hype around this new revelation left many customers wondering if the chain plans to offer its breakfast menu nationwide anytime soon.
Their question would be answered only a few weeks later, but the chain's response might not be what many expected.
Portillo's CEO, Michael Osanloo, said during the company's latest earnings call that the feedback from its breakfast pilot has been positive, but this does not mean it will become available at all locations nationwide.
Osanloo said the company will continue to monitor the progress of the breakfast test throughout the summer and gather all the metrics necessary to ensure success before it decides whether to expand it to other locations.
"There's plenty of restaurant companies out there that have tried to expand to breakfast, and it hasn't worked. So we have a number of internal metrics that will define success, and I think we want to make it as clean and clear as possible for us," said Osanloo.
He added that breakfast could be a significant asset for the company, since it would extend the hours that locations are open for business, subsequently increasing sales.
However, there's one major concern with this addition. If not handled properly, breakfast could hurt the bounceback in lunch preparations, affecting overall operations in the company's main business.
More Food News:Osanloo noted that a successful test doesn't mean Portillo's will launch the breakfast menu nationwide; it would just give it the go-ahead to expand it in Chicago. The restaurant chain would then have to test it outside Chicago before bringing it to all locations.
Although Portillo's has promoted the breakfast menu at the pilot locations, it has no plans yet to invest heavily in nationwide marketing.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
41 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A new try at renewal in the old West End
Advertisement Today, the half-century-old superblock is a windswept wasteland, a solemn reminder of what can go wrong when you level a vibrant neighborhood. Related : The six-story Hurley, along Cambridge and Staniford streets, has been emptied of the state labor department employees who once toiled inside. The vastly underused Lindemann, with its M.C. Escher-style staircases, still houses Department of Mental Health patients and facilities who will need to be accommodated in the redevelopment, or nearby. (Both buildings need hundreds of millions of dollars worth of repairs.) Few people use — or are even aware of — the courtyard in the midst of it all, a hidden crown jewel. And a prime spot for open space along Merrimac Street, at the foot of those windy Lindemann stairs, is no more than a makeshift parking lot surrounded by chain-link fencing. Plenty of untapped potential, in the heart of the city. Advertisement The center courtyard at the Lindemann and Hurley complex. David L. Ryan/Globe Staff As Adam Baacke, commissioner of the state's Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance, put it at a community meeting in early June: These two structures were built at a time when the prevalent thinking was about how best to 'defend yourself from a city,' rather than embracing your surroundings the way most urban real estate projects are designed today. This request for proposals — which could go out later this year — would be Seven bids were initially submitted for the site the first time around, with hinged on building a lab tower alongside the Hurley. As the market for new labs cratered, so did the hopes for that Hurley redo. This next attempt will differ in key ways. This time, the Lindemann, considered more architecturally significant than the Hurley, is also part of the project. Bidders will no longer have to accommodate nearly 700 state office workers, who have since decamped for other locations. And the Related : Advertisement It's unclear just how many housing units could go up on the block, either in redeveloped versions of the Hurley or the Lindemann, or in a newly built tower. But the number would likely be hundreds, if not thousands. The site's zoning allows for far more development than what's there today — roughly four times the combined square footage of 570,000 square feet. And a tower could be up to 400 feet high, only modestly shorter than the two that have overtaken the old Government Center Garage next door. DCAMM hopes to pick a developer next year, according to a timeline the agency provided, and start construction in 2029. For land-use lawyer Matthew Kiefer, an attorney at Goulston & Storrs who worked on the Leggat McCall project, the state's new attempt to bring life to this sterile superblock is particularly intriguing. An aerial view of the Charles F. Hurley Building in Boston on April 13, 1973. Ed Jenner/Globe Staff In some ways, Kiefer said, the site is even more promising as a residential project than for office and labs, due to its proximity to stores and restaurants. Plus, North Station is just steps away. A talented design team, he added, could draw out the virtues of the Brutalist architecture to create a unique residential environment. He sees it as a fascinating challenge, but threading this giant block back into the neighborhood is not for everyone. At the June 4 community meeting, held in the West End Museum, with faded photos and artifacts from the old neighborhood hanging on the walls, community members spoke up about what they would like to see take shape around the corner. Shops along the fortress walls to enliven the street. A new public school, to replace the one that was demolished there in the 1960s. Preservation of the two 25-foot-tall murals in the Hurley lobby. More greenery, to break up all the hardscape. And of course, something to commemorate what was lost in the name of progress so many years ago: a memorial, for example, or a new home for the museum. Related : Advertisement Perhaps no testimony was more compelling than that of Quincy's Ron Iacobucci. His first home was on Norman Street, a roadway that no longer exists — disappeared under the Hurley and Lindemann. His grandparents settled in the West End from Italy, and his parents lived there until the Boston Redevelopment Authority took their home, along with the homes of thousands of their neighbors, to make way for a swath of new development from the old Scollay Square to the Charles River. (Iacobucci's mom was friends with arguably the most famous West Ender, actor Leonard Nimoy.) Iacobucci, who was only two when his family was uprooted, pleaded with state officials to give preference in any new affordable housing on the site to displaced West Enders and their descendants. This should be more than a development project, Iacobucci said, it's the chance to write a new chapter to the West End's story, one that's focused on justice and equity. That's asking a lot of any construction project, even a massive one like this. But maybe, finally, the sins of the past can offer a promising opportunity for the neighborhood's future. Jon Chesto can be reached at
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
"Big, beautiful bill" gives some seniors hefty tax break
The " big, beautiful bill" features a new tax break for older Americans who pay taxes on Social Security income. But there's a significant catch. Why it matters: The break leaves out the poorest seniors, and the very rich ones, too. How it works: Both the House and Senate bills include an increased tax deduction for tax filers age 64 and older. In the Senate version, the new deduction is $6,000 for individuals and $12,000 for couples. The deduction starts phasing out for those who earn over $75,000 ($150,000 for couples), and phases out completely at $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples, in the Senate version. The break expires in 2028 when President Trump leaves office, as do a few other White House priorities in the bills, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on auto loan interest. What they're saying: "This amounts to the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," per a report out earlier this week from the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Yes, but: Most seniors — 64% of them — don't pay taxes on Social Security, according to the White House's own analysis. Those who can't afford the taxes already don't pay. This break targets most, but not all, of the rest. Between the lines: Trump promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security income. Lawmakers couldn't pull that off entirely, given the constraints of passing a reconciliation bill and changing Social Security law. This break comes close. After adding the recipients of the new tax break, 88% of seniors wouldn't pay Social Security tax, per the White House. "The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers on President Trump's promise of no tax on Social Security," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson says in a statement, noting the analysis by the Council of Economic Advisers. Zoom out: For those upper-middle class folks who pay taxes on retirement benefits, this is a "substantial tax break," says Marc Goldwein, senior policy director for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that advocates for fiscal responsibility. For the several million senior citizens who live in poverty, and already don't pay taxes on Social Security, this doesn't help. The bill would also accelerate Social Security and Medicare insolvency by a year, to 2032, per an analysis from the group. The bottom line: Seniors in the U.S. overall are doing great financially right now, sitting on assets that have soared in value in recent years.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Sector winners and losers of the "big, beautiful bill"
Manufacturing and defense companies stand to win from the " big, beautiful bill," while wind and solar fare worse and hospitals could be hit hard. Why it matters: Investors welcome the certainty of the bill, but are also nervous about heavily exposed sectors. The big picture: Companies will get expanded provisions on itemization and expenses, including 100% bonus depreciation, which allows business to deduct expenses immediately rather than over three years. Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners says this could benefit manufacturers, although the stimulative effects of the bill could be muted by tariffs on things like steel and aluminum. "The John Deeres and Caterpillars of the world benefit from a 100% bonus depreciation" historically, she says. Defense spending also benefits, as armed services spending is set to increase by $150 billion under the bill. Couple that with the administration's push to grow the defense budget to over $1 trillion annually and it's a boost in spending that "markets do not appreciate…at all," says Terry Haines, founder of Pangaea Policy. Palantir, an AI-focused defense contractor with ties to Donald Trump, is still among the top five best-performing stocks in the S&P 500 this year. The other side: While a proposed tax on wind and solar projects was taken out of the bill, tax credits are still set to be removed. Tax credits are key to the economics of solar installation investments, and "for many in that sector, this bill would represent their fears confirmed," per a statement from John Gimigliano, principal in charge of federal tax legislative and regulatory services at KPMG U.S. The removal of a $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit is set to be a headwind for EV sales, which could be another pain point for Tesla (though its stock recently rallied even after soft delivery numbers.) Hospitals have"just gotten absolutely smoked, so much so that quite frankly there's no way that these cuts go into effect," according to Treyz. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated $1.1 trillion in health care cuts from the bill. This could weigh on hospital REITs that benefited from that government spending. The loss of social safety nets for millions of Americans could be an additional pressure point to the broader economy over time. The bottom line: Winners and losers aside, at least the market has a better handle on what's coming now.
