Elon Musk reignites feud with Trump as 'big, beautiful bill' passes
The billionaire SpaceX, Tesla and X owner who catapulted his zealous embrace of US President Donald Trump into a powerful position slashing government spending now risks sweeping cuts to his own bottom line after resuming the feud that led to their very public bitter split last month.
Musk's renewed heckling of Trump's big tax breaks and spending cuts "One Big Beautiful Bill Act", which passed the Senate on Wednesday, threatens to put billions of dollars of his government contracts in jeopardy if Trump retaliates. The rupture of their tenuous peace has resulted in a wobbling of the stock price of a market-moving company and led the president to muse about deporting Musk to his native South Africa.
In a Frankenstein-style twist, as Musk volleyed fresh critiques about the cost of Trump's signature legislation, Trump mused Wednesday about turning Musk's Department of Government Efficiency back on its creator.
(Source: Associated Press)
ADVERTISEMENT
"DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon," Trump told reporters as he left the White House for a tour of a new immigration detention centre in Florida.
Trump also suggested in an early morning social media post that if Musk lost his government contracts, he "would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa".
Asked by a reporter later if he would deport Musk, Trump paused and said, "I don't know. We'll have to take a look."
In response, Musk wrote on X: "So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now." Tesla and SpaceX did not respond to messages seeking comment about their chief executive.
The big bill divide
Musk has called Trump's big bill a financial boondoggle for America that would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries. He's not limiting himself to harsh assessments on social media. On Monday, he threatened to reinsert himself into politics and try to oust every member of Congress who votes for the bill.
"They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk said in one post.
ADVERTISEMENT
In other posts, he branded Republicans "the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" and threatened to create a new political party.
Trump has said Musk is actually irritated by the legislation's dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles and related technologies. Musk has denied this, but the rollback could hurt Tesla's finances.
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Australia's weather bomb, the surprising costs of getting one more dog, and BTS are back. (Source: 1News)
"Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social media network.
Musk became a US citizen in 2002, according to a biography of him by Walter Isaacson. It's unclear if Trump would take the extraordinary step of having the government explore the rare process of removing his citizenship, known as denaturalization.
Feud has high stakes for Musk
Musk's rocket and satellite company, SpaceX, is also in Trump's crosshairs.
ADVERTISEMENT
"No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE," Trump said in his post. "BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!"
SpaceX has received billions of federal dollars to help to send astronauts into space and other work for NASA, including a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year.
But the most immediate fallout of their feud was the tumbling stock in Tesla down 5% in early afternoon trading Tuesday.
Tesla stock's performance can have an outsize impact on the stock market index funds in which millions of Americans 401(k)s have invested their retirement savings. The electric vehicle maker is one of the Magnificent Seven, the group of companies that includes Apple and Google parent Alphabet and that account for about a third of the value of the S&P 500.
Musk's social media outbursts come at a delicate time for his car company. Tesla is just a week into its test run of its self-driving "robotaxi" service in Austin, Texas. Musk needs that test to succeed if he hopes to make good on his promise to investors that he will be able to quickly offer the service in other cities over the next few months.
One possible hurdle to that: federal safety regulators.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requested information from Tesla last week after videos began circulating on social media of a few of its autonomous cabs in Austin driving erratically, including one heading down an opposing lane.
ADVERTISEMENT
That followed a NHTSA request for data last month on how the driverless taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions, which itself followed an investigation last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian.
Musk needs robotaxis to take off because Tesla's main business of selling cars is going poorly.
New fallout from the spat
Musk has acknowledged that boycotts by people angry with his political views have hurt sales, but he has largely blamed a less frightening, temporary factor: People are so excited about Tesla's forthcoming latest version of their Model Y SUV that they decided to hold off on purchases for a few months.
But now that new version is available, and sales are still tanking. Figures out last week showed sales in Europe plunged 28% in May over the prior year, the fifth month in a row of big drops. A new batch of sales data for other parts of the world, including the US, is coming out Thursday.
The irony is that Musk's social media spat with Trump threatens his businesses from both sides. People won't buy his cars because of the memories of his friendship with Trump, and now that and his other businesses could get hurt because that friendship has soured.
"In a bizzarro world, he's alienated both sides," said Dan Ives, a Wedbush Securities financial analyst. "It seems impossible, but he's actually done it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
At least two dozen GOP lawmakers in the House have declared themselves open to rejecting the bill
Republican leaders in the United States Congress delayed a key vote for hours on President Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill today as they scrambled to win over a group of rebels threatening to torpedo the centrepiece of the President's domestic agenda. Trump is seeking final approval in the
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Trump urges 60-day Gaza ceasefire deal ahead of Netanyahu visit
US President Donald Trump has urged Hamas to accept a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, saying that Israel had agreed to finalise such a deal, as its forces also stepped up operations in the Palestinian territory. Trump, in a post on social media, said his representatives had met with Israeli officials
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Trump, Leakers And Journalists: The Assange Precedent And Revisiting The Espionage Act
When campaigning in 2016, presidential candidate Donald Trump was delighted by leaked, hacked or disclosed material that wound its way to the digital treasure troves of WikiLeaks. The online publisher of government secrets had become an invaluable resource for Trump's battering of the Democratic establishment hopeful, Hillary Clinton, with her nonchalant attitude to the security of email communications and a venal electoral strategy. 'Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks,' he tooted on what was then Twitter. 'So dishonest! Rigged system!' After winning the keys to the White House, he mysteriously forgot the organisation whose fruit he so merrily feasted on. During the Biden administration, the fate of the founding publisher of WikiLeaks, an Australian national who had never been on American soil and had published classified US defence and diplomatic material outside the country (Cablegate was a gem; Collateral Murder, a chilling exposure of atrocity in Baghdad), was decided. Kept in the excruciating, spiritually crushing conditions of Belmarsh Prison in London for over five years, Julian Assange was convicted under the US Espionage Act of 1917 in June 2024, the victim of a relic dusted and burnished for deployment against the Fourth Estate. Assange's conviction on one count of conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information has paved a grim road for future prosecutions against the press, a pathway previously not taken for its dangers. With this nasty legacy, recent threats by Trump against journalists who published and discussed the findings of a leaked preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency are hard to dismiss. The report dared question the extent of damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities by Operation Midnight Hammer, which involved 75 precision guided munitions in all. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,' Trump asserted with beaming confidence. 'Obliteration is an accurate term!' CNN and The New York Times duly challenged the account in discussing the findings of the short DIA report. Damage to the program had not been as absolute as hoped, setting it back by a matter of months rather than years. This sent Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth into a state of apoplexy, haranguing those press outlets who 'cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and in your blood'. For his part, Trump accused the Democrats on a Truth Social post of leaking 'information on the PERFECT FLIGHT on the Nuclear Sites in Iran', demanding their prosecution. He further charged his personal lawyer to harangue The New York Times with a letter demanding it 'retract and apologize for' the article, one it claimed was 'false' and 'defamatory'. To Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business, Trump also added that reporters could be forced to reveal their sources on 'National Security' grounds. 'We can find out. If they want to, we can find out easily. You go up and tell a reporter, 'National security, who gave it?' You have to do that, and I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' According to Rollingstone, the President has already queried whether the press could be snared by the Espionage Act. While the magazine misses a beat in ignoring the Assange precedent, it notes the current administration's overly stimulated interest in the statute. Prior to returning to the White House, Trump and his inner circle considered how the Act could be used not only to target leakers in government and whistleblowers 'but against media outlets that received classified or highly sensitive information'. The publication relies on two sources who had discussed the matter with the President. One source, a senior Trump administration official, insists that the Act has again come up specifically regarding reports on the efficacy of the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Members of the administration are 'looking for the right case to launch their 'maiden voyage' of an unprecedented type of Espionage Act prosecution', one designed to deter news outlets from publishing classified government information or concealing the identities of their leaking sources. 'All we'd really need is one text or email from a reporter telling a source: 'Can you pull something for me?' or something very direct of that nature'.' A less ignorant source would not have to look far for the one existing, successful example in the US prosecutor's kit. When pressed on the issue of whether the espionage statute would become the spear for the administration to target leakers and journalists, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly was broad in reply: 'Leaking classified information is a crime, and anyone who threatens American national security in this manner should be held accountable.' The unanswered question regarding Assange's prosecution and eventual conviction remains the possible and fundamental role played by the Constitution's First Amendment protecting press freedom. Unfortunately, the central ghastliness of the Espionage Act is its subversion of free speech and motive. Given the Australian publisher's plea deal, the mettle of that defence was never tested in court. Some members of Congress have shown a worthy interest in that valuable right, notably in the context of defending Assange. In their November 8, 2023 letter to President Joe Biden, sixteen lawmakers spanning both sides of politics, including Trump loyalist Marjorie Taylor Greene and progressive Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, declared their commitment 'to the principles of free speech and freedom of the press' in urging the withdrawal of the US extradition request for Assange. Unfortunately, and significantly, that request was ignored. Where Greene and other MAGA cheerleaders sit on Trump's dangerous enchantment with the Espionage Act remains to be seen, notably on the issue of prosecuting publishers and journalists. MAGA can be incorrigibly fickle, especially when attuned to the authoritarian impulses of their great helmsman. Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@
