
China's Iran Oil Bet Hits Strategic Snag
Major Chinese independent refiners, the so‑called 'teapots' in Shandong province, are enduring mounting losses as deepening discounts on Iranian oil clash with soaring global prices. Discounts have widened to between $3.30 and $3.50 a barrel against ICE Brent for July cargoes – up from approximately $2.50 in June – contributing to refinery utilisation dropping to around 51 per cent, down from 64 per cent a year ago.
Despite Israel's airstrikes targeting Iranian energy infrastructure and concerns over potential U.S. sanctions, Iran has maintained its exports through a shadow tanker fleet and strategic logistics adjustments. Kpler reports that crude loadings have reached a five‑week high of about 2.2 million barrels per day, assisted by the use of a less exposed jetty on Kharg Island and pre‑positioning of floating stocks nearer to China – including approximately 8 million barrels stationed offshore China.
ADVERTISEMENT
In 2024, Iranian shipments to China peaked at 1.6 million barrels per day, but that volume had already declined to roughly 740,000 bpd by April 2025, as broader Middle East instability and tightening sanctions exerted pressure. Rival supplies from OPEC+ producers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE may partially compensate, yet analysts emphasise that prolonged disruption would still erode Beijing's strategic leverage and diplomatic role in the region.
For China, this dependence on Iranian crude is part of a broader ambition to deepen its influence across the Middle East as a counterweight to the West. The initial rationale behind the 25‑year deal encompassed energy security, infrastructure projects, trade expansion, and regional diplomacy. But the conflict's escalation threatens those objectives, undermining China's established pipeline for cheap oil and complicating its efforts to mediate regional tensions.
Economists note the urgency for Beijing to accelerate its shift toward renewable energy and domestic self-reliance. China had already reached a milestone with renewables comprising 56 per cent of its electricity capacity in 2024. The current moment has intensified calls to reduce external vulnerabilities and accelerate electrification.
At present, the Chinese government has refrained from military engagement, calling for de-escalation and abstaining from direct intervention in support of Iran. Instead, it is pursuing regional diplomacy while guarding its considerable investments. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson emphasised the need to 'prevent the region from spiralling into greater turmoil', particularly to secure stable energy imports.
However, should the conflict deepen, or if key Iranian oil infrastructure suffers irreparable damage, China's reliance on opaque supply routes and shadow trading may no longer suffice. Its medium‑term strategy of presenting itself as a credible peace broker in the Middle East faces growing strain amid diverging interests between Iran and Gulf states.
China appears poised to rely more heavily on Gulf crude, yet that reliance comes with its own geopolitical calculations. Riyadh and Abu Dhabi together hold significant spare capacity – over 4 million barrels per day – which may cushion global shocks but do little to salvage China's ambition to sustain influence via energy partnerships.
The unfolding developments in the Israel–Iran arena have exposed strategic fissures in a partnership that once appeared unshakeable. Even as Iran adapts tactically to maintain its export pipeline to China, Beijing must confront the reality that maintaining influence in the region demands resilience beyond discounted barrels and shadow fleets.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Iran Escalates Nuclear Secrecy, Cuts IAEA Ties
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai A deepening rift between Iran and international nuclear inspectors marks a turning point in Tehran's approach to its atomic programme and signals a complex challenge for global diplomacy. Iran has formally suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, severing communication channels and obstructing inspections, in the wake of U.S. and Israeli military strikes on its nuclear sites. The move was set in motion on 23 June when Iran's parliamentary national security committee approved a framework for halting camera installation, inspections, and reporting to the IAEA unless the 'security of nuclear facilities is guaranteed'. The legislation was ratified by the Guardian Council on 26 June and now awaits signature from President Masoud Pezeshkian. Parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf justified the step, stating that cooperation should resume only when IAEA activity ceases to endanger facilities. ADVERTISEMENT Iran has since implemented the decision, reportedly blocking emergency channel calls from the IAEA's Vienna headquarters. According to a Bloomberg report, once the Incident and Emergency Centre had been in sustained dialogue since 13 June, communication has now dwindled to silence. The suspension has intensified global worry over what happened at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites that were struck in late June by U.S. and Israeli forces. Satellite imagery indicates significant damage, and the UN nuclear chief Rafael Grossi described the destruction as 'enormous', stating that centrifuges at Fordow are no longer operational. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed the strikes as theatrics, displaying defiance in his first address since a ceasefire with Israel, while the IAEA has received no formal notification from Tehran about the halt. Inspectors face a dual challenge: assessing bomb damage and reconciling it with actual uranium stockpiles. Reuters reports that uncovering whether enriched uranium was destroyed, buried in debris or clandestinely moved will be 'long and arduous'. IAEA chief Grossi noted Iran informed him on 13 June it had taken measures to protect nuclear materials — raising the possibility that uranium was relocated before the bombings. A senior diplomat cautioned that verifying the fate of enriched stocks will require extended forensic and environmental analysis. Analysts highlight that these uncertainties, coupled with Iran's growing 60 percent enriched uranium stockpile — now surpassed 400 kg — raise proliferation concerns. Iran stands as the only non-nuclear-weapons state to produce such highly enriched material. The crisis threatens to undermine the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Experts warn that Iran's rejection of oversight and potential expansion of enrichment capabilities could erode confidence in international safeguards and spark similar behaviour in other states. Tehran counters that it remains compliant with its obligations, defending the withdrawal as a sovereignty measure and accusing the IAEA of complicity in aggression. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov urged Iran to maintain IAEA cooperation. German officials echoed this sentiment, appealing for de-escalation and finer calibration. U.S. and Israeli intelligence contend the strikes brought Iran's enrichment efforts to a standstill, yet stop short of describing them as complete obliteration. Donald Trump claimed the attacks eliminated any need for a new nuclear deal, yet leaked U.S. intelligence suggests only a short-term delay of a few months. Disruption of IAEA activities follows a pattern of mounting distrust. The agency censure on 12 June marked the first formal finding of non-compliance by Iran in two decades. Tehran subsequently announced expansion of enrichment infrastructure, including a third site and advanced centrifuges. This standoff adds complexity to diplomatic efforts. Indirect U.S.–Iran negotiations held from April to June in Oman and Rome collapsed when Israel struck nuclear facilities on 13 June. Although Washington has signalled readiness to resume dialogue, Iran's decision to suspend IAEA cooperation adds another layer of mistrust. The prospect of tracking uranium movements amid top-secret relocation efforts, inaccessible bombed sites, and blocked communications has created a labyrinthine challenge. Inspectors and intelligence agencies alike face a 'cat-and-mouse' hunt for clarity in rubble and uncertainty. Continued monitoring and a potential return to diplomatic channels will be vital in determining whether the inspection suspension is temporary or signals a more fundamental shift in Iran's nuclear stance.


Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Narendra Modi Has The Big Task Of Refurbishing India's Image In Global South At BRICS Summit
By Nitya Chakraborty Prime Minister Narendra Modi faces a tough task in improving India's image as defender of the interests of Global South at the coming meeting of the BRICS at Rio de Janeiro in Brazil on July 6 and 7 which he will be attending. The 17th BRICS summit will be hosted by Brazil and the focus is on the theme 'Strengthening Global South Cooperation for More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance'. Apart from this broad theme, the discussions will relate to global fight against terrorism and the Israeli genocide in Gaza which has been strongly condemned by most members of the BRICS, Initially comprised of Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa, the recently expanded alliance now also includes Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). In the coming summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin will not be attending. That way, Indian Prime Minister will be one of the most prominent leaders attending the summit apart from the presidents of South Africa and Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, commonly known as Lula. The Brazilian Presidency will focus on two priorities: the Global South Cooperation; and BRICS Partnerships for Social, Economic, and Environmental Development. Brazil also proposes to focus on six core areas global health cooperation, trade, investment and finance, climate change, artificial intelligence governance, multilateral peace and security architecture and institutional development. For India, especially the Prime Minister, the most important thing at the summit is to persuade the BRICS members to appreciate the Indian view on terror and the country's assessment of Pakistan's role. Pakistan is not a member of BRICS and the Chinese President's towering presence will not be there at the summit. So, Narendra Modi can do some proper spadework to remove the perception as victim that Pakistan has been able to create among the global south nations. At the recent conference of defence ministers of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in China, India faced embarrassment as there was no reference to Pahalgam in the joint declaration while Balochistan was mentioned as a case of terror action. Out of ten SCO members, nine including China, Russia and Pakistan supported that declaration ignoring India. Though India did not sign that and it could not be issued, the isolation of India at the SCO meet revealed the failure of India's diplomatic efforts overseas since the Operation Sindoor which ended on May 10 in a ceasefire. Though the Indian external ministry officials have pointed out that the BRICS declaration in Brazil summit will reflect India's position on terror, this can not be taken as granted as Chinese senior minister still will be attending the meeting and most of the BRICS members do not subscribe to the Modi's three point near normal theory. Indian officials have to do a lot of spadework to ensure that this time in Brazil, no such embarrassment takes place as happened during SCO defence ministers meet in China last month. The declaration will be monitored by the host-the Brazilian president Lula. So a personal intervention by Narendra Modi with President Lula is needed to make the joint declaration incorporate the views of India on terror. The reality is that Narendra Modi has lost his personal image as a fighter for global south in the eyes of the BRICS members. In the last three years, the isolation of India from the common causes of global south has intensified with the Indian Prime Minister taking more interest in QUAD as against BRICS, SCO and even G-20. The QUAD foreign ministers are meeting on Tuesday July 1 in Washington being attended by the Indian external affairs minister Dr. S. Jaishankar. This will be followed by QUAD summit later this year, possibly in New Delhi. If that happens, President Trump will be attending. Both PMO and the external affairs ministry will be too busy working for the success of this meeting. This July meeting of BRICS is of crucial significance to the Indian Prime Minister as India will take over the next presidency of BRICS meaning that the 18th BRICS summit will be held in India. India's deep involvement in this summit and sharing of the interests of the global south will create confidence among the BRICS members as also the associates that India can be trusted to be among the major leaders of global south. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a golden opportunity this time to identify with the common interests of global south while taking care of the issues of India's specific interest. Prime Minister is also visiting Brazil on an official visit after the summit at the invitation of the Brazilian President Lula. This should help in further consolidating the political and economic relations between the two large economies. There are vast untapped opportunities of collaboration between the two countries. Agreements are likely to be signed in the areas of agriculture, renewable energy and defence cooperation. India and Brazil can collaborate in the application of artificial intelligence where India has a dominant role. Narendra Modi has to impart a new dynamism to the India-Brazil economic relations through this official visit. (IPA Service)


Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Saudi Arabia's oil exports soar as kingdom tries to claw back market share
Saudi Arabia's oil exports soared in June as the kingdom tries to claw back market share from other members of the energy alliance Opec. Saudi exports jumped by 441,000 barrels a day, or about seven percent, in June, to 6.36 million a day, according to tanker-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The jump underscores how Saudi Arabia is trying to leverage its heft in the energy market by unleashing supply after years of restricting it, in an effort to keep prices higher. The jump also reaffirms the limited impact the conflict between Israel and Iran had on oil exports. Iran and Israel both generally refrained from attacking energy infrastructure geared towards exports. Iranian oil exports also soared despite Israeli attacks. Saudi Arabia is exporting more oil, but prices have also dropped. Brent Crude was trading at roughly $75 per barrel at the start of the year. On Tuesday, Brent was trading $67.07 per barrel. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters For years, Saudi Arabia pushed an energy alliance that includes Russia, dubbed Opec+, to cut production in a bid to lift oil prices. Saudi Energy Minister Abdulaziz bin Salman went so far as to warn market speculators that they would be 'ouching like hell' if they doubted his willingness to starve the oil market of supply. One outcome of constricting supply was that Saudi Arabia surrendered market share in India and China to other oil exporters like Iran and Russia. Why Saudi Arabia can spend more money than it makes, even as oil prices drop Read More » The kingdom also did the heavy lifting to support prices. The United Arab Emirates won concessions to lift its production quotas in recent years from Opec+. Energy analysts also said Saudi Arabia's decision to boost output was aimed at Iraq and Kazakhstan, two Opec+ members who were going even further, exceeding their production quotas. Bank of America said last month that Saudi Arabia was gearing up for a prolonged period of lower prices and more supply. 'It's not a price war that is going to be short and steep; rather, it's going to be a price war that is long and shallow,' Francisco Blanch, the bank's head of commodities research, told Bloomberg. According to Oxford Analytica, Saudi Arabia needs an oil price of over $100 per barrel to balance its budget in 2025, when factoring in spending by the kingdom's Public Investment Fund (PIF) on megaprojects. With prices down, Saudi Arabia has turned to issuing more debt to fund Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's Vision 2030 agenda, aimed at diversifying the kingdom's economy. Some analysts say Saudi Arabia is well-placed to endure a slump in prices because it has a relatively low debt-to-GDP ratio and there is strong global demand for its debt. 'Saudi Arabia doesn't need to balance its budget,' Ellen Wald, the founder of the energy consulting firm Transversal Consulting and the author of Saudi Inc., previously told Middle East Eye. 'The idea that Saudi Arabia needs a certain dollar per barrel to balance its budget doesn't really explain the new Saudi mindset when it comes to oil pricing,' Wald said. Saudi Arabia likely had a range of motivations to boost output this year, experts say. In addition to trying to win back some market share, the rise in global supply has helped keep energy prices low. That has been a boost to US President Donald Trump as he tries to tame inflation. The surge in oil supply also helped keep prices from rising during Israel's attack on Iran. Brent jumped more than 10 percent after Israel's attack on Iran, but fell quickly once Iran limited its response to the US strikes on their nuclear facilities.