MBA in Business Analytics vs MBA in Operations Management: Difference between the two, the right choice
– Yash Merchant
In a business environment shaped by digital disruption and complex supply networks, enterprises are rethinking how they extract value from data and operations. MBA specialisations in Business Analytics and Operations Management are two key pathways that help build these capabilities. While they may appear to serve different domains, both are vital to driving modern enterprise performance.
An MBA in Business Analytics is designed to develop professionals who can interpret data and generate business value through insight-led decision-making. It blends statistical modelling, machine learning, and domain-specific analytics with tools like Python, SQL, and Power BI. The focus is to unlock predictive power and real-time business intelligence that helps in guiding strategy.
In contrast, an MBA in Operations Management prepares students to design and manage systems that deliver goods and services efficiently. The curriculum emphasises supply chain strategy, process design, logistics, lean methodologies, and project execution. The lens is primarily structural, with a strong foundation in quantitative decision-making and process optimisation.
Business Analytics professionals typically start in roles such as Data Analyst, Business Intelligence Consultant, or Product Analyst. As organisations invest in advanced analytics and automation, these roles often lead to positions in digital transformation, customer intelligence, or data-driven strategy.
Operations Management graduates take on roles like Supply Chain Analyst, Operations Consultant, Procurement Manager, or Program Manager. Their work is critical in sectors ranging from manufacturing and logistics to services and retail, especially as businesses build more resilient and adaptive operations post-COVID.
Placement trends reflect the growing demand for hybrid talent. Companies in tech, consulting, financial services, and e-commerce actively seek Business Analytics graduates for roles involving customer analytics, risk modelling, and product strategy. Operations graduates are recruited by firms in manufacturing, logistics, infrastructure, and consumer goods to lead process improvements, supply chain digitisation, and operational excellence initiatives.
Increasingly, job roles are evolving to blend both capabilities such as supply chain analytics, operations digitisation, and performance intelligence, creating opportunities for professionals who straddle both disciplines.
Business Analytics is best suited for individuals who are data-curious, comfortable with quantitative tools, and interested in influencing decisions through evidence. Operations Management, on the other hand, is ideal for those who enjoy systems thinking, problem-solving at scale, and optimising how work gets done.
Ultimately, both paths contribute to building enterprises that are smarter, faster, and more resilient. The edge lies in professionals who can connect real insights with execution.
(The author is the Director of Communications at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
11 hours ago
- First Post
India begins groundwork for US tariff deal, ministries told to draft sector-wise concessions: Report
Facing pressure from Trump's 25 per cent tariff, the Indian government has launched an inter-ministerial effort to draw up trade concessions ahead of key negotiations. With a US delegation set to arrive on August 25, key economic ministries have been directed to prepare sector-specific proposals read more President Donald Trump with Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House. The 25 per cent tariff and Russian penalty on India comes even as officials continue to hammer out a trade deal, which has been ongoing since February. File image/AP In response to US President Donald Trump's sweeping 25 per cent tariff imposition on Indian goods, New Delhi has launched a cross-ministerial exercise to identify trade concessions it can offer in upcoming negotiations. With a high-level US delegation set to arrive on August 25, key economic ministries have been directed to prepare sector-specific proposals, The Indian Express reported. The Trump administration is seeking deeper market access than India has previously committed to, pressing for broad tariff reductions and the removal of non-tariff trade barriers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 25 per cent tariff, effective from August 7, is compounded by a separate, unspecified 'penalty' tied to India's defense and energy imports from Russia. According to the report, government departments have already begun submitting possible concession packages. In some cases, such as oil refining, adjustments are underway, with refiners beginning to cut back on Russian crude purchases. However, sources warned against retaliatory posturing in response to Trump's provocations, no matter how inflammatory they may be. 'This is a time for pragmatism, not posturing,' one official noted. Although Trump had originally listed India among his top trade priorities, progress has been sluggish, leading to mounting frustration in Washington. Like other countries navigating Trump's tariff tactics, India has followed a cautious approach, offering selective concessions while safeguarding its economic interests and shielding vulnerable domestic sectors. Observers note that several nations that rushed to sign trade deals with the US—such as the UK and Australia, emerged with lopsided agreements that disproportionately benefited Washington, particularly in cases where trade deficits existed. New Delhi had long operated on the assumption that the US would maintain a 10–20% tariff differential between India and China, and continue to respect India's longstanding trade red lines. These include opposition to genetically modified (GM) crops and the need to protect its vast, labor-intensive manufacturing base that underpins much of its export economy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Officials remain cautious on sensitive agricultural imports, particularly soybeans, corn, and dairy, despite already proposing tariff cuts on 55 per cent of US imports. This figure could rise in the upcoming talks, especially as India's trade pacts with Japan, South Korea, and ASEAN saw over 80 per cent of tariff lines reduced to zero. While negotiators are eyeing October as the tentative deadline for finalising a deal, progress in fresh rounds of talks could accelerate that timeline. Complicating India's position, however, is the possibility of China finalising a trade deal of its own, potentially locking in favorable tariff rates and securing waivers, including on penalties linked to Russian oil imports.
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
To secure US trade deal, key ministries told to list what they can bring to talks table
FOLLOWING US President Donald Trump's tariff sledgehammer, the government has kicked off an exercise to thrash out concessions across sectors that can be offered in the tariff negotiations later this month. Key economic ministries have been asked to see what they can still afford to offer to sweeten New Delhi's deal when the US team is here on August 25. To reach an agreement, the Trump administration has been demanding much more than what the government has offered in its market access commitments, including lowering of tariffs across the board and removal of non-tariff trade barriers. As policymakers grapple with Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on goods from August 7, alongside an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia, economic ministries have started sending in sectoral tariff concessions in their jurisdictions. There are indications oil refiners have started reducing Russian oil purchases. Some of these concessions, if calibrated well, could ensure an opening up of the domestic economy, sources aware of discussions at the highest levels told The Indian Express. In fact, it was an external crisis that had forced the reforms of 1991. Most importantly, the sources said, an unnecessary show of bravado in countering some of Trump's assertions, however ridiculous they may be, should be avoided. India was one of the first countries the Trump administration had expected to sign a deal with, but slow progress has been a source of frustration for Washington DC. Like countries around the world scrambling to deal with Trump's tariff threats, India had largely adopted a principled, but non-confrontational, stance in an attempt to balance selective concessions with caution to safeguard its economic growth, and circumvent a backlash from domestic producers. Sources closely tracking the US talks with others said a majority of the countries that rushed to sign deals with the world's biggest economy ended up with lopsided agreements that effectively extracted more than what it gave. This includes the UK and Australia that have a trade deficit with the US. On talks with New Delhi, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC Thursday: 'Well, I don't know what's going to happen; it will be up to India. India came to the table early. They have been slow-rolling things, so I think that the President, the whole trade team is frustrated with them. And also, India has been a large buyer of sanctioned Russian oil, that they then resell as refined products. So, they have not been a great global actor'. The assumption in New Delhi has always been that Washington DC will maintain a differential of 10-20 per cent in tariffs between China and India; and that the Americans would be cognizant of India's traditional redlines that have endured for decades, including concerns over GM food crops and the need to safeguard the interest of the vast subsistence-level manufacturing base that has an oversized contribution to labour-intensive exports. The government is also keen to stay away from offering duty concessions on imports of agri items such as soybean, corn and dairy, in the interim deal. While the government has offered to cut tariffs on 55 per cent of US imports, this could be pushed up in the upcoming talks, given that in FTAs with Japan, Korea, and ASEAN, over 80 per cent of tariff lines were down to zero. Sources said the outer limit for a deal with the US, currently pegged at around October, could be brought forward, if fresh negotiations are positive. What complicates the equation for India is that the Chinese are at an advanced stage of negotiations towards a deal, which could have a favourable tariff rate and potential waivers on secondary tariffs, including possibly the tariff on account of Russian oil imports and the proposed 10 per cent BRICS tariff. China is currently faced with a 30 per cent tariff. From New Delhi's perspective, a deal needs to be clinched precisely for ensuring the gap in tariffs between India and China is maintained, even with a limited early-harvest type of deal. There is, however, greater receptiveness now within the policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, especially intermediate goods where there is the twin problem of high duties and an inverted duty structure (duty being higher on inputs than on final products). Alongside, there is a willingness to grant concessions in sectors such as public procurement and agri provided these are matched by the other side, like in the case of the UK deal. Also, India is willing to import more from the US, especially in three big-ticket sectors – defence equipment, fossil fuels and nuclear – to manage Trump's constant references to the trade gap, the sources said. Tariff rebalancing, if done right, could potentially offer an impetus to the economy, given that the biggest beneficiaries of tariff protection, especially the non-tariff barriers such as an increasing array of QCOs (quality control orders), are the big players. MSME units have been calling for these QCOs to be removed, especially in areas such as steel and textiles. Since 1991, New Delhi has gradually reduced its average tariff from nearly 79 per cent in 1990 to around 12 per cent in 2013, following which it has gone back up to 16-17 per cent by 2023. Sectors such as agriculture, dairy and automobiles, continue to be protected, even as the Ministry of Commerce and industry maintains that its trade measures are WTO compliant. Unlike its response during Trump's first term, where retaliatory tariffs were imposed, New Delhi has desisted from retaliating and is working on strategic concessions in sectors that the US is keen to target, while adhering to its own broad red lines. This involves areas symbolic of trade openness, including nuclear energy, fossil fuels and defence procurement. Think tanks such as Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative have said that by refusing to cross its red lines, particularly on agriculture, India has helped avoid 'the trap of a one-sided deal'. Once the official level discussions wrap up, there is a sense that a final call on the deal could come down to a conversation between the two leaders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump. This is especially so since it is Trump who is the trade negotiator-in-chief. For India, the best-case scenario would be to get a deal of some sort now, and then build on that in the future negotiations that could run into 2026, experts said. With Trump announcing the tariffs and penalties on India, that phone call could come in sooner, they said. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
MBA in Business Analytics vs MBA in Operations Management: Difference between the two, the right choice
('The Right Choice' is a series by The Indian Express that addresses common questions, misconceptions, and doubts surrounding undergraduate admissions. You can read the stories here.) – Yash Merchant In a business environment shaped by digital disruption and complex supply networks, enterprises are rethinking how they extract value from data and operations. MBA specialisations in Business Analytics and Operations Management are two key pathways that help build these capabilities. While they may appear to serve different domains, both are vital to driving modern enterprise performance. An MBA in Business Analytics is designed to develop professionals who can interpret data and generate business value through insight-led decision-making. It blends statistical modelling, machine learning, and domain-specific analytics with tools like Python, SQL, and Power BI. The focus is to unlock predictive power and real-time business intelligence that helps in guiding strategy. In contrast, an MBA in Operations Management prepares students to design and manage systems that deliver goods and services efficiently. The curriculum emphasises supply chain strategy, process design, logistics, lean methodologies, and project execution. The lens is primarily structural, with a strong foundation in quantitative decision-making and process optimisation. Business Analytics professionals typically start in roles such as Data Analyst, Business Intelligence Consultant, or Product Analyst. As organisations invest in advanced analytics and automation, these roles often lead to positions in digital transformation, customer intelligence, or data-driven strategy. Operations Management graduates take on roles like Supply Chain Analyst, Operations Consultant, Procurement Manager, or Program Manager. Their work is critical in sectors ranging from manufacturing and logistics to services and retail, especially as businesses build more resilient and adaptive operations post-COVID. Placement trends reflect the growing demand for hybrid talent. Companies in tech, consulting, financial services, and e-commerce actively seek Business Analytics graduates for roles involving customer analytics, risk modelling, and product strategy. Operations graduates are recruited by firms in manufacturing, logistics, infrastructure, and consumer goods to lead process improvements, supply chain digitisation, and operational excellence initiatives. Increasingly, job roles are evolving to blend both capabilities such as supply chain analytics, operations digitisation, and performance intelligence, creating opportunities for professionals who straddle both disciplines. Business Analytics is best suited for individuals who are data-curious, comfortable with quantitative tools, and interested in influencing decisions through evidence. Operations Management, on the other hand, is ideal for those who enjoy systems thinking, problem-solving at scale, and optimising how work gets done. Ultimately, both paths contribute to building enterprises that are smarter, faster, and more resilient. The edge lies in professionals who can connect real insights with execution. (The author is the Director of Communications at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai)
