
Nothing so shocking as a democratic-socialist in New York
In case you have been living under a rock for the past fortnight, Zohran Mamdani is the 33-year-old democratic-socialist Muslim who has just become the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for mayor of New York City.
Just six months ago this young, energetic, and extraordinarily telegenic New York assemblyperson (member of the state legislature) was given a 6% chance of winning. By the evening of 24 June had amassed 43% of the popular vote in the primary election — 7 points ahead of the Democratic Party's favoured candidate, former New York governor Andrew Cuomo.
Described by President Donald Trump as "a 100% communist lunatic", Mamdani, by his success, has set the entire American political class back on its heels. New York City, with a population of 10 million, is America's largest city. It is also the place where cultural trends and political movements get started. What happens in New York will, almost invariably, end up happening in your neighbourhood.
That is what is generating so much vitriol and bile on the Right. That is the reason the airwaves are carrying red-baiting messages last heard at such volume 70 years ago during the hearings of Senator Joe McCarthy's House un-American activities committee.
"Are you now, or have you ever been, a card-carrying member of the Communist Party?" That was the question McCarthy's witch-hunters put to terrified American citizens subpoenaed to testify before Congress.
There was no right answer. If you said "Yes" then your career was over. If you answered "No" — and you were, or had been, a party member — then you would face perjury charges. And if, as many chose to do, you opted to "plead the Fifth" (the constitutional amendment protecting citizens against self-incrimination) then the committee members just smirked and exchanged knowing glances.
But, that was then, and this is now.
Joe Stalin is long dead, and so is the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. For those born after 1991, the Cold War might as well be the Peloponnesian War.
In the early-1950s, however, the USSR loomed like a fearsome giant over Western Europe. The discovery, in 1949, that Stalin's "Reds" — ably assisted by their elaborate spy networks in the US and the United Kingdom — had acquired atomic weapons, infuriated the American population. (In much the same way a discovery that Iran had amassed a small arsenal of nuclear weapons would infuriate Americans today.)
1949 was also the year in which Mao Zedong, leader of the Chinese Communist Party, drove the US-aligned government of Chiang Kai-shek into exile on the island of Formosa (now Taiwan) and proclaimed the Peoples Republic of China.
Less than a year after that, in June 1950, the Cold War turned very hot indeed as the Moscow and Beijing-backed communist government of North Korea attacked the US-backed capitalist government of South Korea.
In the early 1950s communists were very scary people. Indeed, in the eyes of many Americans (some of them in very high places) communism was (gulp!) winning.
But that was then, and this is now.
We (that is to say, the capitalists) won, you (that is to say the communists) lost. But, if that is true, then why are the Reds not eating it? Have they not received the memo about "The End of History"?
It would seem not.
Which is why Mamdani's victory has come as such a shock.
A self-proclaimed "democratic-socialist" should have about the same chance of becoming the mayor of New York City as — what? — a convicted felon becoming president of the United States.
Ummm ...
Bob Dylan gets it:
People are crazy and times are strange.
I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
You see, I used to care, but
Things have changed.
You could call Mamdani a communist and all he would do is deliver a witty little lecture about the difference between democratic-socialism and authoritarian communism.
Then he would release a cut-down version on TikTok and watch it go viral.
Pretty soon "Hot Girls for Zohran" (yes, they're a thing!) would start wearing T-shirts saying "I only date Reds".
Things really have changed.
And who in our neighbourhood gets it?
Labour? "Hot Girls for Chippie"? Unlikely.
Te Pati Māori? Possibly.
The Greens? Definitely! Why else would Chloe Swarbrick be folding away her keffiyeh and raising the Red Flag?
■Chris Trotter is an Auckland writer and commentator.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
European ESG rebrand challenges NZ ethical investing norms – Fran O'Sullivan
The US President has strong-armed Nato members into increasing their defence budgets to 5% of GDP. However, the Europeans are determined their increased expenditure should boost their own defence companies – not simply be used to buy American military hardware and boost the profits of those American companies contributing to the US war machine. Back here, New Zealand companies have devoted thousands of pages in successive annual reports to trumpeting their prowess on environmental, social and governance metrics (traditional ESG). Some are required by law. Some frankly fall into 'feel-good' box-ticking (often notable among failing companies!) and a deflection from a company's true commercial driver, which is to post a profit and stay in business. It is time for a rethink. As with DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) policies, which even BlackRock chief executive Larry Fink (a previous champion) has walked away from, there is a sharpening of focus. At the Amsterdam Stock Exchange last week, chief executive René van Vlerken was quick to emphasise that the heightened geopolitical risks – obvious on Europe's backdoor where the Russian-Ukraine conflict verges on a 'forever war' – has made for the more existential approach. The Amsterdam exchange is part of the pan-European stock exchange Euronext, which operates regulated exchanges in Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Norway, and Portugal as well as the Netherlands. In May, Euronext's chief executive and chairman Stephane Boujnah said the redefinition of ESG was in response to a 'new geopolitical order'. 'European aerospace and defence companies have expressed the urgent need to invest heavily in their innovation and production capacities to guarantee Europe's strategic autonomy for the next decade,' Boujnah said. Euronext said it would revisit the methodologies for ESG indexes to limit the exclusions currently placed on defence companies. This poses a challenge for traditional ESG ratings agencies when it comes to advertising investments in defence industry-related bonds (for instance). It also has ramifications for entities like the New Zealand Super Fund and KiwiSaver funds, which walk a tightrope on definitions of ethical investing, with all sorts of activists getting exercised over where the funds invest. How will funds approach investing in New Zealand companies ranging from aerospace to quantum computing or drone manufacturing – all within the scope of the Government's new defence plans – when there is a clear implication their products will be used in armed conflict? Euronext has said it will encourage the rating agencies to restrict the concept of controversial weapons solely to armament activities prohibited by relevant international treaties. What's at stake is not small bikkies. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen believes the EU could mobilise up to €800 billion ($1.55 trillion) to strengthen its defence industry. There are also opportunities for Kiwi companies like Dawn Aerospace, with its dual base in the Netherlands and New Zealand. I was in the Netherlands with 40 business leaders on the New Zealand Initiative think tank's Go Dutch study tour, which was designed to provide insights from small, advanced economies. Fortuitously, our time in the Netherlands coincided with the Nato Summit in the Hague. It also coincided with the US attack on three nuclear facilities in Iran with 'bunker buster' bombs and Tomahawk missiles, which made for frantic rebooking of flights back to New Zealand after some airlines pulled back from flying over the Middle East. Trump did attend Nato, being hosted overnight by the Dutch King and Queen in their personal palace before a truncated Nato meeting. At the summit, the allies made a commitment to investing 5% of GDP annually on core defence requirements and defence and security-related spending by 2035. At least 3.5% of GDP was to fit within agreed definitions of Nato defence expenditure to resource core defence requirements and to meet Nato's Capability Targets. The other 1.5% was to be invested in protecting critical infrastructure; defending networks; ensuring civil preparedness, resilience and innovation; and strengthening the defence industrial base. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon was also in the Netherlands. He was the only political leader from the Indo-Pacific Four – Japan, Australia, South Korea and New Zealand – to attend the Nato Summit. It was noted that he had turned up. Luxon contends he was under no pressure to increase New Zealand's defence spending above the targeted 2% of GDP within the decade that was outlined in the recent Budget. But this is a more dangerous world. It was notable that when we visited Rotterdam – which hosts Europe's largest port and some fully-automated container terminals – that the Dutch Ministry of Defence wants to acquire terminal capacity for handling multiple ships carrying military cargo (mainly equipment and ammunition) simultaneously. It has been agreed within Nato that this type of cargo can be transported via the Netherlands, even if the destination is outside the Netherlands. In the Netherlands, where older Dutch people still hold sharply to the lessons from the Nazi occupation in World War II – and where they have more recently been hurt by soaring energy prices sparked by the withdrawal of Russian gas flowing to Europe via Ukraine – there is a quiet confidence. With 26% of land under sea level, the Netherlands has developed extensive water management systems, including dikes, dams and polders (land reclaimed from the sea) to manage the obvious risk. There is a frank realism there – we could do with a bit more here. Disclaimer: Fran O'Sullivan met her own costs to take part in the New Zealand Initiative's Go Dutch study tour. These are her views.


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Fears dog stolen after missing pet found across town
Portobello resident Lena Stewart-Groot's children Flynn, 7, Ellie, 5, and Olly Crowley, 9 are pleased to have their dog Freya back. PHOTO: GERARD O'BRIEN A Dunedin woman believes her beloved dog was stolen after she was found a very long way from home. Lena Stewart-Groot's 9-month-old American bulldog Freya went missing from her Portobello home about 10.45am on Thursday and was found tied to a post in Chapel St, Kaikorai Valley, yesterday afternoon. Ms Stewart-Groot believed the dog was taken because she never went further than her neighbour's house. "It's pretty obvious ... she did not walk that far," she said. The incident was reported to the police. Before Freya was found, Ms Stewart-Groot posted on social media asking for help to look for her and offered a $1000 reward. "I was devastated, and we spent the whole day looking for her." Her family had owned Freya from a pup. The person who found the dog did not claim the reward. "I feel very grateful and just happy that Freya has been found," Ms Stewart-Groot said. "I will never take my eyes of her again."


NZ Herald
14 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Teenage aviator stuck on an island off Antarctica after landing without permission, Chile says
A 19-year-old American content creator who was trying to fly solo to all seven continents was detained by Chilean authorities this week after they said he had landed his plane on an island off Antarctica without authorisation. The teenager, Ethan Guo, said in an interview today NZT that he was