2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Kia Sportage: Plug-In Hybrid Comparison
Toyota revealed the all-new 2026 RAV4 in May, which is now a hybrid-only model with a powerful plug-in hybrid range-topper. Over at Kia, pricing has just been announced for the heavily revised 2026 Sportage plug-in hybrid.This gives us the perfect opportunity to compare these plug-in hybrid compact crossovers. Each boasts modern looks, a decent all-electric range, and the best performance in their respective ranges. As the RAV4 has yet to go on sale, this is an on-paper comparison highlighting key specs between these competitors. View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article
We've started with this category, as it's an important one for a plug-in hybrid crossover.
Starting with the Toyota, it has a 2.5-liter four-cylinder plug-in hybrid powertrain with two electric motors. It produces 320 horsepower combined, which is 18 hp more than the previous RAV4 PHEV. Toyota hasn't shared the torque figure yet, but it does claim a swift 5.6-second time for the 0-60 mph run.
Kia's latest Sportage PHEV has a 1.6-liter turbo four plug-in hybrid powertrain that produces 268 horsepower (up by 7 hp). The electric motor itself is also more powerful than before. Whereas the Sportage PHEV has a six-speed automatic, we expect the new RAV4 to stick with a CVT. Previous independent tests of the Sportage PHEV show that it will reach 60 in about seven seconds. While quite punchy, it's nowhere near as rapid as the RAV4 PHEV.In terms of all-electric range, the 2026 RAV4 PHEV is claimed to achieve 50 miles on a full charge, a healthy 20% increase over its predecessor. Kia, meanwhile, claims 34 miles for its Sportage PHEV.
2026 EPA numbers aren't available yet, but the 2025 Sportage PHEV managed 84 MPGe/35 mpg combined, with the 2025 RAV4 PHEV getting 94 MPGe/38 mpg. If Toyota has managed to make the new RAV4 more efficient, it should easily be better than the Kia in this area.
Finally, while compact crossovers are not known for being towing beasts, the 3,500-pound maximum for the Toyota is better than the Kia's maximum of 2,000 lbs.
Overall, it's a clear victory for the RAV4 PHEV in this category.
View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article
Both these SUVs look good. The newest RAV4 features many geometric creases on the body, especially along the rear doors and rear fenders. The new face is an improvement, with a tall hood and sleek headlights that seem to wrap around the front of the body. The PHEV also comes in GR Sport guise, with large 20-inch wheels, a sporty Matrix grille, and wing-type spoilers.
The basic design of the Kia Sportage PHEV is perhaps even more striking than the RAV4. Amber lighting stretches low down on each side of the crossover's face, while there is a studded grille section that's larger than before. It's also got a curvier rear-end than the Toyota.
What Kia hasn't done is position the Sportage PHEV as an overtly sporty model, as Toyota has done with the RAV4 GR Sport. The Kia is more of a comfortable family vehicle that just happens to be swifter than the gas-only version.
View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article
The rugged look continues inside the new RAV4, which comes with a standard 12.3-inch digital driver's display and a touchscreen measuring up to 12.9 inches. On GR Sport models, there is microsuede and SofTex upholstery for the seats, along with sporty GR logos on the front headrests. Aluminum sport pedals and paddle shifters make it into this version of the RAV4.
Toyota has yet to confirm the interior dimensions or cargo specs of the new RAV4, but even if there's no improvement here, it'll still be a very practical vehicle.
The Sportage PHEV looks more luxurious and high-tech at a glance. It's only available in fully loaded X-Line and X-Line Prestige trims, with standard features like a 12.3-inch touchscreen, hydrographic wood center fascia, SynTex imitation leather, and heated front seats. There are no complaints here regarding rear-seat or cargo space; the Sportage PHEV has almost 40 inches of rear legroom and a trunk measuring 34.5 cubic feet.
Outside of the luxury segment, there aren't many plug-in hybrid compact crossovers, but these are two of the best. Both outclass their normal hybrid siblings in terms of performance, while having the ability to drive on electric power alone.
Until we drive the new RAV4 PHEV, we can't say it is definitively better than the Sportage PHEV. But based on the specs, the RAV4 is the one to choose for outright performance, superior towing, and its longer all-electric range.
The decision between these two may come down to price. The 2026 Sportage PHEV starts at $40,490. We expect the RAV4 to be pricier, since the older 2025 model already costs $44,565. Pricing for the 2026 RAV4 will be revealed closer to its on-sale date later this year.
2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Kia Sportage: Plug-In Hybrid Comparison first appeared on Autoblog on Jul 5, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jul 5, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor Trend
an hour ago
- Motor Trend
How the One Big Beautiful Bill Will Affect Car Buying and Ownership
On July 4, President Trump signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act into law. The budget reconciliation bill made big changes to federal spending, taxes, and regulation, some of which will have big effects on car owners, enthusiasts, and the automotive industry. We've read through the 879-page bill and outlined the parts that'll affect your next car purchase, the price of gas, and your commute. The "One Big Beautiful Bill" affects car buying by altering tax deductions on auto loans, ending EV tax credits, reducing CAFE penalties to zero, and cutting grants for clean vehicles. It also impacts gas and power prices by changing drilling and energy policies. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next Because this is a reconciliation bill, which modifies existing budget legislation rather than starting from scratch, there are limits to what can be included in the legislation. Everything in the bill has to be directly related to government spending and taxation, so some of the changes are creatively written in order to make the cut. (As always, please consult your tax professional before making financial decisions. The below is provided for information purposes only and is not tax or financial advice.) 'No' Tax on Car Loan Interest This one is confusing, and 'no' is in quotation marks because it's misleading. Car buyers looking to finance their next purchase may be able to write off some—but not all—of the interest charged on the loan each calendar year on their taxes. That's not the same as abolishing or suspending the tax altogether, as the claim implies. There are also a number of rules for qualifying which will cut off a lot of buyers. First and foremost, the vehicle you're buying has to be assembled in the U.S. That will be confusing for some buyers, because some of the bestselling vehicles in the U.S, such as the Toyota RAV4 and Chevrolet Silverado, are built in multiple plants, not all of them in the U.S. The IRS will know where your vehicle is made because you have to supply the VIN when claiming the tax deduction, and that number includes a digit that represents the country of origin. The tax deduction doesn't apply to leases, either, only purchases. It appears to apply to both new and used vehicle purchases, as the legislation makes no distinction. Vehicles with salvage titles and parts cars don't count, either. Similarly, it doesn't apply to anything with a gross vehicle weight rating over 14,000 pounds (which is the rating of a Ford F-350, as an example). Commercial vehicles qualify but only if they're for personal use, not business use. Business fleet purchases don't qualify, so be careful if you're planning to register your vehicle to your small business in order to take advantage of other tax incentives. If your purchase qualifies, there are still more rules. The tax deduction is capped at $10,000 per calendar year, so if you pay more than that in interest, the balance will still be taxed. If you make more than $100,000 per year as an individual or $200,000 per year as a joint filer (married or similar), the amount of interest you're able to deduct goes down by $200 for every $1,000 of income you earn over $100,000 (individual, or $200,000 combined). Do the math and it means no tax credit for anyone making over $150,000 individually or $250,000 combined. Finally, the tax credit is only available for a limited time. You can't start counting interest payments towards a deduction until January 1, 2026, so the rest of this year doesn't count. The tax credit will expire on December 31, 2029 unless Congress extends it. EV Tax Credits End September 30 The (up to) $7,500 federal tax credit for new and used EVs now expires on September 30 of this year. Previously, both tax credits were scheduled to expire on December 31, 2032. Likewise, the tax credit for commercial EVs expires the same day. State tax credits are not affected. On a related note, the federal tax credit for installing an EV charger or renewable fuel dispenser at your home or business will expire even sooner, on July 30 of this year. Tax credits have been a huge driver of EV sales to date, so the end of them could cause final vehicle sale prices to rise and sales to plummet. A large drop in sales could lead automakers to discontinue some or all of their EVs, reducing choice in the market. Lower cost EVs with smaller profit margins would be vulnerable, which could lead to only more expensive EVs on the market. Less Help With Bad Auto Loans Stopping predatory auto loans had been a major focus for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau during the Biden administration, but enforcement is likely to drop off substantially after the passage of this bill. Funding for the bureau is cut by 54 percent, which will drastically reduce the number of investigations and actions it's able to execute. No Penalties for CAFE Violations Because this is a reconciliation bill, Congress could not make changes to vehicle emissions and fuel economy laws. Rather than replace or abolish the Corporate Average Fuel Economy program (CAFE), this bill keeps all the existing rules in place but reduces the penalties for breaking them to $0.00. This means automakers are free to ignore federal fuel economy regulations as the EPA cannot meaningfully enforce them. This could potentially affect consumers in multiple ways. If automakers stop following CAFE rules, fuel economy could go down and emissions could go up. Any savings on R&D could then be passed on to the consumer. This is unlikely, however. Automakers plan as much as a decade in advance, so vehicles for sale today were engineered years ago and the money already spent. Future iterations of Congress and future presidents could also reinstate the penalties in a few years, which would wipe out any savings and put automakers behind on R&D. Fuel economy regulations elsewhere in the world aren't changing, so there's little incentive for automakers to cut R&D spending regardless, meaning no reduction in pricing is likely. No More Money for Clean Commercial Vehicles Businesses and local governments around the country have taken advantage of federal grants to help offset the cost of replacing older heavy duty commercial vehicles with EVs. These grants were commonly used to replace old, diesel school busses with new, electric versions and also covered installation of chargers and training employees to work on those vehicles and chargers. Any grant money not already spent has been taken away. Similarly, grants for reducing diesel exhaust emissions in low income and disadvantaged areas have been cut, with all unspent money withdrawn. Funding has also been cut for an EPA program which studies the health and environmental effects of fuel additives. Reduction in Tax Credits for Commuters If your employer provides a transit passes, vanpool reimbursement, parking passes, or a bicycle commuting reimbursement, the amount you're able to deduct on your taxes is going down. Previously, you could deduct up to $175 per month each for your vanpool, transit pass, or parking pass. Now, you can only deduct up to $175 total per month for any combination of those services. The deduction for bicycle commuting has been eliminated entirely. No More Money or Credits For Home Solar and Battery Backups This is tangential to car buying and ownership, but if you were planning to take advantage of tax credits to install solar panels and battery backups in your home to offset the cost of charging an EV, you're out of luck. Any money not already spent on those grants and tax credits has been rescinded. Likewise, the business tax credit for building specifically energy efficient new homes has been cut, along with business tax credits for training contractors to install solar panels, batteries, and more efficient appliances. Gas and Power Prices Could Be Affected Portions of the bill addressing oil drilling and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve may have a small impact on gas prices in the future. Various provisions restart new oil and gas drilling leases both in the U.S. and offshore in its oceans, which would eventually add to the global oil supply and potentially push down prices. However, it will take years for any new leases to be acquired, explored, drilled, and turned into production wells, and oil companies are already sitting on a large number of unexplored leases. Because oil is a globally traded commodity, adding more supply doesn't necessarily change the price of a barrel of oil, nor the price of a gallon of gas. The bill also requires the government to abandon a plan introduced during Trump's first term to sell down part of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Instead, it requires the government to buy more oil it can store for future emergencies. Presidents like to draw on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve during times of high gas prices, but the quantities withdrawn are typically so small they have little to no impact on lowering the price at the pump. With regard to electricity generation, the bill paves the way to reopen old, closed power plants and cuts tax credits for wind and solar farms. Old power plants will now be able to reopen without any retrofitting of modern pollution controls, which could make them economically viable, although it depends on the individual plant. New wind and solar farms now have a shorter window to begin operations before the tax credits are cut off, and the lack of credits is expected to make new such farms economically unviable in the future. Fewer wind and solar farms means energy prices are less likely to go down or remain flat, while old power plants coming back online could partially offset their absence at the cost of greater air pollution in those communities. The bill also undoes several provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided loans and grants for electrical infrastructure improvements nationally, including transmission line improvements in particular, as well as integrating offshore wind farms into the power grid and improving electrical infrastructure on tribal land. Any reductions in electricity prices or increases in reliability these improvements may have provided are off the table. Similarly, by cutting the clean hydrogen production credit several years earlier than planned, the bill will likely slow or halt the adoption of clean sources of hydrogen and slow or stall the nascent hydrogen vehicle industry, both for private and commercial vehicles. Most hydrogen today is produced from gas and oil, which is both cheaper and dirtier than clean alternatives.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
The Hidden Cost of OpenAI's Genius
OpenAI is the undisputed poster child of the AI revolution, the company that forced the world to pay attention with the launch of ChatGPT. But behind the scenes, a desperate and wildly expensive battle is raging, and the cost of keeping the company's geniuses in-house is becoming astronomical. According to a recent report from The Information, OpenAI revealed to investors that its stock-based compensation for employees surged more than fivefold last year to an astonishing $4.4 billion. That figure isn't just large; it's more than the company's entire revenue for the year, accounting for a staggering 119% of its $3.7 billion in total revenue. This is an unheard-of figure, even for Silicon Valley. For comparison, Google's stock compensation was just 16% of its revenue the year before its IPO. For Facebook, it was 6%. So what's going on? In short, OpenAI is fighting for its life in an unprecedented talent war, and its chief rival, Meta, is on the offensive. Mark Zuckerberg has been personally courting top AI researchers with massive compensation packages, successfully poaching several key minds from OpenAI's core teams. This has reportedly prompted a crisis at OpenAI, forcing it to 'recalibrate compensation' and promise even more rewarding pay packages to prevent a catastrophic brain drain. While stock-based compensation doesn't immediately burn through a company's cash reserves, it creates a major risk by diluting the value of shares held by investors. Every billion dollars in stock handed to employees means the slices of the pie owned by major backers like Microsoft and other venture capital firms get smaller. OpenAI is trying to sell this strategy as a long-term vision. The company projects that this massive expense will fall to 45% of revenue this year, and below 10% by 2030. Furthermore, OpenAI has reportedly discussed a future plan where its employees would collectively own roughly one-third of the restructured company, with Microsoft also owning another third. The goal is to turn employees into deeply invested partners who have a massive incentive to stay and build. But the 'Meta effect' is throwing a wrench in those neat projections. The aggressive poaching and the ensuing pay bumps mean OpenAI's costs are likely to remain sky-high. This high-stakes financial strategy puts OpenAI in a precarious position. The company is already spending billions of dollars a year as it spends heavily on the computing power needed to run its models. Adding billions more in stock compensation puts immense pressure on the company to dramatically increase revenue and find a path to profitability before its investors get spooked. While Microsoft seems locked in for the long haul, other investors may grow weary of having their ownership diluted so heavily. It forces a countdown timer on the company to deliver a massive financial return to justify the cost. OpenAI was founded with a mission to build artificial general intelligence (AGI) that 'benefits all of humanity.' This costly talent war, fueled by capitalist competition, puts immense pressure on that founding ideal. It becomes harder to prioritize safety and ethics when you're burning billions to keep your top minds from joining the competition. Ultimately, OpenAI is betting these billions to ensure it has the best talent to win the race to create the world's first true superintelligence. If they succeed, the financial cost will seem trivial. If they fail, or if a competitor gets there first, they will have spent themselves into a hole for nothing. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Under-$10 Stock Soars 585% in a Year. What Analysts Think Will Happen Next.
Shares of CommScope (COMM) are on an impressive run, rising more than 585% in a year. This strong rally reflects the company's solid position as a provider of essential infrastructure solutions for communication, data centers, and entertainment networks. CommScope's growth is likely to be supported by the strength of its three core business segments. The Connectivity and Cable Solutions (CCS) segment provides essential fiber optic and copper connectivity solutions, serving a diverse range of sectors, from data centers to residential broadband networks. Meanwhile, the Networking, Intelligent Cellular, and Security Solutions (NICS) segment focuses on wireless networks crucial for both enterprises and service providers. Lastly, the Access Network Solutions (ANS) segment offers essential products, including cable modem termination systems, video infrastructure, and cloud solutions. This Analyst Just Raised His Broadcom Stock Price Target by 70%. Should You Buy AVGO Now? Why Alibaba Stock Looks Like a Screaming Buy After Falling 27% From Its 2025 Highs 2 ETFs Offering Juicy Dividend Yields of 20% or Higher Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! CommScope is poised to capitalize on the robust growth in the data center market, driven by increasing investments from hyperscale and cloud customers as they expand their AI infrastructure. Moreover, the rebound in its NICS and ANS segments sets a promising trajectory for future growth. In addition, the company's strategic move to divest non-core businesses further enhances its operational efficiency. Despite these positives, the stock's recent rally has sparked concerns about its valuation. Moreover, its high leverage ratio remains a risk. Against this background, let's explore what analysts are forecasting for CommScope stock. CommScope is entering the second half of 2025 with strong momentum, signaling a promising outlook. Its CCS business will continue to benefit from the AI-led tailwinds. Moreover, normalized channel inventory in the NICS and ANS segments, new product launches, and its focus on adding incremental selling resources will support its growth. The company's CCS segment is experiencing impressive momentum, particularly in its enterprise fiber business, which caters to the rapidly growing data center market. First-quarter revenue from this business soared 88% year-over-year to $213 million, now accounting for 29% of CCS revenue, up from 19% a year ago. The growth is fueled not only by the expansion of data centers, but also by the increasing demand from new generative AI architectures. These next-gen AI clusters require more fiber connectivity than traditional systems, pushing up demand for CommScope's fiber solutions. Furthermore, CommScope is accelerating new product development and investing in additional production capacity to capitalize on the rising demand. Its broadband products within CCS are also seeing stronger demand as customer inventories stabilize. In the NICS segment, which includes the RUCKUS product line, Q1 revenue jumped 51% year-over-year, supported by the launch of Wi-Fi 7 products and the RUCKUS Edge platform. This platform enhances networking and security solutions for sectors such as education, where CommScope has recently secured a significant contract. With channel inventory now normalized, NICS is set up for substantial gains in the second half of 2025. ANS, CommScope's access network segment, also delivered solid results, with Q1 sales up 20% and EBITDA up 177% year-over-year, thanks to new node and amplifier products, as well as higher legacy license sales. With a robust pipeline of new offerings and improving market conditions, ANS is expected to keep growing. In summary, CommScope's solid performance across all three business segments, improving industry conditions, and focus on new product launches and profitability improvements set the stage for strong growth in the quarters ahead and could potentially boost its share price. CommScope is poised to deliver solid growth and has been focusing on strengthening its balance sheet, notably paying off its 2026 debt maturities ahead of schedule in the first quarter of 2025. However, despite this progress, CommScope's net leverage remains elevated, at 7.8 times as of March 31, raising some concerns. Furthermore, the stock's recent surge has kept analysts bearish. COMM stock holds a 'Moderate Sell' consensus rating. Adding to the concern, the average analyst price target of $5.10 suggests a potential downside of about 36% from current levels. This indicates that analysts believe the stock may be due for a significant pullback, even as the company works to improve its financial health. CommScope's remarkable rally over the past year reflects the strength of its core businesses and its exposure to rapidly growing sectors, such as data centers and AI infrastructure. Moreover, a rebound in its NICS and ANS segments augurs well for growth. However, elevated debt levels and stretched valuations warrant caution. On the date of publication, Amit Singh did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
