logo
First Singaporean appointed as a chief scientific adviser to European Commission

First Singaporean appointed as a chief scientific adviser to European Commission

Straits Times2 days ago
Life sciences professor Mangala Srinivas is head of the cell biology and immunology department at Wageningen University and Research in the Netherlands.
SINGAPORE – Life sciences professor Mangala Srinivas, 44, is the first Singaporean among a team of top scientists advising European Union (EU) politicians on shaping new policies and laws based on science.
Prof Srinivas, who is based in the Netherlands, is one of seven new chief scientific advisers to the European Commission – the EU's executive body – and the first non-EU citizen to take up this role, which was created in 2015.
The advisers, who serve three-year terms, were chosen from around 400 nominees, including Nobel laureates.
Appointed in May, Prof Srinivas – along with the other advisers – provides independent advice to the European Commission's political leaders on any science-related matter, including policy issues that the European Parliament and the European Council consider to be of major importance.
Topics that previous advisers have weighed in include sustainable agriculture, cancer screening, clean energy and controversial methods to reduce global warming by reflecting sunlight back into space.
Their opinions and reports are published on the commission's Scientific Advice Mechanism website. The 2022 opinion on cancer screening, for example, underpinned the new EU Cancer Screening Scheme, which aims to ensure that 90 per cent of eligible Europeans are offered breast, cervical and colorectal screening by 2025.
'I think it's really heartening, especially now, to see that politicians still take science seriously, at least in this part of the world,' said Prof Srinivas, who grew up in Tampines.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide
Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts
Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole
Asia Singapore-only car washes will get business licences revoked, says Johor govt
World Food airdropped into Gaza as Israel opens aid routes
Sport Arsenal beat Newcastle in five-goal thriller to bring Singapore Festival of Football to a close
Singapore Benchmark barrier: Six of her homeschooled kids had to retake the PSLE
Asia S'porean trainee doctor in Melbourne arrested for allegedly filming colleagues in toilets since 2021
She has lived in the Netherlands for the past 17 years after completing her PhD in the US. Since 2021, she has headed the department of cell biology and immunology at Wageningen University and Research.
As an undergraduate at the National University of Singapore, she was torn between medicine and biology, but eventually chose biochemistry. She was 'drawn to understanding how cells function and how different biological systems connect'.
After her doctorate, she worked at the Radboud University Medical Centre in the Netherlands, planning to stay for just two years. However, with further research funding and young children to care for, settling in Europe became the easier choice.
She has a 14-year-old son and two girls aged 11 and eight. They visit Singapore every two years, with her last visit in February for a conference.
Her current research focuses on improving how doctors see specific cells such as immune or therapeutic cells in the body. Current techniques like MRI often fall short in tracking such cells closely over time, she noted.
This visibility is especially important when scientists are evaluating promising but often extremely costly cell therapies for diseases like cancer, she said.
To address this, Prof Srinivas and her team have been developing novel ​nanoparticles, or tiny tools, that can be used to track immune cells in both humans and animals.
Her team , together with international collaborators, are preparing to start a clinical trial using these nanoparticles to track the immune cells of patients with rectal cancer.
But when wearing her scientific adviser hat, she has to take a step back when handling questions from politicians on life sciences to avoid bringing personal bias into the final opinion.
'The aim isn't to offer my own expert opinion but to help translate input from a wide range of specialists into something policymakers can use,' she said.
On her decision to throw her hat into the ring, Prof Srinivas said: 'When I looked at the former members of this group, they are really established. One of them was the director of Cern (the European Organisation for Nuclear Research). It's that level of people, and I thought I probably have no chance of getting it.
'But on the other hand, if I don't apply, I really have no chance. So let's just give it a go.'
The selection process for the new batch of top scientists took about a year. In early 2024, Prof Srinivas was nominated by the Young Academy of Europe – a coalition of young scientists who champion science policy – where she served as chair and board member.
She was interviewed by former chief scientific advisers. The EU commissioner for start-ups, research and innovation hand-picked the final seven who were announced in late May.
Onboarding for the new team took place in Brussels in early July.
Prof Srinivas credited her selection to her contributions to science policy with the Young Academy, as well as her international background. She has industry experience, where she focused on strategy at multinational corporation GE Healthcare (now Cytiva) and co-founded a medical imaging start-up.
'I was really excited, but then you realise this is actually an important position, and it's a responsibility... I could have impact on a lot of people on real matters. And representing not only my university and the Netherlands but also Singapore,' she said.
Soon after, the weight of her selection sank in: She is not just a prominent expert but also a representative of female scientists of colour and working mothers.
When her children were between ages one and five, she raised them alone for a few years as a single mother. She is now remarried.
'My husband is very supportive. But in the few years when I was a single mother, it was really a challenge, especially during the (pandemic) lockdown and I had to homeschool them,' she said.
'A lot of people were sceptical that it's feasible to mix a position like being professor with having young children.'
Beyond advising the European government, she hopes to continue representing minority women in science.
'I hope to champion evidence-based policymaking while highlighting diversity and inclusion – especially for women and scientists from under-represented backgrounds.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Actress Eleanor Lee wins lawsuit against former assistant who doctored her audio recording
Actress Eleanor Lee wins lawsuit against former assistant who doctored her audio recording

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Actress Eleanor Lee wins lawsuit against former assistant who doctored her audio recording

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Singaporean actress Eleanor Lee has not updated her social media accounts since appearing in a video clip posted on her social media accounts on May 21. China-based Eleanor Lee has won a lawsuit against a former assistant who edited an audio recording which got the Singaporean actress into hot water with Chinese netizens. The 25-year-old daughter of local Taiwan-born host Quan Yifeng was in the news in May for allegedly making derogatory comments about the people of China, which she denied. On May 21, a netizen claiming to be her former assistant posted an apology on Chinese social media platform Weibo and admitted to posting the edited recording. On July 29, Lee's agency wrote on Weibo that it had received the Chinese court's Certificate of Judgment Enforcement and attached the document. 'Eleanor Lee has always loved and respected Chinese culture and stood firm in her position,' the agency wrote. 'We firmly defend her legal rights and urge everyone to refrain from believing or spreading rumours, to jointly resist false information and build a clean cyberspace.' The agency also shared a post from Mr Yang Shuguang, a senior partner from Hai Run Law Firm, who shared a legal statement on the progress of the case. The statement said the court had issued a ruling on June 23, with the ruling taking effect on July 17. It also noted that the false content posted online by the former assistant had damaged Lee's reputation, causing her mental distress and affecting her business activities. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Business S'pore's Q2 total employment rises, but infocomm and professional services sectors see more job cuts Business Seatrium to pay $168m to Brazilian authorities, $73m to Singapore authorities to settle corruption case Singapore Migrant workers who gave kickbacks to renew work passes were conservancy workers at AMK Town Council Singapore 2026 school year to begin from Jan 2 for MOE kindergarten, primary, secondary students Asia Japan issues tsunami warning after 8.8-magnitude earthquake strikes off Russia Singapore Singapore prepared to recognise State of Palestine in principle, says envoy at high-level UN meeting Business MAS keeps Singapore dollar policy unchanged amid US tariff risks to economy Singapore Escape, discover, connect: Where new memories are made 'The court ordered the defendant to run a statement of apology to Eleanor Lee on the defendant's Weibo account for 60 consecutive days, and to pay damages to her for mental stress, legal costs and other financial losses,' said the statement. It also said the legal firm has identified several social media accounts which maliciously fabricated and spread false information, and stated that it will continue to monitor these users. 'If the relevant network users still fail to promptly delete the infringing content they have posted after the release of this statement, or continue to commit the infringing acts, our lawyers will promptly collect additional evidence and file a lawsuit in court with the client's authorisation.' The furore began when a netizen claiming to be Lee's former assistant released a poor-quality audio recording that lasted about 30 seconds on Weibo in April. In the recording, which features much background noise and some muffled words, a woman is heard saying she is 'doing this not for fame, but for money' and that 'most people in China are idiots'. The incident gained traction after the media in China and Taiwan reported on it in May. Lee has not updated her social media accounts since posting a video clip on May 21, in which she gave her side of the story. There is no word if her role in the upcoming Chinese period drama, The Journey Of Legend, will be affected by the saga. Shi Hang Law Firm, which is representing the producers of the show, said in a statement posted on Weibo on July 29 that it is planning to take legal action against certain online users who have been spreading false information and continuously posting defamatory content about the series.

‘Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deal behind the scenes
‘Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deal behind the scenes

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

‘Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deal behind the scenes

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The devil lies in the nitty-gritty, and leaders from Asia and Europe have openly contradicted the US on the terms of agreement. – US President Donald Trump has chalked up a spate of headline-grabbing trade deals as the clock ticks down to his Aug 1 'reciprocal' tariffs deadline. But cracks are emerging over their precise terms amid confusion over their timing, implementation, and investment conditions. Critics have reportedly described the agreements as 'flimsy napkin deals'. The devil lies in the nitty-gritty , and leaders from Asia and Europe have openly contradicted the US on the terms of agreement. For Vietnam , The Straits Times understands that the proposed rates that were announced were not even what Hanoi had agreed on . Mr Trump touted a deal with Hanoi on July 2, proposing a 20 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff and a 40 per cent rate for transshipments. Unlike Japan and the EU, Vietnam believes it would be counterproductive to oppose Mr Trump publicly and directly, and both teams of negotiators are now hashing things out quietly. 'The strategy here is to work on the definition of goods that are deemed to be transshipped, not to change the headline number of 40 per cent itself,' a source with knowledge of Vietnam's ongoing trade talks with the Trump administration told ST. 'Ultimately, we hope to be able to persuade the White House that it is a fact that the Chinese are manufacturing products that form the bulk of the goods that we make. It is not fraud, but simply how the supply chains work,' the person added. For Japan, a deal was struck on July 22 for the US to lower the 'reciprocal' tariff rate from 25 per cent to 15 per cent, and car levies from 27.5 per cent to 15 per cent. As part of the deal, Mr Trump said Japan pledged US$550 billion (S$708 billion) in investments as a 'signing bonus', with the US to rake in 90 per cent of the profits. With the European Union, the US agreed on July 27 to halve tariff rates to 15 per cent, with the bloc committing an additional US$600 billion in investments in the US. For both agreements, there is no clear start date on their implementation. Politicians, economists and analysts are struggling to unmuddy the waters of what exactly had been agreed on. In the EU, where French and German leaders are among those to have soured on the deal, Bloomberg cited officials as saying that the announced agreement was but the first step in a long-drawn process for trade negotiators to iron out a legally binding text. For Japan, chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa even said that Tokyo would forgo a formal legally binding document lest this holds up the deal's implementation. But the absence of any signed document and a different understanding with the US over what had been agreed on precisely is turning up the heat on embattled Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Mr Ishiba is fighting for his political survival after his ruling coalition was routed in consecutive polls, losing its majority in both the Lower and Upper House of the Diet. On July 28, he again reiterated that he would not resign as a political vacuum would only jeopardise an agreement that 'serves both countries' national interests, while protecting what we should protect'. One day later, he announced a task force to oversee the proper implementation of the deal. Among its members was Economy Minister Yoji Muto, who said at a regular news conference: 'With the deadline in mind, we urge the US to take necessary measures such as by issuing a presidential order to reduce the tariffs, as soon as possible.' There is, however, a fair share of critics, even within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, over the lack of clarity and how the agreement was struck. Former economic security minister Sanae Takaichi, who is gunning to replace Mr Ishiba in the top job, wrote on X: 'In the absence of any written agreement, we don't know exactly what has been guaranteed.' She went on to highlight the discrepancies in both countries' statements . For example, while Mr Trump boasted that Japan agreed to 'buy billions of dollars worth of military and other equipment', such a commitment was nowhere in a Japanese fact sheet on July 25 of what was agreed on. But the biggest minefield stemmed from the supposed US$550 billion in investments, to be made across nine strategic sectors such as chips, pharmaceuticals, steel and shipbuilding. 'What Japan did is they brought down their tariffs. They gave us US$550 billion upfront, 100 per cent. We get 90 per cent, they get 10 per cent,' Mr Trump had said. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described Japan as 'the banker', with a White House fact sheet saying that Japan would invest as 'directed by the United States to rebuild and expand core American industries'. The Japanese document instead said Japan pledged 'up to' US$550 billion – and not the precise figure. The US would be assured 90 per cent of profits and Japan, 10 per cent, 'proportionate to their respective financing contributions and risk burdens'. And rather than Japan taking orders from the US, Mr Akazawa stressed that the government-linked Japan Bank for International Cooperation would strictly review the projects that it would finance. He added that between 1 and 2 per cent would be actual investment, with the remainder funded by loans or loan guarantees. Further, while US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has threatened that Japan's 'reciprocal' tariff rate would boomerang back to 25 per cent if its deal was not followed faithfully, Mr Akazawa denied that any punitive measures were ever discussed. 'The uncertainty is only growing,' Ms Takaichi said. A source privy to the trade talks told ST that Japan was girding for even more turbulence ahead, given that 'there are voices within the US administration that it had been too lenient on Japan'. Geoeconomics expert Saori Katada of the University of Southern California told ST: 'Although the vibes after the Japan-US deal last week seem to be that it was a 'massive' agreement and an absolute success, I fully doubt so.' She observed that the US would have been in a hurry to land a good deal with Japan, a sizeable economy and an Indo-Pacific security ally whose political climate is increasingly volatile. As Mr Trump turned up the heat on Japan over alleged market barriers in cars and rice , the US could score headlines by playing up Japan's compromises. Japan agreed to allow US cars to be imported without the need for additional safety tests, and review subsidies to promote electric vehicles. It also promised to buy more US rice within the tariff-free import quota of 770,000 tonnes. The deal gave Mr Ishiba a policy victory, as he had long described the tariffs as a 'national crisis'. While the 15 per cent rate was still markedly higher than before Mr Trump announced sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the glass-half-full view of the July 22 deal was how low it was compared with other countries, with Mr Trump unlikely to exempt any country or region from these 'reciprocal' tariffs. 'It sounds like a public relations ploy on both sides, especially in the US,' Dr Katada said, adding: 'I think the global uncertainty will not end with the current series of 'trade deals', especially when Trump sees that others can be pushed around.' Meanwhile, criticism continues to swirl over the purported US$550 billion investment pledge, which main opposition leader Yoshihiko Noda warned would be a 'minefield'. Nomura Research Institute executive economist Takahide Kiuchi, a former Bank of Japan policy board member, said the statements from the US make the deal feel 'as though Japan's sovereignty is being infringed upon'. Dr Stefan Angrick, head of Japan and frontier markets at Moody's Analytics, added: 'The deal is unlikely to be the final chapter in a saga that has bruised Japan's economy.'

US, China tariff truce holds for now but US says Trump has final say, World News
US, China tariff truce holds for now but US says Trump has final say, World News

AsiaOne

time4 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

US, China tariff truce holds for now but US says Trump has final say, World News

STOCKHOLM — US and Chinese officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce on Tuesday (July 29), following two days of what both sides described as constructive talks in Stockholm aimed at defusing an escalating trade war between the world's two biggest economies that threatens global growth. No major breakthroughs were announced, and US officials said it was up to President Donald Trump to decide whether to extend a trade truce that expires on Aug 12 or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digit figures. But US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent tamped down any expectation of Trump rejecting the extension. "The meetings were very constructive," Bessent told reporters after the meetings wrapped up. "It's just that we haven't given the signoff." As Trump returned to Washington after visiting Scotland, where he inked a trade deal with the European Union, he said Bessent had just briefed him on the China talks. "He felt very good about the meeting, better than he felt yesterday," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. After months of threatening high tariffs on trading partners, Trump has secured trade pacts with the EU, Japan, Indonesia and others, but China's powerhouse economy and grip on global rare earth flows make these talks particularly complex. Both sides in May walked back from imposing triple-digit tariffs on each other in what would have amounted to a bilateral trade embargo. But global supply chains and financial markets could face renewed turmoil without an agreement. Bessent told reporters he expects to meet with Trump on Wednesday after both have returned to Washington, and the president would have the final say on any extension. Another 90-day extension is one option, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer added. "We had constructive meetings for sure, to go back with the positive report. But the extension of the pause, he'll decide," Greer said after talks at Rosenbad, the Swedish prime minister's office in central Stockholm. Trump sees meeting with Xi by year-end Bessent said there would likely be another meeting between US and Chinese officials in about 90 days, and the agreements on the flow of Chinese rare earths were becoming more refined after previous talks in Geneva and London. "There was good personal interaction being built up, good, mutual respect. I think we understand their agenda much better," he said. Underlining the stakes, the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday raised its global growth forecast but flagged a potential rebound in tariff rates as a major risk. China's top trade negotiator Li Chenggang said both sides fully recognised the importance of maintaining a stable and sound economic and trade relationship. "The Chinese and US economic and trade teams will maintain active communication, exchange views on economic and trade issues in a timely manner, and continue to promote the stable and healthy development of bilateral economic and trade relations," said Li. The talks could pave the way for a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later in the year, though Trump denied going out of his way to seek one and US officials said the topic was not discussed. Aboard Air Force One, Trump said he thinks he will meet with Xi before the end of the year, though he did not elaborate. The Stockholm meetings also included a lengthy discussion on the US and Chinese economies, with Greer and Bessent emphasising the need for China to shift away from a state-led, export-driven manufacturing economy to one powered by increased consumer demand, which would help US exports. "Cooperation between China and the United States will benefit both sides, while if they fight both will be hurt," according to a readout of the meetings from China's state news agency Xinhua. "Stable, healthy and sustainable economic and trade relations between China and the United States are not only conducive to achieving their respective development goals, but also conducive to promoting the development and stability of the world economy." China vs. EU talks The Stockholm talks follow Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods exports to the United States, and a deal with Japan. That agreement has brought a measure of relief to the EU but also frustration and anger, with France denouncing the deal as a "submission" and Germany, Europe's largest economy, warning of "significant" damage. [[nid:720760]] China can exercise leverage with its grip on the global market for rare earths and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, analysts say. Unlike the EU, it does not rely on the United States for security ties and can let trade talks play out for several more months, Cyrus de la Rubia, chief economist at Hamburg Commercial Bank, told Reuters. "China is well aware of its strong negotiating position, as could clearly be seen in the temporary escalation observed in April," he said. "But over Europe always hangs the Damocles sword of the US withdrawing its security guarantee, and that is why the EU did not escalate the situation like China did." Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China; and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. Among broader economic issues, Washington complains that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, while Beijing says US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. Separately, China's industry minister on Tuesday met with a delegation of US businesses, including Apple, in Beijing, and pledged to uphold fair and open market competition and provide support and services for foreign enterprises. [[nid:720740]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store