What's next for Japan after far-right election surge?
Japan's coalition government led by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba lost its parliamentary majority in Sunday's election after large gains made by right-wing populist parties, in a sign that right-wing populism and polarization are now also undermining political stability in Japan.
For now, Ishiba has vowed to hang on as prime minister, despite the second election debacle in nine months. His Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost a snap election last October, making it a minority party ruling with a coalition.
Ishiba has said he would "humbly accept" the result and "continue to take responsibility for national affairs."
However, Ishiba's continuation as prime minister no longer depends on him alone.
A strengthened opposition could topple him at any time with a vote of no confidence, even if these parties are not united enough to forge a governing coalition themselves.
Ishiba also faces the threat of a rebellion within the LDP, which has governed Japan almost continuously for 70 years and has always controlled at least one chamber of parliament.
Conservative LDP heavyweight Taro Aso has said he "could not accept" Ishiba as prime minister.
However, potential successors appear to be staying under cover for the time being. "Nobody wants to replace Ishiba in these difficult times for the LDP," political scientist Masahiro Iwasaki from Nihon University in Tokyo told DW.
Japan's ruling coalition barely misses
The ruling coalition of the LDP and the Buddhist Komei Party missed its self-imposed target of retaining a majority in the upper house of parliament, with 125 of 248 seats up for reelection.
The coalition missed by only three seats, which was an unexpectedly close result.
The LDP is now likely to try to win over some independent MPs to its side. Even if this succeeds, the government is still on shaky ground.
One of Ishiba's options would be to expand his governing alliance. However, the major opposition parties have already declared that they would not enter into a grand coalition. Apparently, they doubt that Ishiba will remain prime minister and LDP leader in the medium term.
This leaves the 68-year-old politician with the option of selective cooperation with individual opposition parties, which he has been doing since losing his majority in the more important lower house at the end of October.
However, this will not succeed without painful concessions, for example, on tax issues. Before the election, Ishiba rejected opposition demands for a reduction in VAT on food. Instead, he promised every citizen a cash payment of 20,000 yen (€116/$135) by the end of the year to compensate for the loss of purchasing power due to high inflation.
Japan's right-wing surge
According to Japanese media, the LDP's election debacle comes as many voters are dissatisfied with the three-year decline in real wages caused by high inflation, along with a sharp increase in foreign workers and tourists.
Two young, right-wing populist parties benefited the most from this, but the largest opposition group, the constitutional democratic party of former Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, hardly benefited at all.
The Sanseito party, which is only five years old, increased its number of seats in the upper house from two to 14 and the Democratic Party for the People from nine to 17.
The Sanseito party went into the election campaign with the openly xenophobic slogan "Japanese First" and has accused the government of pursuing a "policy of concealed immigration."
The number of foreign residents in Japan grew by 10% in 2024 to just under 4 million.
The Sanseito Party claims that recruiting foreigners as workers to address an ageing and shrinking population will disrupt Japan's social harmony.
Founder Sohei Kamiya has said his party has been modeled after Germany's far-right alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and other European far-right parties.
The democratic party for the People, with its charismatic leader Yuichiro Tamaki, is now the third strongest force in the party system, which lends political weight to its main demand for tax cuts.
"Both right-wing parties were able to capitalize on the anger of the younger generations towards the political system," analyst Tobias Harris told DW, citing percieved gerontocracy, inflation and stagnant wages as key factors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Populism and polarisation come to Japan
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), Japan's long-time ruling party, suffered a historic setback at upper-house elections on Sunday. The party and its smaller coalition partner, Komeito, lost 19 seats. That will leave them governing without a majority in Japan's upper chamber for the first time since 2013. This poor showing is a nightmare for prime minister Ishiba Shigeru, who took office in October. His ruling coalition had already lost its majority in the lower house. Mr Ishiba called the result a 'harsh verdict' and said he intended to stay on. But calls for his resignation are mounting. The LDP remains the single largest party in both chambers of Japan's parliament. But the results on Sunday confirm that its long dominance of Japanese politics is under real threat. Its greatest challenge is not the established centre-left opposition, the Constitutional Democratic Party (CDP), which in the election maintained its seat tally in the upper house. Instead it is political upstarts that are luring away the government's voters. The Democratic Party for the People—a centrist outfit led by Tamaki Yuichiro, who has populist flair—more than doubled its seats, from nine to 22. That makes it the second-largest opposition bloc in the upper house, after the CDP. The Do It Yourself Party (Sanseito), a hard-right outfit with an anti-immigration message, also made a breakthrough. It jumped from two seats to 15 (Kamiya Sohei, its leader, is pictured). These newish parties appear to have energised voters: turnout increased to 59%, the highest level since 2012. The LDP was on the defensive long before polling stations opened. In recent years scandals have tainted the party's image. Mr Ishiba, the 68-year-old scion of a political family, has struggled to give his outfit new appeal among the young. Most of all, 'voters were dissatisfied with the LDP's response to inflation,' says Uchiyama Yu of the University of Tokyo. Prices have risen steadily since 2022. Wages have not been keeping up; in real terms they have fallen for five months straight. During the campaign parties of all stripes promised voters tax breaks and other giveaways. That unsettled investors, who were already worried about Japan's public debt (around 130% of GDP). In particular, opposition parties called for a cut in the consumption tax, currently 10%. In response Mr Ishiba, a fiscal hawk, promised a one-off cash handout of 20,000 yen ($136) per resident. As it turns out, that pledge was too meagre to win over many voters. And it irked many of the party's existing supporters, who saw it as shallow and reactive. Yet it was immigration, not the economy, that dominated the final days of electioneering. Because Japan's native-born population is declining, the country is becoming increasingly reliant on migrant workers to fill jobs. The number of foreign workers reached a record 2.3m last year. That is still only around 3% of the workforce (compared with around 20% in Britain and Germany) but is three times higher than a decade ago. Sanseito, the hard-right party, accused the government of importing cheap labour at the behest of big business. It claimed this was holding down the wages of locals, and caused other problems. Sanseito's 'Japanese First' slogan struck a chord. At a recent street rally in Saitama, an area near Tokyo, a party speaker compared the movement to MAGA in America and the Alternative for Germany, a hard-right party. Koeda Yoshiyuki, a 51-year-old supporter, called Sanseito 'the only party that can truly tackle the big problems Japan faces today'. Sanseito relied on social media, especially YouTube, to reach voters disheartened with politics-as-usual. Legacy outlets tried to debunk its dubious claims, including that foreigners are pushing up crime and have been buying up big swathes of land. Many voters apparently did not listen. What will the LDP do now? Its policymaking is about to become even more constrained: lacking a majority in either chamber, it will need to negotiate with other parties to pass legislation. It could try to expand its coalition by bringing in one more of them. But all the likeliest candidates have so far rejected this idea. Mr Ishiba's days as prime minister are surely numbered, even if he is insisting he will stay. The LDP could soon seek to install a fresher face, such as Koizumi Shinjiro, the charismatic 44-year-old son of a former prime minister, who as agriculture minister has been handling the government's response to a rice-price shock. Alternatively, the party could move to the right in hopes of fending off the challenge from Sanseito: Takaichi Sanae, a hardline nationalist who competed against Mr Ishiba in last year's LDP leadership race, has already hinted she would consider another tilt at the top job. For years Japan had seemed to escape the populism and polarisation that has upturned politics in many other rich democracies. That is clearly no longer the case.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Japan's ruling coalition loses majority: What Trump-inspired right-wing party's gains mean
For the first time in decades, Japan's dominant Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has lost its majority in the Upper House of Parliament following national elections held on Sunday (July 20). The Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba-led ruling coalition also included the centrist Komeito party. Exit polls and early results indicated a shift in voter sentiment, driven by rising dissatisfaction with the government's approach to inflation, immigration, and foreign policy. Ishiba has decided to remain in power but faces increasing pressure from within his party and new opposition forces. Most notably, the far-right political party Sanseito, which was founded only five years ago, has made historic gains. This election could signal a reshaping of Japan's political future. Japan's political system is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary form of government. The Emperor holds a ceremonial position, while executive power lies with the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. Japan's legislature is called the National Diet, comprising two houses: the House of Representatives (Lower House) and the House of Councillors (Upper House). The public elects both their members. The House of Representatives has more powers and prevails in discussions on passing budgets, but the House of Councillors, which had the recent elections, also plays an important role. Just like India's upper house, the Rajya Sabha, the House of Councillors is a permanent body and helps ensure political stability. It has 248 seats, half of which are contested every three years. What happened in the recent elections? With 125 seats going to polls, the PM Ishiba-led coalition won 47 seats — three short of what was needed to maintain a majority, in addition to the 75 seats they already held. He is now facing pressure to resign, since the result makes the conservative LDP a minority in both houses of the Diet. Losing the Upper House majority could stall the passage of legislation, and reflects waning public support for the ruling party. The LDP has governed Japan almost uninterrupted since its founding in 1955. The key emerging players are the right-wing Democratic Party and Sanseito, which won a record number of seats. The Democrats gained 13 seats, raising their total in the Upper House to 22, while Sanseito went from one to 15 seats. Sanseito launched on YouTube in 2020, with criticism of Covid-19 vaccine mandates. It has since campaigned on a platform inspired by US President Donald Trump — describing immigration as a 'silent invasion' and calling to revive national pride. It is headed by the 47-year-old Sohei Kamiya, who gained support from young voters for his 'Japanese First' policy. He earlier said he was inspired by Trump's 'bold political style'. The Democratic Party also gained support from young voters, but is more moderate than Sanseito. What likely helped both of them was voter dissatisfaction with the LDP. Prices of the staple rice and other groceries have risen, with inflation over 3%. A key issue was the US imposing 25% tariffs on Japanese exports. An increase in immigration, with foreigners now making up the highest-ever percentage of the total population at 3%, was also raised as an issue. The top sources of immigration in 2023 were China and Vietnam. Historically, Japan has been averse to the entry of foreigners, with some of the opposition linked to myths of racial superiority. This, even as record-low birth rates in recent years have raised the option of turning to immigration. The electoral results are not only against the status quo, but signal a growing appetite for ideological alternatives. They also suggest that Japan's political centre may be narrowing, with implications for domestic and foreign policy. According to Reuters, some of it has already begun. Days before the vote, Ishiba's administration announced a new taskforce to fight 'crimes and disorderly conduct' by foreign nationals, and the LDP promised a target of 'zero illegal foreigners'. Sanseito has also advocated implementing more conservative educational and cultural policies. A CNN report said it has urged greater defence capabilities, warning that Japan was 'surrounded' by nuclear-armed countries and thus needs a 'deterrent force' while pursuing long-term denuclearisation. Internationally, Japan's tilt towards right-wing parties aligns with a broader trend: far-right parties and leaders have gained ground in countries like the United States, Italy, and the Netherlands in the last decade. While Japan's context is unique, with a history of postwar pacifism and tight immigration controls, the political rhetoric now resembles populist movements elsewhere. The writer is a student who is a summer intern at The Indian Express.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
The Crime Of The Century: Trump explodes on Truth Social, says Obama manufactured Russia hoax after Tulsi Gabbard releases files
AP President Donald Trump did not hold back on his Truth Social, Tuesday, July 22, by attacking Obama, Hillary and all Democrats through a post. this comes a day after 100-pages of documents published by DNI Tulsi Gabbard exposing "treasonous" intelligence interference amongst Obama-era officials and Obama at the end of 2016. The contention among the governments has increasingly become volatile amid a deep divide, when the country still debates about Russia. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) President Donald Trump went on full rampage on his Truth Social, on Tuesday, July 22, with a post attacking all democrats at once on his Truth Social. Calling allegations of Russian interference in the US presidential election 2016 when Barack Obama was at the helm 'THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY', Trump called it a major threat to America. Trump's explosive Truth Social post Below is US President Donald Trump's Truth Social post dated July 22, 2025: Obama himself manufactured the Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX. Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Joe, and numerous others participated in this, THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY!. Irrefutable EVIDENCE. A major threat to our Country!!! The post comes after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made certain contentious and classified documents public. From July 18-21, Gabbard declassified, and publicly released over 100 pages of documents, including memos and internal assessments, alleging the Obama administration manipulated intelligence in late 2016. What caused this furoreThe office of then-DNI James Clapper on December 7, 2016, stated, "We have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results" and "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome." Obama's Presidential Daily Brief the next day merely mentioned the "likely" hacking of an Illinois voter registration database, which had "unsuccessfully attempted" in other states and had no bearing on the electoral brief's draft said, "Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes."But once the FBI, under Director James Comey, declared it would "dissent" from the draft's conclusions "based on some new guidance," those results were then led an alternative intelligence report asserting that the Kremlin manipulated the presidential election to Trump's advantage and planned the hacking of DNC emails, thousands of which were ultimately made public by Wikileaks. Several officials, including CIA Director John Brennan, Secretary of State John Kerry, and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, gathered at the White House on Dec. 9, 2016, where Obama began 'tasking' each to look into 'Russia Election Meddling.' Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, and White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonogh were also present at the meeting. How Obama's intelligence agencies gradually changed course By early January, 2017, former president, Barack Obama, ordered the CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS to produce a new intelligence assessment that included detailed information about Russia's involvement in the US presidential race. This assessment ultimately included the now-debunked dossier created by former MI6 spy Christopher that same day, an email from Clapper's executive assistant stated that the new intelligence assessment needed to outline the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election."Later, intelligence community leakers told the media that Obama voiced public concerns about hacks impacting the vote-counting process and that officials had "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in the "U.S. Election Hack."According to a National Security Council document, the participants in the White House meeting also "agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for cyber operations as a response to cyber activity that attempted to influence or interfere with U.S. elections, if such activity meets the requirements." The Intelligence Community Assessment of January, 2017 According to Gabbard, the end result was an Intelligence Community Assessment on January 7, 2017, which "directly contradicted the IC assessments that were made throughout the previous six months."CIA Director John Ratcliffe published a shocking analysis of the 2016 assessment earlier this month, concluding that Clapper, Brennan, and Comey purposefully tainted it for "possible political motive[s]."Later, more than eight years ago, the Trump Justice Department opened an investigation into Brennan and Comey for possible criminal offences connected to the preparation of that data will be sent to the Department of Justice "to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve," Gabbard said in a statement. Gabbard's declassification bombshell The declassification is based on shocking new information unearthed by an Office of the Director of National Intelligence whistleblower who told Clapper that there was "no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means." The National Intelligence Officer for Cyber pushed the whistleblower to believe the conclusions of the later Obama intelligence assessment, which included Moscow's preference for whistleblower's superior told him, "You need to trust me on this," referring to reports that the informant was "not allowed to see," most likely the Steele dossier. Whistleblower testimony challenges 2017 assessment The whistleblower wrote in one of their emails, "As for the 2017 ICA's judgement of a decisive Russian preference for then-candidate Donald Trump." Based on the material at hand and my professional analytical opinion, I was unable to concur in good documents claim an earlier finding (around September-December 2016) which showed no evidence of direct Russian cyber interference, but Gabbard says intelligence officials suppressed it in favor of a new assessment accusing Russia of meddling to aid of Friday, July 18, Gabbard has called for prosecution against Obama-era officials, namely, James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, and the man himself, after alleged 'treasonous' intelligence interference. FAQs 1. What did President Trump post on Truth Social on July 22?Trump made a post attacking Democrats, especially during the Obama-era, after DNI Tulsi Gabbard recently declassified several contentious documents in reference to the Russian interference in the 2016 elections.2. What was in those documents?Gabbard released a 100-page document, which essentially claim that intelligence officials suppressed the truth when it came to the 2016 election interference and hence claiming authority.3. Alleged role of whistleblowerThe whistleblower was allegedly threatened by intelligence officers to support unsubstantiated claims of Moscow's interference.4. Why was the January, 2017 Assessment a key detail?Gabbard claimed that this particular assessment had contradicted previous findings from the intelligence officials, then. She claimed those findings were a result of political pressure.5. Who has Tulsi Gabbard called for prosecution? Gabbard has called out the former president, Barack Obama, and Obama-era officials, James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, alleging they played a role in manipulating intelligence.
