Landslide Approval Of Wairarapa Water Model
The council asked for feedback on two options: a Wairarapa-Tararua asset-owning council-controlled organisation (CCO), or its existing approach — a non-asset owning CCO similar in structure and ownership to Wellington Water.
Submitters to South Wairarapa's Local Water Done Well consultation have been largely in favour of joining forces with Carterton, Masterton, and Tararua to deliver water services.
But some presenters at Wednesday's hearing were critical of the council only consulting on one 'viable' option.
The council asked for feedback on two options: a Wairarapa-Tararua asset-owning council-controlled organisation (CCO), or its existing approach — a non-asset owning CCO similar in structure and ownership to Wellington Water.
Of 134 written submissions, about 87% were in favour of the Wairarapa-Tararua model.
Submitter Leah Hawkins said the Wairarapa-Tararua option was 'not just being presented as the preferred choice, but is the only viable choice'.
She was concerned there was no backup plan if the model did not succeed.
'South Wairarapa should not be forced to adopt a model just because there are no other options on the table.
'It's policy by default and we must try to demand better.'
The council's consultation document said the status quo approach would present significant financial challenges in delivering its planned water infrastructure programme.
It said from around 2030 onwards, the council would no longer have the capacity to fund any further capital works through debt, 'severely limiting our ability to maintain and improve our water infrastructure'.
Submitter Dean Di Bona said the government had delivered 'an absolute lemon of legislation that we have to work with'.
He said the council's status quo approach had resulted in an adverse audit opinion in the council's draft long-term plan, which left only the Wairarapa-Tararua option as 'a contender'.
'This starkness has left us in the unenviable position where tunnel vision can take over and red flags are missed,' Di Bona said.
He asked what would happen if one of the four councils did not join the Wairarapa-Tararua model, and expressed concerns about attracting expertise and resources when other CCOs would be getting set up at the same time.
Submitter Adrienne Young-Cooper, who was previously the chair of the Wairarapa Economic Development Strategy, supported the Wairarapa-Tararua model and believed it would 'create an entity of sufficient scale and financial clout and expertise to be able to do a great thing for all the councils'.
She hoped the proposed Wairarapa-Tararua model would attract 'great people who are prepared to come and live in Wairarapa, grow their families here, and build their careers'.
Submitter Shane Atkinson was also in favour of the Wairarapa-Tararua option but believed there would be no buy-in from other councils unless water charges were ringfenced by district.
'I can imagine the howling and snivelling from Masterton should there be any suggestion that they pay for or have higher costs as a result of taking on board some of the smaller entities,' he said.
Submitter Bill Armstrong also supported the asset owning CCO option with neighbouring councils, but he wasn't supportive of Tararua being included.
He said the inclusion of Tararua significantly increased the geographical area of the proposed CCO and was concerned it would increase costs and stretch resources thin.
Submitter Sue Fox asked the council to pursue a status quo model with Wellington councils.
'Instead of the uncertainties and costs attached to forming a new CCO, let's stick with the devil we know,' she said.
'Having seen the attempts to get the Wairarapa councils to work together over the past three or four terms, I just cannot have confidence that the CCO body will be set up in a timely way and be ready to start operating within the proposed budget.'
The council would deliberate on submissions on May 8.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Mayor Mahé Drysdale's call for council review backed by LGNZ
It comes after Drysdale called for 'tough' amalgamation conversations between Bay of Plenty councils. He said the remit passing showed everyone was aware that change was happening in local government. '[We] want to be proactive around designing the system that will work for our people and work for us as local government.' The remit called for a review of current functions and governance arrangements of councils. Councils weren't as efficient and effective as they could be, he said. The sector needed to look at what services should be delivered nationally, regionally, and locally, then design a system that would best deliver those services, Drysdale said. Having a national IT system for all councils and regional roading networks were some ideas the sector could discuss, he said. Mahé Drysdale said councils could have a national IT system for service like rates. Photo / 123rf When talking about efficiency, people 'jump to amalgamation', Drysdale said, but it was only one of the solutions. 'It may not be the solution that comes out of it. We've got to keep a really open mind.' He said he was not trying to 'ram through amalgamation'. 'The intent of this is getting all the local authorities with LGNZ and central government working together to design a system that works for the country.' New Zealand has 78 councils: 11 regional, 11 city, 50 district, and six unitary authorities (regional and city/district combined). Changes to how councils managed water through Local Water Done Well and Resource Management Act (RMA) reform meant the functions of councils was changing, so councils needed to change their form, Drysdale said. LGNZ was in the 'perfect position' to co-ordinate the remit, but buy-in was needed from central Government and the other councils, he said. Plenty of reviews had been done, but action was needed, Drysdale said. 'Let's make sure we've done this thoroughly and we know what the best system is, but then we've actually got to implement it.' Local Government Minister Simon Watts. Photo / Alex Burton Local Government Minister Simon Watts said opportunities for efficiency included working alongside the sector. The new legislation that would replace the RMA included provisions about the roles, responsibilities, and processes of local government, he said. This included proposals that differed from the status quo, Watts said. 'I am keen to look at how the reorganisation process for local government can be made simpler and expect to receive advice on this.' Local Government New Zealand chief executive Susan Freeman-Greene. Photo / Mark Tantrum LGNZ chief executive Susan Freeman-Greene said local government needed to be proactive and lead the changes required. 'The current sector arrangements are a legacy, and do not always reflect how communities have expanded and how modern services are delivered. 'With key Government legislation changes now under way, it'll require an agile and well-planned response by the sector,' she said in a statement. 'It's also important we retain local decision-making in the work we do and the decisions we make, particularly when it comes to the delivery of infrastructure and services for the community.' The LGNZ national council would consider next steps on the remit in the coming months. After the October election, the organisation would engage with councils in a member-driven process, an LGNZ spokesperson said. Outgoing Bay of Plenty Regional Council chairman Doug Leeder said councils needed to be prepared to question their structure and functions. 'The structure of local government hasn't meaningfully changed since 1989. In that time, our communities, demographics, and challenges have changed dramatically,' he said in a statement. 'We need to be brave enough to question how we deliver services and what functions sit best at which level - national, regional, or local.' The remit had the support of metro councils before it was presented to LGNZ. The metro councils would provide support and resources to work on the programme established, the remit said. - LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Mackenzie District Mayor Anne Munro steps down as cancer worsens
Mackenzie District Mayor Anne Munro is stepping aside due to her cancer diagnosis. Munro shared the news last year and testing has confirmed the cancer is metastatic. She said while treatment was ongoing, her prognosis remained uncertain, and she had made the decision in the interest of continuity and stable leadership. "Although I've stayed up to date with council business, the work we do is complex and fast-moving. I'm simply not across the level of detail needed to provide the leadership our council and community deserve at this critical time," she said. Munro said the council was navigating a time of significant change — including determining how to implement the Government's Local Water Done Well reforms. ADVERTISEMENT She said she would not be seeking re-election in October. "Given the uncertainty surrounding my health, I cannot fully commit to serving our community in the years ahead," she said. Munro served two terms as a councillor from October 2016, before being elected in 2022. She was diagnosed with cancer shortly before Christmas last year. Deputy Mayor Karen Morgan would continue acting in the role until the election, she said. Munro said Morgan had led with "calm and capable hands" in her absence. Munro thanked the management and staff of the council for their "expertise, dedication, and adaptability". ADVERTISEMENT "Without your efforts, many of us would have no water in our taps, no roads to drive on, and no shared community spaces to enjoy. Few outside the organisation truly appreciate the breadth and complexity of the responsibilities council carries every day," she said. She thanked her fellow elected members for their "time, energy, and unwavering commitment" to the community. "Your insight and shared purpose have helped keep council focused on what matters most," she said. Munro also thanked the residents and ratepayers whose support "meant so much". "Needless to say, this is not where I expected to be, nor how I imagined my time in local government would come to an end. But perhaps it's a reminder that change is life's only constant. We can't always control what comes our way, but we can choose how we respond," she said. "Politics, even at the local level, can at times be divisive. My hope is that, as a community, we continue to meet challenges with open minds, respectful debate focused on the issues not the individuals, and a spirit that celebrates both our differences and the values we share."
Otago Daily Times
08-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Council pulls out of proposed water CCO
"I was surprised at how one-sided it was," Waitaki Mayor Gary Kircher told the ODT after a surprise U-turn by the Waitaki District Council, which has voted to withdraw from a proposed joint water services company with three neighbouring Otago councils, opting instead to manage its water services independently — at least for the next two years. The decision, made at a council meeting in Oamaru yesterday, overturns the council's previous unanimous support for establishing a shared council-controlled organisation (CCO) with the Clutha, Central Otago and Gore District Councils under the "Southern Water Done Well" initiative. Only Mr Kircher and Cr Jim Hopkins, Waitaki's longest-serving councillor, voted in favour of pursuing the joint CCO model. Mr Kircher was shocked by the turn of events. "We've shared a lot of information on the various aspects of it. We were further advanced with the southern group of councils than with the South Canterbury one, and that was really due to just being far more motivated in the South, but councillors have given their reasons for their particular decisions and that's democracy. "Now the focus is on delivering a water services delivery plan to DIA [Department of Internal Affairs] in September and we will see what they do with that." Public consultation across the four councils drew in over 1000 submissions, 57.5% favouring the in-house business unit model, the preferred option in Waitaki (54%) and Clutha, while only 26.7% supported the joint CCO, most popular in Gore and Central Otago. A series of statements from Waitaki councillors at the meeting pointed to the opposition to the Southern Water Done Well concept, making it difficult listening for the mayors of the other councils involved, who sat grim-faced as one councillor after another shot down the idea of a joint CCO. Cr Tim Blackler's summary did not pull any punches. "Southern Water Done Well was the last cab off the rank, no-one wants a ride on it and if we believe the consultation to be some sort of litmus test for community feelings, which I do, then the feedback was clear ... There was a resounding call to keep it local ..." A joint statement from Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley, Gore District Mayor Ben Bell and Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan was issued after the meeting. "While acknowledging that councils must make decisions they feel are in the best interests of their communities, we believe a jointly owned council-controlled organisation remains the best option for water services delivery in the future. "The government has been quite clear about its expectations for councils to work together to deliver Local Water Done Well legislation. "Southern Water Done Well meets those expectations and sets a strategic long-term direction for delivering financially sustainable, efficient water services while retaining local control. "When considering next steps, councils will need to be mindful of whether alternative options comply with government regulations and expectations." The Clutha and Central Otago District Councils meet tomorrow to decide their water services delivery model, while the Gore District Council's meeting is on Monday.
