
3 ways Americans could pay for Trump's war with Iran
An Iranian cleric stands next to a scale model of an Iran-made surface-to-surface missile, which is displayed during an anti-Israeli protest at Palestine Square in downtown Tehran, Iran, on April 9, 2025. Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images
President Donald Trump has framed his strikes on Iran as a costless triumph. The president is not asking Americans to accept sacrifices in service of destroying the Iranian nuclear program — only to applaud his already successful destruction of it.
'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' Trump declared Saturday night. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.'
From this precarious position, the Iranian leadership might conclude that it can ill afford an escalating conflict with the world's greatest military power. Perhaps, it will follow the same basic playbook it did following Trump's assasination of its military leader Qasem Soleimani in 2020: Back then, Iran responded with face-saving strikes on US military bases in Iraq — but ones that it heavily telegraphed, enabling American soldiers to take cover and retain their lives, which in turn allowed Trump to call things even and end the conflict. Iran's strike on a US base in Qatar on Monday could be interpreted as fitting this mold: The US said that it had advanced warning of the strike and that there were no American casualties.
What's more, it is even possible that the Iranian regime could conclude that its nuclear program is more trouble than it's worth and sheepishly return to the bargaining table, now ready to accept more stringent restrictions on its freedom to enrich uranium or build ballistic missiles.
But such rosy outcomes are far from certain. And if things do not transpire as Trump hopes, his war could impose significant costs on the American people — in terms of money, blood, and nuclear security.
How Trump's war on Iran could impact the economy
For Americans, the most widely felt consequences of Trump's war with Iran would likely be economic. Oil prices have climbed by more than 12 percent since the end of May, when Israel began threatening to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. An escalating US-Iran conflict could further elevate Americans' energy costs.
The nightmare scenario here concerns the Strait of Hormuz, the world's only waterway connecting the Persian Gulf with the open ocean. Each day, about 20 million barrels of oil — or about 20 percent of the world's total supply — moves through the strait. Iran could plausibly choke off all shipping through the waterway if it wished to do so. And on Sunday, the Iranian Parliament reportedly approved such a course of action, although it remains up to the nation's Supreme National Security Council to enact a blockade.
Were Iran to take that extraordinary measure, the price of oil could shoot up past $130 a barrel, according to industry analysts (as of this writing, a barrel is trading at $72). That would dramatically increase the costs of energy and transportation for US consumers. And since energy is an input into the production of more or less every good and service, a sustained blockade could push up prices more broadly. Faced with higher inflation, the Federal Reserve would likely scrap plans for cutting interest rates. In this scenario, Americans would see lower real wages and higher borrowing costs than they would have enjoyed in a world where Trump did not bomb Iran.
It's worth saying that a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is unlikely. Were Iran to pursue such a policy, it would effectively be sabotaging its own economy, which is heavily dependent on exporting oil via the waterway. Nevertheless, the threat of disrupting shipping through the strait is the regime's greatest point of leverage over other world powers.
Iran could also disrupt global commerce in more modest ways. Tehran is allied with Yemen's Houthi militia, which is already threatening to recommence its attacks on US ships in the Red Sea. Any disruption to Red Sea trade could increase global shipping costs, which would eventually bleed into US consumer prices.
Alternatively, Iran could strike oil and gas infrastructure in Middle Eastern countries allied with the United States. In a 2019 drone attack allegedly backed by Tehran, the Houthis bombed two major oil facilities in Saudi Arabia, temporarily cutting the country's oil production in half and spiking crude prices.
At a moment when the president's tariffs are already nudging up the cost of imports, any war-related disruptions to global trade could prove painful for American households.
Trump's attack has put American soldiers in harm's way
As Monday's attack on US troops in Qatar demonstrated, Americans stationed in the Middle East face a far graver threat than more expensive gasoline. More than 40,000 US soldiers are serving on bases and warships in the region, well within reach of Iranian missiles.
Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities represented a far broader and more destructive attack than his strike against Soleimani five years ago. It's reasonable to fear that Tehran's response will be proportionally more severe, and that Monday's strikes at Qatar represent only the beginning of its retaliation. At least, this is what the regime is telling Americans to expect.
'Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces,' Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Saturday. 'America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences.'
Some of these 'consequences' could transpire on American soil. Although Iran's immediate targets will likely lie close to home. Years after the Soleimani strike, Iran allegedly orchestrated failed assassination attempts against former national security adviser John Bolton, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Donald Trump.
According to US officials who spoke with NBC News, Iran warned Trump at this year's G7 Summit that it could respond to an American strike on its nuclear facilities by perpetrating terrorist attacks within the United States. The regime claimed to have sleeper cells in America ready and waiting to commit such violence.
Trump may have made an Iranian nuclear weapon more likely
Trump's war with Iran may risk making all Americans poorer while getting some of us killed. But in his administration's ostensible view, these potential harms pale in comparison to the threat posed by Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon — a threat that Saturday's strikes greatly mitigated.
It is not obvious how much Americans actually have at stake in preventing Iran from developing atomic weapons. No serious analyst believes that the Iranian regime is suicidal. Tehran is not going to order a nuclear first strike against the United States or any other country. Rather, it almost certainly sees nuclear weapons primarily as a deterrent against both foreign intervention and domestic challenges to its authoritarian regime.
Nevertheless, all else equal, Americans have an interest in preventing nuclear proliferation. Were Iran to acquire an atomic weapon, Saudi Arabia would be liable to pursue its own. And a nuclear arms race in the Middle East would increase the tail risk of a future atomic catastrophe.
And yet, it is possible that Trump's strikes on Iran have actually made that nation's acquisition of a nuclear weapon more likely.
Before Saturday's bombings, Iran was engaged in negotiations over its nuclear program without the United States. And Tehran had previously reached an agreement to limit its enrichment of uranium in 2015, a nuclear deal that Trump tore up during his first term in office.
Now, all diplomacy over Iran's nuclear program appears dead. And Tehran may see a nuclear weapon as more indispensable for its security than ever before. After all, the regime's conventional military defenses have proven grossly inadequate to deter or defeat Israeli and American incursions.
Already, Iranian officials are signalling that the nation will withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), a move that would mean an end to the nation's cooperation with United Nations inspections of its uranium enrichment. At present, the UN's nuclear watchdog says it is uncertain about where Iran is storing the highly enriched uranium it has already produced. Tehran claims that, before Trump's strikes, it had moved its uranium stockpiles out of the three sites that he targeted.
American and Israeli bombing has surely undermined Iran's capacity to produce weapons-grade uranium. Tehran has lost some of its top nuclear scientists and suffered massive damage to its enrichment facilities. But Iran retains both the technical know-how and raw materials necessary for building an atomic bomb. And the world may have now lost visibility into its nuclear activities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Criticizes Macron for Opting to Recognize Palestinian State
(Bloomberg) -- President Emmanuel Macron said France would recognize a Palestinian state in September, prompting a backlash from the US and Israel. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom 'In keeping with its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognize the State of Palestine,' Macron said in a social media post late Thursday. The official announcement will be made on the sidelines of the next annual gathering of the United Nations General Assembly, in New York, he added. Macron's decision described as 'reckless' by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Still, it comes amid growing pressure on Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, particularly from European and Arab states. Macron's announcement led to a harsh response from Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejects Palestinian statehood. The Israeli government argues its offensive in Gaza is necessary to topple and disarm Hamas after the militant group killed 1,200 people and abducted 250 in the Oct. 7, 2023, assault on southern Israel. Of the hostages, 50 are still in Gaza, with roughly 20 thought by Israel to still be alive. Talks over a ceasefire in Gaza stalled again on Thursday, with the US and Israel withdrawing their negotiating teams from Qatar. They were there holding indirect negotiations with Hamas. 'We strongly condemn President Macron's decision to recognize a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv in the wake of the Oct. 7 massacre,' Netanyahu said in a social media posting. 'Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became.' France's move 'only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace,' Rubio said. 'It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th.' Hamas has been designated as a terrorist organization by the US and the European Union. Macron, as well as several other world leaders, is increasingly angered by the Israeli military's continued attacks in Gaza and Netanyahu's restrictions on allowing humanitarian aid to enter the territory, with reports of emaciated babies, children crammed into soup queues and men tussling over bags of flour. 'The 2.1 million people trapped in the war zone that is Gaza are facing yet another killer on top of bombs and bullets: starvation,' the World Health Organization's director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said this week. New York Conference Macron has said since last year that France, home to both the largest Jewish and Muslim communities in Europe, could recognize a Palestinian state. He even tried to organize a conference with Saudi Arabia in New York in June to do so, before canceling it following missile strikes between Israel and Iran. French and Saudi officials are now expected to lead a conference to discuss Palestinian statehood next week in New York. The US won't attend, the State Department said Thursday. The leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, was informed of France's decision via a letter from Macron, the French foreign ministry said. While many Western countries are critical of Israel for its actions against civilians in Gaza, no other member of the Group of Seven has taken the step of recognizing Palestine as a nation. Spain, Ireland and Norway are among Western countries that do recognize Palestine. Macron's announcement may put pressure on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is facing a push from senior members of his own government, to follow suit. It's unclear if a potential backlash from the Trump administration would make Starmer wary of recognizing a Palestinian state. The British leader said Thursday that 'statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people' and a ceasefire would put the UK 'on a path' to recognition, but stopped short of committing to a timeframe. For years the UK has formally supported a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but only after negotiations between the two sides. That's the same stance that many other countries in the West have taken. Palestinians hope to form a nation comprising Gaza and the larger territory of the West Bank, which together have more than 5 million people. Decades of international peacemaking efforts have hinged on the idea of Palestinian statehood in those areas, which Israel captured in the 1967 Six Day war. The last major talks stalled in 2014. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Tens of thousands flee their homes as Thailand and Cambodia clash
The fighting has killed at least 14 people in Thailand, while Cambodia confirmed its first fatality on Friday. Tensions over a disputed border area erupted into fighting after a land mine explosion along the border on wounded five Thai soldiers on Wednesday. Advertisement Clashes break out across border areas The Thai military reported clashes early Friday in multiple areas, including along the border at Chong Bok and Phu Makhuea in Thailand's Ubon Ratchathani province, at Phanom Dong Rak in Surin province, and near the ancient Ta Muen Thom temple. Associated Press reporters near the border could hear sounds of artillery from early morning hours. The Thai army said Cambodian forces had used heavy artillery and Russian-made BM-21 rocket launchers, prompting what Thai officials described as 'appropriate supporting fire' in return. Thailand said one soldier and 13 civilians were killed, including children, while 15 soldiers and 30 civilians were wounded. Cambodia's chief official in Oddar Meanchey province, Gen. Khov Ly, said a man died instantly Thurday after a Thai rocket hit a Buddhist pagoda where he was hiding. At least four civilians were also wounded in Thursday's fighting there. Advertisement Thailand's army on Friday denied it targeted civilian sites in Cambodia, and accused Cambodia of using 'human shields' by positioning their weapons near residential areas. Thousands flee villages near the border As the fighting intensified, villagers on both sides have been caught in the crossfire, leading many to flee. Around 600 people took shelter at a gymnasium in a university in Surin, Thailand, about 80 kilometers from the border. Evacuees sat in groups, on mats and blankets, and queued for food and drinks. Seamstress Pornpan Sooksai was accompanied by four cats in two fabric cages. She said she was doing laundry at her home near Ta Muen Thom temple when shelling began Thursday. 'I just heard, boom, boom. We already prepared the cages, clothes and everything, so we ran and carried our things to the car. I was frightened, scared,' she recalled. Rattana Meeying, another evacuee, said she had also lived through the 2011 clashes between the two countries but described this flare-up as worse. 'Children, old people, were hit out of the blue,' she said. 'I never imagined it would be this violent.' At the nearby Phanom Dong Rak hospital, periodic explosions could be heard Friday, and a military truck arrived with three injured Thai soldiers, including one who had both legs severed. Thursday's shelling shattered windows at one of the hospital's buildings and damaged its roof. In the neighboring Sisaket province, more villagers took their belongings and left homes in a stream of cars, trucks and motorbikes after they received an evacuation order on Friday. Across the border in Cambodia, villages on the outskirts of Oddar Meanchey province were largely deserted. Homes stood locked, while chickens and dogs roamed outside. Advertisement Some villagers earlier dug holes to create makeshift underground bunkers, covering them with wood, tarpaulin and zinc sheets to shield themselves from shelling. Families with children were seen packing their belongings on home-made tractors to evacuate, though a few men refused to leave. Several hundred Cambodian villagers have evacuated to a remote Buddhist temple surrounded by rice fields. Women rest in hammocks, some cradle babies, while children run about. Makeshift plastic tents are being set up under the trees. Veng Chin, 74, pleaded with both governments to negotiate a settlement 'so that I can return to my home and work on the farm.' ASEAN chair calls for calm The conflict marks a rare instance of armed confrontation between member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nation, though Thailand has tangled with Cambodia before over the border and has had sporadic skirmishes with western neighbor Myanmar. Malaysia, the current ASEAN chair, expressed concern. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said Thursday he spoke to both Cambodian leader Hun Manet and Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and urged them to open space for 'peaceful dialogue and diplomatic resolution.' Malaysia is willing to facilitate talks, he said. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has also called for restraint and urged both countries to resolve disputes through dialogue, according to U.N. deputy spokesman Farhan Haq. A longstanding border problem Border tensions between the two nations are not new. Their 800-kilometer (500-mile) frontier has been disputed for decades, with past confrontations typically limited and brief. The last major flare-up in 2011 left 20 dead. The current tensions broke out in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation. The two countries said afterwards they agreed to de-escalate the situation, but both continued to implement or threaten measures including trade and travel restrictions, keeping tensions high. Advertisement But things got worse when a land mine wounded five Thai soldiers on Wednesday. That led Bangkok to withdraw its ambassador from Cambodia and expel Cambodia's envoy to Thailand. Thailand also sealed all land border crossings and urged its citizens to leave Cambodia. Officials said all seven Thai airlines were willing to help evacuate nationals. Cambodia retaliated by downgrading diplomatic ties and recalling all Cambodian staff from its embassy in Bangkok. On Thursday, clashes broke out along the border. Both militaries accused the other of using drones before escalating to artillery and rockets. Thailand said it responded with airstrikes after Cambodian forces launched truck-mounted rockets. The Thai air force said F-16 jets carried out two bombing runs on Cambodian positions. Cambodia claimed those bombs landed near the Preah Vihear temple, a UNESCO World Heritage site that has been at the center of past disputes. Authorities in Phnom Penh released photos they said showed damage to the site and pledged to seek international justice. The border dispute has also roiled Thailand's domestic politics. Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, under scrutiny over a phone call with Cambodia's former Prime Minister Hun Sen, still a power broker in his country, was suspended from office on July 1 pending an investigation into possible ethics violations over the matter. Associated Press writer Eileen Ng in Kuala Lumpur contributed to this report.


New York Times
23 minutes ago
- New York Times
Australia Says Gaza Situation Beyond ‘Worst Fears' as Pressure Mounts on Israel
Canada, Australia and Britain have increased pressure on Israel over the starvation and the killing of civilians in Gaza, with Australia's prime minister on Friday saying the situation has 'gone beyond the world's worst fears.' Israel blocked aid deliveries to Gaza between March and May after it ended a cease-fire with Hamas. Since then, a private Israeli-backed group has run a system in which people go to a few sites in the Israeli-controlled areas of Gaza to receive aid. But hundreds of Palestinians have been killed at these locations, where Israeli soldiers have used live ammunition to contain unrest and disperse crowds of desperate people. Aid groups have said that mass starvation is spreading in Gaza, and that the insecurity and Israeli restrictions have made food deliveries impossible. Haunting images of hollow-eyed, skeletal children have emerged in recent days from Gaza, where doctors say people are dying from hunger. 'Gaza is in the grip of a humanitarian catastrophe. Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food cannot be defended or ignored,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of Australia said in a statement. He called on Israel to immediately allow the United Nations and aid organizations to carry out their work safely. Mr. Albanese's statement was the latest in a growing chorus of criticism of Israel, including from some of its closest allies, over its restrictions on aid deliveries in Gaza and its war in the enclave, which has been going on for 21 months. France on Thursday became the first Group of 7 country to announce that it would recognize a Palestinian state. 'Today the most urgent thing is that the war in Gaza cease and the civilian population be helped,' France's president, Emmanuel Macron, said. A few hours before Mr. Albanese's statement, Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada condemned Israel's 'failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.