Russia Says It Struck Kremenchuk Oil Refinery in Ukraine
'A group strike with precision-guided air and sea-based weapons, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles' hit the facility in the Poltava region, Russia's defense ministry said in a Telegram statement.
Acting regional governor Volodymyr Kohut said Russia's main targets were energy and agriculture facilities in the city, located about 300 kilometers (186 miles) southeast of Kyiv.
Images on social media showed the skies above Kremenchuk ablaze from the aerial bombardment.
'The night was difficult,' Kohut said on Ukrainian TV. 'From 11:30 p.m until 4:00 a.m., a massive attack was happening.'
Nobody was injured and Ukraine's air defense shot down majority of the missiles and drones, Kohut said, without providing details about the status of the refinery.
Explosions and debris ignited fires, damaging residential buildings and vehicles after 'a massive combined attack using missiles and drones,' Ukraine's foreign ministry said on X.
Russia previously targeted the Kremenchuk refinery and surrounding areas with a series of missile attacks in April, May and June of 2022. The first strike shut down the facility, which supplied Ukrainian troops in the central and eastern parts of the country, and damaged much of its infrastructure.
Also on Sunday, the Ukrainian prisoner exchange coordination office said another 1,200 bodies of soldiers killed in action were returned by Russia.
As part of agreements reached after bilateral meetings in Istanbul this month, Russia said it will return 6,000 bodies to Ukraine. So far Moscow has returned 4,812 bodies, according to Russian media reports in the past days.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Friday that the current round of prisoner exchanges should be completed around June 20 or June 21. On Saturday, 1,200 prisoners were exchanged on each side.
(Updates with return of Ukrainian bodies from ninth paragraph.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How do Chinese analysts view speculations of Trump visiting Beijing in September?
Long-time China watchers and foreign affairs experts know that reports of Chinese leaders travelling abroad or a foreign leader visiting Beijing are only confirmed when they come from China's state-run Xinhua news agency. Since rumours of US President Donald Trump being invited to attend a September 3 military parade in Beijing first appeared in the media nearly a month ago, Xinhua has neither denied nor confirmed them. According to reports published in China, Japan's Kyodo News Agency first reported on a possible visit. The Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson denied having 'any information on the matter' on June 30. However, the speculations resurfaced after Moscow confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin will attend the event on July 21. A Reuters story ('Trump may travel to China to meet Xi in 'not-too-distant' future') on July 22 said Trump was likely to attend the ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War 2. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov had said that Russia was also open to discussing the possibility of holding talks between Putin and Trump, should the latter visit Beijing. Amid speculations of a potential high-level meeting involving Putin, Trump, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, London's The Times newspaper also reported that Beijing may be positioning itself to host a trilateral summit. What has also fuelled the rumours are comments from Trump in January, when he was sworn in as President for the second time, and after he spoke with Xi in June amid the tariff war, about his interest in visiting China shortly. China's media landscape differs from most countries, as the Chinese Communist government exerts significant control over news outlets. While the internet also has restrictions, discussions on online forums and websites still help get an idea of Chinese perspectives. Recently, some scholars and strategic affairs analysts in China weighed in on Trump's potential visit in September: *First, it is seen as necessary for the leaders of China and the United States to sit down and exchange their views on the bilateral relationship and their ideas on the evolving world order. This comes amid turmoil in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, as well as important recent issues in the bilateral ties, such as tariffs. *Second, the military parade is also a means for China to display and project its military strength to the outside world. It may make Trump re-evaluate the relative capabilities gap between the countries and could be more conducive to the future development of the two countries, some Chinese scholars have said. *Third, China has formally called the event the 80th anniversary of the 'War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression' in recent years. It could help enhance the status and role of China's wartime endeavours in World War 2 (called the 'World Anti-fascist War'). An article penned under a popular Chinese social media blog account, Fox Condolence, and re-circulated by the digital news platform recently wrote: 'If Trump can also come, there will be a historic scene of China, the United States and Russia celebrating the victory of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression together. This is the first time in 80 years since the war, and it will be held in Beijing. This will undoubtedly greatly enhance China's influence in the world.' *Fourth is the view that calling Trump may be necessary, since he has not held in-person meetings with Putin and Xi since July 2018 and November 2019, respectively. Two weeks ago, in an interview with a Chinese news daily, Professor Gao Zhikai, Deputy Director at the Centre for China and Globalization (CCG) in Beijing, claimed to be the first in China to propose that Trump be invited in September. His main reason was, 'Trump is a short-term phenomenon in US politics, China must try and keep him [Trump] in good humour.' As soon as the Japanese media broke the news of Trump's possible visit, the political elite and media in the United States began to warn the President against it. Chinese scholars have also made a note of these views: *First, there is a view in the US that China's invitation to Trump is a calculated effort to present the country as America's equal on the global stage. Vincent C. Chen, a senior executive in Taiwan's information and communications technology industry, wrote in The Hill that the visit may attempt to convey a vision of 'co-governance of the world.' *Second, he argued that the parade was not a symbol of peace, nor was it aimed at merely commemorating a historic victory. 'It is a deliberate display of military strength, to project the narrative of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) superiority and signaling strategic rivalry with the U.S.', Chen wrote. *Third is the view that the visit would actually help enhance China's role in the war. Writing in Mandarin for the German news agency, Deutsche Welle, a well-known Chinese political affairs commentator, Deng Yuwen, wrote: 'In the Western narrative, China's eight-year war of resistance and huge sacrifices were not crucial to defeating fascism… China has always wanted to reverse the Western-dominated narrative framework of World War II history, but the effect is not obvious.' *Fourth, while analysing reactions in both China and in the US to Beijing's possible invitation to Trump, Singapore-based digital political weekly, ThinkChina, observed: 'Trump sharing the stage with the leaders of two authoritarian states – in the eyes of the West – would trigger strong domestic backlash. Criticism would not come just from the Democrats, but also from the China hawks within the Republican Party. Going against the bipartisan consensus on containing China could come at a political cost for Trump.' Chinese analysts also struck a note of caution, noting that the Communist Party must consider the leaders of the Global South countries, who would likely be invited to the parade as well. As Deng Yuwen has pointed out, if Beijing treats Trump with higher courtesy, will they question China's narrative as an advocate of such countries? This may weaken its influence and appeal in the Global South, where it has made vast investments over the years. Hemant Adlakha teaches Chinese at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. He is also Vice Chairperson and an Honorary Fellow, Institute of Chinese Studies (ICS), Delhi.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Jane Street to Argue That Retail Demand Drove Its India Trades
(Bloomberg) -- Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. Jane Street said on Monday it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order. Last week, SEBI lifted Jane Street's temporary trading ban after the firm deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($560 million) in alleged 'unlawful gains' into an escrow account. A 105-page order from SEBI detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinized. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2% at the open and fell further during the day. SEBI alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. SEBI's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16% and 25% of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10% of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. SEBI did not respond to a request for comment. Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at SEBI's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said. --With assistance from Chiranjivi Chakraborty. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Putin's guards spotted with new high-tech anti-drone weapon amid rising drone threats
In a recent public appearance with Russian President Vladimir Putin , members of his security detail were observed carrying what appears to be a newly deployed anti-drone weapon , signaling Russia's expanding efforts to counter the growing threat posed by unmanned aerial systems (UAS). This marks a notable development in Russia's approach to protecting high-profile figures and critical infrastructure amid increasingly sophisticated drone threats on modern battlefields and within domestic security environments. The new anti-drone weapon According to Defence Blog, observers noted that one of the security officers escorting President Putin was carrying a portable, X-shaped interceptor system believed to be designed to detect, track, and disable hostile drones. This type of weapon is particularly suited to intercepting low-flying or first-person-view (FPV) drones, which are often used in close-range reconnaissance or attack missions and have proven difficult to counter with traditional defenses. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MCA Cybersecurity Operations Management Artificial Intelligence Finance Data Science Design Thinking others Product Management Public Policy PGDM Leadership Degree Management healthcare Others Project Management CXO Technology Data Science Healthcare Digital Marketing Data Analytics MBA Skills you'll gain: Programming Proficiency Data Handling & Analysis Cybersecurity Awareness & Skills Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Master of Computer Applications Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details — sentinelmonitor (@sentinelmonitor) The sighting reflects broader Russian investments in mobile counter-UAS technology , aiming to respond quickly to sudden drone incursions, especially in urban or civilian areas where fixed defenses are ineffective or impractical. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Why anti-drone systems are critical for Russia The deployment is timely, given the increasing use of drones in the conflict with Ukraine. Ukrainian forces have employed a wide range of drones—from commercial quadcopters to loitering munitions and more advanced strike UAVs. These drones have been used for both surveillance and attacks, often bypassing traditional defense systems due to their small size and agility. In response, Russian forces have fielded a mix of countermeasures, including mobile electronic warfare (EW) platforms such as backpack jammers and vehicle-mounted systems like the Abzats . These systems are capable of jamming radio signals and disrupting the control of enemy drones. Live Events However, with many modern drones now featuring autonomous navigation and machine learning-based evasion, electronic jamming alone is insufficient. As a result, Russia has begun integrating kinetic countermeasures—such as drone-on-drone interceptors—and is actively developing laser-based systems to physically destroy UAVs. Laser weapons and Russia's counter-drone strategy In 2025, Russian authorities began public testing of mobile laser air defense systems . While the technical details remain classified, reports confirm that several systems demonstrated the ability to rapidly detect and disable aerial targets, including drone swarms. Despite the promise of laser-based countermeasures, their effectiveness is limited by factors such as bad weather, fog, or rain, and they require high amounts of energy, making them less suitable for mobile use over extended periods. Implications of the new interceptor seen with Putin's guards The interceptor seen with Putin's security detail suggests a targeted deployment of counter-UAS systems for close-range, VIP protection. Such weapons provide real-time defense in open or urban areas where drone attacks could pose a serious risk to high-ranking officials. Its compact, soldier-carried design implies it can be deployed instantly, without the need for support vehicles or stationary equipment. This move underscores the Kremlin's prioritization of advanced drone countermeasures—not only in frontline warfare but also in the high-security environments surrounding national leadership.
