Analysis-Europe faces stark choices over Russian asset seizure
(Reuters) - Growing challenges to the euro's status as a reserve currency in a fast-changing global economy are, for now, staying the hand of European capitals as they weigh up the repercussions of a potential seizure of frozen Russian assets.
Nevertheless, Europe faces an increasingly urgent need to help bankroll Ukraine's survival as President Donald Trump looks to pull the plug on U.S. support and instead bargain with Russia's Vladimir Putin.
That throws a spotlight on the roughly $300 billion of Russian central bank assets frozen by the West after Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine three years ago, the bulk of which is held in Europe - mainly as government bonds, the profits from which are used to guarantee loans to Ukraine.
While seizing those assets outright may be very tempting, such actions have a long and legally fraught history, and could scare off other central banks looking to park assets in Europe.
An early example of such action cited by European economists in research last year was the Soviet confiscation of gold shipped to Moscow by the National Bank of Romania back in 1918. The wars of the 20th century yielded dozens more examples.
But European officials who pride themselves on the region's respect for the rule of law are fighting shy of any breach of the legally enshrined immunity of sovereign assets.
"This is not for the European Central Bank to debate, but I would certainly submit that the international law basis on which any decision is made will matter as far as other investors are concerned," ECB President Christine Lagarde said last week.
The final decision rests not with the ECB but its political masters in Berlin, Paris and the other 18 capitals of the euro countries. But they will not take Lagarde's argument lightly.
"No-one has any interest in doing things that would weaken our system now, which is also being widely attacked elsewhere via trade, tariff, customs policies," French Defence Minister Sebastien Lecornu said last week of threats by Trump to impose hefty new levies on European exports.
DOLLAR DOMINANCE
Europe has long had to accept that the euro is unlikely to challenge the dominance of the dollar as a reserve currency - briefly an aspiration in the heady days after its 1999 birth.
In fact since 2010, the share of global currency reserves held in the euro has dropped from 25.8% at current exchange rates to 20% as other currencies gain traction. Even the dollar has slipped slightly, while still accounting for 58.4%.
In a report last year on the euro's international standing, Lagarde cited challenges ranging from the emergence of other units as trade-invoicing currencies through to renewed interest in gold as a reserve asset in troubled times.
Some, however, question the rationale of even seeking to position the euro as a major reserve currency given the weak points in its construction, already exposed in debt crises 15 years ago.
"If we assume that this is a political ambition, then indeed the euro is handicapped by the absence of capital markets union, the lack of a euro safe asset and the lack of fully fledged banking union," said Hans Geeroms, a professor at the College of Europe and a visiting fellow at the EU think tank Bruegel.
Those were among the failings identified by former ECB chief Mario Draghi in a report last year on how Europe can avoid the "slow agony" of an economy falling further behind U.S. and Asian rivals. Yet scant progress has been made on them even now.
RISING BILL
But if such fragilities help explain why Europe is wary of anything which could weaken the credibility of its currency, wider geopolitical considerations are closing in.
Participants at Thursday's summit on boosting European defence spending said no decisions on Russian asset seizures were taken in the talks, with one EU diplomat confirming that Germany, France and Belgium - home to the Euroclear securities depository where many of the assets are parked - had restated their opposition.
However Mitu Gulati, an expert on sovereign debt law at the University of Virginia, said Trump's reversal of U.S. policy on Ukraine had shocked Europeans into "looking to do the things they weren't willing to do six months ago.
"The same people that said we are not going to do (full seizure) are calling now to say we are interested," said Gulati, who declined to elaborate on which countries he had spoken to.
One euro zone central banker who requested anonymity agreed the political pressure to consider confiscation was mounting.
"The ECB's advice won't change," the banker said. "But this may not sway politicians. The bill for Ukraine has just gone up a lot, and this makes this money so much more attractive."
(Additional reporting by Marc Jones in London, Francesco Canepa in Frankfurt, Andrew Gray, Lili Bayer, Jan Strupczewski in Brussels, John Irish in Paris; Graphic by Harry Robertson in London; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Hugh Lawson)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
19 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Russia is pouring money into its war machine — but it's still struggling to create new, advanced systems
Russia is spending record amounts on defense. But it's falling behind in building the advanced, modern military it needs for future wars, according to a new report. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine triggered sweeping sanctions that not only damaged its ability to procure advanced technology but also weakened its military-scientific base, wrote Mathieu Boulègue, a consulting fellow in the Russia and Eurasia program at London-based Chatham House, in a report published on Monday. "This damage, in turn, affects the rate of military innovation and R&D. More importantly, it determines how the Kremlin will wage war in the future," wrote Boulègue, a specialist in Eurasian security and defense issues. Russia is set to spend 6.3% of its GDP on defense this year — a post-Cold War high. However, the country's military-industrial complex has been "degraded" by trade restrictions and the demands of wartime production, according to Boulègue. "Russia's ability to produce military hardware has been severely impacted, and its ability to innovate and adopt modern military technology constrained as a result of these challenges," he added. With sanctions cutting off access to critical imports, Russia has been left scrambling to replace advanced components with inferior stand-ins. As early as August 2022, Russian state-owned carrier Aeroflot began stripping spare parts from working aircraft due to sanctions-induced supply shortages. In October, Russia filmed its troops using a Soviet howitzer, showing its military stockpiles were under strain. Boulègue assessed that the state of Russia's military-industrial complex is one of regression, not progress. "Russia will likely have to simplify and slow its military production, accept reduced quality of outputs and manage a form of 'innovation stagnation' in its research and development," he wrote, referring to Russia's state armament programme from 2025 to 2034. As a result, Russia's pathway to military innovation is likely to remain incremental — built on small tweaks to old systems rather than genuine breakthroughs. "Innovation generally takes the form of integrating technological solutions directly into proven, older-generation systems — which in turn makes them 'modern,'" Boulègue wrote. Russia's military sector has adopted a "retain-and-adapt" approach because military production is no longer innovation-led. "In other words, Russia 'innovates' through 'smart adaptation' under technical and economical constraints that have a negative, cumulative effect at the tactical level," he added. In the short term, Russia's military-industrial complex will likely keep producing systems that are "good enough" to pose a clear and constant threat to Ukraine, NATO, and the West. But its long-term ability to compete with advanced military powers is eroding. The stresses on Russia's military-industry complex also mean the broader economy is under increasing strain, despite initial signs of wartime growth. "The war economy brings 'good' macroeconomic results, but is causing real-world problems such as increased inflation, decreasing wages and purchasing power, and a liquidity crisis in the banking sector," wrote Boulègue. Russia's economy has shown signs of fatigue recently. Manufacturing activity contracted sharply in June as weak demand and a strong ruble affected exports and jobs. Low oil prices are also hitting the country's all-important oil and gas sector. Meanwhile, a demographic crisis and competition for labor with the military are also hurting the economy in the long and short term.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Can U.S.-Made Shahed Clones Compete In Drone Wars?
New footage shows mass production of Shahed drones at a Russian facility in Alabuga, Tartarstan Russian state media via Twitter On July 20th,Russian state television showed new footage from the giant drone factory which makes Iranian-designed Shahed-136s, revealing the sheer scale of production. The facility in Alabuga a thousand miles East of Moscow has ramped up production roughly tenfold in the last year, enough for more than 700 attack drones to be launched in one night. That could rise to 2,000 Shaheds a night by the end of the year, according to Major General Christian Freuding of Germany's Situation Center for Ukraine. Now plans are afoot for the U.S. to launch drone barrages of its own, with the Pentagon unveiling a new type of weapon apparently in response to a presidential request. But is the Pentagon ready to compete with Russia in launching mass drone attacks? Tactical "Tomahawk" Block IV cruise missile,, the U.S. choice for precision long range attack. US NAVY/AFP via Getty Images Traditionally the U.S. military has favored sophisticated, highly capable weapons like the Tomahawk cruise missile. This is a 20-foot-long weapon flying under 300 feet to avoid radar at around 500 mph and, delivering a 1,000-pound warhead to targets around 1,000 miles away. It has led to attack in many recent operations, including strikes on the Houthis in Yemen earlier this year. In the latest U.S. Navy budget, a batch of 40 Tomahawks cost $1.9 million each. That is not a lot of missiles in the arsenal, especially considering that many may not reach their targets. On 12th July, Russian launched 26 Kh-101 cruise missiles at Ukraine, along with a number of other missiles and hundreds of drones. 25 of those 26 missiles were shot down by air defenses. The Shahed has a similar range and accuracy to the Tomahawk, but flies at a quarter of the speed and carries a tenth as much explosive. A high proportion of the drones were shot down in July 12th too – over 90% -- but as these cost around $35k each they look like a much more cost-effective way of hitting a target. Especially if a 1,00-pound warhead is not needed. President Trump remarked on the need for a U.S. equivalent of the Shahed at a Business Roundtable in Qatar in May, saying: The new LUCAS attack drone U.S. DoD 'We're coming up with a new system of drones because drones are really … drones really seem to be taking over that war… I asked one of the companies, I said, I want a lot of drones and in the case of Iran, they make a good drone and they make them for $35,000, $40,000. So I said to this company, I want to see. They came in two weeks later with a drone that cost $41 million. I said, that's not what I'm talking about, $41 million. I'm talking about something for $35,000, $40,000, where you send thousands of them up and that's a great way -- and they're very good too and fast and deadly, horrible, actually, when you look at what's happening with Russia and Ukraine .' (My emphasis) Part of this speech was quoted on a signboard in front of the new Low-Cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System (LUCAS) displayed in the Pentagon courtyard at an event attended by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth last week. LUCAS looks very much like a Shahed clone, and is billed as ' designed to rival Iran's widely used Shahed-136 loitering munition, in a push to expand affordable airpower options for modern battlefields .' But the new drone may not be all that it seems. A Weapon, Or Just A Target? LUCAS is made by Arizona contractor SpektreWorks and LUCAS looks very much like a version of their FLM-136, a copy of the Shahed-136 made for 'threat emulation'. In other words it was designed as an aerial target for U.S. forces to get realistic practice shooting down Shaheds. Norma Jean Dougherty, aka Marilyn Monroe, assembling target drones in 1945 U.S. Army The U.S has been using target drones for decades. In WWII an Army photographer captured one Norma Jean Dougherty (later to become famous as Marilyn Monroe) on the assembly line for RadioPlane OQ-3 target drones. Generations of target drones followed, including the Teledyne Ryan Firebee, successfully converted into a reconnaissance drone in the Vietnam War. It is obvious why the military would want a drone target representing a Shahed. The U.S. Navy came under attack from a variety of similar drones launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea recently and needs to practice the best ways to tackle them. However the requirement for a target drone is not the same as for an attack drone. The specifications of the FLM-136 show that while it is an excellent substitute for shooting practice, it does not have quite the performance the real thing. U.S. LUCAS attack drone on display week U.S. DoD The FLM-136 has the same size and speed as the Shahed-136 but weighs about half as much as and carries half the payload. Its range of around 500 miles is less than half that of the Shahed. What we do not know is the unit cost of the FLM-136, which is a key metric. It is possible that it really has been procured for the desired '$35,000, $40,000' but this would be remarkably low by Pentagon standards. Previous small drones have been known to cost more than their weight in gold, and the BQM-167 Skeeter, the Air Force's reusable jet-powered drone, costs $1.7 million each. Presumably the LUCAS is at least less than '$41 million,' or a Tomahawk cruise missile. But without seeing numbers we cannot know for sure. Return To The Age Of The Jet Bomb A series of images showing the trajectory of a JB-2 buzz bomb during take off in the desert, USA, ... More circa 1945-1950. (Photo by Frederic Lewis/) Getty Images Back in WWII, the U.S. was big on the idea of reverse-engineering enemy weapons and producing them at scale. The Republic-Ford JB-2 'Loon' was a direct copy of the German V-1 'Doodlebug' which carried out the same roles as the Shahed does now. 'JB' was short for 'Jet Bomb'. V-1s had caused tremendous damage in Europe. The plan was to use JB-2s to bombard Japan into submission with thousands of JB-2s with no risk of losing aircraft, launching them from the decks of aircraft carriers from where they could hit any part of Japanese territory. The military initially ordered 1,000 JB-2, with the same number to be made each month. The project was canceled when Japan surrendered while the first weapons were still on their way to the Pacific. Palmer Luckey, founder of Anduril, has said that he wants to see a return to the mass-production approach of WWII and 'bring mass to the fight.' This means vast numbers of Anduril's low-cost Barracuda cruise missile/drones and other weapons rather than a handful of Tomahawks. But Anduril products were not apparent at the Pentagon event. Whether the Pentagon is serious about this approach, or whether they just wanted to show the Secretary of Defence that the U.S. could make something that looks like the Shaheds the President asked for, is another matter. Meanwhile Ukraine is producing its own low-cost, long-range attack drones and plans to hit Rusia with 30,000 this year. These include a mix of sophisticated types and ultra-low-cost designs with bodies fashioned from plastic pipe. The drone arms race is well under way, and the U.S. is starting from behind.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
The footwear capital, Abia State, in strategic talks with Yikodeen, West Africa's footwear giant on 10,000-pair daily capacity factory
In a strategic move poised to redefine Africa's manufacturing narrative, Yikodeen Company Limited, the largest safety footwear manufacturer in West Africa, is in high-level discussions with the Government of Abia State on the establishment of a state-of-the-art footwear factory in Aba, Nigeria's renowned footwear capital. This proposed partnership between the Abia State Government and Yikodeen will see the development of a world-class manufacturing facility capable of producing 10,000 pairs of footwear per day, forming the Eastern anchor of Yikodeen's national expansion plan to hit a total of 20,000 pairs daily. The talks are spearheaded by His Excellency, Dr. Alex Otti, Executive Governor of Abia State, who hosted Yikodeen's Founder and CEO, Mr. Shamsideen Atunde, at his country home in a meeting that has been described as visionary and deeply inspiring. Yikodeen is a proudly indigenous company with a proven track record of excellence in industrial footwear production. From humble beginnings in 2016, producing just 20 pairs daily, the company has grown into Nigeria's foremost safety footwear manufacturer and largest single exporter of made-in-Nigeria footwear, supplying European markets and global brands. The company's factory in Lagos, Yikodeen Factory 2.0, was recently recommissioned and now stands as the largest in Sub-Saharan Africa, with a production capacity of 2,500 pairs per day. This ultra-modern, ISO-certified facility includes automated QA/QC systems, advanced European machinery, and a skilled workforce of over 350 Nigerians. As a testament to its commitment to domestic industrialisation, Yikodeen also partners with the Lagos State Ministry of Wealth Creation through a dedicated Leather Hub, a 1,000-pairs-per-day facility designed to boost job creation, promote local content, and drive export readiness. Mr. Atunde, reflecting on his visit to Abia State, stated: 'Abia's transformation is undeniable. The Governor's compassion, clarity of vision, and commitment to local development truly moved me. Aba has long been the heartbeat of Nigeria's indigenous footwear craftsmanship. By marrying this legacy with Yikodeen's technology, standards, and global distribution network, we can elevate Aba into a true global industrial hub. My interaction with the Governor gave me renewed hope — that Nigeria can, and indeed will, be great.' The proposed 10,000-pair-per-day facility in Aba will include multi-line production for industrial safety boots, military and paramilitary footwear, school sandals, and slippers. It will be designed with training spaces to upskill over 2,500 local artisans annually, embed international QA/QC systems, and connect directly to Yikodeen's export pipeline. The company is already in advanced talks with international procurement partners looking to increase sourcing from Africa, and the Aba facility will be a key enabler of this ambition. The socio-economic impact of the project is expected to be significant: 2,500 direct jobs for skilled and semi-skilled workers. 2,000 indirect jobs in logistics, maintenance, raw materials supply, and services. Over $20 million in economic activity within two years. Increased use of local leather, rubber, and packaging. Aba-branded products exported under the Made in Nigeria label. A pipeline for youth employment, internships, and entrepreneurship. The partnership is part of Yikodeen's broader vision to establish a pan-African footprint, with upcoming facilities also being developed in Kaduna (to serve military and paramilitary needs) and Ghana (in collaboration with the government). These investments are designed to scale Nigerian manufacturing leadership in footwear across the continent and reduce Africa's dependency on imported personal protective equipment. For Abia State, which has long been the cultural and industrial nucleus of Nigeria's footwear industry, this partnership presents a unique opportunity to institutionalize excellence, formalize artisan networks, and transform local ingenuity into globally competitive manufacturing. 'Governor Otti's administration is focused on rebuilding Aba not just as a market, but as a factory to the world,' said a government representative familiar with the discussions. 'Yikodeen is the right partner at the right time — their success story speaks for itself, and this collaboration aligns with our ambition to industrialise Abia at scale.' The discussions are ongoing, with joint technical assessments already being scheduled to identify suitable land, infrastructure, and logistics requirements for the project. The parties are optimistic that a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) will be signed in the coming weeks. At its core, this initiative is more than just an industrial expansion, it is a bold statement about African self-reliance, ingenuity, and economic transformation. With Yikodeen's expertise and Abia's unmatched footwear legacy, a new chapter in Africa's manufacturing history is about to begin, with Aba and Nigeria leading the charge. About Yikodeen Yikodeen Company Limited is Nigeria's leading safety footwear manufacturer, producing protective and performance-driven footwear for industries across oil & gas, construction, agriculture, education, and security. Certified by the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) and trusted by major corporations, Yikodeen stands as a homegrown champion of industrial excellence, local content, and inclusive economic growth.