Brother of suspect who fought police at Manchester Airport 'lashed out because he believed armed officer was trying to choke his sibling', court hears
Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, was filmed hitting two policewomen and a male officer who were trying to detain him for headbutting a passenger at a Starbucks café minutes earlier.
His brother Muhammad Amaad, 26, was also captured raining punches on the male officer, PC Zachary Marsden, who was armed.
Giving evidence last week, Amaaz claimed that when he was 'grabbed' by PC Marsden at a car park pay station he hadn't realised he was a police officer.
He said he resisted arrest even when he saw his police uniform because he feared PC Marsden was 'going to batter me to the point where I'm dead.'
'It just felt like I was fighting for my life,' he added.
Today it was his older brother's turn to go into the witness box at Liverpool Crown Court.
Amaad, a former KFC assistant manager, told jurors that three police officers arrived as they were paying for parking following the headbutt.
Asked by his barrister Chloe Gardner if he immediately saw they were police, he replied: 'Yeah.'
Amaad said the officers 'grabbed' his brother without announcing who they were or what they wanted and began forcing him towards the ticket machine.
'I didn't understand the need for the aggression,' he said.
Amaad said he saw an officer – who he later learnt was PC Marsden - 'grab' his brother by the neck, and responded by saying: 'Easy, easy, easy.'
'I was trying to de-escalate the situation,' he told the jury.
Amaad said at this point he wrongly thought PC Marsden had both hands around his brother's neck.
'I thought he was choking him,' he said.
Amaad said he put his arm on the officer's arm and said: 'What are you holding his neck for? 'There's no need for it'.
Constable Lydia Ward, who jurors heard is heavily pregnant, previously told of being 'terrified' after coming under attack from Amaaz - as footage of her injuries was was shown to a court
Denying pushing the officer, he added: 'I just wanted his hand off his neck.'
Amaad said he then felt a 'bang' to the face and put his hands out.
Saying he felt 'shocked' and 'stunned', he said: 'I genuinely didn't know what hit me, I was caught by surprise.
'I didn't know who was punching me, my eyes were closed.'
Amaad said he and PC Marsden 'sort of fell over onto the chair' and he could feel 'punches and holding and grabbing'.
'I had to defend myself.'
Amaad said the incident happened 'really quick' and he felt 'disorientated'.
'I punched out because I was being punched,' he said.
Amaad said when he felt the 'pulling and pushing' stop he 'stepped up' and saw PC Marsden pointing what he later learnt was his Taser at him.
'I just felt a sharp pain hit my chest,' he said.
Amaad said his legs immediately felt 'weak' and he fell backwards into the seats.
At that point he saw the officer had a firearm and feared he was going to be shot, so put his hands behind his head.
'I just thought to myself 'I'm not dying today',' he said.
'I've been punched, Tasered, I'm not going to die today.'
Questioned by Ms Gardner he said he 'considered' that PC Marsden might shoot him, Amaad said he did.
Amaad said he then saw his brother 'flat' and 'stiff' on the ground.
Jurors have been shown CCTV and bodycam footage in which Amaaz is Tasered after punching firearms officer PC Ellie Cook and PC Lydia Ward – who was unarmed – in the face.
PC Marsden is then seen to kick Amaaz in the head as he lies on the ground.
Today Amaad said he did not see PC Marsden kick his brother in the head because their elderly mother was in the way.
Amaad said he was shouting out 'Mum' and was also worried about his young nephew.
'I didn't want her to be next. I didn't want the officers to start on my mum.'
He denied reaching for PC Marsden's firearm.
Amaad said PC Marsden was shouting 'Get down!' so he put his hands back behind his head and got to his knees.
He said he then felt a kick to his leg and stomach area and then a 'smack, smack' to the back of his head.
Amaad felt someone jump on his back and looking sideways heard an officer telling him: 'If you move I'm going to smash your f****** face in'.
As he was under arrest, Amaad said he told officers: 'I'm not resisting.'
'I was terrified,' he said.
At that point he saw his mother's face was bleeding and his nephew crying.
Asked again by Ms Gardner why he initially struck out at PC Marsden at the pay station, Ammad said: 'At that point I was trying to make him stop and defend myself.'
After the incident Amaad was left with marks to his chest, and cuts to his head, neck and mouth.
At the police station he felt 'terrified' and 'petrified'.
'I'd never been in a police station in my life,' he said.
'I didn't know what was going to happen or what to do.'
When he gave evidence earlier in the trial, PC Marsden told jurors that as he attempted to gain control of Amaaz in order to arrest him, he felt an 'immense weight' pressing on him from behind.
He later realised this was Amaaz's brother Amaad.
His 'initial fear' was that 'someone is trying to get to my gun', a loaded Glock semi-automatic, out of its holster, he said.
He said Amaad – who was 'taller and larger build than me' – then grabbed his body armour, dragged him to the bench and subjected him to 'blows from all directions'.
Pc Marsden said he had been assaulted on duty multiple times but could 'confidently' say the punches were 'the hardest I've ever felt in my life'.
Asked today about the incident during which the airline passenger was headbutted by his brother, Amaad insisted it had been in self-defence.
He said they had gone to meet their elderly mother from a flight, only for her to tell them a fellow passenger had been calling her a 'P*** b*tch' throughout the journey.
Amaad said as they were walking through the arrivals hall she pointed out the passenger, Abdulkareem Ismaeil.
He said his brother 'calmly' asked Mr Ismaeil to explain but that the passenger said the racial abuse had been aimed at a 'little girl' sitting nearby.
Amaad said that as his brother asked for an apology, Mr Ismaeil threatened to 'smash' his brother, saying 'You don't know who I am' and 'I'll kill you.'
Describing the headbutt, Amaad said his brother 'defends himself' because Mr Ismaeil was 'in his face'.
Neither brother has ever been arrested, cautioned or convicted, the trial has heard.
Amaaz denies assault by beating, two charges of assault causing actual bodily harm, and a charge of assault by beating of a police officer acting as an emergency worker.
Amaad denies one charge of assault causing actual bodily harm relating to PC Marsden.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bristol: Homes in Ashton Vale evacuated amid emergency response
Residents have been evacuated from their homes amid a major emergency services response. Avon and Somerset Police has not confirmed the exact nature of the incident in the Ashton Vale area of Bristol, but a number of homes have been evacuated around Risdale Road. A road closure is currently in place on South Liberty Lane and multiple police vehicles and officers are in the area. A spokesperson for Avon Fire & Rescue Service has confirmed crews are "currently assisting in the response to a police-led incident in the South Liberty Lane area of Bristol".
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office U-turn as it agrees to share location of asylum seeker hotels with Deliveroo and Just Eat to crack down on illegal workers
The Home Office has finally agreed to share the location of asylum hotels with food delivery companies to help crack down on migrant illegal working. Deliveroo said last week it had asked civil servants for the hotel addresses so it could block accounts operating from these locations, only to be refused due to 'safety concerns' for hotel occupants. But the Home Office has now changed its stance and will share this information with Deliveroo, as well as its competitors Just Eat and Uber Eats. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said tonight: 'Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime. 'By enhancing our data sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement. 'The changes come alongside a 50% increase in raids and arrests for illegal working under the Plan for Change, greater security measures and tough new legislation.' Last month it emerged that migrants living in taxpayer-funded asylum hotels – including those who arrived by small boat – are securing work as fast food delivery riders within hours of entering Britain. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said he had found evidence of asylum seekers breaking rules which bar them from working while their claim is processed by the Home Office. The Tory politician visited an asylum hotel in central London and posted a video showing bicycles fitted with delivery boxes for Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats parked outside. Days later, the Home Office said it had called in all three companies for a dressing down – and the meeting led to pledges to introduce 'facial recognition' systems on rider apps, such as those used by banks to confirm someone's identity. However, Deliveroo was refused access to hotel location data despite assurances it would be treated confidentially, the Times reported. Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said at the time: 'The fact that the Home Office is refusing to help them just shows how topsy-turvy this country's approach to migration has become. 'Crossing the Channel illegally is a crime. Working here illegally is a crime. 'Too many people are brazenly breaking the rules and it's a disgrace that the Home Office is aiding and abetting them.' Eddy Montgomery, Director of Enforcement, Compliance and Crime at the Home Office, said following tonight's u-turn: 'This next step of co-ordinated working with delivery firms will help us target those who seek to work illegally in the gig economy and exploit their status in the UK. 'My teams will continue to carry out increased enforcement activity across the UK and I welcome this additional tool to disrupt and stop the abuse of our immigration system.' The Government has also announced the trialling of AI-powered facial recognition technology to determine whether Channel migrants are being wrongly identified as children. The Home Office announced testing on new technology will begin later this year with the hope it could be fully integrated into the asylum system in 2026. Ministers admitted that assessing the age of asylum seekers is 'an incredibly complex and difficult task' but said AI might soon provide quick and cost-effective results. More than 23,000 migrants have crossed the Channel so far this year, up more than 50 per cent on the same point last year and the highest number in the first six months since figures began in 2018. The Home Office says there are 32,345 asylum seekers being put up at taxpayer expense in hotels, with another 66,683 in houses and flats. These have regularly been the target of protests, some of which have turned violent.
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults
SMALL boat migrants who claim to be children are being given the benefit of the doubt by immigration staff - despite more than half turning out to actually be adults. A report has found that workers show a 'lack of curiosity' about the real age of asylum seekers arriving across the Channel. 2 AI tech is set to be rolled out in 2026 which can accurately assess how old a person really is. Currently, anyone who says they are under 18 are treated as minors unless they look 'significantly' older. In one case highlighted by Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration David Bolt, an Iranian national who had grey hairs was treated as a child despite assessors thinking he was probably around 22. In 2024, over half - 56 per cent - of the individuals who claimed on arrival to be children were either later assessed to be adults or admitted that they were 18 or over. The two-day training given to assessors 'instructs officers that they should always give the benefit of the doubt to the individual where they are not sure about someone's claimed age and do not judge them to be significantly over 18'. The report states that a Vietnamese national was 'initially given the benefit of the doubt' as a child because workers said he had a 'soft face'. Another officer then raised concerns about his age because of his 'developed shoulders', 'huge hands' and a 'tiny bit of stubble'. In other assessments 'arrogance' was used as a sign that a migrant was an adult. One Iranian national presented with some grey hairs and black stubble on his face and claimed to be 17. Despite being assessed as actually 22 years old, he was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and treated as a child pending further assessment. Man believed to be running meet and greet service arrested in dawn raid as part of Channel crackdown It is acknowledged by the report that it is not always possible to assess the age of a young person through their physical appearance or demeanour, because different life experiences can stunt growth or change behaviours. David Bolt made eight key recommendations to the Home Office on the age assessment process, including reviewing the training given to officers by the end of year. In response, the Government accepted all recommendations and pointed out that they are rolling out Facial Age Estimation technology next year pending a trial. It has been trained on millions of images where an individual's age is known. Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said in a written statement: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task, and the Home Office has spent a number of years analysing which scientific and technological methods would best assist the current process, including looking at the role that Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology can play. 'In a situation where those involved in the age assessment process are unsure whether an individual is aged over or under 18, or do not accept the age an individual is claiming to be, Facial Age Estimation offers a potentially rapid and simple means to test their judgements against the estimates produced by the technology.' A procurement process is currently underway with the new tech set to be integrated into the current system 'over the course of 2026'. 2
