Stitt-appointed OSBE members clash with Supt. Walters
'Why am I here?' asked new board member, Ryan Deatherage, when it was confirmed that they didn't determine new items to go on agendas and that essentially, it was up to Supt. Walters.
The meeting started with new board member, Chris Van Denhende, voicing his concern with Walters' recent rule of counting undocumented students.
OSDE posts Request for Proposal for suppliers of Bible-based curriculum
'I'm concerned about the immigration status issue because we've had a lot of pushback from parents. I would respectfully request until we get all the information sorted out from the AG that we suspend all activities related to immigration,' said Van Denhende during the meeting.
The attorney that was put in place by Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond informed him that his concern was not on the agenda, so they could not discuss that.
The meeting then went on to give a presentation on the new Oklahoma Science and Social Studies Standards. These standards have brought controversy as they mention the Bible almost 50 times, and focus on religion.
However, the presentation that was given did not mention that fact or mention the Bible once.
In the end, the standards were approved, but for the first time, a board member voted 'No' to an agenda item, that board member being Deathrage. The standards will make their way to the legislators before being officially passed.
He wanted to know how they can bring about new items for future agendas, essentially the superintendent has all the power when it comes to that.
Deatherage brought up an article from The Oklahoman that outlines the rules when it comes to what the new members can do.
According to the state website, 'The Superintendent of Public Instruction, Chief of Staff, and Senior Leadership at the OSDE are accountable for the agency's data governance structure, resourcing, and policy approval and implementation.'
Deatherage and Van Denhende seemingly expressed concern surrounding the fact.
'I brought up an item that was rejected at the beginning of the meeting that wasn't on the agenda, and I want to be involved in that conversation,' said Van Denhende, talking about the counting of undocumented students.
'I will always stand with President Trump and enforce his executive orders, especially when it comes to illegal immigration,' said Supt. Walters.
Supt. Walters posted on his 'X' social media page instead of answering questions from the press and said that the new board members '..tried to undermine our immigration rules that align with President Trump. They wanted us to align with the Biden Administration. Allowing illegal immigration to continue without any kind of accounting.'
That's not what happened. The new board members were appointed by Governor Stitt as a form of accountability for Supt. Walters. At the time, Stitt told Walters to do his job and to 'Stop the needless political drama.'
In a response to News 4, Stitt said after the meeting Thursday, 'I'm grateful to all the members of the State Board of Education for fighting for transparency and accountability for Oklahoma students, parents, and teachers. Nothing is more important than making sure Oklahomans have the best education possible—and I believe we're heading in the right direction.
'We're dealing with kids; leave the kids alone. And deal with the people that need to be dealt with,' said Van Denhende to the press after the meeting.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
John MacArthur, firebrand preacher and culture warrior, dies at 86
Advertisement His church's growth defied conventional wisdom about 'seeker-sensitivity,' a model that emphasized appealing to non-churchgoers. Rev. MacArthur rejected a more accessible evangelical preaching style that favored ostensibly real-life anecdotes and practical applications. His dogged emphasis on expository preaching -- narrowly focused on the meaning and historical context of a particular piece of Scripture -- influenced thousands of conservative Protestant pastors who studied at the seminary he led, or simply listened to his sermons on the radio or online. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Evangelicalism is a pulpit-driven movement, and John has driven the most influential pulpit in evangelical Christianity for more than a half a century,' R. Albert Mohler Jr., the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, in Louisville, Ky., said in an interview this year. In recent years, Rev. MacArthur increasingly waded into political and cultural skirmishes. He denounced critical race theory and became a leading Christian critic of 'wokeness.' After his church closed for several months at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, it defied state public health orders and began holding indoor in-person services. The church later received an $800,000 settlement from the state and Los Angeles County, after suing on the grounds that the restrictions impinged on religious freedom. Advertisement In August 2020, Rev. MacArthur told an interviewer for a podcast associated with Liberty University that President Trump had called him to thank him for 'taking a stand' on church closures. The two men discussed why 'Christians could not vote Democratic,' MacArthur said. 'There's no way that a Christian could affirm the slaughter of babies, homosexual activity, homosexual marriage, or any kind of gross immorality.' Rev. MacArthur didn't just clash with secular authorities and liberal politicians. More often, he took on perceived enemies within Christianity. He preached on the errors of Roman Catholicism and published multiple books on the dangers of charismatic theology and the prosperity gospel -- strains of Protestantism that emphasize miraculous healing and promises of wealth, and that flourished over the course of his lifetime. He attacked popular evangelical figures including the Bible teacher Beth Moore and various pastors, including televangelists Robert Schuller and Joel Osteen, always citing specific Bible verses in his critiques. His interest in threats to Christianity from within was evident early on: He wrote his graduate thesis on Judas Iscariot, the apostle who betrayed Jesus in the Gospels' account. Rev. MacArthur's preaching style was deceptively simple. He would speak for about 45 minutes, walking his congregation line by line through a single Bible passage. He also produced a popular study Bible and a 33-volume set of New Testament commentaries, among many other books. Advertisement His critics said that he misled listeners by insisting that even the thorniest passages in the New Testament had a single clear, true meaning. To his supporters, this was exactly the point. Unlike liberal pastors and academics, Rev. MacArthur believed that 'there's a historical, grammatical, literal sense to the text that can be derived through study,' said Austin Duncan, the director of the MacArthur Center for Expository Preaching at the Master's Seminary in Sun Valley, Calif., which Rev. MacArthur had founded in 1986. 'It isn't a subjective thing, it's an objective reality.' In 1985, Rev. MacArthur became president of the former Los Angeles Baptist College, now known as the Master's University. He opened the Master's Seminary soon afterward to train men -- and only men -- to become pastors. Unlike many pastors who ascend to a national platform, Rev. MacArthur never gave up his local role: He was the head pastor at Grace Community Church for more than 56 years. An online archive of his sermons includes more than 3,000 recordings. Known in many evangelical circles as simply 'JMac,' he had a preaching approach that translated well overseas, where it required little cultural interpretation. His books have been translated into at least 40 languages. And even his older sermons have not aged as noticeably as more recent ones from other pastors, who make frequent reference to pop culture or newspaper headlines. Rev. MacArthur 'inspired thousands of pastors to believe that explaining what the Bible means honors God, saves people, and is just plain interesting,' John Piper, a retired pastor and popular theologian in Minnesota who was a longtime friend, said in an email. 'To this day, from Dallas to Dubai, young people (especially men) come up to me and say that they listen to John MacArthur.' Advertisement John Fullerton MacArthur Jr. was born June 19, 1939. He was the eldest child of Jack MacArthur, a Baptist pastor, and Irene (Dockendorf) MacArthur, who managed the home. The family lived briefly in Philadelphia and Chicago during his childhood, but he was raised primarily in Southern California, where he would spend the rest of his life. He spent a few years at the fundamentalist Bob Jones University, following his father's prodding, and then transferred to Los Angeles Pacific College to play football and other sports. Rev. MacArthur was a fifth-generation preacher. His grandfather, Harry MacArthur, had a live weekly radio and television program in the 1940s, 'The Voice of Calvary.' His father eventually took it over, and Rev. MacArthur began preaching occasionally on Sunday evenings. He married Patricia Sue Smith, whom he met at his father's church, in 1963. In addition to his wife, he leaves their four children, Matthew, Marcy Gwinn, Mark, and Melinda Welch; two sisters, Jeanette DeAngelis and Jane Walker; 15 grandchildren; and nine great-grandchildren. He arrived at Grace Community Church in February of 1969. On his first Sunday, the 29-year-old preached to his new congregation on three verses from the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew. In the passage, Jesus says that not everyone who professes faith will enter the kingdom of heaven. Most American church members, Rev. MacArthur told his congregants, were likewise 'dead spiritually.' Advertisement He intended to nurture Grace as a living church, which to him meant one that boldly proclaimed the truth, no matter if it led to conflict. 'The church must be the conscience of the world,' he said. 'The church must be so well defined that it becomes the antagonist of the world.' This article originally appeared in
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Rise of Zohran Mamdani has Wall Street giving up on Gotham
The NYC Partnership threw a party — but no one really showed up. A who's who of the New York City business community were no shows for a Tuesday meet and greet session with socialist democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani. The list of New York City-based CEOs that declined the Partnership's invitation includes Jamie Dimon, the nation's top banker and chief of JP Morgan, the nations largest bank; Steve Schwarzman, the CEO of private equity powerhouse Blackstone; Brian Moynihan, the head of Bank of America, the nations second largest bank; Larry Fink, the CEO of Blackrock, the worlds largest asset manager; and David Solomon, the CEO of investment banking giant Goldman Sachs. Advertisement Most publicly pleaded 'scheduling conflicts.' But 'what is this guy going to tell us that we don't already know?' is how someone close to Solomon described the situation. Those sentiments were pretty universal among according to sources at the banks of the CEOs who didn't attend. Advertisement There was once a time that CEOs of this caliber would want to meet the likely next mayor of the city. Now, it's resignation — a bet that New York City is a lost cause, and a belief that the Partnership, run by the retiring Kathy Wylde, is an increasingly impotent advocate to turn back the increasingly leftist political class. Most business leaders I know are looking for an exit strategy rather than a strategy to deal with a mayor Mamdani. Yes, they want the current mayor Eric Adams to stick around — ethical warts and all — because he's the devil they know and they like his very competent police commissioner, Jessica Tisch. Advertisement But Adams faces an uphill climb, all the more so because Andrew Cuomo, who lost to Mamdani in the primary, is leading what they see as a Quixotic run as an independent. Curtis Sliwa, the GOP nominee, is going nowhere fast. The polls, for now, show a likely Mamdani mayoralty, combined with a leftist city council and a state government that veers nearly as far left as Zohran. Advertisement All which spells disaster for those businesses who stay: Police defunding, higher taxes and government takeover of businesses like supermarkets. And that gets us to why there were so many no shows Tuesday: the city's business community doesn't have to stay. If you follow these big firms, as I do, you know they employ hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers — but fewer and fewer in recent years. The harsh COVID lockdowns here gave them the excuse to move operations to places with lower taxes and regulations, mainly Florida and Texas, but also Utah and even Tennessee. Mamdani will be another reason for the big banks to finally say goodbye to Gotham.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Migrant charity says new UK and France deal will be ‘drop in the ocean'
The UK Government's new one in, one out migration agreement with France 'lacks transparency' and is 'sidestepping the issue', charity leaders have said. Last week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced their new migrant return agreement which is due to begin within weeks. However, the deal still faces final legal verification and consultation with the EU bloc before it can come into effect. Kent-based migrant charities have offered criticism of the Prime Minister's plans, with one leader suggesting the plan is a 'drop in the ocean' and does not address the full scale of the issue. Dr Razia Shariff, the chief executive of Kent Refugee Action Network (Kran) told PA News Agency it is 'unlikely' that the deal is a step in the right direction. Dr Shariff said: 'I don't actually understand how it's going to help. I think it's welcome that we've got some form of a safe or legal route being introduced for the first time – above and beyond a resettlement scheme.' However, she went on to point out that the UK and French leaders 'don't know if the EU is even going to verify it' and that they haven't worked out the details yet. She continued: 'There's a little bit of light if you like, given the fact that they are going to be offering some safer legal routes on this new scheme, but it's definitely not enough. It's a drop in the ocean, right?' French officials have suggested the pilot scheme is expected to return an estimated 50 migrants a week. A spokesperson for Dover based migrant charity Samphire said: 'This is a small proportion of the total number crossing. 'Desperate people in need of sanctuary are taking a huge risk to cross the Channel to safety – a small chance of being returned will just be another risk to take and does not, on the face of it, seem like a strong deterrent.' Last week, some 1,375 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel, according to provisional figures from the Home Office. At least 22,000 people have already made the journey since January, putting 2025 on course to be a record year for crossings. The returns scheme will be accompanied by a crackdown on illegal working in the UK as the Government attempts to address the 'pull factors' encouraging people to attempt the crossing from France. Dr Shariff, who has worked with Kran for almost 10 years, argued that the deal did not address the bigger picture. 'If they just offered humanitarian visas or safe and legal routes in the first place, then they wouldn't have to be in the hands of criminals and smugglers and be brought over here in the first place,' she said. According to Samphire, 61% of people crossing the Channel on small boats in the year to March 2025 were Afghans, Syrians, Iranians, Vietnamese and Eritreans, who have a 66.6% asylum seeker acceptance rate in the UK between them. The charity's spokesperson said: 'There is a high likelihood that the UK will attempt to return some seeking asylum with legitimate claims, which will no doubt be subject to legal challenge. 'The Government should not be playing with human lives or catering to anti-migration narratives. Saying that any deal is better than no deal is not the right way to treat people.' The UK Government has said it expects Brussels to approve the pact, while a spokesman for the European Commission indicated it wanted to know more about the 'substance and form' of the arrangement before offering support. Both charities welcome safe and legal passage which could offset the power of the smuggling gangs, but neither seems to think this deal provides a comprehensive answer. 'It's side-stepping the issue, trying to appease everyone a little bit in some shape or form, but you know we will see if it's going to actually address the issue – I really don't think it will,' added Dr Shariff.
