Investigators look into Air India sabotage theory
Indian authorities are investigating the possibility that sabotage could have caused the deadly Air India crash.
Murlidhar Mohol, India's civil aviation minister, said investigators were examining all possibilities, including sabotage, that could have led to Air India Flight 171 plunging from the skies shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on June 12.
The crash killed at least 260 people, leaving only one survivor and was the first fatal accident involving a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft.
Mr Mohol said: 'It was an unfortunate incident. The AAIB [Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau] has begun a full investigation into it ... It is being probed from all angles, including any possible sabotage.
'The CCTV footage is being reviewed and all angles are being assessed ... several agencies are working on it.'
The AAIB, assisted by American and British teams, is analysing the plane's voice and data recorders, known as black boxes, and has yet to comment on any findings.
The minister called the crash a 'rare case' and, referring to claims by veteran pilots and experts that a dual-engine failure may have led to the crash, said: 'It has never happened that both engines have shut down together.'
'Once the report comes, we will be able to ascertain if it was an engine problem or fuel supply issue or why both engines had stopped functioning.
'There is a CVR [cockpit voice recorder] in the black box which has stored the conversation between the two pilots. It is too early to say anything, but whatever it is, it will come out. The report will come in three months.'
The investigation is also looking at engine thrust, flap settings and why the landing gear remained extended, anonymous sources told Reuters. Maintenance records and crew actions are under review, while a bird strike has reportedly been ruled out.
The assessment will also look at airport surveillance footage, radio communications and environmental conditions at the time of take-off.
India's government said the process of data extraction from the black boxes started on June 24 with a team of Indian and US experts, including some from the US National Transportation Safety Board.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pilot reveals what would really happen if the emergency exit door gets opened mid-flight
While the scenario of an emergency exit door being yanked open mid-flight is a major fear for nervous flyers, one pilot has revealed exactly what happens when it occurs. Emergency exits are strategically placed throughout the aircraft to enable quick and efficient evacuation for all passengers, regardless of their seating location. While it's rare, there have been instances in recent years of passengers - or even flight attendants - opening emergency doors on airplanes on the ground or in mid-air. But American Airlines First Officer, Steve Scheibner, long-haul pilot, Pascal Cooney, and former airline pilot and aviation expert, Dan Bubb, have revealed the truth about what happens once the 'forbidden' door handle is turned at 35,000 feet. According to Bubb, when an emergency exit door is opened while the plane is stationed on the group and unpressurised, it will result in the door opening and an inflatable slide deploying. This is what happened in the infamous JetBlue Steven Slater incident in 2010, where the flight attendant quit his job in style and used the emergency exit to activate the slide and depart the plane following a confrontation with a passenger. Plug-type emergency exits on aircraft are designed to fit snugly into the door frame, creating a seal that is strengthened by the pressure difference between the interior and exterior of the aircraft. These doors are equipped with hardware like vertical rod and rim exit devices to ensure they stay securely closed under pressure. But if the plane is on the ground and accelerates up to a speed of 80 knots - equivalent to roughly 92 miles per hour - a mechanism on the doors locks, meaning they cannot be opened. Once the plane is in the air, it's virtually impossible to open an emergency door mid-flight due to the cabin's pressurisation. The pressure inside the cabin is significantly higher than the pressure outside at cruising altitude, creating a force that keeps the doors securely sealed. This pressure differential makes it physically impossible for a human to overcome the force holding the door closed. As reported by Reader's Digest, Steve Scheibner explained, 'Once this door gets pressurised in flight, it's nine pounds per square inch.' Fellow long-haul pilot, Pascal Cooney, who goes by @pascalklr on YouTube, said in a clip: 'We pressurise our aircraft to a lower altitude so that you guys can breathe. The inside pressure pushes the door in its frame.' While it's physically near-impossible to open emergency doors in the air, there have been documented cases of passengers hijacking planes and even jumping out of exits mid-flight. In 1972, a man named D.B. Cooper hijacked Northwest Orient Airlines Flight 305, demanding four parachutes and $200,000 (£146,070) in ransom. After the plane landed in Seattle, he released the passengers and crew, refueled, and then, while flying towards Mexico, he parachuted out of the plane with the ransom money. Cooper was never found nor seen of again. Many passengers have also attempted to open doors mid-flight and whilst on the runway. A manic passenger was wrestled into a seat after trying to open the emergency exit mid-flight and threatening to kill all onboard a All Nippon Airways plane in May. In April, a flight headed to Melbourne was forced to turn around after a woman tried to open the aircraft door at 30,000 ft as the plane flew over the Indian Ocean. Budget airline JetStar said in a statement that flight JQ-34 had to return to Denpasar airport in Bali after a 'disruptive passenger' attempted to force the plane door open mid-air. In most cases, opening an emergency door mid-flight would lead to arrest, with specific charges and potential prison sentences depending on various factors, such as whether anyone was harmed or damage had been caused to the aircraft. Steven Slater, for example, escaped a prison sentence of seven years after being charged with a string of offences - including reckless endangerment and criminal mischief. However, the former JetBlue flight attendant was made to pay his old airline employer $10,000 (£7,303) in restitution to make up for some of the cost of his spectacular exit. In April, AirAsia X passenger, Shadi Taiseer Alsaaydeh, was charged with two counts of endangering the safety of an aircraft, as well as one count of assaulting crew members, when he attempted to open the plane's emergency doors several times. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years behind bars. He was restrained by crew members and passengers with one worker allegedly assaulted in the process.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Pilots suspended after Vietnam Airlines planes collide on airport runway
Four pilots have been suspended after a plane sliced the tail of another aircraft at an airport in Vietnam whilst taxiing to the runway, leaving passengers in a state of shock. The incident occurred at Noi Bai International Airport in Hanoi on Friday, when the tail of an Airbus A321 was sliced by a taxiing Boeing 787 that was ready to take off to Ho Chi Minh City. As the Boeing plane started to taxi, its right wingtip hit part of the Airbus' tail, which was waiting to depart to Dien Bien. Footage of the incident, which appeared to have been taken from a passenger window, shows the tip of the Boeing wing slash through the tail of the stationary Airbus, jolting the aircraft and sending debris onto the taxiway. Due to the damage caused to the tail and wingtip of both planes, the aircraft were grounded so inspections could take place. The planes involved were operated by Vietnam Airlines, which organised replacement planes for both flights. A total of 380 passengers were onboard the two flights at the time of the incident, but no one was injured. Vietnam Airlines suspended two pilots from each flight, and has set up an independent investigation team to seek the cause of the incident with the Civil Aviation Authority of Vietnam, The Mirror reported. Earlier this year, an aircraft's wingtip hit another plane on the runway at Washington, D.C.'s Ronald Reagan National Airport, while three members of US Congress were on board. The incident occurred in April when an American Airlines flight struck another plane from the same airline, causing damage to the winglets of each aircraft. Both aircraft were taken out of service to be inspected, the airline said. Federal officials started an investigation in May when two planes got dangerously close to one another on a runway at New York's LaGuardia Airport. A Republic Airways jet had to abort its takeoff because a United Airlines plane was still taxiing across the runway. In audio from the tower, air traffic control said to the pilot of the Republic Airways jet: 'Sorry, I thought United had cleared well before that.' At the time the controller was directing the Republic Airways jet to take off, a ground controller on a different radio frequency was directing the United plane to a new taxiway after it missed the first one it was supposed to use to exit the runway.
Telegraph
18 hours ago
- Telegraph
Investigators look into Air India sabotage theory
Indian authorities are investigating the possibility that sabotage could have caused the deadly Air India crash. Murlidhar Mohol, India's civil aviation minister, said investigators were examining all possibilities, including sabotage, that could have led to Air India Flight 171 plunging from the skies shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on June 12. The crash killed at least 260 people, leaving only one survivor and was the first fatal accident involving a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft. Mr Mohol said: 'It was an unfortunate incident. The AAIB [Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau] has begun a full investigation into it ... It is being probed from all angles, including any possible sabotage. 'The CCTV footage is being reviewed and all angles are being assessed ... several agencies are working on it.' The AAIB, assisted by American and British teams, is analysing the plane's voice and data recorders, known as black boxes, and has yet to comment on any findings. The minister called the crash a 'rare case' and, referring to claims by veteran pilots and experts that a dual-engine failure may have led to the crash, said: 'It has never happened that both engines have shut down together.' 'Once the report comes, we will be able to ascertain if it was an engine problem or fuel supply issue or why both engines had stopped functioning. 'There is a CVR [cockpit voice recorder] in the black box which has stored the conversation between the two pilots. It is too early to say anything, but whatever it is, it will come out. The report will come in three months.' The investigation is also looking at engine thrust, flap settings and why the landing gear remained extended, anonymous sources told Reuters. Maintenance records and crew actions are under review, while a bird strike has reportedly been ruled out. The assessment will also look at airport surveillance footage, radio communications and environmental conditions at the time of take-off. India's government said the process of data extraction from the black boxes started on June 24 with a team of Indian and US experts, including some from the US National Transportation Safety Board.
