Watchdog may compel Peter McVerry Trust to come before it amid growing anger over finances
Peter McVerry Trust
(PMVT) to appear before it to answer questions about its
€15 million State bailout
.
Sinn Féin
TD John Brady, who is chair of the
Public Accounts Committee
(PAC), expressed 'dissatisfaction and anger' towards the housing charity which has now twice refused to appear before the committee.
Mr Brady said the PAC would now consider 'what options are open to us at this point', which could include compelling the trust to appear.
At a meeting in public session on Thursday morning, a number of cross-party TDs expressed anger at the PMT for refusing to answer questions about its financial troubles. It came after serious governance failings by the trust came to light in investigations by two State regulators.
READ MORE
The trust has so far failed to file its company accounts for 2023.
In early 2024, it told the PAC it could not appear before it due to ongoing investigations.
In a letter to the PAC this week,
the trust again refused to make itself available
for public questioning, claiming it was not in a position to attend 'at this time'.
'There's a real level of dissatisfaction and anger here by members, and I include myself in that,' Mr Brady said.
He added that he was also aware of attempts over the last year by the Oireachtas housing committee to invite PMVT to appear before it. Mr Brady said the trust had received 'huge' sums of public funding and 'there needs to be accountability'.
'I propose that we write immediately to PMVT imploring them to come in at the earliest opportunity,' Mr Brady said.
He said PAC will be seeking guidance from the Oireachtas standing orders committee to see what options it had to expand its remit and bring PMVT before it.
'It is deeply unsatisfactory and disheartening, as members said, when an organisation such as PMVT does not actually take cognisance of the last word in that – trust,' he said.
'Public trust is foremost here and people cannot have trust in how public money is being spent and the governance around that. I think that is deeply concerning.'
PMVT said in a statement: 'At this time, PMVT is not in a position to take part in the committee's meeting. We are currently awaiting the completion of our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31st, 2023.
'Once these audited accounts are available, they will be published and we will share relevant information with our stakeholders and the public as appropriate, including making representatives available for the appropriate Oireachtas committee in due course.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
16 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Government's spending overruns amount to ‘poor planning', Fiscal Council says
The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) has said the Government's ongoing spending overruns amount to 'poor planning and budgeting'. It follows the Summer Economic Statement (SES), published on Tuesday, showing that planned expenditure for this year is now expected to amount to €108.7 billion, €3.3 billion more than set out in Budget 2025. Some €90.5 billion was allocated in the budget to current expenditure, or the cost of delivering public services, and €14.9 billion to capital expenditure. Both lines have since increased. 'Based on spending data for the first six months of the year, this upward revision is likely to be insufficient,' IFAC said in one of a series of posts it made on X on Wednesday afternoon on the Summer Economic Statement. [ Tax and spending package of €9.4bn to form basis of Budget 2026 Opens in new window ] 'Analysis by the Council suggests current spending is likely to be around current spending is likely to be around €1 billion higher than the SES figures.' IFAC chairman Seamus Coffey confirmed the posts when contacted by The Irish Times. While gross voted spending is now officially forecast to rise by €7.9 billion next year, IFAC said that spending overruns in 2026 are 'almost inevitable'. Some €2 billion of the increase is being provided for capital expenditure under the Government's revised National Development Plan. The Government is allowing for scope for €1.5 billion of tax cuts in Budget 2026, which, IFAC notes, is the equivalent of linking the system to inflation. [ What did the summer economic statement really tell us about Budget 2026? Opens in new window ] 'Excluding windfall corporation tax receipts, the Government is forecasting a budget deficit of almost €11 billion next year,' the watchdog said, nothing that this equates to 3.2 per cent of gross national income-star (GNI*), a measure of the domestic economy. 'This is despite a strong economy.' IFAC also took aim at how the Government warned that if there is a deterioration in the international tariffs landscape, the 2026 budget package would be smaller. 'This is exactly the opposite of standard economic advice. Countercyclical policy means giving more support when the economy is weak and less when it is strong,' it said. The EU is currently in trade talks with the US in an effort to avert US president Donald Trump's threatened 30 per cent charge on most European imports kicking in from August 1st. The EU has threatened to impose nearly €100 billion worth of retaliatory tariffs on US imports ranging from bourbon whiskey to Boeing aircraft in one fell swoop if an accord isn't reached by the deadline. 'More generally, the Government's budgetary plans are focused on the short term,' IFAC said, noting that the Government has yet to live up to its own programme commitment to publish a medium-term fiscal structural plan.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Orders against security firm top €140,000 as WRC blasts 'blatant flouting' of pay rules
A Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) adjudicator has blasted a security firm for its 'blatant flouting' of national pay regulations for the sector as he awarded more than €30,000 to a worker subjected to non-payment of wages. Security officer Kipkorir Francis Kiptoo is the 16th worker to win an employment rights claim against BGS Security Ltd, trading as BGSS, in the past 18 months – with the total awards against the company in that time now standing at over €140,000. The company, whose clients included Centra, Spar and Supervalu stores in Dublin, also had its licence to operate static security guards revoked by the Private Security Authority (PSA) in June this year. The tribunal noted that Mr Kiptoo had given sworn testimony on his complaints under the Payment of Wages Act 1991, the Industrial Relations Act 1946, and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 at a hearing in May this year. READ MORE Mr Kiptu's representative, David Cotter of the Independent Workers' Union (IWU), submitted payslips, work rosters and records of wages in support of a payment liability of €4,213.96 on the part of BGSS to his client. Mr Cotter submitted that BGSS 'effectively ignored the requirements of the employment regulations order (ERO)' for the security sector and had suffered an 'egregious breach of statutory rights'. The trade union rep gave evidence that he had made 'numerous efforts… to no avail, to establish contact in the hope of local agreed settlement' with the management of BGSS, adjudicator Michael McEntee wrote. In his decision on the case, Mr McEntee wrote that the claim was 'one of numerous cases being taken by former employees against this respondent'. He was satisfied that the company was on notice of the 'time, date and place' of the hearing and had failed to present any 'bona fide explanations' for failing to attend. He found that Mr Kiptoo's trade union rep had set out a 'comprehensive case supported by detailed evidence' that his client was owed €4,213.96 in wages to which there had been no rebuttal or counterargument. 'The wages due will have to be paid,' the adjudicator wrote. Mr McEntee also ordered BGS Security to pay Mr Kiptoo €26,500, one year's pay, in compensation for noncompliance with the employment regulation order in breach of the Industrial Relations Act 1946. He wrote that the national system of employment regulation orders was meant to be 'a safeguard for workers, and as importantly, to law-abiding employers'. 'Blatant flouting of the order is egregious to fair commercial trading, good industrial practice and national industrial relations,' he added. Mr McEntee also awarded €2,000 to Mr Kiptoo for a breach of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 in BGSS's failure to provide a 'satisfactory contract of employment'. The total awarded to Mr Kiptoo in the case was €32,713.96 – with today's decision bringing the total due to former BGSS staff on foot of findings of employment rights breaches since May 2024 to €140,560.71. It's understood that at least two more former employees of the company are to have cases heard by the WRC in the coming weeks.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Indian embassy objects to planning permission for development at rear
The Indian embassy in Dublin has delayed plans for a housing scheme on Merrion Rd citing privacy and security concerns. In its objection to the scheme the head of chancery at the embassy, Vijay Singh, said that the proposed two-to-three-storey high units with balconies surrounding the rear area of the embassy would 'have serious implications for the security and privacy of the embassy complex, and its members and visitors'. The embassy lodged an appeal with An Coimisiún Pleanála against the decision by Dublin City Council to grant planning permission to Harry and James Simpson to construct five houses on a site to the rear of numbers 67 and 69 on Merrion Road in Dublin 4. A second appeal has also been lodged with the planning board by Patricia V Harrington and Mary Lewis. READ MORE The applicants had initially proposed six houses and, after the council expressed 'serious concerns' over the proposed density, scale and height of the proposal, the applicants omitted one unit, Unit 2, which was nearest the embassy and reconfigured a second unit. India has its embassy at 69 Merrion Road, which is the neighbouring property of 67 Merrion Road. In the embassy's initial objection lodged with the council, Mr Singh said that the embassy 'would like to strongly object' to the proposed scheme. Mr Singh said that the proposed development of four three-storey bedroom houses backing onto the rear garden of the embassy and Unit 2 next to the boundary wall of the embassy would 'negatively impact the ambience and aesthetics of the rear garden/area of the embassy complex, where embassy regularly organises important events, including Indian National Day celebrations'. Mr Singh went on to say that it would 'be impossible for the embassy to organise these events after being surrounded by the new proposed units'. He said that 'the new overbearing units will completely box in the rear area of the embassy, block out the view, obstruct ventilation and significantly reduce the amount of natural light that the embassy gets'. Ms Singh further said that 'the proposed development is not in conformity with the character of the area, where the detached houses are the norm, and will negatively impact the residential amenities in the area'. 'As a resident diplomatic mission in Ireland, this is a matter of grave concern for the embassy.' The council granted planning permission after concluding that the omission of unit No 2 was 'a great improvement to this section of the development, creating a higher level of residential amenity for both neighbouring units and future occupiers of the development'.
